Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:25 AM Jun 2016

Hillary's been late to the party on LGBTQ equality, late to the party on regrets about her Iraq War

vote, late to the party on $15 minimum wage, late to the party on TPP and NAFTA, late to the party on a humanistic view of immigration, etc.

Supporters of someone who's been late to the party so often shouldn't be the ones to issue threats about party unity.

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary's been late to the party on LGBTQ equality, late to the party on regrets about her Iraq War (Original Post) Vote2016 Jun 2016 OP
she and bill were some of the earliest supporters on LGBTQ issues La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #1
supportive like this? azurnoir Jun 2016 #2
2004 Sanders opposed marriage equality also. seabeyond Jun 2016 #5
No he said it should be left to states to decide reality is it was SCOTUS who opened it up azurnoir Jun 2016 #8
Yes, he opposed marriage equality. In 2009 he changed his opinion. seabeyond Jun 2016 #13
post it up then azurnoir Jun 2016 #15
To justify his stance, Sanders complained that a battle for same-sex marriage would be too “divisive seabeyond Jun 2016 #21
Sanders opposed DOMA which was Bill and Hillary's baby both advocated for it azurnoir Jun 2016 #22
Which his excuse was... States rights. Now, this is interesting. Having just read about this seabeyond Jun 2016 #25
Because people in 2004 were otherwise oh so supportive of gay marriage La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #7
it's no distortion in 2004 1994 or 1984 for that matter I felt the same as I do now azurnoir Jun 2016 #11
Bernie too evolved on it when politically expedient, i.e. when his state evolved La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #16
Wasn't it 2001 Vermont tried to push it thru and regardless of being pushed for opinion, Sanders seabeyond Jun 2016 #14
as recently as 2006 he opposed marriage equality in vermont. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #17
LGBT rights were not a “major priority” for him seabeyond Jun 2016 #24
And people in 1864 were otherwise so supportive of freeing the slaves elljay Jun 2016 #29
not just in her defense, but in defense of Sanders, Obama, Kerry, and my mother. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #30
And that makes it ok in your view elljay Jun 2016 #33
i don't need people comparing my rights to those of African Americans La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #35
+1. Nt seabeyond Jun 2016 #3
This DURHAM D Jun 2016 #6
“I believe marriage is not just a bond, but a sacred bond between a man and a woman.” Vote2016 Jun 2016 #10
yeah, so she thought and so did most of this country, including sanders and obama La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #12
She bases her personal ideals and positions solely on public polling. Hence the "weathervane" tag. NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #4
Bernie has said nothing that I have heard about LGBT...probably a distraction like abortion rights. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #9
Women, blacks, gays has made amazing advances. More to go, lets applaud. Now, lets address the real seabeyond Jun 2016 #18
He did not call abortion a distraction, and he has said plenty about LGBT. thesquanderer Jun 2016 #19
You guys keep saying he has said plenty. To women and blacks also. We keep telling you seabeyond Jun 2016 #26
He has said plenty about LGBT KansDem Jun 2016 #23
Post 26. He has not said plenty. He has talked the issues, some. seabeyond Jun 2016 #27
His actions speak louder than words KansDem Jun 2016 #32
Not good enough. seabeyond Jun 2016 #34
You might as well try to reason with Scientologists. n/t QC Jun 2016 #28
And another really clever personal insult. seabeyond Jun 2016 #31
Keystone pipeline, private prisons... thesquanderer Jun 2016 #20
She took money from the private prison industry until she was criticized for it loyalsister Jun 2016 #38
She is not late to the party so much as having been told that she needs to make an appearance solely djean111 Jun 2016 #36
Your point is sound Babel_17 Jun 2016 #37
Clinton voted against Cafta, the only vote we really know. Her position on TPP seabeyond Jun 2016 #39
Hillary has been worse than useless on all these struggles Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #40
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
1. she and bill were some of the earliest supporters on LGBTQ issues
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:27 AM
Jun 2016

the fact that the rest of the country was not with them, is not their fault

people who intentionally distort history to create a dishonest narrative are dishonest.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
25. Which his excuse was... States rights. Now, this is interesting. Having just read about this
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:17 PM
Jun 2016

in that article that I provided for you. Very interesting.

Sanders people stated for him, his vote was with state because it would cause problems not having a uniformity, creating havoc.

Not for gay people. Not a mention of them. The tone deaf.

I talked to my brother in law, that is gay, living in both NY and SF and well into the politics. I was so angry about the 2004 marriage equality issue that was fore front. That was a learning experience I carry with me, because it so profoundly told me to shut up and listen.

I was cheering on and fighting for civil marriage. Good intent. I was pissed people were denied rights and this may be a step to loosening people up while allow gays to be legally protected.

I was told, in no uncertain word, that it was not good enough. I had to listen.

But, I was talking to my brother in law, angry and he sat back and said, it was cool, we were on the right track, it would happen. He did not have the same anger, having lived thru all this, not me.

With what Sanders said with DOMA, ... was exactly wrong. Because the states, certain states, started passing marriage equality and fucking up the system, it made people say.... this isn't scary, this is ok, my son got married, good for him.... or nephew, or mother, or or or or.

By that very action, it created an atmosphere that allowed the nation to do one big ole sigh, and let it the fuck go. Cause we all know it is right, morally and constitutionally.

Essentially that is what it takes to break the will of the division. Blacks. Women. Gays. We are seeing the same with the $15/hr. States, areas that can afford, companies..... That will make it a norm. The norm wins.

Very interesting.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
7. Because people in 2004 were otherwise oh so supportive of gay marriage
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:33 AM
Jun 2016


this is what i mean by intentionally distorting history.

Bernie didn't come out for marriage till around 2009, although he represented one of the most liberal states on this issue and could have easily 'evolved' earlier.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
11. it's no distortion in 2004 1994 or 1984 for that matter I felt the same as I do now
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jun 2016

if ya want to get married get married no matter who you are, Hillary didn't untill after the SCOTUS ruling when it was politically safe

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
14. Wasn't it 2001 Vermont tried to push it thru and regardless of being pushed for opinion, Sanders
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jun 2016

refused to give an opinion and stayed silent?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
24. LGBT rights were not a “major priority” for him
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jun 2016
Earlier in his political career, Sanders was even more indifferent toward gay rights, which W.J. Conroy recounts in his book Challenging the Boundaries of Reform: Socialism in Burlington. When serving as mayor of Burlington, Sanders told an interviewer that LGBT rights were not a “major priority” for him.


Asked if he would support a bill to protect gays from job discrimination, Sanders responded, “probably not.”


Thank you so much. I had not gone back that far. Simply amazing. And the man has the audacity to state that he was always. He cannot get away with buying into his own hype and call it integrity when he flat out plays politics.

I have not read this one. I have read many. Blacks with the 60's seems to be the time he touched on black lives. Women, 70 and 80's, I started gays about 90's.

Interesting. Thank you for the info.

This was my tell. I started with Sanders and immediately saw this tell, and suggested we allow gays, women, blacks to sit at the table, too. In between being told other things were more important, I was being told Sanders voice for me was good enough. A mlk/feminist hero better than any black or woman, I assure you, they told me. Christ live in that way. Yet... I was not hearing us discussed, and the little I heard, I was not impressed.

Very interesting. Now, here is the upside with all this, learning lessons in everything. Sanders has afforded me an opportunity to see a side of our Democratic man (and of course the women that support) that thinks he is supporting me, but not allowing us to speak, misses the mark.

That has been revelations for me, another growing experience. Hi women, and with your education, what do you see.

Thank you. Love it.

elljay

(1,178 posts)
29. And people in 1864 were otherwise so supportive of freeing the slaves
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:27 PM
Jun 2016

I understand your point. Civil rights should be determined by public opinion and not by what is morally right. Hyoprisy in the defense of Clinton is no vice, right?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
30. not just in her defense, but in defense of Sanders, Obama, Kerry, and my mother.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jun 2016
none of whom supported gay marriage in 04 but all of whom do now.

also, while the slaves were 'freed' in 1864, black suffered from all sorts of legal discrimination/jim crow for a hundred years after. Civil rights and justice take time. it wasn't all done in 1864, nor even in 1964.

elljay

(1,178 posts)
33. And that makes it ok in your view
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jun 2016

well not in mine. I don't need straight people gaysplaining why I have fewer civil rights than African Americans in half of this country. I don't care what other people thought. I remember well when Hillary sold me out and then her "evolution" long after public opinion had changed and there were fewer consequences for doing what was right than for being opposed to equality. She belongs to a right wing Evangelical secret organization and I have no doubt her position is a pure political calculation and not a true belief. No justification for her at all.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
35. i don't need people comparing my rights to those of African Americans
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:53 PM
Jun 2016

since my people and I were never slaves, never subjected to jim crow etc. I don't need people speaking about gay as though there are no gay African Americans. I find people who do that, are general awash in white privilege.

Hillary and Bill Clinton spoke of the LGBT community in a way in the 90's that VERY few people in their stature did. They took a very different tone to AIDS than anyone who held their office before, and changed the climate around how people spoke about LGBT people. Just because you don't want to or can't remember that, is not my fault.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
18. Women, blacks, gays has made amazing advances. More to go, lets applaud. Now, lets address the real
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:40 AM
Jun 2016

issue. White, middle/upper middle class, men that need our help.

Yup.

Wedge issues.

thesquanderer

(11,972 posts)
19. He did not call abortion a distraction, and he has said plenty about LGBT.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jun 2016

He never said abortion rights were a distraction, he was saying that Trump's stupid statements are distractions. You can see the original words (that were twisted by Clinton) at http://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-full-transcript-rachel-maddow-interview-442491

And if you haven't heard him talk in support of LGBT, you haven't been listening.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
26. You guys keep saying he has said plenty. To women and blacks also. We keep telling you
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jun 2016

we get too little time. White, middle/upper middle, men and university youth are 99 percent of the time, the he divveys out the rest to us. Maybe, sometimes.

This is our point.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
23. He has said plenty about LGBT
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:51 AM
Jun 2016
Right to love each other, regardless of sexual orientation. (Jul 2015)
Never accept racism, sexism, nor homophobia. (Jun 1997)
Voted NO on Constitutionally defining marriage as one-man-one-woman. (Jul 2006)
Voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)
Voted NO on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)
Voted NO on ending preferential treatment by race in college admissions. (May 1998)
Constitutional Amendment for equal rights by gender. (Mar 2001)
Rated 93% by the ACLU, indicating a pro-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
Rated 100% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)
ENDA: prohibit employment discrimination for gays. (Jun 2009)
Prohibit sexual-identity discrimination at schools. (Mar 2011)
Enforce against anti-gay discrimination in public schools. (Jun 2013)

Bernie Saners, "On the Issues"

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
32. His actions speak louder than words
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jun 2016

While other public figures talk the talk, Bernie walks the walk.

thesquanderer

(11,972 posts)
20. Keystone pipeline, private prisons...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:45 AM
Jun 2016

About the only times she's not late are the places where she's still wrong.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
38. She took money from the private prison industry until she was criticized for it
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jun 2016
“She believes that we should not contract out this core responsibility of the federal government,” Hinojosa said. “This is only one of many ways that she believes we need to re-balance our criminal justice and immigration systems.”

Yet the decision came after months of pressure from civil rights and immigrant justice groups, who launched online petitions and interrupted Clinton’s public events, demanding she cut ties with the private prison industry.

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/10/23/3715544/clinton-private-prisons/


It's disturbing that it has been one human rights issue after another where she has had to evolve. It says a lot about her moral compass and values. One of the things that bothers me most is the lack of remorse. She owes a lot of apologies to families affected by mass incarceration and welfare reform.
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
36. She is not late to the party so much as having been told that she needs to make an appearance solely
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jun 2016

to pander for votes. She would back off her new stances in a heartbeat, if the situation called for it. There is no there, there.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
37. Your point is sound
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jun 2016

The counter argument, imo, should be why her positives outweigh it. If Secretary Clinton becomes our nominee then only NAFTA and the TPP will be issues of concern to undecided moderates.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
39. Clinton voted against Cafta, the only vote we really know. Her position on TPP
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jun 2016

is more about how Sanders has defined her on the issue, not reality. So, I am interested where she goes here. It will give us a better idea.

NAFTA? She was not the boss, and it was not her doing the directing and guiding. Both TPP and NAFTA, her position was supporting another.

It will be interesting to see her position. It is very measured, and very informed.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
40. Hillary has been worse than useless on all these struggles
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:50 PM
Jun 2016

She swoops in after the battle is won to pose for pictures.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's been late to th...