Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPRESUMPTIVE (adj): giving grounds for reasonable opinion or belief
-- Merriam Webster
Since voting will essentially over on Tuesday (yes, I'm aware of DC), and voters won't be influenced, what is the objection to allowing people to PRESUME that Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee after Tuesday's delegates are awarded? Only negative impact I can see in on Sanders' pool of funders...
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PRESUMPTIVE (adj): giving grounds for reasonable opinion or belief (Original Post)
brooklynite
Jun 2016
OP
in a sense, she's been the presumptive nominee since the day she declared. (n/t)
thesquanderer
Jun 2016
#2
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. They have no respect for democracy if they don't like the result.
thesquanderer
(12,919 posts)2. in a sense, she's been the presumptive nominee since the day she declared. (n/t)
DrDan
(20,411 posts)3. "giving grounds for the inference of a fact or of the appropriate interpretation of the law"
a fact . . . appropriate interpretation
yep - it works
