Message auto-removed

[Name removed]

[brooklynite]

1. ...and 13,259,842 said they were...

Have you heard of...MATH?

[geek tragedy]

4. Caucuses count twice nt

[seabeyond]

12. And still that won't be enough, lol. Awfully small numbers in caucus's/ The south doesn't count.

There, better. That might help.

[grossproffit]

5. Math is a touchy subject for some.

[geek tragedy]

2. 13 million did. 13 million > 10 million. nt

[arely staircase]

7. They don't count. Alot of them are in the South.

And all over the country come to think of it.

[Joob]

3. The problem is they think they will be with her. As if we can ignore what she gets away with.

No. My vote won't let her get away with what, I and many others think is corruption.

[joeybee12]

14. Enjoy your last week here...nt

[Joob]

17. If it's my last week here, enjoy having the first woman president being the most corrupt... nt

[joeybee12]

18. My bad...I don't think you'll make a week...nt

[Joob]

21. Maybe not, it's not about ME though... nt

[GulfCoast66]

24. Oh, The Irony!!

[Joob]

27. Lots of irony in this election.

One being the irony that a vote for a candidate that gets away with corruption beats an incompetent bigot that gets called out every time.

[seabeyond]

19. Most truthful of all the candidates, more than once.

[sadoldgirl]

23. Oh, really?

[seabeyond]

25. Yup. Like three times running. Analyzed and MOST truthful of all the candidates.

[arely staircase]

6. Second place.

[grossproffit]

10. is the new first. Don't cha know.

[seabeyond]

8. And three million more said otherwise. It was close with Obama and Clinton. Much closer.

Winner/loser. That is what a race is about. What is the point?

[hrmjustin]

9. And?

[SpareribSP]

11. They're all uneducated whiny losers and deserve no voice in the Democratic party.

They want nothing but the destruction of the DNC and will achieve their goals with violent means while voting for Donald Trump.

[seabeyond]

13. What? What is this? This is a race. One wins. One loses. Why does this concept seem foreign to

too many?

[annavictorious]

15. Wait...isn't the Sanders side claiming that it's independents

who are breaking for Sanders and that we need to ignore the will of the primary voters in order to court the unaffiliated?

The loser of the 2008 primary had over 17,000,000 votes. As a matter of fact, by some measures she had more votes than the person who won the nomination.

And the person who 17,000,000 Democrats did not vote for in the primaries went on to win two terms as president.

So, your point is...?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

[RobertEarl]

28. So he stole the election?

Subverted democracy? That's what the Bernie haters are saying about him, today.

Sad, isn't it, that H got far fewer votes this time than 8 years ago? And that an unknown small state senator has nearly tied this time. The California vote is not yet in, and Obama refuses to endorse H, even tho yall are claiming H has already won.

[oasis]

16. 90% will be come November. nt

[Henhouse]

20. 17,822,145 Democrats

said I am not with him [Obama] in 2008.....

What is your point...?

[bigwillq]

22. Happy to be one of those voters!

[beachbumbob]

26. 13 million is greater than 10 million= LOSS

In every mathematical system except Whiney Bernie land

[jcgoldie]

29. I mean uhm

This really wasnt a very well thought out argument was it? I like vodka too.

[aikoaiko]

30. For a wild-haired, independent democratic socialist from Vermont and NOT the machine.

It is a second place finish, but it is fuckin awesome to behold.

[Bleacher Creature]

31. I highly doubt they are all zealots.

Most just preferred Sanders, but will proudly stand with Hillary come November.