Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:10 AM Jun 2016

I wonder if the Bernie or Bust movement grossly overestimates their size

In a few days, Clinton will pass the necessary delegate count (with superdelegates which i know only count if they support Sanders) and for most people, the democratic primary will be over. The media will move on, the democratic party will move on, the republicans will move on, the president will move on but we hear people here talking about "going all the way until the convention" or "it isn't over until the delegates vote" or "we won't have a nominee until july!". However, I do wonder if all of the Bernie Keyboard Brigade here and on Reddit are really the unstoppable juggernaut that they claim or if they are just a few people living in an echo chamber ready to rise up, when 99.999% of people have moved on with their lives. Sure, we will hear "well my brother and all of my friends say they will only support sanders" or "i live in california and i have seen tons of bernie bumper stickers" but i am willing to bet that the bernie or bust movement isn't so much a revolution but just a few people that are really, really, really loud.

71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wonder if the Bernie or Bust movement grossly overestimates their size (Original Post) Doctor Jack Jun 2016 OP
I don't consider myself Bernie or Bust but I will never vote for Hillary. Live and Learn Jun 2016 #1
" I don't consider myself Bernie or Bust but I will never vote for Hillary." qdouble Jun 2016 #2
Nope. I will be voting, just not for her. So there is no bust. Sorry to disappoint you. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #3
Bernie or Bust doesn't mean, "Bernie or I won't vote", it means exactly what you are saying... qdouble Jun 2016 #6
Did you invent the term? Why do you think you get to dictate what it means? Live and Learn Jun 2016 #7
Google "Bernie or Bust" and see that most of it's proponents are saying exactly what you are saying. qdouble Jun 2016 #10
How so? I said it doesn't have to be Bernie and I will be voting. I don't see a Bernie or a bust Live and Learn Jun 2016 #12
"Bernie or Bust: A pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders or vote for the Green Party candidate 108,000" qdouble Jun 2016 #17
The people I know that say they are Bernie or Bust will not be voting at all. Live and Learn Jun 2016 #20
Bernie or Bust equates to "If Bernie is not the democratic nominee, then I will not be supporting qdouble Jun 2016 #24
oh MFM008 Jun 2016 #30
It is called ethics and unless Hillary has a drastic change in them, I think you aare wrong. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #33
Fyi in this case, your presumed ethics = assisting Trump. Sheepshank Jun 2016 #65
Than vote for the Supreme Court itsrobert Jun 2016 #4
For some people the world can burn Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #5
Has nothing to do with Bernie. It has to do with no valid choice. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #8
so you admit bernie is not a valid choice. good for you! nt msongs Jun 2016 #39
Silly post. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 Jun 2016 #9
I know, he had a big rally and birds like him. Make this man president! Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #11
As opposed to the royal familes we keep electing? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #13
Such drama and hyperbole Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #14
Really? Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Clinton, hmmmm. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #22
You name 5 presidents and 1 is a clinton Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #25
I named 4 and a possible (dubious as it might be) 5th that is a Clinton. Live and Learn Jun 2016 #29
Teddy Roosevelt was Eleanor's uncle, but was not all that closely related JDPriestly Jun 2016 #36
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #35
Why would I trust Hillary to pick a SCOTUS? So she can pick one that ensures more private prisons Live and Learn Jun 2016 #18
She can't even be trusted to conduct her email. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #46
No offense, but I don't believe you Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #51
LOL You are calling me a liar while supporting the candidate that said she was under sniper fire. Live and Learn Jun 2016 #52
That's disappointing PJMcK Jun 2016 #54
Give me an ethical candidate to support. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #55
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #59
Not sure how big it is PowerToThePeople Jun 2016 #15
.......................... MFM008 Jun 2016 #32
For me, it's a personal decision based upon my own values. Maedhros Jun 2016 #16
and Trump shares those values? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #53
Los Angeles Times printed a recent California poll that bears you out Hekate Jun 2016 #19
Charlie Cook says that 65% would push clinton to a near double digit lead over trump Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #21
Trump is probably toast in California. Even 50+% of Republicans here are for environmental Hekate Jun 2016 #27
40 million that don't want Hillary? Maybe. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #49
Californians are far more opposed to Trump than people in other states. JDPriestly Jun 2016 #37
How relevant is a Blue state? HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #47
The BoB'ers overestimate their size and importance ... just like the PUMAs of 2008 did n/t SFnomad Jun 2016 #23
Be careful, many of the PUMA's are back and still supporting Hillary. Yikes, they are on your side Live and Learn Jun 2016 #56
They were on my side in 2008 ... until they couldn't handle the fact that Clinton didn't win SFnomad Jun 2016 #68
If you aren't worried about it Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #26
Why try to learn anything? Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #31
You're a little bit obsessed aren't you? Scootaloo Jun 2016 #28
I guess if Hillary's the nominee, we'll find out in LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #34
Well, we'll see soon enough. bjo59 Jun 2016 #38
sorry to hear you are not going to vote for MIC buddy bernie sanders. oh well nt msongs Jun 2016 #40
It doesn't make sense to say you'll never do something and then mention when you did it before. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #45
It's a tiny number of actual voters rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #41
True! Loud but irrelevant. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #44
Yet you're still butthurt over Nader. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #48
First of all, great image to go with your post! Second of all, I don't wonder. I know they do. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #43
I doubt Bernie or Busters are a solid flock/school Sky Masterson Jun 2016 #50
The majority of Sanders supporters do not hang out on political forums. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #57
I am not Bernie or Bust, just anti-Hillary. bigwillq Jun 2016 #58
It's very small Stuckinthebush Jun 2016 #60
What's your point? 99Forever Jun 2016 #61
Call me whatever you like. I will not vote for a corrupt, money grubbing candidate. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #62
"Money grubbing" is being overly polite... Yurovsky Jun 2016 #63
I think "corrupt" covers that and other things. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #64
Pretty much, it's just too bad the powerful are never held accountable... Yurovsky Jun 2016 #66
So if the Will NOT Ever Vote for Clinton movement is so very insignificant... 99Forever Jun 2016 #67
I don't even think it is a movement. Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #69
Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #70
Maybe, but then again NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #71

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
1. I don't consider myself Bernie or Bust but I will never vote for Hillary.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:12 AM
Jun 2016

All most of us want is an ethical progressive to vote for.

qdouble

(891 posts)
2. " I don't consider myself Bernie or Bust but I will never vote for Hillary."
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:14 AM
Jun 2016

"I will never vote for Hillary" = "Bernie or Bust." as Clinton will be the Democratic Nominee.

qdouble

(891 posts)
6. Bernie or Bust doesn't mean, "Bernie or I won't vote", it means exactly what you are saying...
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:20 AM
Jun 2016

which makes you part of the same group.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
7. Did you invent the term? Why do you think you get to dictate what it means?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:23 AM
Jun 2016

And as I tried to explain to you, it didn't have to be Bernie, just someone i could vote for in good conscience. It won't be Trump or Hillary.

qdouble

(891 posts)
10. Google "Bernie or Bust" and see that most of it's proponents are saying exactly what you are saying.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:26 AM
Jun 2016

I don't see why you want to distance yourself from the Bernie supporters who are saying the exact same things you are saying.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
12. How so? I said it doesn't have to be Bernie and I will be voting. I don't see a Bernie or a bust
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:28 AM
Jun 2016

in there. I simply won't vote for an unethical candidate.

qdouble

(891 posts)
17. "Bernie or Bust: A pledge to write-in Bernie Sanders or vote for the Green Party candidate 108,000"
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:32 AM
Jun 2016

"108,000+ people have taken so far. Why? Keep reading." https://citizensagainstplutocracy.wordpress.com/

If you're under the impression that Bernie or Bust means that you won't be voting, then you are mistaken.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
20. The people I know that say they are Bernie or Bust will not be voting at all.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:37 AM
Jun 2016

i don't really care what pledge says. I haven't taken it and I won't be but I will not be voting for Hillary. So, then maybe your dozens are really a hell of a lot more.

qdouble

(891 posts)
24. Bernie or Bust equates to "If Bernie is not the democratic nominee, then I will not be supporting
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:41 AM
Jun 2016

the nominee." It's really that simple. I don't know why you are twisting and turning to not acknowledge an easily understood phrase.

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
30. oh
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:48 AM
Jun 2016

I hope every one works the sour apples out of their system by the June 16 deadline here in
the DU.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
65. Fyi in this case, your presumed ethics = assisting Trump.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:51 AM
Jun 2016

Others' ethics will not allow that to happen.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
4. Than vote for the Supreme Court
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:17 AM
Jun 2016

The highest Court in the land. The next President may have 3 to replace in the next four years. I don't think Bernie is ethical with his plans that don't have any chance of passing congress and add $19 trillion in debt if they did, but I would vote for him over any republican for the court. Thank you.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
5. For some people the world can burn
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:18 AM
Jun 2016

If a random senator that has done nothing while in government can't be the nominee then everyone else must suffer!

Response to Doctor Jack (Reply #5)

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
14. Such drama and hyperbole
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:31 AM
Jun 2016

Your argument might be stronger if Sanders actually was ahead in something, like PDs or popular vote. But you want the supers to select him?

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
25. You name 5 presidents and 1 is a clinton
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:41 AM
Jun 2016

That is a sign of some corrupt dynasty? There were 2 roosevelts, those devious bastards, probably in the pockets of Goldman Sachs too!

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
29. I named 4 and a possible (dubious as it might be) 5th that is a Clinton.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:47 AM
Jun 2016

And yes, we have been known to elevate families in the past to royalty status. Though the Roosevelts hardly count since they were related only by marriage and their politics were quite different.

Response to Doctor Jack (Reply #11)

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
18. Why would I trust Hillary to pick a SCOTUS? So she can pick one that ensures more private prisons
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:34 AM
Jun 2016

and the locking up of "super-predators"?"

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
51. No offense, but I don't believe you
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:52 AM
Jun 2016

Clinton had a 93% progressive rating. She voted for the same things as Sanders. In fact, she is better on guns in my opinion. Now she is the only thing standing between us and destruction of all progress achievements since Roosevelt and the packing of the courts which would certainly end Roe V Wade. But you can't bring yourself to vote for her? Of course,Trump doesn't worry you ? That is a powerful bitter hate there. The GOP would have five court picks and the entire government. All progressive accomplishments since Roosevelt would be lost. But one man Bernie Sanders is more important than stopping that? Well, you are Bernie or bust. I am sure you will say oh...but I would vote for Biden or Elizabeth Warren...well they didn't run...so you don't have that choice. You can write in Mickey Mouse which is the same as voting for traitor green spoiler's or simply not vote. You would be helping to elect Trump. If you don't cast a vote for Hillary Clinton, you are all for purposes casting a vote for Trump. You would be better off and so would any of your kids or your grand-kids to Lend a hand and defeat the most dangerous candidate the Republicans have ever nominated -both domestically and in terms of foreign affairs... or get out of the way and let the rest of us do it. Trump with the nuclear codes is too horrifying to contemplate.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
52. LOL You are calling me a liar while supporting the candidate that said she was under sniper fire.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:55 AM
Jun 2016

Forgive me for not trusting your judgement on truth telling.

PJMcK

(22,025 posts)
54. That's disappointing
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:00 AM
Jun 2016

We must defeat the Republicans. Please reconsider and vote a straight Democratic ticket.

Response to Live and Learn (Reply #55)

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
15. Not sure how big it is
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:31 AM
Jun 2016

It is not an organized group, just an idea.

Each person will make their own choice.

My choice is Bernie or Bust.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
16. For me, it's a personal decision based upon my own values.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:31 AM
Jun 2016

It has nothing to do with how many others agree or disagree.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
53. and Trump shares those values?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:56 AM
Jun 2016

You can make all the excuses you want but it is bitter anger because Bernie lost...and it is bern it down.

Hekate

(90,624 posts)
19. Los Angeles Times printed a recent California poll that bears you out
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:36 AM
Jun 2016

65% of Sanders supporters are willing to vote for Clinton in November
10% said they'd vote for Trump
13% won't vote

Sounds to me like 65% of Sanders supporters are Democrats and/or adults who recognize the threat Trump poses to our country.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
21. Charlie Cook says that 65% would push clinton to a near double digit lead over trump
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:37 AM
Jun 2016

70% will get her to 8%-10%

Hekate

(90,624 posts)
27. Trump is probably toast in California. Even 50+% of Republicans here are for environmental
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:46 AM
Jun 2016

...protections, understand the severe impact of the drought, want immigration reform ... I mean, they aren't idiots.

Interestingly enough, neither Trump nor Sanders seems capable of moderating their basic dogma to address specifically Californian realities for more than a few moments. And there's 40 million of us.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
37. Californians are far more opposed to Trump than people in other states.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:09 AM
Jun 2016

That is because of his views on immigrants from Mexico and Muslims.

Hillary may develop problems in California as her stances turn rightward, and they are bound to turn rightward as she tries to move into general election mode.

In my area, Californians love Bernie. I only know my area, but it is very clear to me as I canvass, etc. that my area is very pro-Bernie.

I just stop people on the street, and they are voting for Bernie. Go house to house and the numbers for Bernie are even higher.

But I am not in a wealthy area. Hillary appeals more to wealthy people at least in California.

We shall see. Hillary reads her speeches and makes very little personal contact with audiences. She seems distant to people.

Bernie has campaigned on a national level for just over a year. Not long. If she were a strong candidate, Bernie would not have been able to gain on her as much as he has. That is the problem with Hillary.

It isn't so much about Bernie or bust as it is about whether people will feel moved to bother to vote for her.

Will Trump moderate his tone enough to make himself seem less of a threat? Will Hillary turn right and offend more Bernie supporters than she has so far?

It's going to be very tricky for Hillary to get Bernie voters to really vote for her. We shall see. I could not predict this. But I do know that the insulting behavior of many of her supporters toward Bernie supporters on the internet will not help Hillary.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
47. How relevant is a Blue state?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:42 AM
Jun 2016

The Dem candidate will win CA no matter what. The crucial states are the swing states, the half-dozen or so that went to Obama by very slim margins. If 35+% of Sanders supporters go Bernie or Bust there it'll be a bloodbath for not only Clinton but downticket Democrats also. Can the DNC afford to lose swing states like Florida by wide margins? The superdelegates might gamble on it to keep their corporate gravy train rolling.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
56. Be careful, many of the PUMA's are back and still supporting Hillary. Yikes, they are on your side
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:04 AM
Jun 2016

now.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
68. They were on my side in 2008 ... until they couldn't handle the fact that Clinton didn't win
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 11:33 AM
Jun 2016

the nomination and lost their minds ... Yikes, like that group on your side this time.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
31. Why try to learn anything?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:48 AM
Jun 2016

The planet of Jupiter doesn't cause any day to day worry to anyone on Earth, so why study it? Intellectual curiosity, trying to learn more about the things around me, etc. But if you want to live in a closed off, isolated world, then more power to you.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
38. Well, we'll see soon enough.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 03:12 AM
Jun 2016

I have never voted for a corporatist (except in 1992) and I am not about to start now. What anyone else does is their business.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
45. It doesn't make sense to say you'll never do something and then mention when you did it before.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:09 AM
Jun 2016

It especially doesn't make sense to mention when you did something and then say "and I'm not about to start now." Of course you're not, because you already did.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
43. First of all, great image to go with your post! Second of all, I don't wonder. I know they do.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:07 AM
Jun 2016

When you're part of a crowd, it's too easy to start believing that your crowd is the majority, even when it most certainly is not. And that's the Sanders movement. They all gathered together, and started telling themselves, "We're just a small section of something greater," when in fact they were the collected gathering of the total sum.

And since their tactics were designed to drive away anyone who didn't already agree with them, their movement never actually got any bigger than the crowds that showed up to the rallies. And that meant not enough votes to win, more often than not.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
50. I doubt Bernie or Busters are a solid flock/school
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:48 AM
Jun 2016

They are individuals who don't really care for Trump or Hillary.
Some will bite the bullet and vote for the "More Muscular foreign policy" candidate,or the Green candidate, and probably in rare instances vote nihilistic for the orange one. Many will probably just stay home.
I would be more concerned about the "I'm With Her" vote.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
57. The majority of Sanders supporters do not hang out on political forums.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:06 AM
Jun 2016

The BoB crowd is not as big as they might think. Heck, look at the above posts. They run from the BoB classification. Hillary will solidify the vast majority of the Party at the convention while this BoB crowd will behave in such a fashion outside the convention hall that they will completely delegitimize themselves in the eyes of the country.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
58. I am not Bernie or Bust, just anti-Hillary.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:07 AM
Jun 2016

I would have been fine with pretty much any other DEM besides Clinton.
I like Bernie, but he doesn't have to be the nominee for me. I would have accepted someone else.

Stuckinthebush

(10,843 posts)
60. It's very small
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:34 AM
Jun 2016

And will get smaller. This is normal in primaries. Hell, remember how many GOPers vowed to never vote Trump? Well....that went away fast. Same for Dems. 99% will vote for Hillary. At least those who would have supported Dems anyway. Some Sanders supporters would never have voted Dem regardless of the Democrat who won.

Sanders will concede and support Hillary. They will join each other on stage and smile and hug. Sanders will encourage his supporters to vote for Hillary because he knows that the alternative will destroy progressive causes for decades to come. There will be grumbling but by November the majority of never Hillary sanders supporters will be never Trump voters and will mark the box for Clinton.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
61. What's your point?
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 08:50 AM
Jun 2016

Who others vote for is their choice, not yours.

Think you are going to change their minds by insulting them?

The delusion runs deep in this one.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
62. Call me whatever you like. I will not vote for a corrupt, money grubbing candidate.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:42 AM
Jun 2016

Others can do what their conscience dictates.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
63. "Money grubbing" is being overly polite...
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:46 AM
Jun 2016

but if you or I accurately label HRC's fundraising style, her loyalists will sprain their index fingers hitting the "alert" button...

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
66. Pretty much, it's just too bad the powerful are never held accountable...
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:57 AM
Jun 2016

they just continue to be rewarded for it. More money. More power.

And we just have to deal with it.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
67. So if the Will NOT Ever Vote for Clinton movement is so very insignificant...
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 09:59 AM
Jun 2016

... why precisely are you spending so much time and energy telling us it's so very insignificant?


Inquiring minds want to know.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
69. I don't even think it is a movement.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:06 PM
Jun 2016

It's a slogan. Certainly there are millions of people in that boat, but then again you need more than a few million to make an impact.

Unless it swings a few key states like Maine and Florida and stuff.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
70. Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jun 2016
Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost. John Quincy Adams
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I wonder if the Bernie or...