2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI wonder if the Bernie or Bust movement grossly overestimates their size
In a few days, Clinton will pass the necessary delegate count (with superdelegates which i know only count if they support Sanders) and for most people, the democratic primary will be over. The media will move on, the democratic party will move on, the republicans will move on, the president will move on but we hear people here talking about "going all the way until the convention" or "it isn't over until the delegates vote" or "we won't have a nominee until july!". However, I do wonder if all of the Bernie Keyboard Brigade here and on Reddit are really the unstoppable juggernaut that they claim or if they are just a few people living in an echo chamber ready to rise up, when 99.999% of people have moved on with their lives. Sure, we will hear "well my brother and all of my friends say they will only support sanders" or "i live in california and i have seen tons of bernie bumper stickers" but i am willing to bet that the bernie or bust movement isn't so much a revolution but just a few people that are really, really, really loud.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)All most of us want is an ethical progressive to vote for.
qdouble
(891 posts)"I will never vote for Hillary" = "Bernie or Bust." as Clinton will be the Democratic Nominee.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)qdouble
(891 posts)which makes you part of the same group.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)And as I tried to explain to you, it didn't have to be Bernie, just someone i could vote for in good conscience. It won't be Trump or Hillary.
qdouble
(891 posts)I don't see why you want to distance yourself from the Bernie supporters who are saying the exact same things you are saying.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)in there. I simply won't vote for an unethical candidate.
qdouble
(891 posts)"108,000+ people have taken so far. Why? Keep reading." https://citizensagainstplutocracy.wordpress.com/
If you're under the impression that Bernie or Bust means that you won't be voting, then you are mistaken.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)i don't really care what pledge says. I haven't taken it and I won't be but I will not be voting for Hillary. So, then maybe your dozens are really a hell of a lot more.
qdouble
(891 posts)the nominee." It's really that simple. I don't know why you are twisting and turning to not acknowledge an easily understood phrase.
I hope every one works the sour apples out of their system by the June 16 deadline here in
the DU.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Others' ethics will not allow that to happen.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)The highest Court in the land. The next President may have 3 to replace in the next four years. I don't think Bernie is ethical with his plans that don't have any chance of passing congress and add $19 trillion in debt if they did, but I would vote for him over any republican for the court. Thank you.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)If a random senator that has done nothing while in government can't be the nominee then everyone else must suffer!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)msongs
(67,381 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Response to Doctor Jack (Reply #5)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)No, make him Emperor!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Your argument might be stronger if Sanders actually was ahead in something, like PDs or popular vote. But you want the supers to select him?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)That is a sign of some corrupt dynasty? There were 2 roosevelts, those devious bastards, probably in the pockets of Goldman Sachs too!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)And yes, we have been known to elevate families in the past to royalty status. Though the Roosevelts hardly count since they were related only by marriage and their politics were quite different.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to Franklin.
Response to Doctor Jack (Reply #11)
Post removed
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)and the locking up of "super-predators"?"
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I def don't trust her picking a SCOTUS.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Clinton had a 93% progressive rating. She voted for the same things as Sanders. In fact, she is better on guns in my opinion. Now she is the only thing standing between us and destruction of all progress achievements since Roosevelt and the packing of the courts which would certainly end Roe V Wade. But you can't bring yourself to vote for her? Of course,Trump doesn't worry you ? That is a powerful bitter hate there. The GOP would have five court picks and the entire government. All progressive accomplishments since Roosevelt would be lost. But one man Bernie Sanders is more important than stopping that? Well, you are Bernie or bust. I am sure you will say oh...but I would vote for Biden or Elizabeth Warren...well they didn't run...so you don't have that choice. You can write in Mickey Mouse which is the same as voting for traitor green spoiler's or simply not vote. You would be helping to elect Trump. If you don't cast a vote for Hillary Clinton, you are all for purposes casting a vote for Trump. You would be better off and so would any of your kids or your grand-kids to Lend a hand and defeat the most dangerous candidate the Republicans have ever nominated -both domestically and in terms of foreign affairs... or get out of the way and let the rest of us do it. Trump with the nuclear codes is too horrifying to contemplate.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Forgive me for not trusting your judgement on truth telling.
PJMcK
(22,025 posts)We must defeat the Republicans. Please reconsider and vote a straight Democratic ticket.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Response to Live and Learn (Reply #55)
Name removed Message auto-removed
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)It is not an organized group, just an idea.
Each person will make their own choice.
My choice is Bernie or Bust.
MFM008
(19,803 posts)bust?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)It has nothing to do with how many others agree or disagree.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)You can make all the excuses you want but it is bitter anger because Bernie lost...and it is bern it down.
Hekate
(90,624 posts)65% of Sanders supporters are willing to vote for Clinton in November
10% said they'd vote for Trump
13% won't vote
Sounds to me like 65% of Sanders supporters are Democrats and/or adults who recognize the threat Trump poses to our country.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)70% will get her to 8%-10%
Hekate
(90,624 posts)...protections, understand the severe impact of the drought, want immigration reform ... I mean, they aren't idiots.
Interestingly enough, neither Trump nor Sanders seems capable of moderating their basic dogma to address specifically Californian realities for more than a few moments. And there's 40 million of us.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)That is because of his views on immigrants from Mexico and Muslims.
Hillary may develop problems in California as her stances turn rightward, and they are bound to turn rightward as she tries to move into general election mode.
In my area, Californians love Bernie. I only know my area, but it is very clear to me as I canvass, etc. that my area is very pro-Bernie.
I just stop people on the street, and they are voting for Bernie. Go house to house and the numbers for Bernie are even higher.
But I am not in a wealthy area. Hillary appeals more to wealthy people at least in California.
We shall see. Hillary reads her speeches and makes very little personal contact with audiences. She seems distant to people.
Bernie has campaigned on a national level for just over a year. Not long. If she were a strong candidate, Bernie would not have been able to gain on her as much as he has. That is the problem with Hillary.
It isn't so much about Bernie or bust as it is about whether people will feel moved to bother to vote for her.
Will Trump moderate his tone enough to make himself seem less of a threat? Will Hillary turn right and offend more Bernie supporters than she has so far?
It's going to be very tricky for Hillary to get Bernie voters to really vote for her. We shall see. I could not predict this. But I do know that the insulting behavior of many of her supporters toward Bernie supporters on the internet will not help Hillary.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The Dem candidate will win CA no matter what. The crucial states are the swing states, the half-dozen or so that went to Obama by very slim margins. If 35+% of Sanders supporters go Bernie or Bust there it'll be a bloodbath for not only Clinton but downticket Democrats also. Can the DNC afford to lose swing states like Florida by wide margins? The superdelegates might gamble on it to keep their corporate gravy train rolling.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)now.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)the nomination and lost their minds ... Yikes, like that group on your side this time.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)why are you posting about it?
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)The planet of Jupiter doesn't cause any day to day worry to anyone on Earth, so why study it? Intellectual curiosity, trying to learn more about the things around me, etc. But if you want to live in a closed off, isolated world, then more power to you.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)November.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)I have never voted for a corporatist (except in 1992) and I am not about to start now. What anyone else does is their business.
msongs
(67,381 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)It especially doesn't make sense to mention when you did something and then say "and I'm not about to start now." Of course you're not, because you already did.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)but oh boy are they loudmouths.
History says they won't matter.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)When you're part of a crowd, it's too easy to start believing that your crowd is the majority, even when it most certainly is not. And that's the Sanders movement. They all gathered together, and started telling themselves, "We're just a small section of something greater," when in fact they were the collected gathering of the total sum.
And since their tactics were designed to drive away anyone who didn't already agree with them, their movement never actually got any bigger than the crowds that showed up to the rallies. And that meant not enough votes to win, more often than not.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)They are individuals who don't really care for Trump or Hillary.
Some will bite the bullet and vote for the "More Muscular foreign policy" candidate,or the Green candidate, and probably in rare instances vote nihilistic for the orange one. Many will probably just stay home.
I would be more concerned about the "I'm With Her" vote.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)The BoB crowd is not as big as they might think. Heck, look at the above posts. They run from the BoB classification. Hillary will solidify the vast majority of the Party at the convention while this BoB crowd will behave in such a fashion outside the convention hall that they will completely delegitimize themselves in the eyes of the country.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I would have been fine with pretty much any other DEM besides Clinton.
I like Bernie, but he doesn't have to be the nominee for me. I would have accepted someone else.
Stuckinthebush
(10,843 posts)And will get smaller. This is normal in primaries. Hell, remember how many GOPers vowed to never vote Trump? Well....that went away fast. Same for Dems. 99% will vote for Hillary. At least those who would have supported Dems anyway. Some Sanders supporters would never have voted Dem regardless of the Democrat who won.
Sanders will concede and support Hillary. They will join each other on stage and smile and hug. Sanders will encourage his supporters to vote for Hillary because he knows that the alternative will destroy progressive causes for decades to come. There will be grumbling but by November the majority of never Hillary sanders supporters will be never Trump voters and will mark the box for Clinton.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Who others vote for is their choice, not yours.
Think you are going to change their minds by insulting them?
The delusion runs deep in this one.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Others can do what their conscience dictates.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)but if you or I accurately label HRC's fundraising style, her loyalists will sprain their index fingers hitting the "alert" button...
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)they just continue to be rewarded for it. More money. More power.
And we just have to deal with it.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... why precisely are you spending so much time and energy telling us it's so very insignificant?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)It's a slogan. Certainly there are millions of people in that boat, but then again you need more than a few million to make an impact.
Unless it swings a few key states like Maine and Florida and stuff.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)maybe NOT.