2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie feeding the "or bust" trolls
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sanders-on-bernie-or-bust-supporters-i-cant-tell-them-what-to-do/And if hes not the nominee, he added, then the onus is on Clinton to explain to those people why she should get their support.
It's true that Bernie can't MAKE anyone vote for Hillary, but he can damn sure tell them it's the right thing to do, and it's what he wants them to do. That's what a decent person would do in his position.

HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)LonePirate
(14,079 posts)boston bean
(36,768 posts)president. PERIOD. And he knows this.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Hay muchas cosas pasando detrás de puertas cerradas.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Call again when we have one. Right now, Bernie's job is to get votes in CA and that's exactly what he should be doing.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)are separated by age not race.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)This is everything. This is me and every other voter who votes the midterm elections too
https://twitter.com/jawillie/status/737396582425976833/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)She's wrong most of the time.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)That and the misogynist card is all they've got.
Personally, I think that it is both bigoted and sexist to continuously play those two cards. However women, and people of color don't seem to have a problem with it.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I have a plethora of in-laws and friends who do not support Hillary either. In fact, many are offended by her past support of certain policies and comments she has made.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)She's a disaster.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)her positions on past policies is a huge indicator of what her policies will be in the future- despite the lip service she currently pays to those who would support her.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So you are merely projecting
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Response to CrowCityDem (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)It's up to Clinton to get people to vote for her.
amborin
(16,631 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Sanders is not a general commanding his troops. We are not loyal to Sanders, we are loyal to a set of policies and ideals.
As a result, Sanders issuing orders has little effect.
That's the difference between the slogans, "I'm with her" and "He's with us".
The Clinton campaign understands this. That is why the Clinton campaign has been attacking Sanders supporters instead of Sanders. Damaging Sanders does not get his supporters to switch, because it's not about Sanders. It's about those policies and ideals.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Again, you're going to have to take off the H-shaped blinders to understand the situation. And until you do, you're just going to keep making the situation worse.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)and do "everything" to stop Trump, which includes telling his supporters he think they would be best served voting for Hillary. Do you not see that if he doesn't do that, regardless of its effect, he's a complete liar? It goes against what his loud supporters have been saying about him this whole time; that he's a moral, honorable person.
Prove it.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Sanders said telling his supporters to vote for Clinton won't have much effect, not that Sanders will not do it.
Again, your refusal to understand your opposition leads you to attack something Sanders did not say. As well as continuing to trash Sanders's supporters.
Do you not see that your strawman is not what Sanders actually said? The liar here is not Sanders.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Again, you are operating under the assumption that if Sanders says to vote for Clinton, lots of Sanders supporters will follow their orders.
Because that is what you'd do if the roles were reversed.
But Sanders supporters are not the same as Clinton supporters. You proudly say "I'm with her". We proudly say "He's with us". Those short sentences show the profound difference between the supporters of each candidate.
And until you understand that difference, you will continue to make Clinton's job harder. Like with this thread.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Good to know we have the ok from you to go ahead and run the race we want, without having to worry about placating your hurt feelings. Thanks!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)A long track record of flip-flops and pandering for votes means she can not believably promise much today.
So you'd be much better served figuring out how to help shore up that problem instead of continuing to attack. Because attacks won't fix it. If we were happy with "lesser of two evil" arguments, we'd already be Clinton supporters. So attempting to make a greater evil will not work.
As for your glib dismissal, you're going to need us in November, or you're going to pull a Coakley.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Since I like democracy, I'd have a damn hard time voting for a loser who had it handed to him. What's his plan to get me on board?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)What would we do if a plague of space orangutans descended on our country on November 1st?!?!?!!
Again, you have a large problem: You need the left in order to win the general election. You hate it, but it's true. The moderate Republicans who have spent the last 30 years hating Clinton will not vote for her. Even with Trump on the ballot.
So instead of continuing to attack us, you need to pivot to the general. That is, if you actually want to win. You would get to do a lot more hippy punching if Clinton loses though, so you've got a tough decision to make.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Sanders will no more be "handed the nomination" than those space orangutans invade.
So, hippy punching or winning? Which is more important to you?
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)What I expect to happen is Clinton will win the nomination.
Then around mid to late September, the Republicans in the FBI will leak that they recommended an indictment. This will happen whether or not it is true. Thus getting the Republicans a "two-fer", greatly hurting Clinton's campaign while also greatly hurting Obama's legacy.
That will result in a November election with incredibly low turnout. And incredibly low turnout elections really help the Republicans.
Now, you gonna keep going with the hippy punching, or do you want to win the general?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)for far too many.
840high
(17,196 posts)does Hillary weathervane so much on issues?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Wait long enough, and she ends up where she began...Republican.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)It's all about her. IT'S HER TURN!
For all those reasons, it is okay for her supporter to ignore her lies.
Got it?
840high
(17,196 posts)time ago - what has happened to this country? Go Bernie!
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)and we didn't get the memo?
QC
(26,371 posts)is also a personality cultist.
It's simple projection.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I'm sure Bernie will endorse her if he loses but endorsements don't mean anything to us. We're voting on the issues, not the person.
It's on the candidate to win us over. If that candidate is Hillary then that will be on her. Bernie is 100% correct.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I never said that about Hillary Clinton but my point remains, the bottom line is candidates have to win over voters.
Bernie can no more order us to vote for her than I can order you to vote for Bernie. You've examined their positions, listened (I hope), heard their appeals, and decided. I presume you to be intelligent and aren't waiting for Martin O'Malley's endorsement of Hillary right? That's because endorsements just aren't working like they used to.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)But here you go, a million and 1
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5706fbbde4b03a9e75d3fd93
As the two Democratic presidential candidates engage in some of their sharpest attacks of the campaign, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Thursday affirmed that he would support opponent Hillary Clinton in the general election if she wins the nomination.
Sure I will, he said, when pressed by CBS News Charlie Rose in an interview. Look, as I said a million times, I think the idea of a Donald Trump or a Ted Cruz presidency would be an unmitigated disaster for this country. I will do everything in my power and work as hard as I can to make sure that that does not happen. And if Secretary Clinton is the nominee, I will certainly support her.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Did you try googling that before speculating that he had not?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Just ignore him, he's practically invisible. Besides, it has been made more than clear that Hillary doesn't need his supporter votes. She's got it all in the bag. Member? You member.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...when under an FBI criminal investigation?
basselope
(2,565 posts)Hillary Clinton was never a consideration for me. Ever. I only registered democrat to avoid confusion voting for Bernie.
I will change my registration the day after the primary.
I am not a fan of religion.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)You honestly don't get it. It's obvious.
Many Bernie supporters have absolutely no interest in voting for Hillary. Period. Full stop.
As I have said before, many see her and Trump alike. All part of the same corn crop, just different rows of corn.
Yet your camp doesn't get this. Bernie may very well say that but you need to understand, a very large margin of his supporters will NOT vote for Hillary who they see as corrupt, propped up, artificial, disingenuous, dangerous and untrustworthy.
That is the bottom line.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Bernie said he would do "everything in my power" to stop Trump. If he doesn't even pay lip service by asking you to vote for Hillary, he is a flat out, unrepentant liar.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Bernie is right in what he said, he can't wave a magic wand and say "Ooomp loompa, you will now be hypnotized and you will vote for Hillary under my command".
The reality is what again?
What I posted above.
You don't get it. A large chunk of Bernie supporters aren't interested in voting for the "Master Of Puppets". This is what you and your camp fail to understand & that margin of his supporters is rather large. You and I can beat around the bush on this but you're looking through the glass being a Hillary supporters. I am not.
People are sick and tired of voting for "who you don't want as POTUS" instead of voting for someone they believe in and because of that, many are taking a stand and not "falling in line" as Dems would hope they do.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Bernie has said all along he would support and fight for Hillary should she be the nominee.
Why is that hard to understand?
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Well we'll throw out your argument then right now.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton_us_5706fbbde4b03a9e75d3fd93
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)Bernie knows BoB is not actually Bernie supporters but republicans disguising themselves as Bernie supporters and knows that he holds no sway over them
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Autumn
(47,734 posts)politician who want's their votes to get their votes.
Autumn
(47,734 posts)is fucking ridiculous, people know what they want to do and i don't need anyone making up my mind for me. Getting voters in line to vote for her is Hilary's job. Any decent person who expects people to vote for them reaches out to those voters.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)A Million Dollars worth of trolls!
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)their name.we aren't robots for goodness sake.
we know who we like all by ourselves .