Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:15 PM Jun 2016

Something for Bernie Sanders to Consider, among Other Things

If the Senator from Vermont decides to continue with his campaign right up through the convention, he will be running a great risk. It will be obvious to every one after Tuesday that he cannot become the nominee. Expect to see all Super Delegates who have already said they'll vote for Clinton at the convention reaffirm their decisions. Probably, some additional ones will declare their intentions as well.

Here's the thing: Every Democratic Senator is a Super Delegate. As far as I am aware, all of them are planning to vote for Hillary, except for Bernie, himself. Here's the problem with that. If, as is expected, the Democrats regain a majority in the Senate, Bernie is risking a great deal if he continues to bluster and attack Hillary Clinton in a vain attempt to defeat the candidate who will have one a majority of pledged delegates.

In the Senate, Bernie is an Independent. While he normally caucuses with the Democrats, he insists on his Independent status. If he pisses off Democratic Senators by acting as a spoiler to a smooth nomination in July, his Senate colleagues are very likely to simply ignore him in the Senate. They will have a majority in the Senate, so his vote with the caucus is not as important as it normally has been.

Sanders would still vote with the Democratic caucus, because he cannot vote, in good conscience, with the Republicans on most issues. But, he will no longer be a crucial vote. If he continues to insist that the will of the voters be overturned, I can see the Democratic caucus responding by simply taking away his committee seats and ignoring him altogether in discussions on legislation. In that case, he will have virtually no clout whatever as a Senator.

It might even be that his state, Vermont, could refuse to return him to the Senate two years from now. That risk is so high, Sanders might even consider resigning his seat next year. His fellow Senators might simply shun him for his sorry performance between the primaries and the convention.

I hope Bernie does not continue his truculent opposition to Clinton's nomination. It will not succeed and he may well suffer considerably ignominy from it.

Think about it, Bernie. Help us elect a Democratic President in November. Do the right thing.

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Something for Bernie Sanders to Consider, among Other Things (Original Post) MineralMan Jun 2016 OP
He is desperately trying to save lives. Give him a break. Vattel Jun 2016 #1
Oh my! :-P NurseJackie Jun 2016 #6
Omfg. You should send this to sanders campaign hq Warren Stupidity Jun 2016 #2
Why? Bernie already knows it. MineralMan Jun 2016 #7
I'm certain he will give your implied threats the attention they deserve tularetom Jun 2016 #3
He will never see what I wrote. MineralMan Jun 2016 #5
Alas, it is so, and more's the pity tularetom Jun 2016 #17
Gosh, did I use those words without realizing it? MineralMan Jun 2016 #19
There you go, being all literal again tularetom Jun 2016 #25
I'm a literal kind of guy. MineralMan Jun 2016 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author tularetom Jun 2016 #24
Obvious? Not obvious. Too much mass media and New Dem brainwashing. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #4
An RT video? MineralMan Jun 2016 #10
Too funny, too true? Get your news from the kind of mass media Bill Cllinton paved the way for? highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #34
Bernie doesn't read DU. Why don't you send him a letter? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #8
Why would I do that? This wasn't a letter. MineralMan Jun 2016 #9
Well, you seemed to be addresing it to him. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #11
No, actually I didn't. I referred to him in the third person throughout. MineralMan Jun 2016 #13
Good grief: 'Think about it, Bernie. Help us elect a Democratic President in November.' nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #14
Vocative case. MineralMan Jun 2016 #16
It doesn't look like vocative case to me. It looks like you are addressing Bernie. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #18
Well, English doesn't use a different noun form for the vocative MineralMan Jun 2016 #20
For the love of a duck, why not just have said 'Bernie should' instead of 'Bernie,'? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #22
I did do that in several places in the post. MineralMan Jun 2016 #23
So, our highly ethical Democratic senators are going to indulge in petulance? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #12
Petulance? Not at all. Disapproval of MineralMan Jun 2016 #15
The will of the voters? Will the voters approve of senators acting like vengeful adolescents? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #21
yes, this scolding in the OP reveals... grasswire Jun 2016 #28
"Taking it to the convention" is not the same thing as running for president. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #30
So what? How would that interfere with him being a senator and doing his job after the election? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #36
I'm not even getting what you're arguing. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #37
The OP talked about shunning and removing him from committess. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #38
Yes, committee assignments are favors. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #43
So, our government is run on the basis of "favors", "revenge", and "rewards". Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #44
Nobody's listening, Dad. grasswire Jun 2016 #27
More's the pity. MineralMan Jun 2016 #29
you may see more history made than you want to. grasswire Jun 2016 #31
I have already seen far more history made than I wanted to. MineralMan Jun 2016 #39
Didn't you see enough of it when you were a member over there... grasswire Jun 2016 #47
No, "the possibility of HRC being indicted" is nonexistent. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #46
Bernie losing doesn't mean the election was rigged, just that most voters don't want him. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #45
Shorter... Help us elect a *Progressive/Liberal President in November, Do the right thing. HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #32
"His Senate colleagues are very likely to simply ignore him". . . . Jake Stern Jun 2016 #33
I think he will suspend his campaign after Tuesday's results oberliner Jun 2016 #35
Yes, I do, too. He may wait until after DC votes, though, MineralMan Jun 2016 #41
He should lose his committee assignments. We've got Democrats who need the experience and exposure BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #40
If he's smart, that won't happen, and he'll continue to be MineralMan Jun 2016 #42
Hillary will just have to cool it until the correct time Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #48
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
1. He is desperately trying to save lives. Give him a break.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jun 2016

In all probability he will lose and he knows that. But he is playing by the rules and, quite literally, lives are at stake.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
3. I'm certain he will give your implied threats the attention they deserve
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jun 2016


Keep being truculent Sen. Sanders, keep up the bluster, and don't worry about the ignominy.

Nobody will have a clear majority of delegates until the convention.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
17. Alas, it is so, and more's the pity
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:41 PM
Jun 2016

Because he really needs anonymous posters on the internet telling him he's just a cranky old curmudgeon.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
19. Gosh, did I use those words without realizing it?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jun 2016

Nope. I checked, and neither "cranky" nor "curmudgeon" appeared in my post.

It looks like you're the only one using those descriptors.

Response to tularetom (Reply #17)

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
9. Why would I do that? This wasn't a letter.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:27 PM
Jun 2016

It was my opinion. I'm sure that Bernie Sanders is capable of forming his own opinions.

You're welcome to forward it to him, if you think he isn't already considering those things.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
13. No, actually I didn't. I referred to him in the third person throughout.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jun 2016

It's just a post stating my opinion, as are all posts I write here. Had it been a letter to him, I'd have written it differently and sent it to him, rather than posting it here.

But, thanks for your reply.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
20. Well, English doesn't use a different noun form for the vocative
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:46 PM
Jun 2016

case, so it can be hard to notice. Here's another example of its use:

"Lord love a duck!" Now, that's not a prayer directed at a deity. It uses the vocative case.

If it were a prayer, or a request, it would have said,

"Lord, I beseech you to to love this duck."

Since the rest of my post was in the third person when referring to Senator Sanders, the last sentence was an exhortation using the vocative case, directed at the reader, rather than to Bernie. It's a subtle distinction in English. Some would say that English doesn't even have the vocative form to use. I disagree, as a semi-amateur linguist.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
23. I did do that in several places in the post.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jun 2016

It was not a letter to Bernie. I know how to write letters to political people. I do it all the time.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
12. So, our highly ethical Democratic senators are going to indulge in petulance?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:31 PM
Jun 2016

Will he no longer be invited to the clique's parties? Will they stick their tongues out when he passes them in the hall? Call him a Meanie? Write messages about him on the restroom walls?

And, some wonder why people don't bother to vote.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
15. Petulance? Not at all. Disapproval of
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:34 PM
Jun 2016

his actions after the primaries are over and the will of the voters is known.

Disapproval.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
21. The will of the voters? Will the voters approve of senators acting like vengeful adolescents?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:46 PM
Jun 2016

Shunning? Removing from committees? Because he ran for president? Has he done a bad job as a senator? Screwed up the committees?

Do tell.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
28. yes, this scolding in the OP reveals...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:12 PM
Jun 2016

...the nature of the Clintons, in spades. Retribution. Authoritarianism. Meanspiritedness. Revenge. Enemies list.

Sounds almost Nixonian.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
30. "Taking it to the convention" is not the same thing as running for president.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jun 2016

It's a demand on Bernie's part that the win be handed to him after he lost.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
37. I'm not even getting what you're arguing.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jun 2016

He'd still be a senator, but that doesn't mean other senators would have to do him any favors.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
44. So, our government is run on the basis of "favors", "revenge", and "rewards".
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:02 PM
Jun 2016
"Power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton

Or, if you prefer:

“History has tried hard to teach us that we can’t have good government under politicians. Now, to go and stick one at the very head of the government couldn’t be wise.” Mark Twain

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
27. Nobody's listening, Dad.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jun 2016

The fears you cite are invalid.

Bernie has nothing to lose. He is the head of a movement that is greater than the Third Way; a coalition of progressives and independents. The political landscape has changed. HRC may prevail through this rigged election, but she will be the last Third Way to gain the WH, and will likely be impeached within weeks.

You are simply on the wrong side of history. The old rules are failing to control the surge.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
29. More's the pity.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jun 2016

I'm afraid I can't take your predictions very seriously. When you bring impeachment into the discussion, you fail to convince.

As far as history is concerned, at my age, I will be history before too many years pass. History is being made every time we elect a new President. This time, we'll be electing our first female President. That will be a significant change in the political landscape. It will make history, and I'll be on the right side of that.

As President, Clinton will continue to make history. What that history will record remains to be seen, of course.

Bernie may be the head of a movement. Whether that movement actually ends up prevailing also remains to be seen.

I hope to live to see more history being made, of course.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
31. you may see more history made than you want to.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jun 2016

Republicans are cheering the idea of both Clintons impeached. That would be historic, you must admit. Even the possibility of HRC being indicted is historic. No Democrat has run for POTUS under criminal investigation by the FBI.

If you are not aware of what the enemy (Republicans) are planning, then you really need to get out of the bubble.

They have the votes to make it happen. And oh, how they want to beat her up.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
39. I have already seen far more history made than I wanted to.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:39 PM
Jun 2016

I've seen several Republican Presidents do serious damage to everyone's dreams. I've seen unjust wars, unnecessary poverty, blatant discrimination against women and minorities, and much much more.

I don't know your age, but I remember every President, starting with Eisenhower. I remember good periods and horrible periods. I remember the history that has been made in my life. That's why I vote for the better option in every presidential election.

So, I'm no stranger at observing history being made. I expect to see more of it being made, and to try to influence it as I'm able.

There will be no impeachment of Hillary Clinton. That's your own pipe dream. Smoking is bad for you. I recommend giving it up.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
45. Bernie losing doesn't mean the election was rigged, just that most voters don't want him.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:06 PM
Jun 2016

No matter how hard this may be for you to believe, not everybody's looking for a "revolution" and not everybody supports your "movement."

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
32. Shorter... Help us elect a *Progressive/Liberal President in November, Do the right thing.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jun 2016

'Think about it, Bernie.' He has, thx for pointing it out

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
33. "His Senate colleagues are very likely to simply ignore him". . . .
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:29 PM
Jun 2016

. . . . .until they're scrambling to find votes to shut down a GOP filibuster.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
35. I think he will suspend his campaign after Tuesday's results
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:35 PM
Jun 2016

Barring some kind of massively large wins in CA and NJ.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
41. Yes, I do, too. He may wait until after DC votes, though,
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016

just to say he waited until everyone had voted. But, he might just suspend and concede on Wednesday. I'll be watching either way.

But, when he does concede, it will be a great "surprise" to his supporters. I'm sure the agonizing cries will be heard here and on other political discussion venues. That will be followed by vituperative anger, and then by silence.

I'm listening for the sound of silence, frankly. There's a General Election to win, after all.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
40. He should lose his committee assignments. We've got Democrats who need the experience and exposure
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016

that he's sponging up. We need to begin preparing our next generation of Senators, not placating non-Democrats who stab us in the back over and over.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
42. If he's smart, that won't happen, and he'll continue to be
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jun 2016

relevant in the Senate. I think he'll do the smart thing, really, and maybe sooner than many think.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
48. Hillary will just have to cool it until the correct time
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jun 2016

for the Supers to vote at the convention.

And neither she, nor anybody else has any effective lever over Sanders. Don't believe me, wait and see.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Something for Bernie Sand...