Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:10 PM Jun 2016

Bernie Sanders CAMPAIGN Statement



PRESS RELEASE


Sanders Campaign Statement



JUNE 6, 2016



SAN FRANCISCO – U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ spokesman, Michael Briggs, on Monday issued the following statement:

“It is unfortunate that the media, in a rush to judgement, are ignoring the Democratic National Committee’s clear statement that it is wrong to count the votes of superdelegates before they actually vote at the convention this summer.

“Secretary Clinton does not have and will not have the requisite number of pledged delegates to secure the nomination. She will be dependent on superdelegates who do not vote until July 25 and who can change their minds between now and then. They include more than 400 superdelegates who endorsed Secretary Clinton 10 months before the first caucuses and primaries and long before any other candidate was in the race.

“Our job from now until the convention is to convince those superdelegates that Bernie is by far the strongest candidate against Donald Trump.”




https://berniesanders.com/press-release/sanders-campaign-statement/

93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders CAMPAIGN Statement (Original Post) Segami Jun 2016 OP
KICK! Raster Jun 2016 #1
Delusional. n/t Kang Colby Jun 2016 #2
Factual. Democracy is Democracy. nt retrowire Jun 2016 #21
Funny how still, STILL, at this late date, the posts that generate the most Recs nilram Jun 2016 #62
Fact: bvar22 Jun 2016 #88
What a sham! Segami Jun 2016 #3
That is SOOOO true. dchill Jun 2016 #29
From the candidate who railed against the DNC for the last year. Sad redstateblues Jun 2016 #4
The DNC demanded Bernie's feality greiner3 Jun 2016 #86
The HRC people are full blown obnoxious Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #5
its going to be a War reddread Jun 2016 #8
It sure seems that way Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #57
Obama, his family, his surrogates, his campaign, and his supporters stillwaiting Jun 2016 #66
Yeah, it arrived for me back in '08 with the racist campaign HRC ran against Obama Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #77
Most of us are more angry about this announcement than the BS supporters. Jitter65 Jun 2016 #25
Ya cause ignoring the peoples vote is classy... seabeyond Jun 2016 #43
You won't hear a Clinton mouth admit that. They'll milk it for all its worth. Ruthlessness. floriduck Jun 2016 #6
Didn't seem to bother him in 2008 when he endorsed Obama well before the convention. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #7
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Peacetrain Jun 2016 #11
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2016 #14
Oh heavens, not an ENDORSEMENT!!!! lmao nt retrowire Jun 2016 #22
Bernie outright stated that his endorsment was BECAUSE OBAMA WAS THE NOMINEE. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #70
Bernie endorsed Obama before the convention and before Hillary conceded Sheepshank Jun 2016 #53
So now endorsing equals declaring someone the nominee? cui bono Jun 2016 #61
we are parsing words.....Obama was announced the Presumptive nominee prior to convention Sheepshank Jun 2016 #67
You equated endorsing with declaring someone the nominee. cui bono Jun 2016 #81
Bernie specifically said in 08 that his policy was to not endorse until there was a nominee. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #71
So now endorsing equals declaring someone the nominee? cui bono Jun 2016 #60
Apparently so, in the twisted logic of Hillary supporters ... Martin Eden Jun 2016 #87
Hillary's internal poll numbers must be terrible in California for the LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #9
Absolutely to tamper with DNC Rules like this...they are Desperate! KoKo Jun 2016 #17
The Clintons don't care about the future of the Democratic Party WolverineDG Jun 2016 #32
What "rule" does this violate? mythology Jun 2016 #46
That was my first thought as well. They were going to lose very badly. n/t FourScore Jun 2016 #58
As a result of this, they are going to lose worse. LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #59
Absurd tinfoil hat nonsense. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #72
I Doubt We'll Ever Really Know, I'm Afraid That Even Though He Had ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #92
Yeah... Tragl1 Jun 2016 #10
who knows if it was or wasn't her fault? she calls the shots. wendylaroux Jun 2016 #12
If you believe that, you haven't been paying close attention Segami Jun 2016 #19
I hope this shit backfires... Tragl1 Jun 2016 #26
You bet your ass they did. pangaia Jun 2016 #34
Hope super delegates see the light All in it together Jun 2016 #13
The Clinton machine and the media have gone too far this time... HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #15
LOL anigbrowl Jun 2016 #41
WTF? HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #45
You didn't, but maybe you should have anigbrowl Jun 2016 #49
You're putting a lot of words into my mouth n/t HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #56
Did he lose all sense of reality? Beacool Jun 2016 #16
So no DNC is all about having SD vote acrodign to voters? TimPlo Jun 2016 #24
Since the inception of the super delegates they have NEVER nominated the losing candidate. Beacool Jun 2016 #51
So DWS back in Jan TimPlo Jun 2016 #52
I don't remember anything of the sort. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #73
I think it's more about staying in until every vote is counted Jon Ace Jun 2016 #33
No, he and his two weasels (Weaver and Devine) have bee pushing this strategy since early spring. Beacool Jun 2016 #50
This is how the networks have always called primaries with super delegates. tandem5 Jun 2016 #18
Wow, 400 whole superdelegates? ContinentalOp Jun 2016 #20
Pay attention GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #28
Translation: Adrahil Jun 2016 #23
i smell a uuuuuge bernie win in cali!! nt restorefreedom Jun 2016 #27
Since when does Sanders listen to what the Democratic National Committee says? baldguy Jun 2016 #30
Bernie doesn't run the world upaloopa Jun 2016 #31
The Clintons think they do..... Segami Jun 2016 #35
duuuuuuude Corporate666 Jun 2016 #36
Duuuuuuuuuuude..... Segami Jun 2016 #38
You're clinging to a lost cause... Corporate666 Jun 2016 #47
And the band plays on... Tarc Jun 2016 #37
And then Sanders continues to be an ass, trying to flip the results of voters. As bad as AP. seabeyond Jun 2016 #39
I'm writing just to tell you to look at post 42 which was stupidly hidden for some reason Number23 Jun 2016 #89
That is an hoot! I love it and perfect. Exactly that. seabeyond Jun 2016 #90
The Five Stages of Grief Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #40
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #42
Delusional workinclasszero Jun 2016 #44
Welp we found the tinfoil factory. ucrdem Jun 2016 #48
This man is hilarious.... CherokeeDem Jun 2016 #54
We're with you Bernie laserhaas Jun 2016 #55
Good for Bernie!!! nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #63
I'm with Bernie! chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #64
Polite, restrained statement in response to an act of pure scumbaggery. senz Jun 2016 #65
Precisely. avaistheone1 Jun 2016 #68
What's this "only" a 286 delegate lead? That's massive, basically insurmountable lead. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #74
KICK Mad-in-Mo Jun 2016 #69
I hope he seeks out a therapist. eom MohRokTah Jun 2016 #75
K&R! tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #76
Solidarity felix_numinous Jun 2016 #78
Kick with love for Bernie 840high Jun 2016 #79
Oh, dear RogueTrooper Jun 2016 #80
Clinton supporter's heads must be exploding coyote Jun 2016 #82
You only find out who is swimming naked when the tide goes out merkins Jun 2016 #83
Kick! Kick! Kck! And Rec! Dont call me Shirley Jun 2016 #84
K&R emsimon33 Jun 2016 #85
Huge KICK For Real Democracy... When Will The People Learn??? ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #91
Kicking! LongTomH Jun 2016 #93

nilram

(3,519 posts)
62. Funny how still, STILL, at this late date, the posts that generate the most Recs
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:12 AM
Jun 2016

are the ones that are the most pro-Bernie.













bvar22

(39,909 posts)
88. Fact:
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:50 PM
Jun 2016

ALL the polls show Bernie IS the stronger candidate against Trump, by more than double digits, while Hillary is basically tied.
Kinda stupid to nominate the weaker candidate in such an important election.
Don't ya think?

 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
86. The DNC demanded Bernie's feality
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jun 2016

In order for him to have partial access to his own data and he abide not attending any unDNC approved debates. He is playing their game and if all were equal he would be ahead 3,000,000 votes. I've read on DU the DNC is a corporation and makes its own rules. Too bad they cheat steal and engage in Nixon's 'rat fucking'.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
66. Obama, his family, his surrogates, his campaign, and his supporters
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:53 AM
Jun 2016

Did not treat HRC or her supporters the way that HRC, her family, her campaign, her surrogates, and her supporters have treated Bernie and his supporters.

I can not believe they have collectively decided to treat Bernie and his supporters in the manner that they have. Many Bernie supporters are not going to be able to vote for HRC because she has made it ridiculously personal throughout the entire campaign(in addition to all of the fraud that has happened throughout that they pretend is not happening).

It becomes unsupportable at some point. I think that point has arrived for many.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
25. Most of us are more angry about this announcement than the BS supporters.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:25 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary gets hurt more by this announcement than Bernie. Cheap shot by the media.

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
7. Didn't seem to bother him in 2008 when he endorsed Obama well before the convention.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:13 PM
Jun 2016

He should probably make up his mind.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
70. Bernie outright stated that his endorsment was BECAUSE OBAMA WAS THE NOMINEE.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:23 AM
Jun 2016

Yet Obama had not reached the requisite number of delegates with pledged delegates alone. He needed supers to put him over the top. Bernie didn't wait until the supers actually voted at the convention, he took their announced support for Obama at face value.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
53. Bernie endorsed Obama before the convention and before Hillary conceded
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:58 PM
Jun 2016

It all seems quite hypocritical at this point.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
67. we are parsing words.....Obama was announced the Presumptive nominee prior to convention
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 09:28 AM
Jun 2016

and Bernie's endorsement (along with the others) played into it.

I realize you are angry...but you always seem angry and biting. It's getting old.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
81. You equated endorsing with declaring someone the nominee.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jun 2016

They are entirely two different things. That one leads to another, which is what you are saying, clearly shows that to be true. They are not the same thing.

As to your other comment, you are one of those who thinks anyone who criticizes is angry and a "hater". Maybe you are still mad because I keep pointing out where you are wrong. Have you accepted the fact that in Vermont one does not register in a party? You never did acknowledge that was true after I posted the info with a link to the official Vermont State site stating such in response to your many attempts to make it not so.

.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
71. Bernie specifically said in 08 that his policy was to not endorse until there was a nominee.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jun 2016

And that he was endorsing Obama because the Democratic Party had chosen its nominee.

Martin Eden

(15,464 posts)
87. Apparently so, in the twisted logic of Hillary supporters ...
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jun 2016

... probably because they have to twist logic to support her in the first place.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
9. Hillary's internal poll numbers must be terrible in California for the
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:14 PM
Jun 2016

Clinton campaign in cahoots with the corporate whores to jump the gun and pull this bullshit on the eve of the California primary. Bernie is going to blow her out of the water here in California and march on to the convention. The corrupt assholes in the press can't crown anyone. Fuck em.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
17. Absolutely to tamper with DNC Rules like this...they are Desperate!
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:18 PM
Jun 2016

And, it will not go down well for the future.

WolverineDG

(22,298 posts)
32. The Clintons don't care about the future of the Democratic Party
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:29 PM
Jun 2016

they only care about THEIR future. So what if they leave nothing but scorched earth behind them? They'll be long gone & besides, only peasants do the clean-up.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
59. As a result of this, they are going to lose worse.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:23 PM
Jun 2016

There hasn't been a poll released in a couple of days here. Highly unusual and suspicious. Hillary must be tanking badly. Bernie supporters will come out in droves tomorrow with a big message to the corporate crooks- not so fast. I hope he embarrasses the hell out of her in this state.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
92. I Doubt We'll Ever Really Know, I'm Afraid That Even Though He Had
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:23 PM
Jun 2016

thousands and thousands of people coming out to his rallies and the fact that there are so many new registrations in CA they've probably found a way to fuzz it up and Clinton will come out the winner. I doubt they even care if they find voting irregularities anymore, they've fine tuned a way to blame it on Bernie and his supporters no matter what. It's SOP now.

But, I do wonder what this is going to do because there are far too many Bernie supporters who are absolutely disgusted and fed up with the Clintons and The Democratic Party for the way he's been treated. She's NOT a good campaigner and her negatives are so high that bringing people together will be very, very difficult. I'm already hearing it and this thing from yesterday just seems sooooooooo NOT RIGHT!

BAD MOVE!

 

Tragl1

(104 posts)
10. Yeah...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:14 PM
Jun 2016

Truth be damned. Process who cares? Clinton is going to get a sea of backlash over this. This time it really isn't even her fault. But damn I'm seeing red.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
19. If you believe that, you haven't been paying close attention
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jun 2016

to the lengths Clinton Theater will go to.......the campaign can deny all they want, but this call came from the top.



pangaia

(24,324 posts)
34. You bet your ass they did.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:35 PM
Jun 2016

It is so fucking obvious.

JUST as obvious as the lies told before invading Iraq !!!

All in it together

(275 posts)
13. Hope super delegates see the light
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jun 2016

And vote for Bernie. It's not over till the Convention.

The media screws up this election once again after playing Trump speeches non stop they insist it's over and Clinton has the Dem nomination. Hope we get her email questions resolved before the convention. Not an indictment after.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
15. The Clinton machine and the media have gone too far this time...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jun 2016

Every time there is an important day of primaries, *every single time*, the night before some huge news story breaks that damages Bernie's chance at winning. Every. Damn. Time. It's not a coincidence, and I'm tired of being played the fool. Hillary will not get my vote in November. She hasn't done anything to deserve it. Have fun losing to Trump.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
41. LOL
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:45 PM
Jun 2016

The primary in Puerto Rico was scheduled long ago. Anyone who looked at the numbers knew she was already within a stone's throw of the nomination and might clinch it before Tuesday. It baffles me that Sanders fans keep invoking a conspiracy rather than accept that she has simply outperformed their preferred candidate.

What do you do at sports games - shush the fans of the opposing team until the score is finalized? Do you call in to complain if TV commentators express confidence that the team which appears to be winning is actually going to win? I guess Cavaliers fans were pretty annoyed to hear the Warrior's 30 point lead characterized as a victory before the final buzzed went off last night. Are you from Cleveland perchance?

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
49. You didn't, but maybe you should have
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jun 2016

You can keep blaming 'the Clinton machine' or get with the fact that she has just been doing better where it counts, with voters. I'm really tired of voters' preferences being dismissed as meaningless if they weren't for Sanders.

Beacool

(30,511 posts)
16. Did he lose all sense of reality?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jun 2016

"Our job from now until the convention is to convince those superdelegates that Bernie is by far the strongest candidate against Donald Trump."

The party would NEVER deny the nomination to the candidate who has the most pledged delegates, particularly as this will be a historical nomination.

 

TimPlo

(443 posts)
24. So no DNC is all about having SD vote acrodign to voters?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:24 PM
Jun 2016

I remember when people where bitching about Howard Dean supporting Clinton after Sanders won VT by 80+%? and I remember many Hillary Fans saying that is way the SD are they can vote anyway they want. I am sure you where not one of them.

Beacool

(30,511 posts)
51. Since the inception of the super delegates they have NEVER nominated the losing candidate.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:54 PM
Jun 2016

It would be undemocratic to go against the will of the people. This year won't be any different.

 

TimPlo

(443 posts)
52. So DWS back in Jan
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:57 PM
Jun 2016

Said the SD vote like they want and even Howard Deans said he voted for how he feels America is best served and not how voters voted where just lying?

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
73. I don't remember anything of the sort.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:30 AM
Jun 2016

The response to Bernie winning huge in Vermont is that Vermont does not decide the nomination. There are 49 other states and 6 territories. And supers are not bound to the voting results of their home state. That doesn't mean they'll ignore the voting results of the nation.

But hey, if think superdelegates should be bound to the candidate who carries their state, fair enough. It wouldn't change the outcome.

Jon Ace

(255 posts)
33. I think it's more about staying in until every vote is counted
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:29 PM
Jun 2016

regardless of how near impossible it will be to change the minds of the superdelegates.

Beacool

(30,511 posts)
50. No, he and his two weasels (Weaver and Devine) have bee pushing this strategy since early spring.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jun 2016

I find it outrageous that they think that the same super delegates that they have been bashing, should ignore the will of the people and nominate the losing candidate. So much for democracy, fair play and being a progressive.

tandem5

(2,078 posts)
18. This is how the networks have always called primaries with super delegates.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:19 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders should concede after tomorrow.

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
20. Wow, 400 whole superdelegates?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jun 2016

If only there were some way to ask them who they supported and find out if they had changed their minds in the past 10 months. But I guess we'll never know until July when they all vote for exactly who they said they were going to vote for!

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
28. Pay attention
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:26 PM
Jun 2016

They ask all 700+ of the repeatedly. They do not just ask once.

I guarantee you the press has been working their asses off calling them the last 3 days. When enough support her plus the pledged delegates to put her over the line they call it. That is the way it works.

I assure you HRC is the most pissed off about this. It has no upside for her.

Corporate666

(587 posts)
36. duuuuuuude
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:41 PM
Jun 2016

give it up already.

A man needs to know when he is beaten. Sanders lost fair and square. His stock has only decreased in value over the past weeks and months. He should have called it after New York. He's just been embarrassing himself since then.

Corporate666

(587 posts)
47. You're clinging to a lost cause...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:49 PM
Jun 2016

Seriously, what does he gain by staying in? We all know politicians bullshit incessantly, so all this crap about "wanting to make sure everyone has a say" is just justification/rhetoric.

He really has zero chance of winning. What is his purpose to stay in other than for self-aggrandizement and not wanting to admit defeat (ego)?

He hasn't been doing his job - the one he's actually getting paid for - for many months now. How long should he shit on the people of Vermont for his own ends?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
89. I'm writing just to tell you to look at post 42 which was stupidly hidden for some reason
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:21 PM
Jun 2016

that is the funniest damn thing I've seen all year.

Response to Segami (Original post)

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
44. Delusional
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:46 PM
Jun 2016

Out of touch with the reality of tonight's events.

A real democrat would get behind the nominee now and take the fight to Trump.

Bernie still wants to fight the democratic nominee.

Hmm......

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
65. Polite, restrained statement in response to an act of pure scumbaggery.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 04:17 AM
Jun 2016

He knows perfectly well that declaring a candidate with only a 286 delegate lead the "winner" the night before a six state primary in which the state he is expected to do best in, California, has 475 delegates, is a deliberate act of sabotage designed to suppress voter turnout.

Boy, the Hill Camp must have been awfully nervous about losing their delegate lead in these six contests. But calling the election the night before the primaries is dirty.



Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
74. What's this "only" a 286 delegate lead? That's massive, basically insurmountable lead.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:33 AM
Jun 2016

If California were winner-take-all you'd have a point, but we're not Republicans. We don't have any winner-take-all primaries.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
91. Huge KICK For Real Democracy... When Will The People Learn???
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:12 PM
Jun 2016

Gullibility and funny business probably CAN'T be proven, but I know if I walk into my house and I smell a pile of dog poop I may not know where it's at, BUT I KNOW what I'm smelling!

We'll never know anything FOR SURE, but I'm smelling that pile of dog poop! I could have used the other word for more affect but decided not to.

We can only "hope" that all the new people he's brought into the Democratic Party, all the millennials and the excitement so many of us Boomers have been feeling won't fade away. My son and daughter have kids, two of them signed on with Bernie and they're really, really P.O'ed and they also feel that something fishy has been going on for a long time. I want them to stay involved and keep working for change, but right now they really feel cheated. Time will tell.

After this election I'll be switching to Independent for the first time in my life depending on who may win down ticket. Voting for Alan Grayson in August and have my fingers crossed that Tim Canova kicks DWS ASS!

How did we get so far from what The Democratic Party always stood for?? I've seen the slow changes as I'm sure so many here have, but the factual information on Hillary has yet to be revealed. Her hawkish stance on Afghanistan was even more hawkish than many in the Bush Administration. I could go on about so much more because I've done so much research over the years but there's not much use in reporting anymore information.

I can't get over the last scene in this year's House of Cards where you see Frank & Clair Underwood sitting together and saying they will use FEAR to win re-election! AMAZING!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders CAMPAIGN S...