Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary we're told took the nomination by flipping Bernies SD's (Original Post) azurnoir Jun 2016 OP
Her's flipped to Obama when he became inevitable. That's how it works. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #1
Bernie wins the nom by flipping hers. Skink Jun 2016 #2
And what will convince them to switch? onenote Jun 2016 #26
The supers sent Bernie a message yesterday Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #70
Do you have a link? I have searched for a link of the actual Super Delegates. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #3
USA today said it she has now secured enough SD's for the nomination azurnoir Jun 2016 #4
I didn't see a mention of her flipping any supers... Adrahil Jun 2016 #13
I'm sure you do at that azurnoir Jun 2016 #15
Can you point out the quote? Adrahil Jun 2016 #18
see post #21 it's simple logic really azurnoir Jun 2016 #28
What? Dude.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #38
ummmmhmmm azurnoir Jun 2016 #40
Yeah, I know. Big words. You can do it! NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #42
ummmhmm insults it's all you seem to have azurnoir Jun 2016 #43
When then, look here... Adrahil Jun 2016 #53
Here is a link. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #71
Strange this should be mentioned about flipping sper delegates but it appears to be working well Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #5
so you're admitting all the outrage over Bernie supposedly doing it was a distraction because azurnoir Jun 2016 #6
To the extent there was "outrage" it was at the idea of flipping supers even though onenote Jun 2016 #29
No, don't rewrite my post, it is strange there should be complaints about flipping delegates Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #59
Delegate math: Clinton wins, and how AP counts delegates Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #7
so again you guys pulled it off well screamed and shouted at the top of your lungs how azurnoir Jun 2016 #8
I sense some hostility. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #11
Good luck with that I mean it sincerely they are well matched though azurnoir Jun 2016 #12
Trump is a bigoted racist, misogynistic, narcissistic megalomaniac Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #16
she is too. just better at hiding it. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #22
That was just mean man. Mean. Skink Jun 2016 #31
truth out. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #34
Snicker Skink Jun 2016 #36
He is a BULL. She is a CRAB. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #45
Hostility? passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #24
Losing and being suppressed are not the same onenote Jun 2016 #33
exactly no names azurnoir Jun 2016 #47
Really, you have an actual information to that regard? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #9
What? Sanders didn't have enough SDs to bother trying to flip. sufrommich Jun 2016 #10
The most supers that have ever been flipped is 30 Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #14
Interesting, thanks. Good for perspective too. Hortensis Jun 2016 #65
Did you just make that up? Control-Z Jun 2016 #17
did SD's commit prior to their respective states votes? that's what would have to happen azurnoir Jun 2016 #21
That makes no sense. moriah Jun 2016 #30
yess it would and notice AP hasn't released their names either -hmmmmm azurnoir Jun 2016 #32
I don't believe that AP release names. But wiki and 538 do. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #62
Interesting thing, in playing with math.... moriah Jun 2016 #64
That is not true Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #37
There was still hundreds of uncommitted supers. You seem to think they're all accounted for nt LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #67
Source, Please Norman Conch Quest Jun 2016 #19
see post #21 azurnoir Jun 2016 #23
Who told you? Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #20
a little Birdie azurnoir Jun 2016 #25
Odd, since yesterday had Bernie with 46 SDs on the AP list... moriah Jun 2016 #27
Then IF true delegates are committing prior to their respective state voting -interesting azurnoir Jun 2016 #35
I was using Google's "primary results" AP thingamajig. moriah Jun 2016 #39
But you said 48 SD's for Bernie as of now azurnoir Jun 2016 #41
Yeah, Google Primary Results. moriah Jun 2016 #44
well we'll just have to take the word of a Hillary surrogate that she didn't do it azurnoir Jun 2016 #46
Me, a Hillary surrogate? Thanks so much for your personal attacks. moriah Jun 2016 #48
sorry I didn't know it was an attack to super Hillary azurnoir Jun 2016 #49
Calling me a Hillary surrogate certainly is an attack. Same as a shill. moriah Jun 2016 #54
so surrogate and shill mean the same things-reminds of an episode of South Park that was on a couple azurnoir Jun 2016 #55
A surrogate speaks for someone else, so does a shill. moriah Jun 2016 #56
And since you need help on definitions: moriah Jun 2016 #58
so you'd do it if they paid you? otherwise what? azurnoir Jun 2016 #60
And if that's enough reason to call someone a campaign surrogate, looked at yourself pot? moriah Jun 2016 #61
Superdelegates can support whomever they want and whenever they want frazzled Jun 2016 #50
No but most usually wait until then azurnoir Jun 2016 #51
No, not really. frazzled Jun 2016 #57
no they don't. they might end up switching as a result of the elections but most endorse early JI7 Jun 2016 #63
That would be ironic RandySF Jun 2016 #52
I know, right? charlyvi Jun 2016 #68
I have argued that Clinton has a better position to take his than the other way around. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #66
So explain to me how Bernie still has the same number of delegates? nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #69
He had less than 50 SD's. She has ELEVEN TIMES that. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #72

Demsrule86

(68,504 posts)
70. The supers sent Bernie a message yesterday
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 09:35 AM
Jun 2016

He will concede. He has little choice. Bernie will have a great speech I am sure and get much of what he wanted on the platform...and so it goes...someone wins and someone loses.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
4. USA today said it she has now secured enough SD's for the nomination
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:05 PM
Jun 2016

On Monday night, the Associated Press said that Clinton had secured the support of enough superdelegates to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination when the party convenes at its July convention in Philadelphia. The announcement came on the eve of the last round of state primaries.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/06/hillary-clinton-democratic-nomination/85485764/

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
13. I didn't see a mention of her flipping any supers...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:15 PM
Jun 2016

I assume some previously uncommited delegates committed.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
38. What? Dude....
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:28 PM
Jun 2016

Lots of supers have remained uncommitted. Liz Warren, for example. Neither Obama nor Biden have publicly announced their vote. Neither has Nancy Pelosi.

So, some of those who haven't yet publicly committed did so when surveyed. There us no reason to believe anyone flipped, though i would expect some to domso now that she is the presumptive nominee. Probably after she clinches the majority of pledged delegates tomorrow.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
53. When then, look here...
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:41 PM
Jun 2016
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D-PU.phtml

This tracks the delegates, including supers. Now, they don't have the latest data the AP has, but notice..... About 140 unpledged supers, including 17 from Ca. Also, notice MANY more unannounced supers than supers who have declared for Bernie. Why bother try to flip his, when it's likely a huge chunk of the undeclareds already intend to support Hillary.

Some of those 140 declared themselves to the AP.

This isn't hard.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
5. Strange this should be mentioned about flipping sper delegates but it appears to be working well
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:05 PM
Jun 2016

For Hillary

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
6. so you're admitting all the outrage over Bernie supposedly doing it was a distraction because
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jun 2016

it was Hillary greasing up the SD's all along?

onenote

(42,609 posts)
29. To the extent there was "outrage" it was at the idea of flipping supers even though
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jun 2016

Clinton had defeated Sanders by every imaginable metric. Sanders delegates flipping or being flipped isn't the same since they're just abandoning the lost cause.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
59. No, don't rewrite my post, it is strange there should be complaints about flipping delegates
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:52 PM
Jun 2016

Since this has been a game plan by the Sanders campaign. Why plan to flip the super delegates and then complain about delegates flipping.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
7. Delegate math: Clinton wins, and how AP counts delegates
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:08 PM
Jun 2016
Delegate math: Clinton wins, and how AP counts delegates
ASHINGTON (AP) — Lifted by a big win in Puerto Rico and a burst of late support from Democratic superdelegates, Hillary Clinton has commitments from the number of delegates needed to become the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for president.


She reached the required 2,383 delegates on Monday, according to an Associated Press count.

Here's a look at the count and how the AP determined Clinton has enough delegates to become the presumptive nominee, besting her primary rival, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.


In the primary elections and caucuses, Clinton has won 1,812 pledged delegates. Sanders has won 1,521. That gives her a lead of 291.

That is far more than the 131-delegate lead that then-Sen. Barack Obama held over Clinton when he clinched the Democratic nomination on June 4, 2008.

Among superdelegates, Clinton has the support of 571. Sanders has the backing of 48. That gives Clinton a lead of 523 superdelegates.

Overall, Clinton has 2,383 delegates, Sanders 1,569.

In the rest, they say what they did, but do not name names.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
8. so again you guys pulled it off well screamed and shouted at the top of your lungs how
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:12 PM
Jun 2016

evil and cheating Bernie was for even considering flipping SD's when all along it was your candidate who was greasing them up

well played but what does that say about your candidate and the sort campaign she ran?

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
16. Trump is a bigoted racist, misogynistic, narcissistic megalomaniac
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:18 PM
Jun 2016

We will win this one. No luck will be necessary. Only hard work.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
24. Hostility?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:21 PM
Jun 2016

Do you think people are often hostile when confronted with immoral tactics that suppress them?

Because that may be what we are...hostile because this is a hostile takeover of the democratic process. Supers are not supposed to be include in that 'magic' number. Not that it hasn't happened before...it has, historically! That doesn't make it right, and when we finally have someone with the gumption to stand up to this corrupt system and say no...I'm not quitting until the race is over, you can't handle it so are cheering on the press for calling it before the primaries are even over, disenfranchising all the voters in the remaining states.

Yes, we might be a little hostile, but someone is a little crooked here and it's not Bernie camp.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
9. Really, you have an actual information to that regard?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:13 PM
Jun 2016

It seems that some of the 100+ uncommitted superdelegates decided to announce for Hillary, not that anybody flipped from Bernie to Hillary.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
14. The most supers that have ever been flipped is 30
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:15 PM
Jun 2016

Obama holds the record of flipping the most superdelegates since the dems introduced the system. He got 30 to switch sides in 2008. Sanders needs to flip about 400.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
65. Interesting, thanks. Good for perspective too.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 09:10 AM
Jun 2016

As for Hillary "flipping" Sanders' few commitments, nonsense. If any changed endorsement, they did it themselves.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
17. Did you just make that up?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jun 2016

She didn't/doesn't need Sander's SDs. Please provide a source for your information.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
21. did SD's commit prior to their respective states votes? that's what would have to happen
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jun 2016

otherwise she flipped Bernies

moriah

(8,311 posts)
30. That makes no sense.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jun 2016

Flipping Bernie delegates would mean flipping superdelegates who already announced being committed to Bernie.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
64. Interesting thing, in playing with math....
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:19 AM
Jun 2016

Okay, so AP is claiming only 99 uncommitted SDs (813 votes left, 714 of them pledged , but the Wiki page last updated had 129 uncommitted. Still, Hillary's SD totals go up by 31 and Bernie's 2, for 33 delegates added to totals?

Unless we have actually 96 uncommitted Superdelegates and 3 delegates are still outstanding from uncertified totals?

Demsrule86

(68,504 posts)
20. Who told you?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jun 2016

She had 40 of her own ready to commit...she did not need his...if Bernie delegates decided to send him a message...oh well.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
35. Then IF true delegates are committing prior to their respective state voting -interesting
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:26 PM
Jun 2016

oh BTW can you link it for us?

moriah

(8,311 posts)
39. I was using Google's "primary results" AP thingamajig.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:29 PM
Jun 2016

Wish I had a screenshot from last night, but I was looking at those numbers specifically to determine how many SDs he'd have to flip if he came within 50 delegates of 2026 pledged. The thing said 46 last night, I swear.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
48. Me, a Hillary surrogate? Thanks so much for your personal attacks.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:37 PM
Jun 2016

When I've sat here and provided you all the information that I remember, even if I didn't have the presence of mind last night to take a screenshot, not knowing it would be needed today.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
54. Calling me a Hillary surrogate certainly is an attack. Same as a shill.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:41 PM
Jun 2016

I don't speak for her.

Now, here's the Wikipedia article on SD announcements prior, still not updated.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016

Showing Bernie with 46 and Hillary with 540 SDs at last page update.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
55. so surrogate and shill mean the same things-reminds of an episode of South Park that was on a couple
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jun 2016

of hours ago - I don't think they do

moriah

(8,311 posts)
56. A surrogate speaks for someone else, so does a shill.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:45 PM
Jun 2016

I am speaking for myself only.

So I am a SUPPORTER.

Okay?

moriah

(8,311 posts)
58. And since you need help on definitions:
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:50 PM
Jun 2016
http://www.wisegeek.com/in-politics-what-is-a-campaign-surrogate.htm

A campaign surrogate is a term used to describe a person who acts on the behalf of a candidate running for some sort of political office. The campaign surrogate often appears at public events that the candidate cannot make it to, or may simply appear to bolster the image of the candidate in a certain demographic.


I could wish I had that much clout.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

A shill, also called a plant or a stooge, is a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization. Shills can carry out their operations in the areas of media, journalism, marketing or other business areas.


Again, speaking not just their own opinions but coordinating them somehow.

Nice I guess that you think I'm some fancy Clinton elite, if you can get me the cash that's supposed to go with it, that'd be great.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
60. so you'd do it if they paid you? otherwise what?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:53 PM
Jun 2016

again sorry I did not mean to offend but you do seem very supportive of Hillary

moriah

(8,311 posts)
61. And if that's enough reason to call someone a campaign surrogate, looked at yourself pot?
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jun 2016

I'm kettle.

We're both passionate about our candidates.

Edit to add: sorry if I seem sensitive, but I've been here eight years, had over 5k posts without a single hide, and I am sick and fucking tired of being accused of being someone else's parrot when I have the bloody audacity to state my goddamn opinion. That's all.)

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
50. Superdelegates can support whomever they want and whenever they want
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jun 2016

Those are the rules. They are under no obligation to vote for the "winner" of their state. And they can commit the day a candidate first announces ... as many did. And they can change their minds at any time before or during the convention. But there's no earthly reason that superdelegates supporting the candidate who has won the most pledged delegates and the most popular votes during the primary season would flip in any numbers for the loser. Especially a loser who has done nothing but badmouth the party relentlessly, continually say that its rules are "rigged," and who publicly announces he will bring a fight to the convention.

Jeebus.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
57. No, not really.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jun 2016

It doesn't matter anyway ... Sanders has lost the pledged delegate race by some 300 delegates (a gap that will probably increase over the course of these last races). He has no claim to anything. Even without a single superdelegate coming into play. And that didn't happen because superdelegates had committed to Hillary. Most voters aren't even aware of superdelegates or whom they are supporting.

Sometimes candidates just lose. Accept it.



 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
66. I have argued that Clinton has a better position to take his than the other way around.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 09:12 AM
Jun 2016

I clearly stated that not only will she get the remaining available SD's, she will take most of his before the convention. Not only is Sanders not going to gain as he argues for SD's, he is going to fall further behind. Clinton has the better case.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
72. He had less than 50 SD's. She has ELEVEN TIMES that.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 09:41 AM
Jun 2016

They weren't 'flipped' - they were uncommitted but pledged HRC after the weekend's results.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary we're told took t...