2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary we're told took the nomination by flipping Bernies SD's
so I guess that makes the bestest thing any candidate could do
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Skink
(10,122 posts)onenote
(42,609 posts)Demsrule86
(68,504 posts)He will concede. He has little choice. Bernie will have a great speech I am sure and get much of what he wanted on the platform...and so it goes...someone wins and someone loses.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)On Monday night, the Associated Press said that Clinton had secured the support of enough superdelegates to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination when the party convenes at its July convention in Philadelphia. The announcement came on the eve of the last round of state primaries.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/06/hillary-clinton-democratic-nomination/85485764/
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I assume some previously uncommited delegates committed.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Or are just assuming it?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Lots of supers have remained uncommitted. Liz Warren, for example. Neither Obama nor Biden have publicly announced their vote. Neither has Nancy Pelosi.
So, some of those who haven't yet publicly committed did so when surveyed. There us no reason to believe anyone flipped, though i would expect some to domso now that she is the presumptive nominee. Probably after she clinches the majority of pledged delegates tomorrow.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)This tracks the delegates, including supers. Now, they don't have the latest data the AP has, but notice..... About 140 unpledged supers, including 17 from Ca. Also, notice MANY more unannounced supers than supers who have declared for Bernie. Why bother try to flip his, when it's likely a huge chunk of the undeclareds already intend to support Hillary.
Some of those 140 declared themselves to the AP.
This isn't hard.
Demsrule86
(68,504 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)For Hillary
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)it was Hillary greasing up the SD's all along?
onenote
(42,609 posts)Clinton had defeated Sanders by every imaginable metric. Sanders delegates flipping or being flipped isn't the same since they're just abandoning the lost cause.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Since this has been a game plan by the Sanders campaign. Why plan to flip the super delegates and then complain about delegates flipping.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)ASHINGTON (AP) Lifted by a big win in Puerto Rico and a burst of late support from Democratic superdelegates, Hillary Clinton has commitments from the number of delegates needed to become the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for president.
She reached the required 2,383 delegates on Monday, according to an Associated Press count.
Here's a look at the count and how the AP determined Clinton has enough delegates to become the presumptive nominee, besting her primary rival, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
In the primary elections and caucuses, Clinton has won 1,812 pledged delegates. Sanders has won 1,521. That gives her a lead of 291.
That is far more than the 131-delegate lead that then-Sen. Barack Obama held over Clinton when he clinched the Democratic nomination on June 4, 2008.
Among superdelegates, Clinton has the support of 571. Sanders has the backing of 48. That gives Clinton a lead of 523 superdelegates.
Overall, Clinton has 2,383 delegates, Sanders 1,569.
In the rest, they say what they did, but do not name names.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)evil and cheating Bernie was for even considering flipping SD's when all along it was your candidate who was greasing them up
well played but what does that say about your candidate and the sort campaign she ran?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Now it's time to kick Trump's ass.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)We will win this one. No luck will be necessary. Only hard work.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Skink
(10,122 posts)fuck the dumb.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Do you think people are often hostile when confronted with immoral tactics that suppress them?
Because that may be what we are...hostile because this is a hostile takeover of the democratic process. Supers are not supposed to be include in that 'magic' number. Not that it hasn't happened before...it has, historically! That doesn't make it right, and when we finally have someone with the gumption to stand up to this corrupt system and say no...I'm not quitting until the race is over, you can't handle it so are cheering on the press for calling it before the primaries are even over, disenfranchising all the voters in the remaining states.
Yes, we might be a little hostile, but someone is a little crooked here and it's not Bernie camp.
onenote
(42,609 posts)even though you probably can't see that at the moment.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)It seems that some of the 100+ uncommitted superdelegates decided to announce for Hillary, not that anybody flipped from Bernie to Hillary.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Obama holds the record of flipping the most superdelegates since the dems introduced the system. He got 30 to switch sides in 2008. Sanders needs to flip about 400.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)As for Hillary "flipping" Sanders' few commitments, nonsense. If any changed endorsement, they did it themselves.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)She didn't/doesn't need Sander's SDs. Please provide a source for your information.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)otherwise she flipped Bernies
moriah
(8,311 posts)Flipping Bernie delegates would mean flipping superdelegates who already announced being committed to Bernie.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,795 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)Okay, so AP is claiming only 99 uncommitted SDs (813 votes left, 714 of them pledged , but the Wiki page last updated had 129 uncommitted. Still, Hillary's SD totals go up by 31 and Bernie's 2, for 33 delegates added to totals?
Unless we have actually 96 uncommitted Superdelegates and 3 delegates are still outstanding from uncertified totals?
Demsrule86
(68,504 posts)There were 40 delegates ready to commit yesterday.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Norman Conch Quest
(64 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Demsrule86
(68,504 posts)She had 40 of her own ready to commit...she did not need his...if Bernie delegates decided to send him a message...oh well.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)see post #21
moriah
(8,311 posts)... and today there are 48.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)oh BTW can you link it for us?
moriah
(8,311 posts)Wish I had a screenshot from last night, but I was looking at those numbers specifically to determine how many SDs he'd have to flip if he came within 50 delegates of 2026 pledged. The thing said 46 last night, I swear.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)27. Odd, since yesterday had Bernie with 46 SDs on the AP list...
... and today there are 48.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2144009
moriah
(8,311 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)When I've sat here and provided you all the information that I remember, even if I didn't have the presence of mind last night to take a screenshot, not knowing it would be needed today.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)I don't speak for her.
Now, here's the Wikipedia article on SD announcements prior, still not updated.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016
Showing Bernie with 46 and Hillary with 540 SDs at last page update.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)of hours ago - I don't think they do
moriah
(8,311 posts)I am speaking for myself only.
So I am a SUPPORTER.
Okay?
moriah
(8,311 posts)I could wish I had that much clout.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill
Again, speaking not just their own opinions but coordinating them somehow.
Nice I guess that you think I'm some fancy Clinton elite, if you can get me the cash that's supposed to go with it, that'd be great.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)again sorry I did not mean to offend but you do seem very supportive of Hillary
moriah
(8,311 posts)I'm kettle.
We're both passionate about our candidates.
Edit to add: sorry if I seem sensitive, but I've been here eight years, had over 5k posts without a single hide, and I am sick and fucking tired of being accused of being someone else's parrot when I have the bloody audacity to state my goddamn opinion. That's all.)
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Those are the rules. They are under no obligation to vote for the "winner" of their state. And they can commit the day a candidate first announces ... as many did. And they can change their minds at any time before or during the convention. But there's no earthly reason that superdelegates supporting the candidate who has won the most pledged delegates and the most popular votes during the primary season would flip in any numbers for the loser. Especially a loser who has done nothing but badmouth the party relentlessly, continually say that its rules are "rigged," and who publicly announces he will bring a fight to the convention.
Jeebus.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)It doesn't matter anyway ... Sanders has lost the pledged delegate race by some 300 delegates (a gap that will probably increase over the course of these last races). He has no claim to anything. Even without a single superdelegate coming into play. And that didn't happen because superdelegates had committed to Hillary. Most voters aren't even aware of superdelegates or whom they are supporting.
Sometimes candidates just lose. Accept it.
JI7
(89,241 posts)RandySF
(58,513 posts)charlyvi
(6,537 posts)Like his whole strategy wasn't trying to flip hers.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I clearly stated that not only will she get the remaining available SD's, she will take most of his before the convention. Not only is Sanders not going to gain as he argues for SD's, he is going to fall further behind. Clinton has the better case.
Demsrule86
(68,504 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)They weren't 'flipped' - they were uncommitted but pledged HRC after the weekend's results.