Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:49 AM Jun 2016

Hillary: John Edwards' decision to pay $400 for a haircut smacks of liberal elitism

"John Edwards' decision to pay $400 for a haircut smacks of liberal elitism.", Clinton told the jubilant crowd, "If John Edwards thinks that the average Pennsylvanian is going to spend $400 in a trendy hair salon, it is pretty clear that he is out of touch with Pennsylvanian voters".
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/14/495908/-

Anybody know what Hillary pays for a haircut?

The $12000 jacket story today reminded me of this.

She fights real dirty.
60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary: John Edwards' decision to pay $400 for a haircut smacks of liberal elitism (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 OP
so what are we to believe someone plops a bowl over her head? azurnoir Jun 2016 #1
I Have Been Wondering About Her HairDo's? Probably In Line With The Armani Jacket! She Is After All CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #37
Hillary won big in Pennsylvania. Thanks for the reminder. grossproffit Jun 2016 #2
Yes she does fight dirty... leftinportland Jun 2016 #3
How about a $600 haircut? udbcrzy2 Jun 2016 #4
So glad you brought this up! NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #5
This isn't about votes. Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #6
Both of which, of course ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #7
I'm interested in discussing Hillary's dirty campaign tactics Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #8
Oh, I'm sure you are. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #10
Whoa. It turns out Hillary ran a TV ad attacking John Edwards for his pretty boy $400 haircut Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #11
A "total hypocrite" ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #12
The system is unfair but it's what we have so the only way to win would be to play by the rules. Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #14
It has nothing to do with rules. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #15
Hillary voted for the Iraq War and a million people died. Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #16
What does that have to do ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #17
That explains a lot of the emotion of the election I think Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #20
Actually ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #22
bernie votes every year for more death and murder and his MIC best friends nt msongs Jun 2016 #19
This is a good example of a totally intellectually dishonest argument Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #21
"Progressives" voted for Ralph Nader and gave us a Bush presidency. annavictorious Jun 2016 #26
+1 n/t. okieinpain Jun 2016 #58
The standard for posting at DU is now something that would change a vote that has already been cast? merrily Jun 2016 #30
Hillary's $600 for a haircut seems WASTEFUL to me... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #35
+1 n/t. okieinpain Jun 2016 #57
Bullshit. Women pay waaay more for the same clothes and services as men. THAT's playing dirty. ancianita Jun 2016 #9
"Sexist hygiene system" Aerows Jun 2016 #23
Except no one is faulting her simply for spending more than Edwards merrily Jun 2016 #31
Actually, she was spot on in her class critique. Edwards WAS elitist by being spendthrift while ancianita Jun 2016 #52
You've now twice posted to me in a way that seems to assume I am male. merrily Jun 2016 #53
I didn't see your name. I only focused on the hypocrisy argument by saying it's not hypocrisy to ancianita Jun 2016 #56
that was during the 2008 Primary when they were both running JI7 Jun 2016 #13
That does not make it okay to say something you don't believe. merrily Jun 2016 #32
Did she believe that candidates should be ready to debate any time, anywhere? thesquanderer Jun 2016 #36
Another of Hillary's lies. n/t Herman4747 Jun 2016 #46
it's the same as when Sanders said she was unqualified to be president JI7 Jun 2016 #39
bernie blows $600,000 on a family vacation to rome. He flies real luxuriously snt msongs Jun 2016 #18
It still makes me laugh Aerows Jun 2016 #24
Why? Because of the pathetic fit people are throwing over her clothes. Nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #29
LOL! FAIL. We're all seen him fly coach before he had to have Secret Service protection. merrily Jun 2016 #33
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #25
It was discovered this week from FEC filings that Sanders spent $625,000 annavictorious Jun 2016 #27
Please see reply 33 and the trip was for a lecture, which he gave. merrily Jun 2016 #34
it wasn't a "lecture". It was his campaign speech which had nothing to do with the specific subject KittyWampus Jun 2016 #44
Obama 08 spent in excess of a million dollars to address a crowd of non voters in Berlin Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #49
The ambush "meeting" makes sense now. ecstatic Jun 2016 #54
Overall, in the spotlights, guys can go around looking like Sanders. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #28
With all these OPs about Hillary's clothes, there must be a memo for the operatives out this am. Sancho Jun 2016 #38
Oh dear! I laughed and laughed ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #42
Oops. n/t Orsino Jun 2016 #40
Who cares? :-D (#FeelTheJoy) NurseJackie Jun 2016 #41
How much was that bogus Pope Trip, illegally paid for by campaign donations? KittyWampus Jun 2016 #43
What law did the trip to Rome break? Do tell. n/t Herman4747 Jun 2016 #47
Feeling bad for John Edwards? LexVegas Jun 2016 #45
Good point. It is about to suck to be Trump NT arely staircase Jun 2016 #48
I think it's important you focus on what women wear. It seems your best fit. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #50
lol and sanders taking his family on a quick $500,000 vacation to rome beachbum bob Jun 2016 #51
9 days Tarc Jun 2016 #55
June 16th baseless attacks end. nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #59
Get 'em in while you still can...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #60

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
37. I Have Been Wondering About Her HairDo's? Probably In Line With The Armani Jacket! She Is After All
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:23 AM
Jun 2016

A member of the TOP 1/10th of 1%'ers! She'd probably fib anyway... THAT IS her character...



e.g., MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...

Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...

Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"

Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"

Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!

 

udbcrzy2

(891 posts)
4. How about a $600 haircut?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:02 AM
Jun 2016
Clinton regularly sees salon owner John Barrett, who charges regular mortals $600 for a cut and blow-dry. Hair color can cost an extra $600.


http://pagesix.com/2015/07/28/hillary-clintons-600-haircut-puts-bergdorf-on-lockdown/

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
5. So glad you brought this up!
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:05 AM
Jun 2016

It's REALLY important.

I'm sure the millions of people who have voted for HRC thus far would have changed their votes based on this incredibly important information.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
10. Oh, I'm sure you are.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:23 AM
Jun 2016
"The $12000 jacket story today reminded me of this. She fights real dirty."

What could be "dirtier" than wearing a $12,000 jacket? The mind boggles.
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
11. Whoa. It turns out Hillary ran a TV ad attacking John Edwards for his pretty boy $400 haircut
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:26 AM
Jun 2016

That's nice. I would have done the same thing. But in Hillary's case it does make her a total hypocrite.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
12. A "total hypocrite" ...
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:29 AM
Jun 2016

... would be a candidate who calls super-delegates undemocratic and unfair - and then attempts to get them to ignore the voters and hand him the nomination that he couldn't win on his own merits.

THAT'S hypocrisy - and it's a million miles beyond haircuts and jackets.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
14. The system is unfair but it's what we have so the only way to win would be to play by the rules.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:32 AM
Jun 2016

Or cheat.

What you're saying makes no sense.

There's no with saying the rules suck but we are going to play by the rules anyway and try to win within the rules.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
15. It has nothing to do with rules.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:37 AM
Jun 2016

It has to do with saying the people should decide the nominee - and then saying the people should be ignored if the nominee isn't Bernie.

And that is EXACTLY what Bernie is saying.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
22. Actually ...
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:52 AM
Jun 2016

... what your replies have explained is that you have NO explanation for why Bernie "Champion of the People" Sanders thinks that "the people" should be ignored, and the nomination should be handed to him.

Smacks of a want for a "coronation", doesn't it?

 

annavictorious

(934 posts)
26. "Progressives" voted for Ralph Nader and gave us a Bush presidency.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:05 AM
Jun 2016

They own the Iraq War and the Citizens United court.

"How bad can Bush be?"
"Gore is the lesser of two evils."
"There's no real difference between the parties."

Sorry, but responsibility for the Iraq War goes to the Naderite spoilers who had really, really lousy judgement.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
30. The standard for posting at DU is now something that would change a vote that has already been cast?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:18 AM
Jun 2016

Good to know!

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
35. Hillary's $600 for a haircut seems WASTEFUL to me...
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:41 AM
Jun 2016

While you might not mind, I don't want a candidate who will be wasteful with money.
I also don't want a candidate who attacks another for a $400 haircut, while she herself gets a $600 haircut. I believe hypocrisy is not a desirable trait in a presidential candidate.

ancianita

(36,017 posts)
9. Bullshit. Women pay waaay more for the same clothes and services as men. THAT's playing dirty.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:21 AM
Jun 2016

I have short hair. Men have short hair. No matter where I go, my haircut is double the price of men's. In barbershops I might get a price break, but I get a shit job or charged more for some "look" request because of a public double standard for my hair "look". I've had to talk both salon and barber people out of unequal treatment. Now I've found a woman does a masterful job on my multi-layered "look" for $7. I'm her friend.

Most women know, because we become inured to unequal treatment and pricing the moment we walk out the door with our 77 cents per dollar budgets -- for dry cleaning, contraception, medical treatments, haircuts -- that while John Edwards' spending was not typical for men of his class and gender, Hillary's spending is typical of salon pricing because of her class and sex.

It's common for women to pay $50 to $100 for the typical shampoo and cut. I'd have to spend at least $200 for that in any Gold Coast salon in Chicago. Suddenly a woman runs for president can't get a shampoo, cut, tint and perm for $400? Or $600? Puh-lease. Anyone who criticizes that knows nothing of the real world of women.

You'll be laughed at to blame Hillary for a sexist hygiene system she had no part in making.

So nope. Try something else about her appearance. Women everywhere are waiting to hear it.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
31. Except no one is faulting her simply for spending more than Edwards
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:22 AM
Jun 2016

She is the one who called Edwards elitist for spending a lot on a haircut, even though she spends a lot on haircuts, too.

The issue is hypocrisy.

If you don't want someone to discuss the cost of your haircuts, maybe don't call other people elitist for the cost of their haircuts.

ancianita

(36,017 posts)
52. Actually, she was spot on in her class critique. Edwards WAS elitist by being spendthrift while
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jun 2016

catering to the working class vote.

Working class women have no such issue with Hillary's spending because we're ALL forced to overspend.

I think you're missing the women's point here.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
53. You've now twice posted to me in a way that seems to assume I am male.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jun 2016

FYI, I don't miss a heck of a lot.

ancianita

(36,017 posts)
56. I didn't see your name. I only focused on the hypocrisy argument by saying it's not hypocrisy to
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jun 2016

actually adapt or cope with a double standard and then point out another's hypocrisy.

I do often assume the maleness of the internet, not always meaning to, just feeling the patriarchal temperament of the e-spaces.

Do you want me to pay more attention to gender here? Because I've made enough wrong assumptions in the past that I figure gender would be secondary to my messages. I'm so unused to communicating within frames of gender issues, that when I do I probably err on the side of arguing against no-win, double bind, double standard thinking.

Now that the Berners are facing a space where they can unify with the HRC people, I'm trying to be defend Hill's personal attacks early so we can get all that out of the way, even though, through the general it will never really go away.

I do know you. But not well enough to assume anything, really. FWIW, I always like your posts and don't 'see' a female who posts them.

Hope you don't take offense, I 99.9% of the time don't intend it.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
32. That does not make it okay to say something you don't believe.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:23 AM
Jun 2016

Did she believe spending a lot on a haircut was elitist or not?

thesquanderer

(11,982 posts)
36. Did she believe that candidates should be ready to debate any time, anywhere?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:23 AM
Jun 2016

What she believes at any time seems to be situational...

JI7

(89,244 posts)
39. it's the same as when Sanders said she was unqualified to be president
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 09:39 AM
Jun 2016

He thought it was because she said it.

In her case she was responding to attacks on her by Edwards in 2008.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
24. It still makes me laugh
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:08 AM
Jun 2016

at how off the rails some folks went because Bernie Sanders was invited to attend that symposium in Rome.

Griped because he flew on a plane. How dare he, maybe he should have built his own boat out of twigs and rowed there. He actually got food on that plane, perhaps he should have killed rats for himself for supper. He met privately with the Pope, and it was super secret because they don't allow cameras in the place where the Pope lives so obviously it didn't happen.

Are you *still* hanging on to that chapped-assedness? Why? Seriously, WHY?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
33. LOL! FAIL. We're all seen him fly coach before he had to have Secret Service protection.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:25 AM
Jun 2016

That's an excuse for Hillary, but not for Bernie?

 

annavictorious

(934 posts)
27. It was discovered this week from FEC filings that Sanders spent $625,000
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:09 AM
Jun 2016

chartering a Delta 767 jet to fly family and friends for a 36 hour visit to Rome that culminated in a pretend meeting with the Pope.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
34. Please see reply 33 and the trip was for a lecture, which he gave.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:28 AM
Jun 2016

Conversing with the Pope for a few minutes was not the purpose of the trip, but you knew that.

It's a hoot how much a trip to speak on behalf of worldwide economic justice seems to have ticked off so many of DUs Hillary supporters.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
44. it wasn't a "lecture". It was his campaign speech which had nothing to do with the specific subject
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:07 AM
Jun 2016

actually being discussed and he had his cronies at the Vatican pull strings to get him wedged into the already full schedule.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
49. Obama 08 spent in excess of a million dollars to address a crowd of non voters in Berlin
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:18 AM
Jun 2016

It was great but very costly optics and he was speaking to people who can't vote in the US. I think they call it 'election politics'. JFK had that big Berlin speech so they produced on of their own to show the folks back home who is like JFK.

Did you think all of that just happened, paid for by Germans? Not the case.

ecstatic

(32,681 posts)
54. The ambush "meeting" makes sense now.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jun 2016

With over half a million dollars spent... Bernie wasn't going to leave without at least one word being exchanged.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
38. With all these OPs about Hillary's clothes, there must be a memo for the operatives out this am.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:42 AM
Jun 2016

Not as coordinated as usual today though...too many overlapping repeats. At any rate, Bernie needs some fashion help, so maybe that's why he's losing!

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
43. How much was that bogus Pope Trip, illegally paid for by campaign donations?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:03 AM
Jun 2016

And when the time comes that a MAN gets torn apart over what he wears, how he wears his hair, how he talks, how he laughs, how he WINS a party nomination your OP is crap.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
50. I think it's important you focus on what women wear. It seems your best fit.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 11:09 AM
Jun 2016

I think it's important you focus on what women wear. It seems your best fit, regardless of how creepy it may seem.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary: John Edwards' de...