2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary: John Edwards' decision to pay $400 for a haircut smacks of liberal elitism
Anybody know what Hillary pays for a haircut?
The $12000 jacket story today reminded me of this.
She fights real dirty.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)or does she go to cost cutters?
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)A member of the TOP 1/10th of 1%'ers! She'd probably fib anyway... THAT IS her character...
e.g., MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...
Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...
Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"
Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"
Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)leftinportland
(247 posts)udbcrzy2
(891 posts)Clinton regularly sees salon owner John Barrett, who charges regular mortals $600 for a cut and blow-dry. Hair color can cost an extra $600.
http://pagesix.com/2015/07/28/hillary-clintons-600-haircut-puts-bergdorf-on-lockdown/
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)It's REALLY important.
I'm sure the millions of people who have voted for HRC thus far would have changed their votes based on this incredibly important information.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)It's about haircuts and Armani jackets.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... have nothing to do with anything the voters are interested in.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)What could be "dirtier" than wearing a $12,000 jacket? The mind boggles.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)That's nice. I would have done the same thing. But in Hillary's case it does make her a total hypocrite.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... would be a candidate who calls super-delegates undemocratic and unfair - and then attempts to get them to ignore the voters and hand him the nomination that he couldn't win on his own merits.
THAT'S hypocrisy - and it's a million miles beyond haircuts and jackets.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Or cheat.
What you're saying makes no sense.
There's no with saying the rules suck but we are going to play by the rules anyway and try to win within the rules.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)It has to do with saying the people should decide the nominee - and then saying the people should be ignored if the nominee isn't Bernie.
And that is EXACTLY what Bernie is saying.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... with Bernie's hypocrisy about the SDs?
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... what your replies have explained is that you have NO explanation for why Bernie "Champion of the People" Sanders thinks that "the people" should be ignored, and the nomination should be handed to him.
Smacks of a want for a "coronation", doesn't it?
msongs
(67,394 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)annavictorious
(934 posts)They own the Iraq War and the Citizens United court.
"How bad can Bush be?"
"Gore is the lesser of two evils."
"There's no real difference between the parties."
Sorry, but responsibility for the Iraq War goes to the Naderite spoilers who had really, really lousy judgement.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Good to know!
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)While you might not mind, I don't want a candidate who will be wasteful with money.
I also don't want a candidate who attacks another for a $400 haircut, while she herself gets a $600 haircut. I believe hypocrisy is not a desirable trait in a presidential candidate.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)ancianita
(36,017 posts)I have short hair. Men have short hair. No matter where I go, my haircut is double the price of men's. In barbershops I might get a price break, but I get a shit job or charged more for some "look" request because of a public double standard for my hair "look". I've had to talk both salon and barber people out of unequal treatment. Now I've found a woman does a masterful job on my multi-layered "look" for $7. I'm her friend.
Most women know, because we become inured to unequal treatment and pricing the moment we walk out the door with our 77 cents per dollar budgets -- for dry cleaning, contraception, medical treatments, haircuts -- that while John Edwards' spending was not typical for men of his class and gender, Hillary's spending is typical of salon pricing because of her class and sex.
It's common for women to pay $50 to $100 for the typical shampoo and cut. I'd have to spend at least $200 for that in any Gold Coast salon in Chicago. Suddenly a woman runs for president can't get a shampoo, cut, tint and perm for $400? Or $600? Puh-lease. Anyone who criticizes that knows nothing of the real world of women.
You'll be laughed at to blame Hillary for a sexist hygiene system she had no part in making.
So nope. Try something else about her appearance. Women everywhere are waiting to hear it.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I just had to reiterate that.
merrily
(45,251 posts)She is the one who called Edwards elitist for spending a lot on a haircut, even though she spends a lot on haircuts, too.
The issue is hypocrisy.
If you don't want someone to discuss the cost of your haircuts, maybe don't call other people elitist for the cost of their haircuts.
ancianita
(36,017 posts)catering to the working class vote.
Working class women have no such issue with Hillary's spending because we're ALL forced to overspend.
I think you're missing the women's point here.
merrily
(45,251 posts)FYI, I don't miss a heck of a lot.
ancianita
(36,017 posts)actually adapt or cope with a double standard and then point out another's hypocrisy.
I do often assume the maleness of the internet, not always meaning to, just feeling the patriarchal temperament of the e-spaces.
Do you want me to pay more attention to gender here? Because I've made enough wrong assumptions in the past that I figure gender would be secondary to my messages. I'm so unused to communicating within frames of gender issues, that when I do I probably err on the side of arguing against no-win, double bind, double standard thinking.
Now that the Berners are facing a space where they can unify with the HRC people, I'm trying to be defend Hill's personal attacks early so we can get all that out of the way, even though, through the general it will never really go away.
I do know you. But not well enough to assume anything, really. FWIW, I always like your posts and don't 'see' a female who posts them.
Hope you don't take offense, I 99.9% of the time don't intend it.
JI7
(89,244 posts)and attacking each other.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Did she believe spending a lot on a haircut was elitist or not?
thesquanderer
(11,982 posts)What she believes at any time seems to be situational...
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)He thought it was because she said it.
In her case she was responding to attacks on her by Edwards in 2008.
msongs
(67,394 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)at how off the rails some folks went because Bernie Sanders was invited to attend that symposium in Rome.
Griped because he flew on a plane. How dare he, maybe he should have built his own boat out of twigs and rowed there. He actually got food on that plane, perhaps he should have killed rats for himself for supper. He met privately with the Pope, and it was super secret because they don't allow cameras in the place where the Pope lives so obviously it didn't happen.
Are you *still* hanging on to that chapped-assedness? Why? Seriously, WHY?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)That's an excuse for Hillary, but not for Bernie?
AzDar
(14,023 posts)annavictorious
(934 posts)chartering a Delta 767 jet to fly family and friends for a 36 hour visit to Rome that culminated in a pretend meeting with the Pope.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Conversing with the Pope for a few minutes was not the purpose of the trip, but you knew that.
It's a hoot how much a trip to speak on behalf of worldwide economic justice seems to have ticked off so many of DUs Hillary supporters.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)actually being discussed and he had his cronies at the Vatican pull strings to get him wedged into the already full schedule.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)It was great but very costly optics and he was speaking to people who can't vote in the US. I think they call it 'election politics'. JFK had that big Berlin speech so they produced on of their own to show the folks back home who is like JFK.
Did you think all of that just happened, paid for by Germans? Not the case.
ecstatic
(32,681 posts)With over half a million dollars spent... Bernie wasn't going to leave without at least one word being exchanged.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Women cannot.
That is the issue.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Not as coordinated as usual today though...too many overlapping repeats. At any rate, Bernie needs some fashion help, so maybe that's why he's losing!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)And when the time comes that a MAN gets torn apart over what he wears, how he wears his hair, how he talks, how he laughs, how he WINS a party nomination your OP is crap.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)LexVegas
(6,052 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think it's important you focus on what women wear. It seems your best fit, regardless of how creepy it may seem.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid