Am I the only person wishing for a Clinton/Sanders ticket?

[Fresh_Start]

I actually think they'd be better together then either alone.
She's more nerdy: he's more inspiring.
He's more gutsy: she's more cautious.
She's got the details: he's got the vision.

[VulgarPoet]

1. Yes. Yes you are. eom

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

2. Yes... not me.

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

[Ned_Devine]

14. Bernie and Tulsi!

[MyNameGoesHere]

3. Yes. Eom

[rateyes]

4. You might be.

[PoliticAverse]

5. Probably not, but it's not happening. n/t

[MoonRiver]

6. HORRIBLE idea

[seabeyond]

7. He is not respectful of her or the position she will hold. His would be the role of supportive

and I do not see Sanders capable. He would cause chaos, as seems to be what he does best. If I were a boss not a chance in hell I would hire someone whose every turn is to cut me short.

[bigwillq]

8. Yes

Lol

[Maedhros]

9. She's a neoliberal war hawk, he's an anti-war progressive.

Ain't gonna' happen.

[Donald Ian Rankin]

10. No, but I think you're in a minority.

I also think that it's unlikely to happen, and that Sanders probably isn't the best choice of running mate for Clinton.

[NurseJackie]

11. I'd prefer a VP who'll still be young enough to run for president in 8 years from now.

[Jackilope]

12. No thank you.

HRC is symbolic for Third Way Corporatism. That has to get confronted and taken out.

We need to elect more Sanders and Warrens in House and Senate and correct dark campaign financing.

Putting him beside her would be like immersing soap in a mud vat.

[Ned_Devine]

13. Yes

I'd rather mix roast beef with lime sherbet and relish.

[BKH70041]

15. No

He considers her to be a corporate scumbag. Wouldn't work.

[SheilaT]

16. His positions on a lot of things are very different from hers

and he's been making that quite clear for a year now. He'd have to severely compromise himself to run with her. I hope he's more ethical than that.

And, this is not the way party politics work. Otherwise, she'd have been VP these past eight years.

[Hiraeth]

17. Yes. You. Are.

[SFnomad]

18. Yes you are ... as a VP candidate, I would expect him to go rogue and cause as many problems as

he would solve. It's not worth the trouble or the headache.

And I'm not saying he'd be an idiot like Princess Dumbass of the Northwoods. I would expect him to continue to push things that wouldn't sound right with him saying yes to a VP slot from Secretary Clinton.

[reflection]

19. I'd prefer that all sitting Democratic senators stay put.

We need as many as possible in there, especially ones who have been there awhile and know the ropes.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

20. I could vote for that ticket...if the Clinton part is removed.

[loyalsister]

21. She would be his boss

That would only serve to muzzle him and demand absolute loyalty.

[Sheepshank]

22. I think maybe you might be.

fwiw, I also don't want a Hillary/Elizabeth ticket.

[COLGATE4]

23. Yes

[PowerToThePeople]

24. I think so.

[rhett o rick]

25. She already promised the VP slot to Goldman-Sachs. If she wins the General then

a corporation would only be a heart beat away from the presidency. Remember they are human.

[Buzz cook]

26. You're one os the few nt

nt

[Skwmom]

27. They are POLAR opposites on the issues and on character.

[anotherproletariat]

28. Yes. Absolutley no one else wants this. Including both candidates. nt

[peace13]

29. Aaa...yes you are.

[Squinch]

30. Yup

[First Speaker]

31. Well, let's see...FDR/Garner, FDR/Wallace, JFK/LBJ...

...Dukakis/Bentsen, Gore/Lieberman...or for that matter--Dewey/Warren, Ike/Nixon, Goldwater/Miller, Reagan/Bush, Bush/Quayle, McCain/Grifterella...or even Lincoln/Andrew Johnson, or Jefferson/Burr. Are any of these unlikelier than Hillary/Bernie? Unifying warring elements of the party is as old as American history. The horrified, self-righteous reactions of some on this thread makes me happier than ever that GDP will be gone with the wind in just a few more days...I voted for Sanders, by the way, if that matters, which it doesn't...

[MohRokTah]

32. Far as I can tell, yes, you are. eom

[ChiciB1]

33. I CAN'T GO THERE!! NO To Hillary Now, NO to Hillary FOR POTUS PERIOD!!! n/t

[Stuckinthebush]

34. *shudder*

Yes. You may be.