2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPuerto Rico: "Local officials expected more than 700,000, only 60,671 made it to the ballot box."
"While local officials expected more than 700,000, only 60,671 made it to the ballot box."
"Though voter turnout in Puerto Rico is usually much higher than in the 50 U.S. states, Sunday's Democratic race had a dismal showing of just 3.45% of eligible voters."
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)Hillary supporters.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)A "Sanders for President" reddit page also called the reduction "about as bad as Arizona." Dozens of Sanders supporters voiced their displeasure on the page over the cuts.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/281639-sanders-supporters-up-in-arms-over-puerto-rico-polling
w4rma
(31,700 posts)SAN DIEGO U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders campaign issued the following statement Sunday on long lines at polling places in Puerto Ricos Democratic Party presidential primary election:
Some Puerto Rico Democratic officials are claiming that the Sanders campaign requested fewer polling places in todays primary contest. Thats completely false. The opposite is true. In emails with the party, Sanders staff asked the party to maintain the 1,500 plus presidential primary locations promised by the Puerto Rico Democratic party in testimony before the DNC in April, when the party was asking to have its caucus changed to a primary. They cannot blame their shoddy running of the primary on our campaign. This is just one example of irregularities going on in Puerto Rico voting today. We are the campaign that has been fighting to increase voter participation.
https://berniesanders.com/press-release/sanders-campaign-statement-puerto-rico-polling-places/
Skink
(10,122 posts)msongs
(67,395 posts)pandr32
(11,579 posts)Sanders had hoped to pull an upset in California and use it to bolster his argument at the convention that he had momentum at the end.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I'd say they shouldn't have expected that at all. Hundreds leave--for good--daily. It's really quite sad.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)overwhelming issues included the fact that the government didn't have any money to put this primary on. They're going to default in July -- they owe billions.
It's really a case of dire straits.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)think
(11,641 posts)What a crock of crap....
reformist2
(9,841 posts)WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)they actually don't want our votes or our help.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)There's no public transportation. I read someplace that in order to vote in both their local election and the primary, many had to go to two different polling places.
Given all the last minute changes, I'm surprised that even that many made it.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)In a country with an economy in the tank, thus the need to close polling places.
M'kay.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)This is from last October--and the numbers are NOT improving:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/14/puerto-ricans-leave-in-record-numbers-for-mainland-u-s/
Last year, 84,000 people left Puerto Rico for the U.S. mainland, a 38% increase from 2010, according to the analysis of American Community Survey data. At the same time, the number of people moving to Puerto Rico from the U.S. mainland declined, resulting in Puerto Rico having a net population loss to the mainland of 64,000 in 2014, more than double the net loss of 26,000 in 2010.
The islands declining population is not a new trend. Indeed, Puerto Rico has been experiencing a net population loss since at least 2005, a year before its recession began. However, the trend has been accelerating since 2010 as the U.S. mainlands economy has rebounded from the Great Recession even as the islands economy has remained mired in a recession. More recently, the Puerto Rican government has seen its tax revenues decline and, barred by U.S. law from filing for bankruptcy, it may run out of cash in November. The continued loss of people, particularly school-aged children and those in their prime working age, has only worsened the islands economic situation and outlook.
It's not getting any better.
MADem
(135,425 posts)There are fewer buses, obviously, but the buses do run.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I am waiting for the family members I have living there to think about making a move. PR really needs help.
Article @ post 24....
w4rma
(31,700 posts)No, that is not responsible for an 85% reduction in voter turnout. Maybe you should watch the videos that do explain the 85% reduction in voter turnout, before making assumptions.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The country is also BROKE, and the government has no money to "get the word out," never mind pay for election officials. That is why they had to make do with not only volunteer poll watchers/vote count observers, but volunteer poll workers as well.
Here--READ this:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/24/historic-population-losses-continue-across-puerto-rico/
Economic opportunity is one of the primary drivers for moving to the U.S. mainland, according to Census Bureau data. Among island-born Puerto Ricans who moved to the mainland, 40% said they left mainly for job-related reasons, while 39% cited family-related reasons.
The islands sustained outmigration and low fertility rates have helped push its population below 1990 levels, when 3.52 million people lived on the island. For now, the island remains above its 1980 population of 3.2 million. However, the Census Bureau projects the population of Puerto Rico will fall to 2.98 million by 2050.
If the situation continues, they'll hit that target well before then. Doctors and dentists are leaving, teachers are leaving...the country is in dire straits.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)That is stable. And it certainly isn't an 85% decline (or even a decline).
MADem
(135,425 posts)They went through a period of growth, and that growth has been reversing itself at a RAPID clip.
NET DECLINE is not--by ANY measure--"stable."
Not sure what your point is? More people are leaving than are arriving, and the birth rate is in decline and is NOT -- repeat, NOT -- making up for the departure of people, hundreds every day.
Is that clear enough for you? It's simple math.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Go down there and have a look around. It is not "slight" at all--these are historic losses. It's a bloody diaspora.
Or just look at this graphic:
w4rma
(31,700 posts)pat_k
(9,313 posts)Previously their delegate selection was by closed caucus. They amended the plan on March 8, 2016. It looks like they did a horrendous job of getting the word out to Democratic voters.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/303981230/Puerto-Rico-s-Amended-Delegate-Selection-Plan
valerief
(53,235 posts)to control elections.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Sooner or later, but it will happen. People can only tolerate so much.