Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:23 PM Jun 2016

Clinton Tech Aide Asks Court To Keep Immunity Deal Secret

By JOSH GERSTEIN 06/07/16 03:45 PM EDT

A former technology adviser to Hillary Clinton appears to be seeking to keep under wraps an immunity deal the aide reportedly reached with the Justice Department in its investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state.

A lawyer for Bryan Pagliano submitted a sealed motion and exhibits to U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan Tuesday afternoon, less than two hours before the 5 p.m. deadline Sullivan set for the filing of Pagliano's immunity agreement.

The docket entry reflecting the filing does not say specifically what documents were lodged with the court, describing them solely as a "sealed motion for leave to file document under seal" and two exhibits.

--CLIP
Pagliano was scheduled to be deposed on Monday in a Freedom of Information Act suit a conservative group, Judicial Watch, is pursuing over Clinton's email set-up.

However, Sullivan postponed the deposition after Pagliano's lawyers indicated the former tech aide planned to assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. In the judge's order delaying the testimony, he ordered Pagliano to file a legal explanation justifying his planned assertion as well as a copy of an immunity agreement under which the former Clinton aide reportedly gave testimony to the FBI about his role in the private server arrangement.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/06/bryan-pagliano-hillary-clinton-emails-immunity-224015#ixzz4Aw1soW91
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Tech Aide Asks Court To Keep Immunity Deal Secret (Original Post) Purveyor Jun 2016 OP
And again I ask, WTF is he afraid of? tularetom Jun 2016 #1
All he (they) have to do is hang away..delay...until she gets in laserhaas Jun 2016 #2
Likely the FBI doesn't want him testifying Lurks Often Jun 2016 #3
Or, maybe it isn't the FBI he's afraid of tularetom Jun 2016 #5
He'd be better off testifying if that was the case Lurks Often Jun 2016 #6
Apparently it's limited immunity. Barack_America Jun 2016 #4

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. And again I ask, WTF is he afraid of?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:28 PM
Jun 2016

It can't be the gummint, they've already immunized him. But he's obviously terrified of testifying in this FOIA case.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
2. All he (they) have to do is hang away..delay...until she gets in
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jun 2016

In January 2017

Given the state of things ( pun is okay)

Its smart strategy

Not kosher or pure

But smart

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
3. Likely the FBI doesn't want him testifying
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:11 PM
Jun 2016

The FBI's criminal investigation trumps the FOIA civil suit. The last thing the FBI wants is Pagliano testifying in the civil suit and giving either Clinton or her aides a chance to see what the FBI has on them.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
5. Or, maybe it isn't the FBI he's afraid of
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jun 2016

The presidency of the United States is literally at stake depending on how much information about this case gets into the public domain.

Mr Magliano should probably avoid small airplanes.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
6. He'd be better off testifying if that was the case
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 07:33 AM
Jun 2016

Once he testified there would be no real point in killing him.

And no, I don't particularly believe he would be murdered to shut him up.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
4. Apparently it's limited immunity.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 08:18 PM
Jun 2016

And I suppose details of the immunity could shed light on the investigation.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Tech Aide Asks Co...