2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJudging by the OP's, the Party Unity Plan (aka PUP) of DUers is not brilliant.
What's a Bernie supporter to do?
msongs
(67,403 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)plan to vote for
But, now that you brought it up, given your posts, I cannot help but wonder for whom you'll be voting in November.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1916451
Coming from a host of DUs largest hate group and a mod over at a Clinton hate site? Cry me a river.
merrily
(45,251 posts)All you need to do to know that is read in some of the other protected groups.
But you knew that.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Please. Sanders fake supporters are just upset they will have to be normal humans for a few fucking months. Big deal.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Any more tall tales you want to tell about me?
Got a particular post of mine that you have a complaint about, or are you just all about smearing right now?
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Guess you're not as close to the cabal as I thought.
I refuse to be associated with hate groups or sites, thanks.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Nothing that happened in these primaries entitles you to talk down to people like that.
For the sake of your own candidate's best interests, please just don't post anything more tonight.
Take your pointless bitterness to bed.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)And maybe nothing then.
All of the sudden declarations from progressives on this site that they'll support her, with still no confirmation that she'll support them, is frankly disappointing.
The progressive agenda will need to be fought for tooth-and-nail, it will not be given, particularly by a candidate such as Clinton.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)So it's par for the course for some around here to throw that accusation around.
ancianita
(36,048 posts)will take my political cue from Bernie's response to how inclusive of progressives the party does/doesn't become in November. The General will reveal a lot, too.
And I'll act accordingly. Don't expect cynicism or defeatism from progressives. They got stuff to do with or without this party.
But once Clinton -- who'll be forced, at worst, to make agreements that turn the party left -- can get in place more energetic congressional party whips (Durbin, ugh) after downticket wins, I have to give her the benefit of a doubt that she'll sign every bit of progressive legislation headed by a woman that comes across her desk.
Give the various reactions a break.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Partido Único de Pendejos.
"La PUP ha sido fundada con la noble meta de contribuir a crear un ambiente saludable en el diario vivir, exhortando a sus miembros a la plena aceptación de su pendejez."
(Translation)
The PUP has been founded with the noble goal of contributing to create a healthy environment in daily living, exhorting its members to plainly accept their stupidity.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 8, 2016, 01:44 AM - Edit history (1)
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Camp Weathervane's 'unity' effort is laughably incompetent and insincere. I check in from time to time to laugh at their pitiful efforts, but probably spend more time at JPR...that's where all the interesting and thought-provoking posters are gathering.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Assumed it was a Beach Boys song. My bad!
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)But most Sanders people here are not his supporters.
merrily
(45,251 posts)AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)never have complete faith in any person, and it's not up to them to demand someone act accordingly ignoring thier personal beliefs, it's up to the individuals desire to express themselves,
I'm not a puppet, no one is, if we were we'd all end up with freakishly long snouts, it's best to avoid that horror....
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)You'll fight to the convention if he does, you'll Bern Philly, but God be damned if he supported Clinton like a normal decent human would do.
You want him to be more power hungry than Clinton was in 2008, less ethical, whole nine yards.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)ancianita
(36,048 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)ancianita
(36,048 posts)Bile spreaders live off that, anyway. They'll never take a break, so everybody just take a break from them.
merrily
(45,251 posts)ancianita
(36,048 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)ancianita
(36,048 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)It's part message board, part kabuki, part propaganda mechanism, part pay per post, part addiction, part delusion, part_________________________
Fill in the blank
ancianita
(36,048 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)ancianita
(36,048 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Well on this one thing, I do.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)cynical means "dog like" in that way of sniffing the roses and smelling the piss that is behind the pretty image. A little cynicism is good for the soul.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)But, as a factual statement, lots of third parties out there.
merrily
(45,251 posts)It may do better this November than it has the last few elections, but you never know. I don't like making predictions.
My analysis skills and memory are not the worst, but I totally stink at reading minds and crystal balls. Most people do. I admit it and try to act accordingly. Many posters do neither.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Whatever you believe that to be. Independents have more voters than D's or R's. As an Independent....
merrily
(45,251 posts)I wish the occurrence were more frequent.
(occurrence: first word I got wrong in a spelling bee. Corrected myself instantly, but that was against the rules).
senz
(11,945 posts)entities that are incapable of any conversation more profound than repeating the score ad infinitum?
merrily
(45,251 posts)I can't say that I recommend voting for President on the basis of how the supporters of any candidate behave, most especially those online who may or may not actually support the candidate they claim to support.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Here is a simple test. Any poster who has seriously promoted HA Goodman will not be voting for Clinton. It's absurd to think a group sounding like Goodman wants unity. Those falling in that category should be removed from your thoughts of unification. I'm seeing unification. It will not be one hundred percent.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)I have not quibbled at all that I do not like Sanders any longer, nor respect him. The supporters certainly have been nasty to us, and Clinton and Democrats as a whole, real Democratic heroes. They do not factor into my voting decisions.
Just not a hard one for me to figure out. Not only would I easily go vote, I can easily list out why it would be important to vote for Sanders.
Merrily, it is on you. Not our responsibility for your choices.
merrily
(45,251 posts)And what exactly is on me? The OP's Hillary supporters post? No, they are not.
I have not asked anyone else to be responsible for my choices. No clue what you're on about.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)The OP is not about my vote and I have less than zero problem with my vote anyway. To the contrary, I'm proud of how I've voted.
Perhaps Reply 50 will help you.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)What are you to do?
Take responsibility of your own vote. I say for the third time instead of dependent on others.
merrily
(45,251 posts)FYI I don't want or expect diddly from HIillary supporters.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)My bad. You are right. I did not read your reply to some other poster. Like I care enough to respond the fourth time.
merrily
(45,251 posts)And Reply 50 is not the whole thread. Asked you twice to read it in the hope you would finally get what the fuck the OP was about. However, apparently, you'd rather keep posting without knowing what you're talking about. Here's a thought: If you can't grok the OP and won't read the post that might help you grok it, then either don't start posting on the thread or stop posting on it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)rather than an Op we are replying to.
That ole personal responsibility again. Ah ha, such an hoot.
merrily
(45,251 posts)You're the only one who did not understand the OP, so I tried to help you by pointing you to reply 50. You don't understand the OP, you won't read reply 50, and you won't stop embarrassing yourself by posting nonsense, but I'm the one who has no personal responsibility?
Go ahead, be my guest. reply lots more to an OP you don't understand.
vintx
(1,748 posts)The Dems I've encountered in other online places are not trashing him, or his supporters.
They're not whining about boos. They're not bellyaching about their hurt feelings.
What I've seen on other sites have been calm appeals for unity, and I've seen no angry, lecturing responses when their pleas are met with anger.
Because they are not idiots, or trolls, or Brock's paid puppets. They're actual dems / progressives who actually care about their country.
I come here, though, and I see a post from a longtime DUer (not a troll) saying he's going to send money to help primary Bernie.
So, you ask, what's a Bernie supporter to do?
merrily
(45,251 posts)was full of very nasty posts about Bernie and his supporters, mostly Bernie, IIRC. This thread was, as I stated upthread, intended to break the very ugly mood I thought those OP's were creating. (Meanwhile, in the Bernie Group, one poster after another was saying goodbye because of how ugly it was.)
As far as asking what's a Bernie supporter to do, that was intended as a gentle parody of an OP posted in, um, some protected group or other asking "What's a Hillary supporter to do? The thrust of the OP was that Bernie supporters were preventing Hillary supporters from working toward party unity.
vintx
(1,748 posts)And it sounds like someone is preparing some excuses for when their candidate doesn't fare as well as they'd assumed.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)message board? Because only a seriously sad person would allow themselves to be influenced by something that silly and inconsequential.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)for the real world is going to be really disappointed when they find it has little to do with real life.
merrily
(45,251 posts)As long as we're "replying" in non sequiturs.
The OP is about DU specifically the OPs that were on DU last night. It has zero to do with taking DU as a bellwether for real life.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Third Way slashing of social programs and increased H-1B visas and no to single payer and no to Wall Street regulation and lies (and other things Hillary proudly stands for) "out of my system".
No matter how prettily worded the "Bernie But" avowal is made.
merrily
(45,251 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)that they're in the #NeverHillary camp.
Why would supporters of the Democratic nominee spend any time or energy engaging those who will never vote for Hillary anyway?
Sid
merrily
(45,251 posts)the candidate who is no threat to your candidate? And the DUers who support him?
And then bemoan how Bernie supporters are thwarting all your efforts to seek party unity? Because those were the OPs all over the board last night. I don't know where you see me asking Hillary supporters to engage me.
Here maybe this will explain. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2157563
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)and people like to make sure that shit flows both ways.
Sid
merrily
(45,251 posts)(meaning generic "you," not siddithers)
All in it together
(275 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)When I was 4, my father's behavior imprinted on my that he thought Democrats' winning elections was vital. My father was very smart, but not a sophisticated or well education. So, when I saw him THAT concerned, I knew on some visceral level that it was about the well-being of his family, not some abstract principle. In college, the discussions I had with my classmate confirmed: vote Democratic.
Then, I started posting on message boards and learned about the DLC.
I don't have to grapple too hard about my votes, though. I live in Boston.
I do grapple with donating and otherwise supporting, though. Who gets that stuff? Obama in 2008 (before I learned about the DLC) and Sanders in 2016 and until he says stop.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I live in Washington and my vote will have absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election. I've voted in 22 federal elections over the years and that has been true no matter who ran, what party they belonged to, or where I lived.
Now, it seems to me foolish to abjure my principles for the "lesser of two evils" or "party unity".
The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. Friedrich Nietzsche
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Act in such a manner he expects of everyone else.
Everything else is secondary, and are variations on excuses.