2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders should use defeat like Hillary did in 2008
As a springboard to victory (in this case his political heir like E. Warren) in the presidential election eight years from now.
I noticed that Clinton's staff and voters are welcoming of Sanders and his ideas.
Sanders and his supporters should use that--- as Hillary did with the Obama administration--- to empower and reinforce his platform so it's even stronger the next election instead of knocking Hillary down.
Would Hillary have won this time around if she had been combative with the Obama administration?
Just some thoughts.
TeacherB87
(249 posts)And I imagine that would be a huge issue in 8 years if he ran again. He won't do it. The kind of victory he should be seeking is shifting the positions of the Democrats so that they more authentically represent their progressive base.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)I realize Bernie would be too old by then.
My point was Sanders and his supporters should use the fact that the Clinton campaign is welcoming to his ideas to advance and strengthen an alternative platform within the Democratic Party.
TeacherB87
(249 posts)I agree
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Unfortunately, his mindset only seems to see differences instead of commonality, so it also seems likely he will continue to do what he can to increase his leverage, i.e., force more agreement on what he sees as positive change from the party. In the end, he says he will do everything he can to stop Trump, though.
tritsofme
(17,367 posts)Not a knock, just a fact of life, I would say the same of Hillary.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)of this thread.
ILikeTurtles2
(36 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)It took Hillary a few days in 2008 to come to terms with defeat and concede. Like Bernie, she felt that she had been robbed, both because she felt the process was rigged (she spent a lot of time complaining about caucuses and proportional delegates and talking about the mythical "popular vote", if you recall) and because she felt that Obama had "jumped in line". She did ultimately come around, as I hope Bernie will, but I do not appreciate the way some of her supporters (not saying you are one of them) are demanding more of him than she herself did in 2008.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan, but that hardly means the Michiganer votes for Hillary should be trashed in this consideration. More people voted for Hillary period.
Another difference between 2016 and 2008 is that in 2008 there was less than 1% difference in the popular vote as counted.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)At the end of the day, she had lost. Whether by 1% or 50%, it was clear on the night of the last primary that she had lost.
And her calculations of the popular vote not only included Michigan, but also excluded voters in caucus states for which raw vote totals were not available (but could have been estimated). Hillary felt very strongly that Michigan voters should be counted, but not so strongly about the voters of Iowa and many other caucus states.
mythology
(9,527 posts)It's not exactly a valid comparison if one person gets to use the population of 48 states and the other 50 states. Obama didn't campaign in Florida either due to the rules. No votes from either Florida or Michigan can honestly be included in the 2008 counts.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)You might want to rethink that. Or not as your personality inclines.
In the end, she lost the election because a critical number of superdelegates switched to Obama, but she won the popular vote count by a tiiiiny but real margin.
texstad79
(115 posts)He seems to be more in the lone wolf category.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Force his way into her administration hire banned consultants run a secret hidden server to avoid foia.requests all while hiding his family foundations business with arms dealers.worldwide?
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Someone whose role has been a gadfly for decades might not take to that very well.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I'd like to see the dems do away with the Superdelegates.
Would like to see Clinton promise not to appoint anyone who works for banks or hedge funds.
Would also like to see Clinton promise to not send troops w/o support of congress and not large numbers of troops w/o a declaration of war.
If Sanders could get those 3 things I think I would be happy.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Personally, I would also like us not to go to war without an international coalition.
And I would like her to work to get Citizens United trashed as soon as possible. And make it one of her biggest litmus tests for appointed SC justices.
I say these things as a Hillary supporter.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)I could live with that.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)That, or maybe UN ambassador?