Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:39 AM Jun 2016

Sanders should use defeat like Hillary did in 2008

As a springboard to victory (in this case his political heir like E. Warren) in the presidential election eight years from now.

I noticed that Clinton's staff and voters are welcoming of Sanders and his ideas.

Sanders and his supporters should use that--- as Hillary did with the Obama administration--- to empower and reinforce his platform so it's even stronger the next election instead of knocking Hillary down.

Would Hillary have won this time around if she had been combative with the Obama administration?

Just some thoughts.





21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders should use defeat like Hillary did in 2008 (Original Post) Shankapotomus Jun 2016 OP
I don't want an 80 year old president. TeacherB87 Jun 2016 #1
I said his "political heir" Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #3
My mistake TeacherB87 Jun 2016 #5
He no doubt will, but his way as he sees it. Hortensis Jun 2016 #13
He is too old to realistically mount a 2024 campaign. tritsofme Jun 2016 #2
See post #3 Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #4
How old is Jane? ILikeTurtles2 Jun 2016 #9
Give him a few days democrattotheend Jun 2016 #6
Sorry, but no. In 2008 more people voted for HRC. Hortensis Jun 2016 #14
It doesn't matter how close it was democrattotheend Jun 2016 #15
Actually it does mythology Jun 2016 #19
What? Democracy doesn't matter? Hortensis Jun 2016 #20
Don't think thats his personality type texstad79 Jun 2016 #7
Whatdoyoumean? SwampG8r Jun 2016 #8
... LexVegas Jun 2016 #11
Buiding a legacy like that takes time, money and effort. Brickbat Jun 2016 #10
I'd like to see Sanders stay in the Senate hollowdweller Jun 2016 #12
I genuinely think these are fair requests. auntpurl Jun 2016 #16
So he should angle for SOS? ljm2002 Jun 2016 #17
Did not think of that, but why not? Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #18
Here's a thought... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #21
 

TeacherB87

(249 posts)
1. I don't want an 80 year old president.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jun 2016

And I imagine that would be a huge issue in 8 years if he ran again. He won't do it. The kind of victory he should be seeking is shifting the positions of the Democrats so that they more authentically represent their progressive base.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
3. I said his "political heir"
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:44 AM
Jun 2016

I realize Bernie would be too old by then.

My point was Sanders and his supporters should use the fact that the Clinton campaign is welcoming to his ideas to advance and strengthen an alternative platform within the Democratic Party.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. He no doubt will, but his way as he sees it.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:30 AM
Jun 2016

Unfortunately, his mindset only seems to see differences instead of commonality, so it also seems likely he will continue to do what he can to increase his leverage, i.e., force more agreement on what he sees as positive change from the party. In the end, he says he will do everything he can to stop Trump, though.

tritsofme

(17,367 posts)
2. He is too old to realistically mount a 2024 campaign.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:42 AM
Jun 2016

Not a knock, just a fact of life, I would say the same of Hillary.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
6. Give him a few days
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:51 AM
Jun 2016

It took Hillary a few days in 2008 to come to terms with defeat and concede. Like Bernie, she felt that she had been robbed, both because she felt the process was rigged (she spent a lot of time complaining about caucuses and proportional delegates and talking about the mythical "popular vote", if you recall) and because she felt that Obama had "jumped in line". She did ultimately come around, as I hope Bernie will, but I do not appreciate the way some of her supporters (not saying you are one of them) are demanding more of him than she herself did in 2008.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. Sorry, but no. In 2008 more people voted for HRC.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:37 AM
Jun 2016

Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan, but that hardly means the Michiganer votes for Hillary should be trashed in this consideration. More people voted for Hillary period.

Another difference between 2016 and 2008 is that in 2008 there was less than 1% difference in the popular vote as counted.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
15. It doesn't matter how close it was
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:42 AM
Jun 2016

At the end of the day, she had lost. Whether by 1% or 50%, it was clear on the night of the last primary that she had lost.

And her calculations of the popular vote not only included Michigan, but also excluded voters in caucus states for which raw vote totals were not available (but could have been estimated). Hillary felt very strongly that Michigan voters should be counted, but not so strongly about the voters of Iowa and many other caucus states.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
19. Actually it does
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 04:34 PM
Jun 2016

It's not exactly a valid comparison if one person gets to use the population of 48 states and the other 50 states. Obama didn't campaign in Florida either due to the rules. No votes from either Florida or Michigan can honestly be included in the 2008 counts.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
20. What? Democracy doesn't matter?
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 05:30 PM
Jun 2016

You might want to rethink that. Or not as your personality inclines.

In the end, she lost the election because a critical number of superdelegates switched to Obama, but she won the popular vote count by a tiiiiny but real margin.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
8. Whatdoyoumean?
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jun 2016

Force his way into her administration hire banned consultants run a secret hidden server to avoid foia.requests all while hiding his family foundations business with arms dealers.worldwide?

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
10. Buiding a legacy like that takes time, money and effort.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:22 AM
Jun 2016

Someone whose role has been a gadfly for decades might not take to that very well.

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
12. I'd like to see Sanders stay in the Senate
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jun 2016

I'd like to see the dems do away with the Superdelegates.

Would like to see Clinton promise not to appoint anyone who works for banks or hedge funds.

Would also like to see Clinton promise to not send troops w/o support of congress and not large numbers of troops w/o a declaration of war.

If Sanders could get those 3 things I think I would be happy.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
16. I genuinely think these are fair requests.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jun 2016

Personally, I would also like us not to go to war without an international coalition.

And I would like her to work to get Citizens United trashed as soon as possible. And make it one of her biggest litmus tests for appointed SC justices.

I say these things as a Hillary supporter.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders should use defeat...