Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,189 posts)
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:43 PM Jun 2016

Looking for Early Victories, Sanders Lost Chance to Expand Base

This is something much discussed and agreed upon.........---"ceding the Southern states"--was not a good move for the Sanders camp.



Looking for Early Victories, Sanders Lost Chance to Expand Base


http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-06-08/looking-for-early-victories-sanders-lost-chance-to-expand-base
A decision after his Nevada loss set up a dynamic that would haunt the campaign for the rest of the race.

June 8, 2016 — 4:00 AM CDT
Updated on June 8, 2016 — 9:14 AM CDT



Bernie Sanders’ senior advisers were still in Las Vegas the day after the Nevada caucuses when they convened a conference call to plot their path ahead.

Over the previous 10 months, they had focused establishing Sanders as a credible challenger to Hillary Clinton, the overwhelming early favorite in the race. Sanders was drawing thousands of enthusiastic supporters to rallies. As his populist message resonated among restive voters eager for change, he turned a 50-point gap in the polls in Iowa into a narrow loss in the caucuses. Eight days later, he followed up with a come-from-behind landslide win in the New Hampshire primary.

But after the Feb. 20 loss in Nevada, the third contest in the race, Sanders’ team concluded they needed some definitive, and sure, wins. That meant ceding the Southern states that dominated the next round of contests to Clinton and focusing on five primaries and caucuses in states where minority voters wouldn't be as much of a factor.

“The alternative was to spread the resources over more states, like Texas and Tennessee and Georgia and try to accumulate as many delegates as possible,” Tad Devine, one of the advisers who took part in the strategy session, said in an interview. “If we did that we had a very good chance of maybe winning only Vermont, and maybe one other state, but we would not be able to sustain the campaign and we would not be able to relaunch it.”

That early decision set up a dynamic that would haunt the campaign for the rest of the race. While Sanders’ success with white liberals, independents, and young voters led to huge crowds and a flood of small-dollar donations, he would never overcome his crippling deficit with black and Hispanic voters and long-time Democrats. Momentum wasn't a substitute for votes and delegates......................

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looking for Early Victories, Sanders Lost Chance to Expand Base (Original Post) riversedge Jun 2016 OP
The Sanders campaign couldn't afford to run TV ads in 50 states. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #1
In other words; they campaigned for who they already had, not who they needed. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #2
some good ideas coming from the wrong candidate nt msongs Jun 2016 #3
Ironically he was hurt by IA and NH going first geek tragedy Jun 2016 #4
 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
2. In other words; they campaigned for who they already had, not who they needed.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:59 PM
Jun 2016

That is a hallmark of Republican identity politics, and the reason they can't win national elections right now. It was absolutely a terrible decision that everyone should have seen coming.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. Ironically he was hurt by IA and NH going first
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 10:56 PM
Jun 2016

caused him to focus on non-diverse states. He would have been much better off really getting exposed to diverse communities and their concerns.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Looking for Early Victori...