2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWTF? As many as 3 million CA ballots "unprocessed"?
Los Angeles Times: "Wednesday's big question: How many uncounted California ballots?"http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-california-primary-wednesday-s-big-question-how-many-1465375928-htmlstory.html
CA SoS: Unprocessed Ballots Status
http://vote.sos.ca.gov/unprocessed-ballots-status/
When as many as 3 million mail-in and provisional ballots have yet to be "processed," why haven't news outlets noted that the so-called "results" they are reporting are partial? (i.e., based on something like 65% of the ballots cast.)
Wouldn't it be nice if the LA Times had bothered to call the counties as directed by SoS site, instead of just reporting "but there was no official word on how many remained"? Guess making all those calls was just too much of a hassle. It's not like it was an election anyone was paying any attention to.
P.S. Just curious. Does anyone know if NPPs (No Party Preference) people are able to vote by mail? Or do they have to go to polling place to get a "Democratic crossover" ballot?
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)That it usually took quite a while for California to complete is count. They didn't give a reason.
Heard something similar on Maddow
pat_k
(9,313 posts)But saying "it takes awhile to complete the count" doesn't exactly capture how truly partial the results being reported are.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)The Secretary of State explains the deadlines and schedules for reporting partial and final certified counts.
It need not be a mystery, check out the website and the info is all there for you, begging for you to read it.
http://vote.sos.ca.gov/returns/president/party/democratic/
pat_k
(9,313 posts)... the size of the percentage expected to be counted in the days after the election. Most states have such schedules and caveats, but the difference between election day results and final certified results aren't typically 35% or so.
SoCalNative
(4,613 posts)by mail if they did it by the deadline. Otherwise they had to request on election day at their polling place.
GReedDiamond
(5,313 posts)...whether by mail-in vote or at the polling place.
To vote by mail, they had to request their ballot several weeks before June 7.
Voting in person at a polling place, they had to request the Dem ballot.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)you are confusing two things:
for permanent vote by mail voters, all automatically receive the presidential primary ballot for their party about a month ahead of time.
if non affiliateds wanted a Democratic ballot to be automatically mailed, they had to request that before all ballots were mailed.
but if they didn't, they could simply ask for it by May 31st.
the early "deadline" was just for folks that wanted the Dem ballot a month ahead of time, that wasn't the final deadline.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)So 75% counted in less than 24 hours which isn't bad. But don't let reality get in the way of a good CT.
ThinkCritically
(241 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)do you realize that they allow 5 days for ballots postmarked on Election Day to be received?
or do you expect those to be counted before they arrive?
pat_k
(9,313 posts)I didn't realize such a large portion of ballots were cast by mail in CA, and didn't catch any news reports before the election that made it clear it would be more like "election week" than "election night."
NY Times results page and others report 100% counted. They don't make it clear that that just means that 100% of the precincts have reported partial results... and that some unknown number of ballots are in the mail.
So, I was surprised. And am feeling a little stupid about it.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)Thanks so much for pointing out the later entry.
Looks like that's just LA. I think they account for something like 30% of the registered voters, so, extrapolating, sounds like about 1.6 million remain statewide. Certainly better than 3 million.
ThinkCritically
(241 posts)I explained this last night as they were counting. A huge majority of voters mail in their ballots. Many of the initial reports were early voters. People were able to mail out their ballots up until voting day as long as it was post marked. So there are potentially 5-6 days worth of people mailing in their ballots that didn't get counted yet. And imagine how long this process is going to take. They have to hand count each ballot because you are required to sign the ballot or else it won't be counted. There are up to 3 million still out there in the mail system. Only a small portion of California voters vote at the polls.
And to answer the question about NPPs, yes they can vote by mail. Many were waiting for their democratic ballot to arrive. A huge portion of them received non-partisan ballots which didn't allow them to vote for a presidential candidate. They had to surrender those ballots and wait for a new one to arrive in the mail before they could send out the proper democratic crossover ballot. So yes, there are probably many NPP voters ballots still in the mail as well. And they could also trade their non-partisan ballots at the county elections office or at their polling location.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)I'm feeling a little stupid. I somehow missed the fact that it would be more like "election week" (or "election month" than "election night." I just didn't catch any news reports before the election that made this clear. (And missed your posts last night.)
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)no matter how annoying that is to those ready to push so many people out of their representation.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)In about 24 hours 66,722 added to count. Seems like a kinda feeble pace to me.
Democratic presidential primary ballots counted:
3,482,752 as of June 8, 6:34 p.m
3,549,474 as of June 9, 7:31 p.m
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)It's not going to change the result any though. It's over.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)But the fact they accept mail in ballots postmarked through election day means they aren't going to be on your TV set when you want them to be.
There was a lot more to vote on than Bernie vs. Hillary. I understand the concept that people might vote and have it not be about Bernie is entirely foreign to many, but it has happened for a very long time and will continue to happen. There are all kinds of local races as well.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Regardless of party preference or no party preference. And because CA accepts ballots postmarked on election day, it means it takes a while to get the final count. It's not a conspiracy to deny Bernie his birthright as president of the United States.
Mail in ballots are more likely to be seniors.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)They had to request a crossover ballot and many missed the information and ended up sending the ballot they received in that had no presidential candidates. In addition, I canvassed the day before and many that had requested crossover ballots still hadn't received them. Many others were listed as having received a mail in ballot and had never gotten one at all so they would have to go to the polls and vote with a provisional ballot. Those ones will be counted (for those that really went in) but it will take time.
But the worst of the voter suppression was having the AP announce falsely that Hillary had already one it before the polls even opened.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)That his supporters were suddenly deterred from voting because of an AP story.
It's been obvious he would lose since March 15. Even Sanders campaign staff knew that, as the recent article in Politico shows.
He continued because he had so much money. He outspent Clinton 2-1. He had more than adequate resources to devote to organizing and informing voters. He chose to instead spend money on advertising and arena events. His campaign director for California quit because Bernie refused to invest in advertising. His "revolution" involved relegating voters to an audience, adoring fans, and far less to the kind of organization necessary to win elections, much less enact the sort of changes he promised.
Clinton spent less, organized months in advance and ran a vote by mail campaign. That included helping voters figure out how to vote. The only thing that stopped Bernie from doing the same thing was Bernie.