2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI just saw an ad during Morning Joe and it was damn ugly
Paid for by a conservative PAC of some sort.
I don't know if this was shown locally or nationally but it basically compared Bill's national speech about he did have sexual relations with Lewinsky and transposed Hillary's comments about she never sent classified information in her emails.
Naturally it painted them both as complete liars.
This is going to be the ugliest election ever. This won't be pretty. I hope the DNCyaLater does the right thing and chooses Bernie, although I have little faith they will.
Hand me the damn Aspirin.
Blue_Adept
(6,398 posts)Said every election cycle.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)There's never been the low blows we've seen and they're already beginning. Re-runs of Clinton's affair with Lewinsky? Welcome to the sewer.
MgtPA
(1,022 posts)No one wants to go through that again.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)And who want to vote for Hillary.
Bill is very much beloved. Probably something you don't agree with, so this has you scared.. But you shouldn't be.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Gotta remember Boston Bean, the General Election has a different audience than the primaries.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)until the age of 40+.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Who are undecided. But it's not like negative ads ever work.... except for every presidential election.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)always to be taken seriously.
Poor Hillary. We all make "mistakes," but she makes very serious ones that cost people's lives.
She and Henry Kissinger. (Check out his Wikipedia page. If you know your history, you will never vote for Hillary after reading it.) Kissinger is, as Hillary admitted proudly in one of the debates, one of Hillary's advisers.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,398 posts)That's the nature of the beast. Anyone expecting otherwise is being naive.
Politics is war without the guns and bombs.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Lots of fodder and suitcase throwing is going to happen. This in the end is going to turn the American people off a great deal.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)of politics in America and the degree of personal attacks made in political campaigns
going back to the beginning of the country.
For example:
http://history1800s.about.com/od/leaders/a/electionof1828.htm
Blue_Adept
(6,398 posts)As you see in this thread, "this one" will be worse. But it's been ugly for ages and in many ways it's been tamer than it was centuries ago in different settings.
Thanks for the link, looking forward to digging into learning some new stuff!
Blue_Adept
(6,398 posts)Got to the link earlier than I thought I would. Really interesting stuff! That period of presidential politics hadn't been on my radar in decades so I had forgotten so much of it. Was a great refresher and really shows just how sanitized our current discussions are - and just how much gives regular folks the vapors in comparison.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)was the raucousness of the politics back then.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,398 posts)jzodda
(2,124 posts)The ads against him can star other Republicans and their own words. He also from what I read yesterday at Politico is going to have a huge money deficit.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I want to read that.
Here is one link from Washington Post. If you need to get around that Wapo paywall you can read it if you open the browser page in incognito mode. (I use chrome)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/08/donald-trumps-got-political-money-problems/
Here is one from Politico:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/donald-trump-donors-billion-224080
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)along with Bill's, from a lifetime of corruption, dishonesty, greed, and the politics of personal destruction.
But I guess since she's pro-choice and a recent convert to LGBT equality that's a good enough reason to forget my own standards and values and pull the lever for HRC. At least that's what her supporters tell me so...
She's lucky that the person running against her for the GOP is even more morally repugnant. So she may well win and get to cash in even more from whatever it is that she and Bill do to get all those millions. Yay! I'm super-duper excited!
Demsrule86
(68,542 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Where have you been?
Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Perhaps you should take your blinders off.
Hillary can't even do a debate FFS.....runs away just like in Cali.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)Trump just came out full-on racist against Gonsalo Curiel, the Latino-American judge presiding over his scam university trial.
That's a double whammy anti-Trump ad right there he'll be painted as the racist he is, and as the crook and money scammer he is who cheated unsuspecting students out of their money.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. There are also the videos out there of him calling Latinos rapists and criminals, of him calling for a wall on the border, of him saying Megan Kelly had blood coming out of her eyes and wherever else, of him mocking the handicapped.
Come on, this guy is gonna get killed, and by his own words. Even other repugs are pulling away from him.
You're damn right it's not gonna be pretty.
And he will lose spectacularly.
Demsrule86
(68,542 posts)This has been out there for years...those it would matter to...will not vote for her anyway. Did you think no matter who the nominee was, they would not begin the swift- boat process?
Response to pinebox (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)BUT they do have factual history and re-running ads with Bill from the 90s saying "I did NOT have sexual relations with that woman" isn't going to play well.
Response to pinebox (Reply #49)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
The country has moved on. Remember, President Clinton's approval ratings went up after his impeachment.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)We'll wait. Hillary has a LOT more baggage than Bernie, it isn't even close.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)people dumpster diving in Venezuela with what would happen if a "socialist" was elected. Hammer and sickle would be making a return. It would have been a fucking nightmare.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Why haven't they done with Obama who they've been calling commie and socialist for 8 years? You know why? Because the strategy doesn't work as they've learned. However, what they have is a suitcase of shit with the Clinton's. 30 years worth.
get out your shit protector, you're going to need it.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Bernie calls HIMSELF a socialist. Perhaps you think Americans are savvy enough to distinguish but you would be very fucking wrong. I know this is a difficult time for you so I'm going easy on your bullshit. That will end next week.
OnDoutside
(19,952 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)You're a trip. Still at it?
Can you even adult discourse bro?
Bernie calls himself a Democratic Socialist. Hillary once called herself a Republican. Was there a time when Bernie called himself a Socialist? How many decades ago was that? Hm?
You're going easy on my bullshit? I find that rather hilarious given that you still haven't especially made a case yet of how bad they are going to drag Bernie through the mud should he be the nominee. As I stated already, they have been calling Obama a socialist commie for the last 8 years. Has it worked? Nope. Hillary on the other hand has real issues that are quite important, things like FBI investigations and pretty soon the whole investigation into the Clinton Foundation will begin as well. Do you really want to compare those with name calling? You do that, have at it. And yes, as we're seeing now Bill's sex life is being dragged out into the open and while you say "everybody knows about it", want to take a guess which generation really wasn't around much when it did happen? The largest voting block of them all; millenials. That group Hillary has basically no support from.
It's ok though, ignore at your own peril.
As far as this will end next week, Skinner said legit criticism is allowed did he not? Yup, he sure did.
Response to leftynyc (Reply #58)
John Poet This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheBlackAdder
(28,182 posts).
From the MIC, Private Prisons, Business Grants, Urban Enterprize Zones, etc...
As a poli-sci continuing ed student in my 50's, there is a bus load of stuff that can be raised.
Much of it seems to have fallen off the contemporary radar, and I'm not about to go into further
detail on these issues. While I know the GOP has most or all of this information, I'm not going to
resurface it. Suffice it to say, there can and probably will be a multitude of issues raised that go
far beyond this casual crap. That stuff, I fear, won't come out until after the convention.
So, while you drop the bullshit word, the reall shit hasn't even begun to flow.
.
And using the most disheveled and angry images of him, comparing him to Che Guevara. Goofy Bernie was light stuff compared to what would be used were he the candidate.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)yardwork
(61,588 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)This wasn't a twist, it showed Bill giving his speech about he didn't have sexual relations with that woman transposed with Hillary giving a speech that she never sent classified info in email.
Hand me the Motrin......
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)If there was anyway for Trump to start having women flee from Bernie that would do it in a heartbeat. Donald can only go up with the women vote and this would be a catalyst.
Bills indescretion is old news.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)truth and facts do not matter to the conservatives ... Bernie may be different than the Clintons but has a past that will provide the Republicans plenty of ammunition for negative ads
Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)in about a week for his actions during the Reagan years.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)You honestly believe that? Do you?
Never mind the Clinton's vacayed in China.
840high
(17,196 posts)all the Clinton baggage going as far as Arkansas.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)These ads will then sound stupid.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)You trust her far more than I do. The OIG report already said that she was not in compliance with the federal records laws. And there is at least some information public that federal records were intentionally destroyed, which is a felony.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)There is no way they are going to charge her with anything. If they did that it would open up a huge can of worms.
They will give her slap on the wrist for breaking the rules and procedures.. nothing more.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Where's the FBI investigations?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)She admits she may have broken rules and procedures but not intentionally and not in any illegal manner.
merbex
(3,123 posts)You know those voters, the voters too many people here think we don't need? The Independent voter?
THEY will be the ones to decide whether it is: 'may have broken rules' or 'intentionally broken laws'.
I'd start watching polls very closely if I were you and keep track of how often ads like that get played.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)He did much much worse things and got away with it.. this would be minor compared to those.
840high
(17,196 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Its not a scandal.. she did make a mistake on the decision to use a personal server but there wasnt anything nefarious going on.
840high
(17,196 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)When it does it will say pretty much what the IG report said. She shouldnt have done it but it was more an internal problem with the State Dept and she didnt do anything illegal.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Complying with FOIA is a law. Truthfully signing a document is a law.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)She SIGNED a paper saying she'd received instruction on handing classified information. Ignorance isn't an excuse, although Hillary pleads ignorance often.
She deliberately instructed subordinates to strip security headings from documents and send by unsecured fax. She deliberately shared classified information with a person without clearance...Sidney Bloomenthal. She deliberately signed a document when leaving office that she had turned over all related emails and documents, when in fact she didn't do so and refused to do so for 2 years.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Yes, it was illegal because it did not comply with dept regulations that ensured compliance with classified information laws. Furthermore, after leaving office she had the server placed in storage in an unsecured facility staffed by uncleared employees.
Then there are the other laws she broke...signing false statements, refusing to comply with FOIA, sharing classified info with Bloomenthal and others.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)She did not intend to use the server for classified information. It was for personal use and non-classified departmental use. The fact some classified information may have passed through it by mistake or accidentally is not a felony.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)She used her server for ALL correspondence...classified, unclassified, and personal.
And again, the server hadn't been given approval (IG reported it wouldn't have been, if known about). There was no security check done on the server....a) it would have disclosed its existence, and b) it was do amateurish that it wouldn't have passed the most lenient check.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)OnDoutside
(19,952 posts)if it there is anything negative, at least she has a buffer to over that hump.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)would be doing the right thing?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)We voted overwhelmingly for Clinton knowing that Republicans will come after her and Bill hard. You are saying the people should be ignored when it is clear they were well aware of this? That's a winning argument. lol.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Don D. Con announced that he's gonna do a "major speech" (read: attack) on HRC and Bill "probably Monday."
When I heard that, I thought ... "Who the hell is giving Don D. Con his advice ... He's going to shout his load 5 months out? ... That's not too bright."
Point is, all HRC has to do is survive that one speech, which will just be nothing more than a re-hash and compilation of what has been said for the past 12 months ... 25 years, actually ... then, it will completely lose its effect at the close of the news cycle.
My second thought is the HRC campaign, brilliantly, branded Don D. Con ...
And, his "probably Monday" speech will be seen by everyone (except for the most rabid trump fan/anti-HRCer) in that light.
What do you be the HRC campaign spends big bucks to run an ad, repeating the branding, on all the networks that air his "probably Monday" speech, immediately before (and/or, after) the speech?
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)The past is coming out with Bill's affairs in the White House and under an FBI investigation at the same time? Get ready to be inundated with more kitchen sink throwing than you've seen in your lifetime.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Touche.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Every election is the ugliest one yet. The consistency of that remains unchanged, regardless of who is running.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Or his being a socialist Democrat... I can see the images of Sanders side-by-side with Mao and Stalin now (it doesn't matter to them it's not the same thing--it's what they can make their supporters believe). Then, of course, there's the whole Burlington College scandal Jane is involved in... this is how you get free college? Falsify loan applications?
Elections are ugly and that is not a reason to usurp who the majority of Democratic voters voted for. Many of us are aware of the Clinton scandals and we still chose her over Bernie. It's not that we're uninformed, but we took all things into consideration, and still felt she was the better candidate.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)They have been calling Obama a commie for 8 years, it hasn't worked. The whole rape fantasy thing has been basically debunked, sure we know this, do they? Who knows. However the difference is teh attacks on Hillary are real and they are history, the ad showed Bill lying to America and transposed Hillary lying to America on top of that and basically said "once a liar, always a liar".
Yes elections are ugly things but this one is going to be the dirtiest you've ever seen in your life and if you think otherwise, you're in for a shock. You can win a GE with 23% of an electorate and that will be Bernie's argument because Hillary has hardly any indy support. You think a candidate under an FBI investigation is a better choice? Yeah, I do think you're uninformed.
Response to pinebox (Reply #38)
Post removed
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Yes the whole rape fantasy thing has been debunked and apparently you've not been paying attention, that was debunked months ago. Bill is the most popular politician in the country? Wrong. That title goes to Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker https://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/2015/05/01/most-popular-politician-america
Now you're calling people delusional besides drama queens? Cute. When in doubt, call people names and get mad and divert with shiny objects and squirrels.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)with projection problems. If you think laughing uproariously at your right wing attacks against Hillary while giving Bernie a complete pass as anger, you're truly hopelessly delusional. Well, at least we wont have to be reading that crap here after next week so I can just avoid your nonsense. Carry on.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Personal attacks against me. Can't stick to the issues can you?
You have to call people names and put others down because you don't understand and it makes you feel better. We get it.
The FBI is not a RW attack, sorry. And excuse us all but history does matter, regardless of how you want to spin it.
840high
(17,196 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Hell, truth doesn't matter to the GOP and there are people lazy enough not to validate what they see on TV or the Internet. We see shit posted on DU constantly that is false.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)That could be readily countered by the Clintons, you know...not lying so much.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Rilgin
(787 posts)The Republicans did it first
It is obviously sexist. Only women are accused of lying.
Hillary lies for us because she is a fighter.
-----> Trump
-----> Nader
I won get over it.
Everyone does it.
I was both misinformed and didn't know.
What emails? I never emailed its all a Right Wing Conspiracy.
I am sorry for the delay. We are still deciding which of my aides will be the fallguy.
840high
(17,196 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)It seems that the more "enthusiastic" (a nice way to put it) the Sanders fan is, the more willing he is to commit election fraud upon the Democratic voters to get his way in the end.
I wonder if they realize just how much of a sham their progressive credentials actually are...
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Last I heard it wasn't.
Is it complete idiocy to nominate someone who is under an FBI investigation & whose husband was impeached and will be in the WH along with her? Yes it is.
Blind leading the blind.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)For a camp that has been screaming for months against them...
"Scrap them entirely! They're undemocratic elitists!"
"If Bernie wins the state he should get a proportional amount of superdelegates!"
"If Bernie wins the state he should get all the state's superdelegates!
"Don't count them too soon! That's undemocratic!"
The following;
"Hey, um, supers? Can you, like, forget all that bad stuff I've said about you for a year, ignore the 3.5million vote & 375 pledged delegate gap. and, y'know, vote for me instead? Because, um, polls and FBI and stuff. Yea."
is equal parts desperation and pathetic.
Note the new sig line. It will be updated daily.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"Hey, um, supers? Can you, like, forget all that bad stuff I've said about you for a year, FORGET ALL THE STUFF HE'S BEEN SAYING ABOUT YOU FOR HIS ENTIRE POLITICAL CAREER, FORGET THAT HE HAS NEVER DONE A DAY'S WORK FOR THE PARTY, ignore the 3.5million vote & 375 pledged delegate gap. and, y'know, vote for me instead? Because, um, polls and FBI and stuff. Yea."
That is equal parts of, what should be, pathetic desperation.
TwilightZone
(25,456 posts)They're all like this. Get used to it.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)No they aren't all like this. Show us right now where sexual history with an intern was ever brought up in a damn tv ad?
You can't.
LexVegas
(6,056 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)Thank you.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)When the FBI releases their findings which now is looking is coming soon. Seen the latest headlines? It's now a full blown criminal investigation.
My vote is my own and I will vote for who best represents me.
annavictorious
(934 posts)As a matter of fact, the New York Times issued a retraction and an explanation for mistakenly calling it a criminal investigation.
Do you have any links to actual news stories that don't rely on unnamed "government sources" who are almost certainly Republicans?
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/07/24/3684315/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-explainer/
http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/27/a-clinton-story-fraught-with-inaccuracies-how-it-happened-and-what-next/
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-new-york-times-emails-357246
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/24/politics/new-york-times-clinton-email-correction/
Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)how very brogressive of you!
pinebox
(5,761 posts)who only let a select few vote, isn't it?
Flipping SD's is allowed the last I heard.
still_one
(92,122 posts)Hillary. Martin O'Malley endorsed Hillary, and our President and Vice President have strongly endorsed Hillary, and they will be going full bore, along with the vast majority of American from all demographics.
peace13
(11,076 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)And you think that they're whining about what they perceive as Sander's attacks as the sin of the century. They haven't seen Hillary attacked yet.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)What's been happening the past 25 years from White Water to Benghazi to the latest with the FBI/Private Email Server controversy?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)That is something which is actually happening.
Yes there are bullshit attacks and made up horse crap about Hillary but going back and using history against her of actual facts and how they both lied to the American public? This isn't going to bode well...
I knew we would all see this but people are going to be so over it come November that voter turnout could be at historic lows.
peace13
(11,076 posts)Far enough to find real trouble. Not many people will accept the server issue as a nothing deal. Especially now that they continue to find more on it. Time will tell.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)"Rebuilding America Now". It appears they've started with $32 million in funding.
See: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/06/02/donald-trump-ally-secures-32-million-new-super-pac/85320288/
It appears they have produced just one ad so far:
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Sounds more like a weak attempt to stir the coals on Clinton hatred among the faithful.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Trump has broke all records on the right with the number of votes while Dem votes are actually down by millions compared to 2008.
The ad was posted above, it's a nasty piece of work.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Comparing to 2008 is sheer dishonesty given that no primary has ever had the level of turnout of the 08 Democratic primary. And that includes the Republicans' "record" turnout this year.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Actually, he did but he didn't.
There were 17 Republicans running, there were 4 Dems. 4x the Republican challengers, think about that for a second.
I would invite you to read these articles about voter turnout on the Dem side because this will be a huge problem.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/democrat-turnout-south-carolina_us_56d2e392e4b03260bf77247f
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/low-democratic-voter-turnout_us_56e0944ae4b0b25c9180a3ee
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/election/dem-voter-registration-leading-turnout-article-1.2545420
http://www.npr.org/2016/03/04/469233702/democrats-fret-over-low-voter-turnout-in-early-primaries
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)No actually I do know what's worse, but it's sad that Morning Joke is awful enough to make it a close call.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Honest question.
I like to watch shows that feature BOTH viewpoints because it plays into the whole thing of "keep your friends close and your enemies closer". Education is knowledge. Knowledge is power. Power is how you defeat the other side and counter their attacks and view points. You can't beat them if you don't know about them.
Now as far as overthrowing democracy is concerned, Bernie's argument is going to be that Hillary loses to Trump in the GE. Polls do reflect that. This is why SD's should flip.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)And SDs should never flip on the basis of polls. If we were going to do that, why even have elections? Just take some polls and give the nomination to whoever polls best.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Why even have elections? You tell me. Personally I would be in favor of uprooting the whole process itself. I'd prefer doing away with the EC entirely and have it be a true democracy where the people pick the candidate who wins the popular vote.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Nominations should be decided by polls rather than popular vote?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Only a select few were allowed to vote in those primaries, the GE makeup is much larger and Hillary can't win with 23% of the electorate. Outside that select group she has little support. This is what Bernie will say because he brings a massive coalition of voters to the GE.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Arguing that the primaries shouldn't count because most people didn't vote in them is meaningless noise, because that's the case every election. Even in the record-shattering 08 Democratic primaries, the vast majority didn't vote in them.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)RandySF
(58,728 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)By choosing the candidate with the fewest votes and delegates?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)You have a strange idea of democracy.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Wait.... We have 2 of the most "unfavorable" candidates in the history of US elections. WE put them both there. Yes WE did. Last I heard, HRC was at 60% unfavorable.
Do you think that will contribute to what is coming next? It's going to be very bad. Get ready. ALL that baggage!!!!
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)I just saw an ad during Morning Joe and it was damn ugly
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512163249
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Nothing like pumping up Republicans while tearing down Democrats. This guy has been trolling DU the entire primary.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:45 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Everybody's working for the weekend
Everybody wants a little romance
Everybody's goin' off the deep end
Everybody needs a second chance, oh
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: So sick of this. The OP is TRUE. There is a commercial out there about this and it should be widely known so that Democratic voters are aware. I miss those days when knowledge was power. Knowing this commercial is out there allows us to discuss it, evaluate it, and come up with ways to discuss the commercial with our undecided voter friends. Hillary needs 50.1 percent of the voters so anything to assist us in achieving that goals is good. We need to know what they are fighting with.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter, whomever you are, please try a bit more comprehensive reading. It would help quite a bit.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Does skirt trolling status. Objection sustained.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)and how this will play out in a GE. #ShockedNotShocked
840high
(17,196 posts)cover their eyes and plug their ears.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)You mean disenfranchise millions of voters who chose Clinton?
Ah, yes, it's the 'progressive' way, I suppose.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Now THAT was an ugly campaign, Goldwater v LBJ. Supposedly the guy who made the ad felt guilty about how unfair it was, and he was probably correct.
Difference is this guy sounds like he might be willing to use nukes so the issue is relevant.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)They would go from Sanders supporters to relentless attackers. As would the rest of the republican party.
This isn't our first rodeo. You won't be able to sell this bs here. We are a politically astute bunch.
Ino
(3,366 posts)She's been fully vetted. They got nothing on her. Grasping at straws. Old news.
Hillary is going to break the Repug stranglehold. She's going to get things done! They're running scared.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Wonder if we'll see the Hillary supporters get as mad about this as they are about Bernie, who has never said or run any ads anywhere near this nasty.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)You only have a few days left to sell your wares here. I guess you're trying to make the most of them.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)PufPuf23
(8,764 posts)Now we are supposed to watch the circus.
Anyone else see this video released today?
floriduck
(2,262 posts)forwarded classified material and of course, she said no. That was the wrong question. He should have asked her if she ever sent emails to anyone without security clearance that had classified information. Because her correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal concerning Libya was classified and she violated her security agreement. Then she had the balls to say that she never violated her agreement and did what others before her did. No one before her either had an unsecured home server and no one before her had the same increased rules she agreed to (and violated).
840high
(17,196 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)some of it by you.
Don't break that pearl necklace, now.
senz
(11,945 posts)At least it's not going to be dull.
a kennedy
(29,644 posts)Guess I'll be watching our new roku device until after the election. I don' t want to see any of it.
still_one
(92,122 posts)say "I told you so"
If that is the case, sorry to inform you, Hillary WILL win the general election
Justice
(7,185 posts)on their wives and harboring a rising star who was a pedophile -- all while acting all holy.
Matt_R
(456 posts)because you know... something... something...
Matt_R
(456 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I won't see any of it.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... of Clinton self-induced attack material. By the end of the Summer, this will seem like a love song compared to what's being said.
You demanded it, you got it.
Enjoy.