2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumExclusive: Clinton ally Warren weighs potential VP role, sees hurdles - sources
U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has considered the idea of serving as Hillary Clinton's running mate but sees obstacles to that choice as she prepares to endorse the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, several people familiar with Warren's thinking told Reuters.
While her thinking could evolve, Warren has concerns about joining a Clinton ticket, including the question of whether running two women would give the Democrats the best shot at defeating Republican Donald Trump, one source said.
Advisers to Warren, a fiery critic of Wall Street and a popular figure among progressive Democrats, have been in close contact with Clinton's campaign team and the conversations have increased in frequency in recent weeks, the sources said. Warren has signaled to people close to her that she is intrigued by the possibility of being Clinton's No. 2 but has not discussed the role with Clinton, 68, or anyone else from her campaign, the people said.
Warren, 66, has been one of the Democrats' most outspoken critics of Trump, 69, and her priority is helping to defeat the presumptive Republican nominee in the Nov. 8 presidential election, the sources said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-warren-exclusive-idUSKCN0YU2R8
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I'm sure Clinton's people will think this through from all kinds of angles, if they haven't already.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I think we are seeing a lot of propaganda with the end goal of more party unification than currently exists.
Her rhetoric toward Trump and her current Twitter feed smells of VP.
writes3000
(4,734 posts)She is not shy about her opinions. I think Hillary and Waren would make a formidable team.
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)I really don't want to go through a special election again. And I'd like to have some of my senators get some seniority in the chamber again. After years of Kennedy and Kerry, it's been rough. Warren lucks out because of her notoriety, but still.
"And I'd like to have some of my senators get some seniority in the chamber again."
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)If we keep yanking 'em out of New England, it continues to just minimize their potential. "those NE liberals and all"
Which is why I keep hoping that we'll see the progressive side of the party make a Tea Party style approach to some degree and focus on actually changing things where REAL change happens, at the local and state level.
Presidential politics is all kabuki.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)And I have little issue with Republican governors; I still thought Weld was one of our best back in the day. We tend to both neuter them well and they know they have to work differently here to succeed. I've been wary of Baker (I obviously didn't vote for him) but he's done better than I expected. It's reminiscent of how it "used to be" in some ways nationally.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Brown was supposedly a "moderate" ha
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)But he played a decent part of the electorate at a time when "change politics" was alive, so it was understandable. After a seat was held like it was for that long and the "ownership" of it from some Dems, they needed that smack in the face. At least he was mostly a useless dick. And watching him lose again and again was ever so sweet.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)cynatnite
(31,011 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Unless she really thought she had to to get Bernie's supporters on board.
I'm not sure I want her chosen under those conditions, because she may be marginalized as VP and I'd rather have her in the Senate than as a VP with a small role who was put on the ticket just to appease us.