Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:37 PM Jun 2016

Why do people think Democrats who refused to run for president would want to be a VP?

This is the primary, pun intended, thing I don't understand about those who push Warren and now Biden to be Hillary's VP. It would be very odd indeed if either of these two, who both had enormous support for a presidential run, yet turned that opportunity down, would now want to become mere figureheads, with virtually no ability to effect policy. The Biden choice is particularly weird, imo, because he's already served 8 years, is 73, and still dealing with enormous emotional pain from the death of his son, Beau. Seriously, how long can a person be expected to serve?

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why do people think Democrats who refused to run for president would want to be a VP? (Original Post) MoonRiver Jun 2016 OP
Because most VPs are people who didn't run for the nomination. Zynx Jun 2016 #1
That makes no sense. They chose not to run. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #2
There are many reasons. One could be that they support the other person running. Zynx Jun 2016 #4
Bernie would be the WORST choice, imo. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #5
I agree that VP doesn't make sense for Warren. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #8
And ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #13
In part, because Clinton was running. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #15
Perhaps. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #17
Besides not wanting to go up against Clinton, another reason could be... thesquanderer Jun 2016 #18
True ... But we can, alos, go by what she said ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #19
The campaigning part (the distaste for the ugliness of it it, and time required) might be ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #3
True that. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #6
Yup! longship Jun 2016 #7
It's well known Sanders wasn't the first choice to run for President. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #9
Vice Presidential Candidates jamese777 Jun 2016 #10
Have you ever heard of a VP who actually had policy making authority? MoonRiver Jun 2016 #11
Cheney had a heavy influence on Bush foreign policy TwilightZone Jun 2016 #14
because they know better for that person, than the person knows for themselves ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #12
So you would narrow the choices down to Sanders and O'Malley? Vinca Jun 2016 #16

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
1. Because most VPs are people who didn't run for the nomination.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jun 2016

It's far more common than not throughout history.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
2. That makes no sense. They chose not to run.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jun 2016

Why would they now want to run for a much lesser position? Warren has a lot of influence in the Senate, which she would lose and Biden is grieving.

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
4. There are many reasons. One could be that they support the other person running.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jun 2016

Why would they compete against someone who they think should be president?

Also, it could be that they want the "lesser" job. Not everyone aspires to the highest post. There are definitely powerful positions that I would turn down and less powerful ones that I would take.

Is this supposed to be some argument for Hillary picking Bernie as VP?

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
5. Bernie would be the WORST choice, imo.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:46 PM
Jun 2016

I just don't see Warren or Biden, for the reasons I have outlined, being interested. Time will tell of course.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
8. I agree that VP doesn't make sense for Warren.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:52 PM
Jun 2016

She has more power in the Senate than she'd have as VP. And while Biden (quite unusually for a VP) seems to like the job, he didn't run for president because he didn't want to put his family through another campaign during their time of grief. So he probably wouldn't want it either.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
13. And ...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jun 2016
They chose not to run.


In this instance, the un-named subject, refused to run, despite efforts to draft her, repeatedly.

TwilightZone

(25,464 posts)
15. In part, because Clinton was running.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jun 2016

Had Clinton chosen not to run, I think Warren would have considered it much more seriously.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
18. Besides not wanting to go up against Clinton, another reason could be...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

...that for whatever reasons, she did not want to spend these last 12 months traveling (campaigning, fundraising, etc.) Having no interest in running a grueling (and likely losing) candidacy against Hillary in 2015-6 doesn't necessarily equate to having no interest in being president or VP at a subsequent point in time.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
19. True ... But we can, alos, go by what she said ...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:08 PM
Jun 2016

she values her seat in the Senate, and wants to continue her efforts from there.

But it is , also, true, she could change her mind; but, I will wait for HER to do so; rather than, project my fantasies upon her.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
3. The campaigning part (the distaste for the ugliness of it it, and time required) might be ...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jun 2016

... the biggest reason.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
9. It's well known Sanders wasn't the first choice to run for President.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jun 2016

It was all about Warren. This talk is an attempt to bring unity. In a reply earlier I called it positive propaganda.

jamese777

(546 posts)
10. Vice Presidential Candidates
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:00 PM
Jun 2016

don't have to personally raise the huge amounts of money that are required to run for president.
Fundraising, Barack Obama: $745 million in 2008 and $716 million in 2012.
Vice Presidents can indeed effect policy if a president cedes to them policy making powers. For example, Vice President Dick Cheney, prime advocate for and principle architect of the Iraq War.
A condition of accepting the Vice Presidential position can be having policy making authority.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
11. Have you ever heard of a VP who actually had policy making authority?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jun 2016

I haven't, but if you have I would be interested in knowing which VP, and what policies.

TwilightZone

(25,464 posts)
14. Cheney had a heavy influence on Bush foreign policy
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:44 PM
Jun 2016

Sole policy-making authority? No, but his influence was stamped all over Iraq.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
12. because they know better for that person, than the person knows for themselves ...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jun 2016

we've seen it on DU, over and over again, where DUers confuse what THEY want for what is "best" for others, whether it be other individuals or groups ... but they get highly offended when this is pointed out. So ... thread lightly.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why do people think Democ...