Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:28 PM Jun 2016

Shouldn't picking POTUS be about character

Either your character is exemplary...or it isn't.

It really is that simple.

[br][hr][br]

I didn't expect debates on the meaning of the word character; and provide this item ..for clarity's sake.


char·ac·ter
ˈkerəktər/
noun
1.
the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual.
"running away was not in keeping with her character"
synonyms: personality, nature, disposition, temperament, temper, mentality, makeup; More

40 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Bernie's character is good
30 (75%)
Hillary's character is good
5 (13%)
All of the above
5 (13%)
Laser...is a....character
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shouldn't picking POTUS be about character (Original Post) laserhaas Jun 2016 OP
Only to an extent Vogon_Glory Jun 2016 #1
I dont think bible thumping counts as character laserhaas Jun 2016 #3
Trump's character is very, very bad. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #2
I would argue that you could have worked harder laserhaas Jun 2016 #5
How do you know how hard I worked? I don't understand your response. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #9
Isnt Bernie's loss...our loss laserhaas Jun 2016 #15
I supported Bernie from the beginning, contributed to his campaign, The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #18
I hear you and....sigh laserhaas Jun 2016 #23
character is acknowledging reality, accepting and moving into the next phase nt msongs Jun 2016 #4
Why are we rehashing the primary race? It's over. It's GE time. LonePirate Jun 2016 #6
November is not over. 840high Jun 2016 #35
I care more about policy than character. ZombieHorde Jun 2016 #7
That's absurd. If the policy comes from lacking in character laserhaas Jun 2016 #11
Character is so subjective that I don't think about it very much. ZombieHorde Jun 2016 #42
The trend here...is as telltale laserhaas Jun 2016 #8
As a History Major I'd Caution Against Taking a Puritan View of Character in a President Stallion Jun 2016 #10
JFK is an example...of your paradigm..suggested laserhaas Jun 2016 #13
JFK was not squeaky clean. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #19
That was the point...He had flaws...but was exceptional laserhaas Jun 2016 #24
JFK-s principle campaign issue was an outright lie. okasha Jun 2016 #30
Opinions vary laserhaas Jun 2016 #43
Opinions on the so-called "missile gap" do not vary. okasha Jun 2016 #65
He kept I.S. out of a war with Russia...over Cuba laserhaas Jun 2016 #71
That's US, not I,S, okasha Jun 2016 #81
Picky...picker pikki laserhaas Jun 2016 #82
Anyone who lived through those days. okasha Jun 2016 #89
Why are we fighting a primary that's over? RandySF Jun 2016 #12
You wish it was over; and that's a troubling thing laserhaas Jun 2016 #14
Well RandySF Jun 2016 #17
That would be unwise...DU..DK .etc...speaks the will laserhaas Jun 2016 #20
The will of the people is reflected in their votes. Ace Rothstein Jun 2016 #32
November is coming. 840high Jun 2016 #36
Pshaw laserhaas Jun 2016 #44
Because some folks... LenaBaby61 Jun 2016 #78
character is only a part of it. unblock Jun 2016 #16
Your argument does not hold water...he re laserhaas Jun 2016 #22
so... somehow that means only character matters? unblock Jun 2016 #28
My op posed the question and the answers..pro Hillary laserhaas Jun 2016 #46
i voted for bernie so i don't know what you're talking about. unblock Jun 2016 #70
No..you seem to want to be argumentative laserhaas Jun 2016 #72
Jimmy Carter has more character okasha Jun 2016 #21
I don't agree... We had run away inflation and % hikes laserhaas Jun 2016 #25
Runaway inflation does not indicate a flawed character. okasha Jun 2016 #31
You are the one who argued....effectiveness laserhaas Jun 2016 #47
Did you miss the point that completely? okasha Jun 2016 #68
Isnt that what I just said laserhaas Jun 2016 #73
the inflation we had wasn't "runaway" inflation, which is an entirely different animal. unblock Jun 2016 #33
I remember the prices at the time ( being 60 yrs old) laserhaas Jun 2016 #48
I'll always think of Carter 840high Jun 2016 #38
I dont disagree...but he was a flawed POTUS laserhaas Jun 2016 #49
LBJ was pretty much an asshole. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #27
And his character flaws may include fore knowledge laserhaas Jun 2016 #50
Dammit! I knew I forgot to check the character box on that ballot MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #26
Good one laserhaas Jun 2016 #51
Who defines exemplary character? mythology Jun 2016 #29
I prefer Hillary for many reasons, and yes one of the reasons is character La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #34
You can fool all the 840high Jun 2016 #39
Lol. Ok La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #41
I say laserhaas Jun 2016 #52
Love your sig line. 840high Jun 2016 #62
Thanks laserhaas Jun 2016 #75
I agree with you. athena Jun 2016 #66
Certainly couldnt have nothing to do with facts laserhaas Jun 2016 #80
Sanders has shown a decided lack of character in the last few weeks. baldguy Jun 2016 #37
Says you laserhaas Jun 2016 #53
If he were a "gentlemen and a warrior" he would concede & join Clinton to fight RW oppression. baldguy Jun 2016 #93
Probably not. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #40
That speaks to the character of the nation and Nadar laserhaas Jun 2016 #54
It's about leadership and the ability to effectively prosecute an agenda. MADem Jun 2016 #45
I dont disagree..for the most part laserhaas Jun 2016 #55
I do think she is more qualified. MADem Jun 2016 #57
We disagree laserhaas Jun 2016 #59
No, it's about votes XRubicon Jun 2016 #56
Actually...its about rules and vote countings laserhaas Jun 2016 #61
Don't bogart that... pass it XRubicon Jun 2016 #64
Character, proven authenticity, and sound judgment. SamKnause Jun 2016 #58
Very well put laserhaas Jun 2016 #60
Too bad he couldn't get more people to vote for him... XRubicon Jun 2016 #67
Hypothetically, sure. cheapdate Jun 2016 #63
Exactly laserhaas Jun 2016 #76
One difference between Clinton supporters and the uninitiated... Miles Archer Jun 2016 #69
I simply cannot jiin the fray laserhaas Jun 2016 #79
I'll never "endorse" her...I won't come here for cookies and punch if I vote for her. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #94
Not necessarily.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #74
That's not an issue...this time laserhaas Jun 2016 #77
Hillary is the Democratic nominee. grossproffit Jun 2016 #87
I don't care about someone's character. RB TexLa Jun 2016 #83
Obviously...that's why We're in this dilemma laserhaas Jun 2016 #85
The Rethugs spent $70 million and several years trying to damage Hillary's character pnwmom Jun 2016 #84
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #86
It's funny, Sanders supporters have always said that it's about the issues ContinentalOp Jun 2016 #88
Ding, ding, ding! grossproffit Jun 2016 #90
JFK and FDR were absolute bastards. NuclearDem Jun 2016 #91
yes, and she won. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #92

Vogon_Glory

(9,117 posts)
1. Only to an extent
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jun 2016

Character is only a virtue to an extent. I'd sooner have a rascally, skirt chasing rogue who knows what's what than some Bible thumping Dweeb who has no idea how the world works. We saw PLENTY of the latter in the Republicans' primaries earlier this year.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
2. Trump's character is very, very bad.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jun 2016

At this point my primary concern is to be sure that assclown isn't allowed within a mile of the White House.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
15. Isnt Bernie's loss...our loss
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:47 PM
Jun 2016

He couldnt be in more places...but we could have

Arguing that Trump is the issue now...infers...you are resigned

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
18. I supported Bernie from the beginning, contributed to his campaign,
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jun 2016

did what I could to support him. There really isn't anything more I, as an individual, can do at this point to make him become the nominee. It would be great but it's not likely to happen.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
7. I care more about policy than character.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:35 PM
Jun 2016

Character means different things to different people, but policy is a little more concrete. Still open to interpretation, but not nearly as much as character, in my opinion.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
42. Character is so subjective that I don't think about it very much.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:45 PM
Jun 2016

Philosophers and religious icons have wildly different ideas as to what constitutes a "good character." Nietzsche, Lao Tzu, de Sade, Kant, etc., all hold different opinions on the subject. On paper, many of us would agree on some things, but certainly not in practice. Personally, I suspect there is no such thing as character, or lack thereof.

All policy is fickle. 100%, through and through.

Stallion

(6,474 posts)
10. As a History Major I'd Caution Against Taking a Puritan View of Character in a President
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:36 PM
Jun 2016

generally yeah but Presidents have had great strengths and usually significant weaknesses of character. But I'd agree that's a HUGE weakness for Trump

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
13. JFK is an example...of your paradigm..suggested
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:42 PM
Jun 2016

And he had more character than most

Though nobody is perfect

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
24. That was the point...He had flaws...but was exceptional
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:10 PM
Jun 2016

Wonder what he and MLK (or even Mandela) would say in their minds...of the dynamics of this day

okasha

(11,573 posts)
30. JFK-s principle campaign issue was an outright lie.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jun 2016

He ran on the assertion that the US had substantially fewer ICBM's than the USSR and was therefore vulnerable in a nuclear war. And all three Kennedy brothers had zipper problems that make Bill Clinton look like a choirboy.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
65. Opinions on the so-called "missile gap" do not vary.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:33 PM
Jun 2016

I'd say to him:

1. Thank you for instituting the space program. It was great while it lasted.

2. Fuck you to hell for not having the guts to get out of Vietnam in your first term. You didn't get the second you hoped for, and Lyndon lied us deeper and deeper into it with the Tonkin Gulf Resolution as a result.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
71. He kept I.S. out of a war with Russia...over Cuba
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:02 AM
Jun 2016

And I'd dare say you wouldnt be so uncouth to say FU

HRC has done much worse

Just sayin.....

okasha

(11,573 posts)
81. That's US, not I,S,
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:03 AM
Jun 2016

He faced Kruschev down over deployment of Soviet missiles to Cuba. For the first and only time our military went to DefCon 2. He threatened war with the USSR, and they stood down.

I remember that day very well. The nuns sent us all home so that they could all meet in chapel and pray for peace. No one was fooled, though. We all knew we were going home to die with our families when the bombs began to rain out of the sky.

Yes, I'd use that language. Friends died in Vietnam, and some who survived are permanently disabled.

And no, HRC has not done worse than Vietnam. Don't try to pin Bush's war on her.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
82. Picky...picker pikki
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:07 AM
Jun 2016

You are willfully blind to facts and prefer fiction

Document your contentions.please .if you intend to continue

okasha

(11,573 posts)
89. Anyone who lived through those days.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:10 AM
Jun 2016

will tell you the same things. Get yourself a couple of bios of JFK; read Caro's books on LBJ.

I suspect I play better poker than you do, too.




 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
14. You wish it was over; and that's a troubling thing
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:45 PM
Jun 2016

But we only have a few days left to even dare to pose this question.

And Im expecting my bojo..come that time.

So...fret not...this will likely wither away

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
78. Because some folks...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:16 AM
Jun 2016

Just can't let go of losing. I understand it to a point.

I remember back in 2008 when then Sen. Obama got the best of Hillary. I was not a happy camper, but once the primaries were over, and once Hillary threw all of her support behind Sen. Obama, I got squarely behind him and never looked back. I did what I could to get others to register to vote. Helped get seniors to the polls, and made sure--with the help of others--to make sure people who sent away for mail-in ballots got them, and myself, along with others, also made sure that those who needed help getting to the polls to vote on election night got there.

But like I say, some folks just can't let go . Oh well

unblock

(52,209 posts)
16. character is only a part of it.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:54 PM
Jun 2016

other things matter as well, like issues, priorities, etc.

moreover, "character" is not remotely binary as you describe, especially when it comes to politics.

we could elect a saint only to find them incapable of achieving any helpful outcomes.

lbj had some tremendous accomplishments on the domestic front, and he was known for eating raw onions before close-talking to congress-critters to twist their arms. simply put, he was not a nice guy. but i'll take effective any day of the week if it's in the name of civil rights and progressive values.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
22. Your argument does not hold water...he re
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:07 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie most certainly has as much experience in politics as Senator Obama did

unblock

(52,209 posts)
28. so... somehow that means only character matters?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jun 2016

you're o.p. is trying to make potus selection all about "character", and trying to make "character" something that you either have or don't have.

i'm saying it's rather more complex than that.

now you seem to be saying it's about character and experience.

ok....

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
46. My op posed the question and the answers..pro Hillary
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:57 PM
Jun 2016

Dodge it..or mischaracterize it...in obfuscation

Bernie is much cleaner than Hillary

Just as many years in politics

And more progressive

Much....MUCH ...less...flip floppy

unblock

(52,209 posts)
70. i voted for bernie so i don't know what you're talking about.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:43 PM
Jun 2016

you seem to be bent on seeing everything through a hillary vs. bernie lens.

i wasn't really talking about either.

you were making arguments about how to pick a president, i disagreed with your methodology, which i find highly simplistic as it ignores many other facets that are relevant to the outcomes.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
21. Jimmy Carter has more character
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jun 2016

than any three other presidents from 1900-present.
He was ridiculed for it..

LBJ had less character than Herbert Hoover subtracted from Calvin Coolidge. Yet he accomplished the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Great Society legislation.

Picking POTUS should be based on experience and effectiveness.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
25. I don't agree... We had run away inflation and % hikes
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jun 2016

When he was POTUS

Post Presidency there's none who have devoted themselves to humanity..more

His signing on the Troy Davis case was awe inspiring

okasha

(11,573 posts)
31. Runaway inflation does not indicate a flawed character.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:22 PM
Jun 2016

It indicates poor policy and bad planning.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
68. Did you miss the point that completely?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:36 PM
Jun 2016

I argued that Jimmy Carter is a man of high character, but little effectiveness as President.

unblock

(52,209 posts)
33. the inflation we had wasn't "runaway" inflation, which is an entirely different animal.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:25 PM
Jun 2016

we had moderately high inflation (by american standards, anyway) for a few years, then stamped it out by design with interest rate hikes designed to break the expectation of inflation.

that solution to the inflation problem (which arose due to the oil shocks under nixon/ford and their incompetent non-handling of the problem -- remember ford's "whip inflation now" buttons?) was engineered by carter appointed fed chair paul volcker and is widely credited with having stabilized our economy for the subsequent decades.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
48. I remember the prices at the time ( being 60 yrs old)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:59 PM
Jun 2016

And 21% interest rates on loans

It was nutz


But I adore him (and his silent buddy Holland Ware)

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
49. I dont disagree...but he was a flawed POTUS
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:01 PM
Jun 2016

Lacking the true comprehension of POWER perceived is power achieved

He was...and still is....a very nice guy

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
27. LBJ was pretty much an asshole.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:18 PM
Jun 2016

But he was a very effective president with respect to his domestic policies.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
26. Dammit! I knew I forgot to check the character box on that ballot
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jun 2016

And it was right next to the hash tag #mtguyisthebestestawesome

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
29. Who defines exemplary character?
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jun 2016

There are plenty of reports of Sanders being alienating to potential allies for not meeting his definition of purity. The recent Politico report on the end of the primary season isn't exactly a flattering portrayal (not that I take that report particularly seriously by itself as people are always happy to shift blame for failure to achieve objectives onto others).

Sanders spent a lot of time and effort opposing efforts to look at the VA when the first reports of problems came out. Yes he then helped to pass the reform bill, but he got blasted by IAVA for example for his initial refusal to take action.

I find it rare that somebody actually has exemplary behavior as I would consider it. And that includes myself.

athena

(4,187 posts)
66. I agree with you.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:34 PM
Jun 2016

People who think she has a bad character are believing the propaganda rather than looking with their own eyes.

For example, Tulsi Gabbard is a darling among Bernie supporters, who seem completely unfamiliar with her extreme views on Syrian refugees.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
80. Certainly couldnt have nothing to do with facts
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:19 AM
Jun 2016

Or evidence...mens rea...scienter...her being a lawyer

Vastly experienced in White House inner dealings

Shenanigans

Etc.....

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
93. If he were a "gentlemen and a warrior" he would concede & join Clinton to fight RW oppression.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 06:35 AM
Jun 2016

He is neither.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
45. It's about leadership and the ability to effectively prosecute an agenda.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:56 PM
Jun 2016

That agenda should be to the advancement and betterment of We, The People.

We've had plenty of very effective "characters" in the White House--and some of them weren't clean as a hound's tooth, either, in terms of their moral qualities, certainly.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
55. I dont disagree..for the most part
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:08 PM
Jun 2016

But the arguments that Hillary is more qualified...nicer

Or of better character....are disingenuous

MADem

(135,425 posts)
57. I do think she is more qualified.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:13 PM
Jun 2016

I couldn't say if she's nicer...but who cares? We're not electing a prom queen after all...

XRubicon

(2,212 posts)
56. No, it's about votes
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:11 PM
Jun 2016

How many did Bernie get? How many did Hillary get?

OMG! many people who vote disagree with you...

XRubicon

(2,212 posts)
67. Too bad he couldn't get more people to vote for him...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:35 PM
Jun 2016

Good honest folk, like you. Not evil people, like me.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
69. One difference between Clinton supporters and the uninitiated...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:40 PM
Jun 2016

...is that some, although maybe not all, of her supporters think her character is fine just the way it is.

People not in that category have questions / qualms / etc about her character, or they flat-out are not admirers or supporters.

That's painting it in broad strokes, of course.

There will be more than a few Democrats who will vote for her for reasons other than her "character," the biggest reason being to stop Trump. A "vote" is not synonymous with "vote of confidence" 100% of the time. Sometimes it's something you have to do in order to prevent something else from happening...in this case, preventing "President Trump."

It's like anything else in life.

It would be a large, perhaps impossible effort to convince someone who admires and respects Clinton to convince them that they shouldn't.

It would be a large, perhaps impossible effort to convince someone who neither admires not respects Clinton to convince them that they should.

And as someone who has supported Sanders, I've done that, without trying to bend or allowing myself to be bent. People who are excited about Clinton? Good for them. It's important to find people and causes that excite you. Why would I want to rain on their parade?

I don't think the 2016 election is about character at all, unless you list the negatives Trump brings to the table. Then it's about his character.

Clinton is who we have in our corner to stop him. That's the sum total of my praise for her on any level.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
79. I simply cannot jiin the fray
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:16 AM
Jun 2016

1st of all...her character is an issue..for me

2nd ...the quid pro quo while Sec of State getting millions for the Foundation...from foreigners..is reprehensible

Finally...I know Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs far better than most.. Abd she tooks Sachs money...praising them...while winking an eye...telli g them to stop that

So she has received a piece of my childrens inheritance, by proxy...that they stole..by fraud and corruption

Including mayhem and worse

She will never touch Goldman Sachs

And I'll never touch her

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
94. I'll never "endorse" her...I won't come here for cookies and punch if I vote for her.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:03 AM
Jun 2016

...I just don't know if I'm going to be able to vote for her in November.

I'll never be a supporter, I'll never have an "H->" avatar of Clinton photos in my sig line.

That said, she's what we've got. It will be a choice between her and Trump, unless the RNC decides to throw him under the bus at the convention, and so far they have shown themselves to be cowards who are all tough talk and nothing else.

Someone posted an old video on DU yesterday. He asks her if we should have stuck with the hunt for binLaden, rather than having gone into Iraq.



"Well, Chris, I think we can do more than one thing at a time."

That's probably what concerns me the most...that she can do "more than one thing at a time."

Am I concerned about Wall Street / Big Banks getting richer while the working class struggles? Yes.

Am I concerned about remaining in every war we are in and adding new ones? Yes.

Does she have a track record that justifies my having these concerns? Yes.

And we have three choices in November: Vote for her, vote for Trump, don't vote. I'm not including third-party candidates on this list because I don't believe they would have a chance of succeeding in this election cycle.

I can't do the second, don't feel that great about the third, and a vote for her would be a vote against my values and conscience. If it stops Trump, will my conscience feel better? No. And I have five months to decide what I'm going to do, just like the rest of us.
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
74. Not necessarily....
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:05 AM
Jun 2016

A person can be of excellent character and still not suitable to be President.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
84. The Rethugs spent $70 million and several years trying to damage Hillary's character
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:26 AM
Jun 2016

during Bill's term, and countless dollars since then.

Few have had their character tested as much as Hillary, and the worst they can come up with is copying Colin Powell in using a private email..

Response to pnwmom (Reply #84)

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
88. It's funny, Sanders supporters have always said that it's about the issues
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:08 AM
Jun 2016

But now you admit that it's really about "character." Meaning that you just don't like her. I knew this was the case all along because their stated positions on the issues are not that far apart, but Sanders supporters just assume that she is always lying and pandering. It's always been about personality over the issues.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
91. JFK and FDR were absolute bastards.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:24 AM
Jun 2016

GWB was a choir boy.

You can be a saint and still have disastrous, horrid ideas, and you can be a right prick and still have the vision and capability to do great things.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Shouldn't picking POTUS b...