Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:05 PM Jun 2016

I didn't know that Hillary is NOT a target of the FBI investigation.

Now that I've seen the confirming responses in HCG, I think I ought to share this in GDP. For those who don't read all the replies, the most interesting to me was the explanation that this myth got started many months ago when the NYT reported that she was under investigation. They printed a retraction, but, of course, lots of people never heard about it. Including me...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107164299

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
3. I was actually wondering about that the other day
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:14 PM
Jun 2016

Whether she was actually a target of the investigation as opposed to a person of interest or just a witness.

If she is not a target that is a relief.

I really hope the FBI comes out with its findings soon, before the convention.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
8. Thanks, I like yours too
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jun 2016

You should put yours on a bumper sticker like I did. I think that's a slogan that would sell.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
4. if you knew this, than the mass delusion that she will be indicted and the PTB will award Sanders
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jun 2016

the nomination would have to end.

which is why this is not often seen on DU

nolabear

(41,959 posts)
9. It's amazing how supposedly professional journalists let this go.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jun 2016

Incitement to outrage over any semblance of actual reporting.

niyad

(113,259 posts)
10. but, if that fact were more widely disseminated, how could there be all that wailing
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jun 2016

and gnashing of teeth against her?

Bob41213

(491 posts)
12. Whether or not she is a target is unknown. But the article doesn't say she's not a target....
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jun 2016

It says: Rosen also asked whether Obama had ever discussed the Justice Department's investigation with Clinton, who has never been named a target of the probe.

"has never been named a target" != "not a target"

The FBI doesn't disclose these things. The only people outside the DOJ and FBI who know anything I believe are Hillary who could ask the DOJ if she is a target. But we can't really expect a straight answer out of her. So once again we're back to where we were which is she could very well be a target.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
13. They don't outright name their targets
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jun 2016

I am not sure why anyone would expect that.

But they have given at least one, and possibly two, people immunity/plea deals. That clearly indicates that they are looking at someone up the food chain.

Who could that be? I wonder...

As for why Obama endorsed. He has no other option.

He is not going to say: "I am going to wait and see if she catches the charge".

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I didn't know that Hillar...