Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:34 AM Jun 2016

Susan Sarandon in two Tweets, on the same day

Tweet 1: Scolding Elizabeth Warren as insufficiently committed to the cause of equality and fighting the elites


Susan Sarandon Verified account
?@SusanSarandon

Susan Sarandon Retweeted Elizabeth Warren

Is this meant to be ironic after you just endorsed Clinton???

Susan Sarandon added,
Elizabeth Warren @SenWarren
Government should be accountable to the people, not Wall Street lobbyists, deep-pocketed donors, and secretive Super PACs.



Tweet 2: Italian cashmere!


Susan Sarandon Verified account
?@SusanSarandon

Beautiful cashmere collection, Italian-made @FalconeriTweet in Taormina. Thank you! So generous and fun.



Don't be a Susan Sarandon.
89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Susan Sarandon in two Tweets, on the same day (Original Post) geek tragedy Jun 2016 OP
Multi-millionaire Naderite Tweets something. nt onehandle Jun 2016 #1
Revolution of the People! Oligarchy. .....Squirrel!!!! nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #2
LOL Scurrilous Jun 2016 #29
LOL....n/t Henhouse Jun 2016 #30
#Wall Street #Cashmere! LOL! Cha Jun 2016 #71
She's a great actress and I'v enjoyed her work for years... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #3
yes, Warren has shown to lack Purity Of Essence and is guilty geek tragedy Jun 2016 #5
Well put. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2016 #56
Hopefully, she will just fade away SOON! but I doubt it. riversedge Jun 2016 #4
she will continue to be an overprivileged moron nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #6
^^^This!^^^ Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #12
Stick to acting... Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #7
Agreed. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #70
Awful woman. auntpurl Jun 2016 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #9
She needs anger management therapy. nt DURHAM D Jun 2016 #10
Talk about clueless 1%ers with tone-deaf tweets.... baldguy Jun 2016 #11
So, I'm guessing... LenaBaby61 Jun 2016 #13
don't annoint Sarandon the queen of nitwits just yet geek tragedy Jun 2016 #14
What a loser jzodda Jun 2016 #15
That video of her yelling in the face of Dolores Huerta Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #16
Yes, me too. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #86
This is pretty funny (in a way). cwydro Jun 2016 #17
To be honest.... Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #18
Yeah I agree..........But the obsession with her is worse Armstead Jun 2016 #19
I find her Nader-loving, 1%er, elitist, parasite of privledge Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #39
Nowhere near as tasteful as wearing a 12k desinger jacket while your speaking on income inequality azurnoir Jun 2016 #20
How about taking a 600,000 dollar junket to Rome on your followers workinclasszero Jun 2016 #24
On followers Social Security food money? azurnoir Jun 2016 #25
if she got her clothes off the rack Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #28
So the rest of the 1 percent is off the hook? CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #34
The jacket could have been a loaner. apcalc Jun 2016 #58
or a donation azurnoir Jun 2016 #75
Rome Hekate Jun 2016 #74
Dammit, Janet! nolabear Jun 2016 #21
Susan Sarandon is the poster-child for the phrase "Limousine liberal." nt BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #22
Worst Bernie surrogate ever! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #23
+1 CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #89
Regardless who wins the GE Susan Sarandon will not go hungry, or lack healthcare still_one Jun 2016 #26
^^This^^ Yavin4 Jun 2016 #38
She's a bonehead. Lance Bass esquire Jun 2016 #27
susan sarandon Cheese Sandwich Jun 2016 #31
she's 3 for 3 enid602 Jun 2016 #32
She supported Edwards in 2004 and 2008 CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #33
I love her TSIAS Jun 2016 #35
lol La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #36
cool johnsonmilla Jun 2016 #37
If they support a $15 minimum wage, I don't care what they wear. Ash_F Jun 2016 #40
Clinton isn't scolding Elizabeth Warren geek tragedy Jun 2016 #42
I am concerned with policy, not personality. Ash_F Jun 2016 #44
Maybe she did not want to run for President. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #45
Obviously not, since she didn't. She knew what the Clinton wing would do to her. Ash_F Jun 2016 #46
She repeatedly said she had no interest in running. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #49
Call it a gut feeling. Ash_F Jun 2016 #68
Okay...a female Senator signs a public letter encouraging msanthrope Jun 2016 #82
Politics is complicated. Ash_F Jun 2016 #84
I'm so glad you are here to explain women to us. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #85
Maybe she didn't want to be treated like Sanders has been Fumesucker Jun 2016 #47
Oh please. Sanders barely had a glove laid on him nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #48
Blue Nation Review portrays Sanders as sexist. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #50
How many people read Blue Nation Review during the primary, 10? geek tragedy Jun 2016 #52
Sanders called HRC unqualified after she implied he was Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #57
yes, Sanders called her unqualified because he didn't bother reading past geek tragedy Jun 2016 #60
There is a book titled Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #62
so what? geek tragedy Jun 2016 #64
They aren't sexist. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #67
why did Weaver feel compelled to criticize someone seeking geek tragedy Jun 2016 #69
Take it easy on Mr. Weaver. He's not the only one to note Clinton's troubling ambition. lapucelle Jun 2016 #83
Indeed. Kindly produce a quote of Weaver attacking a man for their ambition. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #81
Gasp! The evil Susan Sarandon! AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #41
They don't like to hear the truth. ozone_man Jun 2016 #66
Thelma & Louise SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #77
I guess their both hypocrites runaway hero Jun 2016 #43
It's a contradiction that Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #51
No, it's her smug, superior tone she takes to public servants like Elizabeth Warren nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #54
She's a hypocrite. She has no problem with quid pro quo as long as she's the benefactor. grossproffit Jun 2016 #59
So Sarandon is in charge of deciding government policy now? If not, who gives a damn. Skwmom Jun 2016 #87
Thanks for posting. I love Susan Sarandon! B Calm Jun 2016 #53
+1 She made a TV commercial with her own money, asking why we were going to war in Iraq. merrily Jun 2016 #61
Nice poncho. That's all I got. grossproffit Jun 2016 #55
I love Susan. bigwillq Jun 2016 #63
Kick CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #65
Oh BooHoo, sarandan.. my heart bleeds for your vapidity. i bet Elizabeth was really impressed.. Cha Jun 2016 #72
Never liked her. Now there's another reason. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #73
Is that like being a privileged white person supporting a privileged white person Scootaloo Jun 2016 #76
The.total lack of self awareness that comes with privilige. nt arely staircase Jun 2016 #78
Susan needs to release the transcripts of her boutique visit/endorsement. nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #79
Classic. And you know what's really funny? ucrdem Jun 2016 #80
kick CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #88
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. yes, Warren has shown to lack Purity Of Essence and is guilty
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:44 AM
Jun 2016

of living in the real world, unlike Naderite nitwit hypocrites like Susan Sarandon (who supported Iraq War Resolution co-sponsor, DLC darling, and hedge fund employee Papa John Edwards in 2008).

Mike Nelson

(9,951 posts)
7. Stick to acting...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:46 AM
Jun 2016

...Susan. You have a right to speak out and use your wealth and celebrity, granted. But you make progressives look loony.

Response to geek tragedy (Original post)

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
13. So, I'm guessing...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:24 AM
Jun 2016

That since Sen. Bernie Sanders is hinting that he'll be meeting with Hillary Clinton soon, she'll throw him under the bus as well, along with Elizabeth Warren and of course Hillary whose been under the bus.

As Mama said, if you don't have something good to say about someone, then just don't say anything.

Well, I guess I can't say anything about Susan's meteoric rise to becoming queen of nitwits then

(Special mention goes out to Roseanne Barr whose also in the running with Susan for nitwit queen).

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. don't annoint Sarandon the queen of nitwits just yet
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:26 AM
Jun 2016

Rosario Dawson hasn't conceded, and of course Tim Robbins is the king, which could get awkward

jzodda

(2,124 posts)
15. What a loser
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:22 AM
Jun 2016

Said trump was better than Clinton. Hope she moved to Mars. It's not far enough but I did hear shes from there.

Florencenj2point0

(435 posts)
16. That video of her yelling in the face of Dolores Huerta
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:31 AM
Jun 2016

with such anger that she was practically spitting, getting those around her to gang up "get the video, get the video".... I will never forgive that stupid woman. With the exception of "Dead Man Walking" in which she was good, not great, she has traded on her beauty and sexuality for every roll she has done.
She is dead to me.

Maru Kitteh

(28,339 posts)
39. I find her Nader-loving, 1%er, elitist, parasite of privledge
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:22 PM
Jun 2016

blabbering pie-hole of hypocrisy to be pretty much worse than anyone who has the temerity to call her out on her crap. YMMV.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
24. How about taking a 600,000 dollar junket to Rome on your followers
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 02:34 PM
Jun 2016

social security food money?

FUCK THE OLIGARCHY!!!...or something.

Florencenj2point0

(435 posts)
28. if she got her clothes off the rack
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 02:57 PM
Jun 2016

the media and the men here would be calling her frumpy. Her clothes are none of your business. She pays for them herself.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
33. She supported Edwards in 2004 and 2008
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 03:56 PM
Jun 2016

So tone deaf tweets arent the only thing she's really shitty at.

BTW, Elizabeth Warren isn't someone you want to get into a war of words with, Susy. Take a seat.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
35. I love her
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 04:40 PM
Jun 2016

I'll take her over that liar America Ferrera any day of the week. Sarandon was right, and Ferrera was wrong in Nevada.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
40. If they support a $15 minimum wage, I don't care what they wear.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:27 PM
Jun 2016

Clinton wears $12,000 outfits and does not support $15/hr.

I am not sure how that is better.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
42. Clinton isn't scolding Elizabeth Warren
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:30 PM
Jun 2016

Loony limousine liberal Susan Sarandon fawns over people like Papa John Edwards but scolds Elizabeth Warren and likes Trump better than Clinton.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
44. I am concerned with policy, not personality.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jun 2016

I am not a fan of the dogpile on Warren, though I think she made a mistake by not running.

She probably thought she could not win, but look how close Sanders got. We now know she would have won.

Biggest mistake of her life.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
46. Obviously not, since she didn't. She knew what the Clinton wing would do to her.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 01:16 AM
Jun 2016

That does not mean she was not considering it until very late.

I think it took so long for Sanders to jump in because they were in communication about it.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
49. She repeatedly said she had no interest in running.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 06:35 AM
Jun 2016

She signed a letter encouraging Clinton to run.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
82. Okay...a female Senator signs a public letter encouraging
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:59 AM
Jun 2016

another female to run.....but your "gut" knows better? I don't think it's your gut.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
47. Maybe she didn't want to be treated like Sanders has been
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 01:27 AM
Jun 2016

Anyone running against Hillary was guaranteed to have a Niagara of crap dumped on them.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
50. Blue Nation Review portrays Sanders as sexist.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:06 AM
Jun 2016

It's owned by David Brock, who runs Hillary Clinton's coordinated Super PAC, Correct the Record.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
52. How many people read Blue Nation Review during the primary, 10?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:12 AM
Jun 2016

and let's not forget the nastiness that came directly from the Sanders campaign, such as Sanders himself calling Clinton unqualified or Jeff Weaver (who is a sexist asshole) scolding her for being too uppity.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
57. Sanders called HRC unqualified after she implied he was
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:33 AM
Jun 2016

...and the WaPo ran a headline that she called him unqualified.

I don't know if Blue Nation Review has a lot of readers but some who read it post links at DU and Twitter.

I don't think Weaver was being sexist:


A top aide to Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders warned late Tuesday that rival Hillary Clinton is running a divisive campaign that is hurting party unity.

"Don't destroy the Democratic Party to satisfy the secretary's ambitions to become president of the United States," Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver told CNN.

"We want to have a party at the end of this that we can unify," he added.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
60. yes, Sanders called her unqualified because he didn't bother reading past
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:39 AM
Jun 2016

the headline of a Washington Post article. There's irony there if you look for it.

This wasn't Weaver's only offense (he also mansplained to Barbara Boxer how she had no right to feel afraid of an angry mob), but it was his most shining example:

http://www.vox.com/2016/4/6/11378306/hillary-clinton-lol-ambition-attack

fter Sanders won the Wisconsin primary Tuesday night, CNN's Jake Tapper asked Weaver whether the Sanders campaign is prepared for a tougher, possibly more negative campaign. Weaver countered, however, that the Clinton camp needs to stop going on the attack.

"This is what I would say to them, which is, you know, don't destroy the Democratic Party to satisfy the secretary's ambitions to become president of the United States," Weaver said. "We want to have a party at the end of this we can unify. Let's have a tough debate. Let's talk about the issues — there's a sharp contrast between the two of them. But let's not denigrate other people's supporters and tear the party apart."

How audacious of Clinton (who remains the party's frontrunner) to want to win her race! It's not like she's been called "one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history," or spent time in the White House, or organized one of the most powerful fundraising operations in the election. Seems like someone sprinkled a bit too much presidential ambition in her oatmeal this morning, amiright?

When asked by CNN's Chris Cuomo to comment on Sanders's assertion that her ambitions are "destroying the Democratic Party," she simply took a moment for a hearty laugh. After catching her breath, she called the idea that she's too ambitious "ludicrous" and went on to tout her work defending and fundraising for the party for the past 40 years.


Of course criticism about Clinton is expected from her opponent's campaign manager. And while some male candidates are called "too ambitious," women's ambitions are often conflated with selfishness.

Weaver's comments don't exist in a vacuum. They reflect the classic gendered critiques made of powerful women. While leadership and likability go hand in hand for men, the opposite is true for women. Study after study shows that women are often punished for seeking positions of power and are less likely to be promoted for those roles despite having equal or better skills than their male counterparts.

In fact, Weaver's description of Clinton fits so neatly into the stale sexist stereotype about powerful women that there's an actual Onion article from 2006 called "Hillary Clinton Is Too Ambitious to Be President." Ten years later, it seems like instead of progressing on female leadership, we're even farther away from reckoning with it.

Clinton knew smashing the glass ceiling of presidential politics would be arduous, but she probably didn't know it would include seeing a decade-old Onion headline become reality.


Weaver's comments were a sexist dog whistle. We can all look forward to his absence from the national conversation going forward.




Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
62. There is a book titled
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:52 AM
Jun 2016

..."Presidential Ambition: Gaining Power At Any Cost."

It was published in 2000. It was written about men.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
64. so what?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:07 AM
Jun 2016

Sanders campaign did a 1-2 punch of calling her "unqualified" and then said she was destroying the party because of her selfish ambition.

In other words, they were telling her to know her place and get back under the glass ceiling, and to not screw things up for the men. Despite the fact she was more qualified and had spent decades building the party Sanders had joined only in order to further his own presidential ambitions, and which he had sued and accused of committing felonious violations of federal banking law.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/opinion-blog/articles/2016-04-15/sanders-self-righteousness-allows-sexist-overtones-in-attacks-on-clinton

I repeat, Jeff Weaver is a sexist asshole and he will not be missed when he goes back to his comic book store.

And after that sexist 1-2 punch they tried to land (but whiffed on badly) please spare us the idea that they were the victims of an ugly smear campaign.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
67. They aren't sexist.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 02:16 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders called Clinton unqualified because of the WaPo headline that HRC called him unqualified.

Weaver referred to Clinton's presidential ambition because "ambition" is a word applied to both men and women and run for president.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
69. why did Weaver feel compelled to criticize someone seeking
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jun 2016

to be the first woman president in our history for being ambitious?

And, on a related note, how does such an attack make sense given that Bernie Sanders was running for the same job?

Sanders's dumb comments about Clinton being unqualified maybe can be described as an impulsive, uninformed, rash blunder.

Weaver's comments played on a very well-known trope, on the other hand, that women deserve special criticism for trying to break into the boys' club.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
41. Gasp! The evil Susan Sarandon!
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:30 PM
Jun 2016

I will never understand Hillary supporters obsession with this woman. Reminds me of the right wing practice called, scapegoating.

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
66. They don't like to hear the truth.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jun 2016

It is incongruous that someone who has built a reputation for taking on Wall Street is supporting someone who thinks Wall Street is just fine, and is on their payroll.

 

SouthernDemLinda

(182 posts)
77. Thelma & Louise
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:12 AM
Jun 2016

If you can't talk about the real issues, you talk about Susan Sarandon.

I liked Thelma & Louise. I watched it on the movie station not long ago.

runaway hero

(835 posts)
43. I guess their both hypocrites
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:31 PM
Jun 2016

Sarandon for not be excited for the first woman nominee and Warren for letting bernie die on the vine


So it cancels out. Have a great weekend.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
51. It's a contradiction that
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:09 AM
Jun 2016

...Susan Sarandon doesn't trust HRC to regulate Wall St, and Sarandon likes free clothes?

If so, I have the same contradiction.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
61. +1 She made a TV commercial with her own money, asking why we were going to war in Iraq.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:39 AM
Jun 2016

Something, "Before we go to war in Iraq, I would like to know what Iraq did to us, wouldn't you?"

I wish someone had answered her question before the invasion wrought so much death, destruction and havoc.

The bit about cashmere is nonsense, typical of the obvious desperation to post negative things.

Cha

(297,136 posts)
72. Oh BooHoo, sarandan.. my heart bleeds for your vapidity. i bet Elizabeth was really impressed..
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:50 AM
Jun 2016

Thanks, geek.. this is perfect.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
76. Is that like being a privileged white person supporting a privileged white person
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:03 AM
Jun 2016

Who likes to condemn all the white privilege everyone else has?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
80. Classic. And you know what's really funny?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:54 AM
Jun 2016

Those clothes are hideous, like something Virginia Woolf would wear to scrub the WC.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Susan Sarandon in two Twe...