2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton is 956 delegates ahead - why won't Bernie concede?
There are only 20 more delegates to be awarded. He is mathematically eliminated at this point. Yet today Bernie said again that he is taking it to the convention.
Why is Bernie seemingly incapable of admitting he lost? Is it because he is a man who got a thumping from a woman? The appearance of sexism on his part is strong. And it confirms one of the many reasons I could not support him.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)No democratic nominee before has been under a criminal federal investigation while being the presumptive nominee before. That's a pretty cool first, huh?
msongs
(67,360 posts)think
(11,641 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...but whether she meets the definition of an official FBI "target" is unknown. That term is reserved for people for whom there is substantial evidence linking them to a crime, according to the prosecutors judgment.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/may/12/fbis-investigation-hillary-clintons-emails-recap/
apcalc
(4,462 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)gone out.
chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Such drama.
enid602
(8,594 posts)You and your Republican colleagues have put a lot of work into this one. I wish you well.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Presidential candidates 'suspend' their campaigns, not least so they can continue to solicit cash to cover their campaign debt (cue a cheap crack about Hillary's 2008 campaign debt). If Clinton were actually indicted (something I consider wildly unlikely) Sanders could easily say 'well circumstances have changed' and reactivate his campaign, there's no law against that or any party rules that I'm aware of, I certainly wouldn't have a problem with him doing so in such a situation.
So I don't buy that that's the only reason at all.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to bravenak (Reply #125)
Florencenj2point0 This message was self-deleted by its author.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)apcalc
(4,462 posts)Response to Ned_Devine (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)brooklynite
(94,333 posts)KPN
(15,635 posts)How do you think Hillary got SOS?
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)KPN
(15,635 posts)apcalc
(4,462 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Bernie supporters can vote for whomever they damn well please in the GE.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)sheshe2
(83,654 posts)You just won't be doing it here,
Rules~
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I imagine you won't be voting here either.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Because I believe that under the DNC rules, assignment to the platform committee is proportional to how many delegates each candidate won. I think most candidates who drop out just release their delegates and don't enforce these rules, but they are entitled to be represented by the delegates who were elected for them, just as Hillary was within her right to not release all delegates and be formally nominated at the convention in 2008. She would have been within her rights to insist on a full roll call as well, instead of calling for nomination by acclamation.
LuvLoogie
(6,913 posts)He want's to "work with her to form a government" he can sign off on. He must approve of Hillary's agenda and make sure that his agenda is addressed.
Hey it's Bernie. Hillary is not the nominee until he says so.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Why do you think she's going to meet with him?
all american girl
(1,788 posts)She knows that everyone needs to work together to get to a better place. I don't think that's wrong.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)In fact, that is a "male" attitude. I believe he would be better to concede and ask to be heard.
think
(11,641 posts)Sancho
(9,067 posts)his stubbornness and lack of understanding clearly indicate he would make a poor President.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)We are fighting for helping the 2.5 million American children that are homeless and the 16,000,000 American children living in poverty that you somehow can rationalize don't matter. You choose to support the big banks. Shame on you
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Sancho
(9,067 posts)...but don't discount male piggishness too.
Response to Sancho (Reply #19)
Post removed
senz
(11,945 posts)embarrass me.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)Wow. It's really getting sad here.
senz
(11,945 posts)They're trying to thin our ranks. Strange, since many of us will be leaving voluntarily quite soon.
chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)We're not wanted or needed.
senz
(11,945 posts)Hillary has 2,178 pledged delegates, many of them from election "irregularities" that are under investigation.
Bernie has 1,810 pledged delegates with California not fully counted.
The superdelegates vote on July 25.
As for DU, Hillary supporters have always been like this but lately, with the nomination in doubt, they are becoming more virulent in alerting innocent comments and making verbal assaults.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...apparently he doesn't need to concede first.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)her stance on issues from a left position instead of migrating back to center-right. He's actually doing her a favor by making her maintain her positions like the new and improved $15/hour minimum wage and her anti-XL Keystone pipeline and TPP stance. More people will like those than her original positions.
Beowulf
(761 posts)ignore him. Bernie's got his reasons and some of them don't rest with the nomination.
As usual Clinton supporters haven't a clue when it comes to Bernie.
senz
(11,945 posts)they've reached the conclusion that Hill Folk can't understand motivations that aren't utterly cynical.
Beowulf
(761 posts)that "Republican" and "Democrat" really don't mean much these days. If we really wanted to be honest in naming our two major political parties we'd call them The Insane Party and The Cynical Party.
I'm with you, Senz, on this one.
senz
(11,945 posts)There's got to be a better party going on somewhere!
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)Response to Beowulf (Reply #7)
Post removed
Wilms
(26,795 posts)The only reason he wants better wages is so that a single income can run a household and there's no excuse for women to be other than where they belong; the kitchen.
Why won't the media talk about it? They won't even mention that little kitten-eating thing he's known for. I suspect that one is high on your list.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)to generate big profits for their bosses once Bernie eliminates the child labor laws.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)But you only hear what you want to I guess.
glowing
(12,233 posts)They always demand and demand and demand... Unless Dr. King should have just sat down and shut up.
And who said he's being a sexist in bringing the issues to her? That's just weird to label a Feminist a "sexist".
coyote
(1,561 posts)I look forward to the convention
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)At his announcement in Burlington, he said "I will never allow a woman to become President."
I heard it. Hoinest.
I apologize. You were correct all along.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Good for them so we just all need to sit down, shut up and let him have his way. Nothing so obvious as admitting this flaw it just comes out in behavior.
Like want to boss the winner around.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...when Hillary Clinton was against it and the majority was against it.
According to your logic, he shouldn't have advocated what he believed in since he was in the minority.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)aikoaiko
(34,162 posts)see a politician keep his promise to his supporters.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Look for broken records the rest of the night.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Not a couple guys sharing a beer!!
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Election fraud wasn't funny when it was done on behalf of Republicans. The person in the video probably saved Obama's reelection in 2012 when he uncovered election tampering in Ohio. He has pinpointed exactly which precincts perpetrated tampering during the Democratic primary. You won't be laughing when Discovery gives him access to raw data and exit polling. He was generous with Hillary stating the perpetrators used Hillary to stop Bernie. But in the words of Father Pfleger, if you're the beneficiary, you are responsible.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Do tell.
Segami
(14,923 posts)facts and evidence to surface within the coming weeks. I have yet to see the MSM act like journalists and investigate the claims within the lawsuit.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It's more about wanting to make sure the platform includes a lot of Sanders stuff(which needs to happen to get the support of Sanders supporters-you can't expect those votes if he gets little of nothing).
It's enough that he isn't attacking her.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And to a lot of other women I know.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)or any other man. Why do you assume that it's about gender?
The best approach is to negotiate. I think HRC gets that and that that is what the meeting on Tuesday will be about.
Our path to victory in November leads through a blended platform encompassing the best from ALL the Democratic primary candidates, and a revitalization of the party(a party which is currently in long-term decline on the Congressional, gubenatorial and state legislative levels)through reorganization and reform, because NOTHING in the Democratic status quo is working. If it were, we wouldn't BE in minorities in Congress and the state legislatures.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And it sure doesn't look that way to lots of folks.
Has he ever given you or anyone else any real reason to think that his campaign was based on opposition to the very idea of a woman being president?
If he felt THAT way, why would Bernie have spent so much time trying to talk Elizabeth Warren into running?
It's a campaign about issues. That's all it ever has been. Why is that so difficult to accept?
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #45)
Post removed
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)He'd have done the same if she was a man running on the same program.
There was no good reason for him to stay out of this year's primaries. He ran because that was the only way to give the voters a chance to vote for someone who'd take the side of the people on economic issues.
If Warren had run or if HRC had embraced Occupy values, Bernie would have stayed out.
It was just about the issues.
And even if you thought he wasn't feminist enough, can you really quarrel with the idea that the party SHOULD challenge corporate control of politics and the economy? It's not as if there is a conflict between doing that and supporting social progressivism. It's entirely possible for the same party to do both, and Democrats can only gain in support in the fall by doing that.
chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)The thing I don't get is if Hillary's supporters are so confident, what are they worried about? Why even start a thread like this if Hillary has got this?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)His history shows differently, as does the way he treats his own wife.
840high
(17,196 posts)much better than Bill treats Hillary.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Or Obama or any man, for that matter. That's my take on it, anyways.
AirmensMom
(14,637 posts)Response to MaggieD (Reply #30)
Post removed
kpola12
(78 posts)The Supers don't vote til July 25. California still has 2.5 million votes to be counted. I don't believe Puerto Rico has been counted. The real bitch is you know all this but just don't play well with others.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Whether Bernie and his fans are able to accept it or not.
kpola12
(78 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Why does he not admit that?
jillan
(39,451 posts)She has 2203.
Bernie has 1828.
I'd listen to your argument if it was based on facts.
Superdelegates don't count until July 25th per the DNC.
KPN
(15,635 posts)Exit polls vs votes major differences; suppression tactics; California's missing 2,000,000+ votes; etc., etc. .... But more to the point, why should he concede until an actual vote at the convention completes the process. By D Party rules at this point, she hasn't won it. In fact, she doesn't have the lead you stated at this point -- it's actually about 500 less.
Bernie has a conscience about corruption in our electoral and governance systems. Why should he discount what his conscience and most Americans tell him?
It's not about winning, it's about doing what's right.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)Really. Why else?
--imm
840high
(17,196 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)She's got 2,178 pledged delegates.
He's got 1,810 pledged delegates.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/
You should fix your title line. It's incorrect.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)He lost and he lost in a spectacular way.
senz
(11,945 posts)if it makes ya feel better.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)EDIT - But also to keep her closer to the center(her left) on policies for as long as possible.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Like asking the Red Sox to concede to the Yankees in the 8th inning.
We don't bow before your chosen authoritarian leaders.
senz
(11,945 posts)Squeee!
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)sheshe2
(83,654 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)sheshe2
(83,654 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)I kid, no idea I guess he is going all the way to the convention.
Mike Nelson
(9,944 posts)...am not sure it's gender. Bernie might have done the same with Webb, Chafee or O'Malley. He has some "coming down" difficulty. I trust he will land safely, however.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Taking the campaign to the convention was kind of normal up through the 1980s, and Brown did it in 1992 (though he didn't get a speaking spot because of that, which Sanders should probably keep in mind).
JustinL
(722 posts)Clinton didn't concede until 16 days after Obama had won a majority of the pledged delegates. The only way she could have won the nomination after that is if the superdelegates had thwarted the will of the voters.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)Sexist is wrong. Can men not like HRC because of her policies?
Vattel
(9,289 posts)BadgerKid
(4,549 posts)so probably the post would evade hiding by jury. I found the post repulsive nevertheless and incremented my ignore list.
Response to MaggieD (Original post)
Post removed
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Bernie is about a movement, not just about winning a primary.
If Hillary wins the nomination, Bernie's movement continues.
If Hillary doesn't win the nomination, Bernie's movement continues.
What's to concede. The convention delegates vote. There is nothing to concede.
Why would Bernie concede?
It isn't necessary or important.
Isn't that OK?
KPN
(15,635 posts)sheshe2
(83,654 posts)You are back!
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)Naturally the alert stalkers are on the case.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)The campaign has been crystal clear since last Tuesday. They are in the process of deciding next steps, but NO final decisions will be made until after DC votes on Tuesday.
He made a commitment to campaign in every state until the last vote was counted. That's what he's doing.
When you've been told "I won't be announcing anything until next week", it's just plain silly to keep whining about the absence of an announcement this week.
Denouncing the man for a decision that has yet to be made is premature. Cool your jets. There will be plenty of time to applaud or lambaste him when he announces the course he is taking.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)He lost by a yuuuuge margin. He is apparently just pathologically unable to grasp the concept that he lost or admit it.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)release his delegates when he endorses her. Or he could ask then to stay with him and vote for him on the convention floor to demonstrate the strength of support for a New, New Deal within the party.
This isn't just about winning the nomination. It never was. Decisions have yet to be made. And negotiations are happening behind the scenes.
You don't give up your leverage without getting as much as you can. He owes that to his supporters.
And whether the Party likes is or not, any "concessions" he gains are going to strengthen, not weaken, the party and our chances across all elections. We may be dragging it along kicking and screaming, but all we want is for our Party to become the popular, powerful force for economic and social justice it can be. (Instead of the feeble, ineffective, defense against the ever advancing Repubs we currently are.)
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)It's not like this was a close race like 2008. He lost by a large margin.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)You don't give up your leverage without getting as much as you can. He owes that to his supporters.
And whether the Party likes is or not, any "concessions" he gains are going to strengthen, not weaken, the party and our chances across all elections. We may be dragging it along kicking and screaming, but all we want is for our Party to become the popular, powerful force for economic and social justice it can be. (Instead of the feeble, ineffective, defense against the ever advancing Repubs we currently are.)
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I have been very active in politics for a very long time, and you will not convince me that the kind of folks that would do such a thing at the convention OR just not accept that the vast majority of the party DOES NOT agree with them are in any way helpful to the party.
I know that it sounds like they would be, in theory, but again I have seen this kind of thing on a local and state level and all it does is create factions. It does not ever result in anything positive.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)you haven't asked him nicely and then told him you would hold your breath until he does!
If SoS Clinton has enough delegates to clinch the nomination then why are you and so many others so anxiety ridden about Senator Sanders not conceding?
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)If he does "take it to the convention," then his plan is clearly to overturn the results of the popular vote. The will of the people has spoken, but Bernie doesn't like their answer, and thinks somehow that he knows better than they do.
Vinca
(50,236 posts)Why are you so concerned? It appears your candidate is the nominee. And stop with the sexism meme. It's bullshit. You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it.
brooklynite
(94,333 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)You say you're good at math but seem to be struggling with basic counting. 2383 is number of delegates she needs to get the nomination. As of now she only has 2203. The leaves 180 delegates short. Since she needs super delegates to to the number needed she will have to wait until the convention to be the nominee. If the supers were to vote for Bernie he would have enough to win. Is that likely atm? No, but still possible mathematically. He earned it. His voters and the DNC rules gave him that right.
2383-2203 = 180 not 2383
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)Bernie wants to make sure that every voter has a chance to vote.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Although it won't be as fun as CA and NJ.
But I mean come on, are the delegates he might pick up in DC going to close that 956 delegate deficit he is sporting? He seems like he can't accept the fact that he lost with this baloney about "taking it to the convention."
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)But the people of DC deserve to have their vote.
findrskeep
(713 posts)be more cheating that can be added to the lawsuit. Give em' enough rope...and all that.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)As of now, he's taking the same exact posture that Clinton took in 2008. The final votes will be cast on Tuesday. I suspect he'll suspend his campaign by the weekend.
If you call getting a thumping -- going from 3 % to nearly 45 % -- I'll take a thumping any day.
At least you only have a few more days to sow your division here.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Well over 15% of the delegates when it is all said and done. That is huge. I really don't understand this idea that he went from "3 % to nearly 45 %"
First of all that is simply not true. He does not have anywhere even close to 45% of the delegates. Secondly, it was a two person race. So of course he got a good share of the "I hate Clinton" vote.
IMO, he is unbelievably disrespectful in refusing to concede. And as such he has confirmed every negative thing I thought about him.
840high
(17,196 posts)for you.
He got 43 percent of the popular vote. He also received 45 % of the pledged delegates.
Are you really saying that Martin O'Malley or some other candidate would have won 23 states? Kerry won something like 47 states. Gore won all 50. Those were landslides. This was a close contest.
TheFarseer
(9,317 posts)And wants to spread his message as long as possible. That's my best guess.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)No convention goodies ...and out he goes after the first vote...he can hand with the 'protest' (riot?) that he helped assemble.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)ThinkCritically
(241 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Response to MaggieD (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)He hadn't achieved those goals yet, and has pledged to campaign for them until the convention.
For further details, I can only refer you to his many speeches.