Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:46 PM Jun 2016

Clinton is 956 delegates ahead - why won't Bernie concede?

There are only 20 more delegates to be awarded. He is mathematically eliminated at this point. Yet today Bernie said again that he is taking it to the convention.

Why is Bernie seemingly incapable of admitting he lost? Is it because he is a man who got a thumping from a woman? The appearance of sexism on his part is strong. And it confirms one of the many reasons I could not support him.

154 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton is 956 delegates ahead - why won't Bernie concede? (Original Post) MaggieD Jun 2016 OP
Maybe it's the FBI investigation Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #1
and what criminal federal investigation would that be? be specific and name your public source nt msongs Jun 2016 #2
The Server did it in the Study with Sidney Blumenthal... New Clue Game.... think Jun 2016 #5
Clinton is undoubtedly a subject of the investigation AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #35
No Clinton is not the subject of an investigation. apcalc Jun 2016 #133
Lolz AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #137
Don't play dumb. 840high Jun 2016 #127
4 days. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #16
... until darkness descends and truth vanishes like a flickering flame senz Jun 2016 #60
... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #79
Ignore chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #88
Oh dear lord rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #83
republican enid602 Jun 2016 #54
No it isn't anigbrowl Jun 2016 #121
She is not under a criminal investigation bravenak Jun 2016 #125
This message was self-deleted by its author Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #126
I hope it ends soon bravenak Jun 2016 #128
She is not under investigation, much less a criminal one. apcalc Jun 2016 #132
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #152
Because the rules say he doesn't have to and his supporters don't want him to. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #3
True...and the rules also don't say he has be given any consideration in the Platform discussion brooklynite Jun 2016 #34
True ... but that would be just plain dumb. KPN Jun 2016 #39
She slept her way to the top? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #80
Nah, no time to sleep with all the finagling that was required. KPN Jun 2016 #106
If that was true, women would rule the world. apcalc Jun 2016 #135
And if that manages to piss off Bernie supporters, the rules say senz Jun 2016 #44
+ a gazillion. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #46
Vote for who you please...,. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #72
LOL You mean DU hasn't gotten its polling place certification, yet? Live and Learn Jun 2016 #105
Actually, they do democrattotheend Jun 2016 #111
Well he has yet to sit in judgement of her "platform" in their meeting Tuesday. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #4
Lol! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #73
Hillary Clinton doesn't have to meet with Bernie Sanders. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #93
Because she's polite and doesn't want to burn the Democrats down. all american girl Jun 2016 #110
Bernie mistakenly thinks his strategy will get him consideration. Sancho Jun 2016 #6
Hillary no longer banks at UBS. She's bonafide.... think Jun 2016 #8
Regardless of where Hillary banks, Bernie has stupid strategy... Sancho Jun 2016 #15
LOL. You judge him by your standards. He won't bow before the Chosen One like you would. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #55
Ahh, the old "male" attitude bullshit Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #14
It seems obvious..old man attitude prevails with Bernie Sancho Jun 2016 #19
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #21
As a woman, I must tell you, those people senz Jun 2016 #49
Thanks for that senz... nice to hear. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #63
Ned's comment #21 got hidden? Seriously? chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #89
It's happening to many innocent comments by Bernie supporters. senz Jun 2016 #109
I guess Hillary has got this. chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #112
Actually, she is only 368 delegates ahead and has not won the nomination. senz Jun 2016 #113
Since she agreed to meet with him Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #94
Your response is rather sexist to me. Bernie is sticking around to make sure Hillary maintains floriduck Jun 2016 #138
Do what you've always wanted to do - Beowulf Jun 2016 #7
A friend who hangs out at Gawker told me senz Jun 2016 #51
I was commenting to my spouse this afternoon Beowulf Jun 2016 #59
That's excellent, Beowulf. senz Jun 2016 #64
Seriously! Could it be Bernie is a man of principle? InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #103
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #136
Bernie HATES women. Wilms Jun 2016 #9
He wants children to have healthy and sufficient food and medical care so they will be strong enough GoneFishin Jun 2016 #86
Bernie Math. n/t Lil Missy Jun 2016 #10
Bernie Match is saying "I know I will not win." Armstead Jun 2016 #22
Because "revolutions" never suspend or concede. glowing Jun 2016 #11
Who has heard of a revolution packing up and going home coyote Jun 2016 #146
Yes, it does appear to be about his ego and not conceding the win to a woman. Nt seabeyond Jun 2016 #12
He said that today. "Because Hillary Clinton is a woman I will never concede." Armstead Jun 2016 #20
Nah, they can never own it. He just knows his policies are better and voters just don't know what is seabeyond Jun 2016 #28
Bernie Sanders was for gay marriage Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #87
Sanders was for marriage equality in 2009. Good for him. seabeyond Jun 2016 #100
Yep bravenak Jun 2016 #13
"I'm very good at arithmetic" -- That's basically a concession. Armstead Jun 2016 #17
He can admit it, He prefers to campaign until the end. Its actually quite charming to aikoaiko Jun 2016 #18
I love him for it! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #65
Oh, boy! It's the sexism talking point again. MelissaB Jun 2016 #23
On Tuesday I heard Hillary was serving halibut and white wine... Sancho Jun 2016 #24
Halibut, sheshe2 Jun 2016 #75
This is why. AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #25
LMAO MaggieD Jun 2016 #31
Just like 2000, 2002, 2004, and so on. AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #48
Hmmm, so which states here he won was there election fraud? MaggieD Jun 2016 #52
I think it's safe to say, expect more Segami Jun 2016 #142
He isn't harming anything. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #26
He looks like a sore loser and sexist to me MaggieD Jun 2016 #30
He'd be doing the exact same thing if it was Biden who was 956 votes ahead Ken Burch Jun 2016 #36
I doubt that MaggieD Jun 2016 #41
Why? Ken Burch Jun 2016 #45
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #50
He was challenging Madeleine Kunin because he thought she was too conservative on some issues. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #58
You're wasting your time. Her mind will not be changed. chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #90
Oh baloney MaggieD Jun 2016 #98
He treats his wife 840high Jun 2016 #129
I don't feel that way. I don't think he would be treating Biden like this at all AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #68
Not to this woman. AirmensMom Jun 2016 #92
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #131
She is not! kpola12 Jun 2016 #27
She is the nominee MaggieD Jun 2016 #29
Presumptive. kpola12 Jun 2016 #33
Sorry, it's over MaggieD Jun 2016 #43
No she's not. She is 375 delegates ahead however. jillan Jun 2016 #32
Maybe its the electoral shenanigans. KPN Jun 2016 #37
I think it's because it really, really, really pisses you off. immoderate Jun 2016 #38
Bingo! Bam! 840high Jun 2016 #130
According to fivethirtyeight.com, she's 368 delegates ahead. senz Jun 2016 #40
Nope - she is 956 ahead MaggieD Jun 2016 #47
Take it up with fivethirtyeight.com. Or just keep telling yourself that senz Jun 2016 #56
She has 368 more pledged delegates than Sanders (nt) Recursion Jun 2016 #67
FBI Ash_F Jun 2016 #42
Vatican sheshe2 Jun 2016 #81
Why are you asking him to concede if it's all over? It's not all over. hello rhett o rick Jun 2016 #53
Precisely. Aren't they cute? senz Jun 2016 #57
You are a Red Sox fan? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #82
Are you a Goldman-Sachs fan? rhett o rick Jun 2016 #116
Are they a baseball team? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #117
No but if Hillary wins they will be running the country. So much for your social justice agenda. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #139
oh sheshe2 Jun 2016 #140
He heard it was driving a few people crazy on this a political forum. Rex Jun 2016 #61
Agree he has an issue, but... Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #62
This used to be a lot more common; it's not the end of the world Recursion Jun 2016 #66
Maybe he's waiting for all the votes to be cast, like Clinton did in 2008. n/t JustinL Jun 2016 #69
Saying Sanders is lancer78 Jun 2016 #70
Your suggestion that he is staying in because he is sexist is a stupid smear. Vattel Jun 2016 #71
Well, technically "appearance of ..." was stated BadgerKid Jun 2016 #114
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #74
What difference does it make whether Bernie concedes? JDPriestly Jun 2016 #76
Exactly! KPN Jun 2016 #107
MaggieD! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #77
Hi! MaggieD Jun 2016 #96
It was a 5-2 leave. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #78
LMAO MaggieD Jun 2016 #99
Why won't you listen to what the campaign has made crystal clear? pat_k Jun 2016 #84
What is there for him to "decide"? MaggieD Jun 2016 #95
He could... pat_k Jun 2016 #120
He still loses on the first ballot either way MaggieD Jun 2016 #122
Refer you back to pat_k Jun 2016 #123
Could have fooled me MaggieD Jun 2016 #124
My guess is because whistler162 Jun 2016 #85
Because Bernie Sanders hates democracy and can't handle losing. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #91
Because he said he'd stay in until everyone voted. Vinca Jun 2016 #97
So, he'll concede in the next 48 hours? Good to know. brooklynite Jun 2016 #101
Mathmatically he EARNED the right to go to the convention. Cobalt Violet Jun 2016 #102
The primaries aren't over yet. One of the 99 Jun 2016 #104
I look forward to his thumping in DC MaggieD Jun 2016 #108
Never said that were. One of the 99 Jun 2016 #118
Yes, and there could possibly findrskeep Jun 2016 #143
Wait until this weekend TSIAS Jun 2016 #115
He lost by a huge percentage MaggieD Jun 2016 #119
Keep thinking - negative is good 840high Jun 2016 #134
OK TSIAS Jun 2016 #144
I think he just very strongly disagrees with her on key issues TheFarseer Jun 2016 #141
If he does not concede...I would not let him spread anything Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #154
Kick CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #145
Because he doesn't have to. ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #147
To annoy you? azurnoir Jun 2016 #148
Bernie Math. And Ego. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #149
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #150
Yeah, right Bernie lost big time, get over it. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #151
He has told you repeatedly what he's campaigning for. Orsino Jun 2016 #153
 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
1. Maybe it's the FBI investigation
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jun 2016

No democratic nominee before has been under a criminal federal investigation while being the presumptive nominee before. That's a pretty cool first, huh?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
35. Clinton is undoubtedly a subject of the investigation
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jun 2016

...but whether she meets the definition of an official FBI "target" is unknown. That term is reserved for people for whom there is substantial evidence linking them to a crime, according to the prosecutor’s judgment.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/may/12/fbis-investigation-hillary-clintons-emails-recap/

enid602

(8,594 posts)
54. republican
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:05 AM
Jun 2016

You and your Republican colleagues have put a lot of work into this one. I wish you well.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
121. No it isn't
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

Presidential candidates 'suspend' their campaigns, not least so they can continue to solicit cash to cover their campaign debt (cue a cheap crack about Hillary's 2008 campaign debt). If Clinton were actually indicted (something I consider wildly unlikely) Sanders could easily say 'well circumstances have changed' and reactivate his campaign, there's no law against that or any party rules that I'm aware of, I certainly wouldn't have a problem with him doing so in such a situation.

So I don't buy that that's the only reason at all.

Response to bravenak (Reply #125)

Response to Ned_Devine (Reply #1)

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
44. And if that manages to piss off Bernie supporters, the rules say
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jun 2016

Bernie supporters can vote for whomever they damn well please in the GE.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
105. LOL You mean DU hasn't gotten its polling place certification, yet?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:09 AM
Jun 2016

I imagine you won't be voting here either.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
111. Actually, they do
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:02 PM
Jun 2016

Because I believe that under the DNC rules, assignment to the platform committee is proportional to how many delegates each candidate won. I think most candidates who drop out just release their delegates and don't enforce these rules, but they are entitled to be represented by the delegates who were elected for them, just as Hillary was within her right to not release all delegates and be formally nominated at the convention in 2008. She would have been within her rights to insist on a full roll call as well, instead of calling for nomination by acclamation.

LuvLoogie

(6,913 posts)
4. Well he has yet to sit in judgement of her "platform" in their meeting Tuesday.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:53 PM
Jun 2016

He want's to "work with her to form a government" he can sign off on. He must approve of Hillary's agenda and make sure that his agenda is addressed.

Hey it's Bernie. Hillary is not the nominee until he says so.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
93. Hillary Clinton doesn't have to meet with Bernie Sanders.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 06:53 AM
Jun 2016

Why do you think she's going to meet with him?

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
110. Because she's polite and doesn't want to burn the Democrats down.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:58 AM
Jun 2016

She knows that everyone needs to work together to get to a better place. I don't think that's wrong.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
6. Bernie mistakenly thinks his strategy will get him consideration.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:54 PM
Jun 2016

In fact, that is a "male" attitude. I believe he would be better to concede and ask to be heard.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
15. Regardless of where Hillary banks, Bernie has stupid strategy...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jun 2016

his stubbornness and lack of understanding clearly indicate he would make a poor President.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
55. LOL. You judge him by your standards. He won't bow before the Chosen One like you would.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:06 AM
Jun 2016

We are fighting for helping the 2.5 million American children that are homeless and the 16,000,000 American children living in poverty that you somehow can rationalize don't matter. You choose to support the big banks. Shame on you

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
19. It seems obvious..old man attitude prevails with Bernie
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:10 PM
Jun 2016

...but don't discount male piggishness too.

Response to Sancho (Reply #19)

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
109. It's happening to many innocent comments by Bernie supporters.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jun 2016

They're trying to thin our ranks. Strange, since many of us will be leaving voluntarily quite soon.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
113. Actually, she is only 368 delegates ahead and has not won the nomination.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:26 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary has 2,178 pledged delegates, many of them from election "irregularities" that are under investigation.

Bernie has 1,810 pledged delegates with California not fully counted.

The superdelegates vote on July 25.

As for DU, Hillary supporters have always been like this but lately, with the nomination in doubt, they are becoming more virulent in alerting innocent comments and making verbal assaults.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
138. Your response is rather sexist to me. Bernie is sticking around to make sure Hillary maintains
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:36 PM
Jun 2016

her stance on issues from a left position instead of migrating back to center-right. He's actually doing her a favor by making her maintain her positions like the new and improved $15/hour minimum wage and her anti-XL Keystone pipeline and TPP stance. More people will like those than her original positions.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
7. Do what you've always wanted to do -
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:55 PM
Jun 2016

ignore him. Bernie's got his reasons and some of them don't rest with the nomination.

As usual Clinton supporters haven't a clue when it comes to Bernie.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
51. A friend who hangs out at Gawker told me
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:59 PM
Jun 2016

they've reached the conclusion that Hill Folk can't understand motivations that aren't utterly cynical.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
59. I was commenting to my spouse this afternoon
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:15 AM
Jun 2016

that "Republican" and "Democrat" really don't mean much these days. If we really wanted to be honest in naming our two major political parties we'd call them The Insane Party and The Cynical Party.

I'm with you, Senz, on this one.

Response to Beowulf (Reply #7)

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
9. Bernie HATES women.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:59 PM
Jun 2016

The only reason he wants better wages is so that a single income can run a household and there's no excuse for women to be other than where they belong; the kitchen.

Why won't the media talk about it? They won't even mention that little kitten-eating thing he's known for. I suspect that one is high on your list.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
86. He wants children to have healthy and sufficient food and medical care so they will be strong enough
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 05:27 AM
Jun 2016

to generate big profits for their bosses once Bernie eliminates the child labor laws.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
11. Because "revolutions" never suspend or concede.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:03 PM
Jun 2016

They always demand and demand and demand... Unless Dr. King should have just sat down and shut up.

And who said he's being a sexist in bringing the issues to her? That's just weird to label a Feminist a "sexist".

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
20. He said that today. "Because Hillary Clinton is a woman I will never concede."
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:10 PM
Jun 2016

At his announcement in Burlington, he said "I will never allow a woman to become President."

I heard it. Hoinest.

I apologize. You were correct all along.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
28. Nah, they can never own it. He just knows his policies are better and voters just don't know what is
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jun 2016

Good for them so we just all need to sit down, shut up and let him have his way. Nothing so obvious as admitting this flaw it just comes out in behavior.

Like want to boss the winner around.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
87. Bernie Sanders was for gay marriage
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 05:38 AM
Jun 2016

...when Hillary Clinton was against it and the majority was against it.

According to your logic, he shouldn't have advocated what he believed in since he was in the minority.

aikoaiko

(34,162 posts)
18. He can admit it, He prefers to campaign until the end. Its actually quite charming to
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:09 PM
Jun 2016

see a politician keep his promise to his supporters.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
24. On Tuesday I heard Hillary was serving halibut and white wine...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:16 PM
Jun 2016


Not a couple guys sharing a beer!!



 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
48. Just like 2000, 2002, 2004, and so on.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:56 PM
Jun 2016

Election fraud wasn't funny when it was done on behalf of Republicans. The person in the video probably saved Obama's reelection in 2012 when he uncovered election tampering in Ohio. He has pinpointed exactly which precincts perpetrated tampering during the Democratic primary. You won't be laughing when Discovery gives him access to raw data and exit polling. He was generous with Hillary stating the perpetrators used Hillary to stop Bernie. But in the words of Father Pfleger, if you're the beneficiary, you are responsible.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
142. I think it's safe to say, expect more
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jun 2016

facts and evidence to surface within the coming weeks. I have yet to see the MSM act like journalists and investigate the claims within the lawsuit.


 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
26. He isn't harming anything.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:34 PM
Jun 2016

It's more about wanting to make sure the platform includes a lot of Sanders stuff(which needs to happen to get the support of Sanders supporters-you can't expect those votes if he gets little of nothing).

It's enough that he isn't attacking her.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
36. He'd be doing the exact same thing if it was Biden who was 956 votes ahead
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jun 2016

or any other man. Why do you assume that it's about gender?

The best approach is to negotiate. I think HRC gets that and that that is what the meeting on Tuesday will be about.

Our path to victory in November leads through a blended platform encompassing the best from ALL the Democratic primary candidates, and a revitalization of the party(a party which is currently in long-term decline on the Congressional, gubenatorial and state legislative levels)through reorganization and reform, because NOTHING in the Democratic status quo is working. If it were, we wouldn't BE in minorities in Congress and the state legislatures.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
45. Why?
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:55 PM
Jun 2016

Has he ever given you or anyone else any real reason to think that his campaign was based on opposition to the very idea of a woman being president?

If he felt THAT way, why would Bernie have spent so much time trying to talk Elizabeth Warren into running?

It's a campaign about issues. That's all it ever has been. Why is that so difficult to accept?

Response to Ken Burch (Reply #45)

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
58. He was challenging Madeleine Kunin because he thought she was too conservative on some issues.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:10 AM
Jun 2016

He'd have done the same if she was a man running on the same program.

There was no good reason for him to stay out of this year's primaries. He ran because that was the only way to give the voters a chance to vote for someone who'd take the side of the people on economic issues.

If Warren had run or if HRC had embraced Occupy values, Bernie would have stayed out.

It was just about the issues.

And even if you thought he wasn't feminist enough, can you really quarrel with the idea that the party SHOULD challenge corporate control of politics and the economy? It's not as if there is a conflict between doing that and supporting social progressivism. It's entirely possible for the same party to do both, and Democrats can only gain in support in the fall by doing that.

chwaliszewski

(1,514 posts)
90. You're wasting your time. Her mind will not be changed.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 06:00 AM
Jun 2016

The thing I don't get is if Hillary's supporters are so confident, what are they worried about? Why even start a thread like this if Hillary has got this?

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
68. I don't feel that way. I don't think he would be treating Biden like this at all
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 02:23 AM
Jun 2016

Or Obama or any man, for that matter. That's my take on it, anyways.

Response to MaggieD (Reply #30)

kpola12

(78 posts)
27. She is not!
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:37 PM
Jun 2016

The Supers don't vote til July 25. California still has 2.5 million votes to be counted. I don't believe Puerto Rico has been counted. The real bitch is you know all this but just don't play well with others.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
32. No she's not. She is 375 delegates ahead however.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:42 PM
Jun 2016

She has 2203.
Bernie has 1828.

I'd listen to your argument if it was based on facts.

Superdelegates don't count until July 25th per the DNC.

KPN

(15,635 posts)
37. Maybe its the electoral shenanigans.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:46 PM
Jun 2016

Exit polls vs votes major differences; suppression tactics; California's missing 2,000,000+ votes; etc., etc. .... But more to the point, why should he concede until an actual vote at the convention completes the process. By D Party rules at this point, she hasn't won it. In fact, she doesn't have the lead you stated at this point -- it's actually about 500 less.

Bernie has a conscience about corruption in our electoral and governance systems. Why should he discount what his conscience and most Americans tell him?

It's not about winning, it's about doing what's right.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
40. According to fivethirtyeight.com, she's 368 delegates ahead.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:50 PM
Jun 2016

She's got 2,178 pledged delegates.

He's got 1,810 pledged delegates.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/

You should fix your title line. It's incorrect.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
56. Take it up with fivethirtyeight.com. Or just keep telling yourself that
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:06 AM
Jun 2016

if it makes ya feel better.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
42. FBI
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:51 PM
Jun 2016

EDIT - But also to keep her closer to the center(her left) on policies for as long as possible.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
53. Why are you asking him to concede if it's all over? It's not all over. hello
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:03 AM
Jun 2016

Like asking the Red Sox to concede to the Yankees in the 8th inning.

We don't bow before your chosen authoritarian leaders.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
139. No but if Hillary wins they will be running the country. So much for your social justice agenda.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:44 PM
Jun 2016
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
61. He heard it was driving a few people crazy on this a political forum.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:23 AM
Jun 2016

I kid, no idea I guess he is going all the way to the convention.

Mike Nelson

(9,944 posts)
62. Agree he has an issue, but...
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:23 AM
Jun 2016

...am not sure it's gender. Bernie might have done the same with Webb, Chafee or O'Malley. He has some "coming down" difficulty. I trust he will land safely, however.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
66. This used to be a lot more common; it's not the end of the world
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:59 AM
Jun 2016

Taking the campaign to the convention was kind of normal up through the 1980s, and Brown did it in 1992 (though he didn't get a speaking spot because of that, which Sanders should probably keep in mind).

JustinL

(722 posts)
69. Maybe he's waiting for all the votes to be cast, like Clinton did in 2008. n/t
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 02:41 AM
Jun 2016

Clinton didn't concede until 16 days after Obama had won a majority of the pledged delegates. The only way she could have won the nomination after that is if the superdelegates had thwarted the will of the voters.

BadgerKid

(4,549 posts)
114. Well, technically "appearance of ..." was stated
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jun 2016

so probably the post would evade hiding by jury. I found the post repulsive nevertheless and incremented my ignore list.

Response to MaggieD (Original post)

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
76. What difference does it make whether Bernie concedes?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 04:07 AM
Jun 2016

Bernie is about a movement, not just about winning a primary.

If Hillary wins the nomination, Bernie's movement continues.

If Hillary doesn't win the nomination, Bernie's movement continues.

What's to concede. The convention delegates vote. There is nothing to concede.

Why would Bernie concede?

It isn't necessary or important.

Isn't that OK?

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
84. Why won't you listen to what the campaign has made crystal clear?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 05:09 AM
Jun 2016

The campaign has been crystal clear since last Tuesday. They are in the process of deciding next steps, but NO final decisions will be made until after DC votes on Tuesday.

He made a commitment to campaign in every state until the last vote was counted. That's what he's doing.

When you've been told "I won't be announcing anything until next week", it's just plain silly to keep whining about the absence of an announcement this week.

Denouncing the man for a decision that has yet to be made is premature. Cool your jets. There will be plenty of time to applaud or lambaste him when he announces the course he is taking.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
95. What is there for him to "decide"?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:46 AM
Jun 2016

He lost by a yuuuuge margin. He is apparently just pathologically unable to grasp the concept that he lost or admit it.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
120. He could...
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jun 2016

release his delegates when he endorses her. Or he could ask then to stay with him and vote for him on the convention floor to demonstrate the strength of support for a New, New Deal within the party.

This isn't just about winning the nomination. It never was. Decisions have yet to be made. And negotiations are happening behind the scenes.

You don't give up your leverage without getting as much as you can. He owes that to his supporters.

And whether the Party likes is or not, any "concessions" he gains are going to strengthen, not weaken, the party and our chances across all elections. We may be dragging it along kicking and screaming, but all we want is for our Party to become the popular, powerful force for economic and social justice it can be. (Instead of the feeble, ineffective, defense against the ever advancing Repubs we currently are.)

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
122. He still loses on the first ballot either way
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

It's not like this was a close race like 2008. He lost by a large margin.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
123. Refer you back to
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jun 2016
This isn't just about winning the nomination. It never was. Decisions have yet to be made. And negotiations are happening behind the scenes.

You don't give up your leverage without getting as much as you can. He owes that to his supporters.

And whether the Party likes is or not, any "concessions" he gains are going to strengthen, not weaken, the party and our chances across all elections. We may be dragging it along kicking and screaming, but all we want is for our Party to become the popular, powerful force for economic and social justice it can be. (Instead of the feeble, ineffective, defense against the ever advancing Repubs we currently are.)
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
124. Could have fooled me
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jun 2016

I have been very active in politics for a very long time, and you will not convince me that the kind of folks that would do such a thing at the convention OR just not accept that the vast majority of the party DOES NOT agree with them are in any way helpful to the party.

I know that it sounds like they would be, in theory, but again I have seen this kind of thing on a local and state level and all it does is create factions. It does not ever result in anything positive.

 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
85. My guess is because
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 05:24 AM
Jun 2016

you haven't asked him nicely and then told him you would hold your breath until he does!

If SoS Clinton has enough delegates to clinch the nomination then why are you and so many others so anxiety ridden about Senator Sanders not conceding?

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
91. Because Bernie Sanders hates democracy and can't handle losing.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 06:03 AM
Jun 2016

If he does "take it to the convention," then his plan is clearly to overturn the results of the popular vote. The will of the people has spoken, but Bernie doesn't like their answer, and thinks somehow that he knows better than they do.

Vinca

(50,236 posts)
97. Because he said he'd stay in until everyone voted.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:52 AM
Jun 2016

Why are you so concerned? It appears your candidate is the nominee. And stop with the sexism meme. It's bullshit. You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
102. Mathmatically he EARNED the right to go to the convention.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 08:37 AM
Jun 2016

You say you're good at math but seem to be struggling with basic counting. 2383 is number of delegates she needs to get the nomination. As of now she only has 2203. The leaves 180 delegates short. Since she needs super delegates to to the number needed she will have to wait until the convention to be the nominee. If the supers were to vote for Bernie he would have enough to win. Is that likely atm? No, but still possible mathematically. He earned it. His voters and the DNC rules gave him that right.

2383-2203 = 180 not 2383

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
108. I look forward to his thumping in DC
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:52 AM
Jun 2016

Although it won't be as fun as CA and NJ.

But I mean come on, are the delegates he might pick up in DC going to close that 956 delegate deficit he is sporting? He seems like he can't accept the fact that he lost with this baloney about "taking it to the convention."

findrskeep

(713 posts)
143. Yes, and there could possibly
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jun 2016

be more cheating that can be added to the lawsuit. Give em' enough rope...and all that.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
115. Wait until this weekend
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jun 2016

As of now, he's taking the same exact posture that Clinton took in 2008. The final votes will be cast on Tuesday. I suspect he'll suspend his campaign by the weekend.

If you call getting a thumping -- going from 3 % to nearly 45 % -- I'll take a thumping any day.

At least you only have a few more days to sow your division here.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
119. He lost by a huge percentage
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jun 2016

Well over 15% of the delegates when it is all said and done. That is huge. I really don't understand this idea that he went from "3 % to nearly 45 %"

First of all that is simply not true. He does not have anywhere even close to 45% of the delegates. Secondly, it was a two person race. So of course he got a good share of the "I hate Clinton" vote.

IMO, he is unbelievably disrespectful in refusing to concede. And as such he has confirmed every negative thing I thought about him.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
144. OK
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:50 AM
Jun 2016

He got 43 percent of the popular vote. He also received 45 % of the pledged delegates.

Are you really saying that Martin O'Malley or some other candidate would have won 23 states? Kerry won something like 47 states. Gore won all 50. Those were landslides. This was a close contest.

TheFarseer

(9,317 posts)
141. I think he just very strongly disagrees with her on key issues
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:16 PM
Jun 2016

And wants to spread his message as long as possible. That's my best guess.

Demsrule86

(68,456 posts)
154. If he does not concede...I would not let him spread anything
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:36 PM
Jun 2016

No convention goodies ...and out he goes after the first vote...he can hand with the 'protest' (riot?) that he helped assemble.

Response to MaggieD (Original post)

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
153. He has told you repeatedly what he's campaigning for.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:52 PM
Jun 2016

He hadn't achieved those goals yet, and has pledged to campaign for them until the convention.

For further details, I can only refer you to his many speeches.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton is 956 delegates ...