"Wikileaks will publish ‘enough evidence’ to indict Hillary Clinton, warns Assange"

[msanthrope]

Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange warns more information will be published about Hillary Clinton, enough to indict her if the US government is courageous enough to do so, in what he predicts will be “a very big year” for the whistleblowing website.

Expressing concerns in an ITV interview about the Democratic presidential candidate, who he claims is monitoring him, Assange described Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump as an “unpredictable phenomenon”, but predictably, given their divergent political views, didn’t say if he preferred the billionaire to be president.

Snip.

Speaking via video link from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, Assange said that there was enough information in the emails to indict Clinton, but that was unlikely to happen under the current Attorney General, Obama appointee Loretta Lynch.

SNIP


Clinton has been acting like the presumptive Democratic nominee even though votes are still being counted in California after the June 7 primary, Sanders flipped three counties in his favor, and nine superdelegates have dropped the former New York senator

https://www.rt.com/usa/346534-wikileaks-clinton-assange-fbi/

OMG.....the Indictment Fairy and the California Count conspiracy....from the rapist and Putin State Media.

Jeebus, I needed a laugh today!!!!!

[bravenak]

1. He's so full of himself

[msanthrope]

11. Truly, I want to hear his views on the first female President. nt

[bravenak]

24. It might make you sick

He doesn't seem very intersectional or female friendly

[Hortensis]

47. Nope. And he would have published long ago if

he had the information he claims.

We actually owe a great deal to Assange, and I was sorry to learn how mentally...off he is. Of course, maybe it's likely he wouldn't have done what he did if he wasn't. The Ecuadorean embassy is no doubt infinitely more comfy than an official prison, in any case, and imo his trumpish comments about their female ambassador are very unfortunate.

[SidDithers]

2. It's a perfect storm of idiocy...nt

Sid

[msanthrope]

7. It saves time, though.......it's all in one spot. nt

[NorthCarolina]

3. Wouldn't Obama just offer her a Presidential Pardon anyway though? -nt-

[TwilightZone]

5. At present, there's nothing to pardon.

This isn't likely to change that.

[NorthCarolina]

9. Assuming that there is though, isn't a Presidential Pardon the likely remedy? -nt

[AgingAmerican]

10. Probably, but...

She would have to drop out of the race

[Cordy]

34. Show me!!!

Show me where it says she would have to drop out of the race? I don't see that under presidential qualifications for office in the Constitution. Jus saying. She cannot only become President, she can pardon herself as far as I know.

[AgingAmerican]

35. She would be forced out by the Democratic party

Running a presidential candidate under those circumstances would be political suicide.

[msanthrope]

41. Not that I don't love fanfic, but um, no. nt

[msanthrope]

12. Why would any rational being concede that as an assumption? nt

[840high]

42. How many candidates can

you name under FBI investigation that were elected president?

[msanthrope]

44. Zero. HRC isn't under investigation. But clap for Tinkerbell! nt

[NWCorona]

52. The WH press secretary said otherwise

[Bob41213]

49. Nixon (I think)

I believe he was under investigation at the time of election and forced to resign shortly afterwards rather than facing impeachment.

[Duval]

15. Yep.

I will be so surprised, though, considering his speech and Harry Reid's, about the Justice Dept and how "no one is above the law". Those speeches were on many cable shows.

[swhisper1]

23. no, if he did that, dems will lose every race

[Travis_0004]

26. Ifhe did that Im not showing up to vote.

Yes, with a pardon she could be elected, but I wouldnt vote for her.

[840high]

28. .+1

[BootinUp]

4. Assange needs money apparently. nt

[FSogol]

6. LOL, the Putinistas are using interns now.

[msanthrope]

8. Nice work if you can get it. nt

[Metric System]

13. Assange, Putin and Russia Today. Putin wants Trump as President. Also, the last line about CA

makes no sense. Even if Sanders won California Hillary would STILL be the presumptive nominee. So much bull.

[Hortensis]

50. Boy, no doubt Putin wants Trump. Of course.

Hillary already has a relationship with Kremlin, and the Kremlin regards her as something of an "iron lady" who would continue our current efforts to lower world oil prices and halt Russia's increasing aggression, while Trump's not only quite admiring of Putin's ruthless authoritarianism, but his election would confirm to the world all the Russian propaganda stereotypes of an America that is imploding.

The Kremlin’s Candidate

In the 2016 election, Putin’s propaganda network is picking sides.
RT America, the U.S. branch of the global cable network formerly known as Russia Today, funded by the Russian government, has become a great admirer of Trump. And guess who's now working there -- Ed Schultz! The RT show, The News with Ed Schultz, now features Putin-friendly discussions about the failings of U.S. policy in the Middle East, America’s “bloated” defense budget and the futility of NATO strategy.

Even Trump is getting a new look from Schultz. Speaking at various points on RT in recent months, Schultz has said that Trump “has tapped into an anger among working people,” is “talking about things the people care about,” and even, as Schultz recently declared, that Trump “would easily be able to function” as president.

Those are strange words coming from an ex-MSNBC liberal better known for casting Trump as a racist lout. But just under the surface of RT is a bought-and-paid-for propaganda vehicle trying to nudge viewers toward Russia’s side of the story... In its early days, RT mostly offered a Kremlin-friendly diet of international coverage, feeding the Obama-bashing, America-in-decline narrative with C-list commentators who couldn’t get an airing elsewhere on cable TV. But that was before Donald Trump—whose unlikely mutual admiration for Russia’s strongman president has been one of the stranger subplots of this American political season.

The blustery billionaire has praised Putin as a strong leader, spoken of closer ties with Moscow and mused about whether NATO is obsolete. At the foreign policy speech Trump delivered in Washington on April 27, the Russian ambassador to the United States was sitting in the front row. As Trump has risen, RT has gotten much more interested in the U.S. presidential campaign. Tune in to Ed Schultz and his colleagues these days and you’ll find a presidential race featuring Hillary Clinton as a malevolent warmonger, Bernie Sanders as an insurgent hero—and Donald Trump as a foreign policy savant.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/donald-trump-2016-russia-today-rt-kremlin-media-vladimir-putin-213833#ixzz4BZAWiCh8

From International Business Times

In December, the GOP nominee said it was "a great honor" to be praised by Putin, a man who is "highly respected within his own country and beyond." Putin had called Trump a "very colorful, talented person."

When questioned on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" about Putin's apparent penchant for killing journalists or invading countries, Trump said, "He's running his country, and at least he's a leader, unlike what we have in this country," adding that the U.S. "does plenty of killing" as well.
...
Trump has also attracted support from other nations with somewhat sour feelings toward the U.S. In a recent newspaper column, the hermetic government of North Korea called the GOP nominee a "prescient presidential candidate."

[think]

14. Perhaps you'd prefer reading the information from a main stream source like Time instead:

http://time.com/4365858/wikileaks-publish-hillary-clinton-emails-assange/

[msanthrope]

16. Oh hells no!!!! Not when you get a twofer like Indictment Fairy and the Taitzian CA count conspiracy

in one article.

[Duval]

17. Did not know it was in Time! Thanks.

[msanthrope]

39. Yes.....I can imagine wanting Time as your source for the Indictment Fairy and CCC....but

not even spurious linkage to a source that doesn't agree with Putin's news outlet is going to fool anyone with sense.

[840high]

29. ty

[BootinUp]

18. What the hell is he waiting for?

Just curious.

[msanthrope]

19. Moar donations. nt

[BootinUp]

20. Yes, see post #4, heh.

[msanthrope]

21. Lawyers are expensive. nt

[Maru Kitteh]

33. and hookers. nt

[msanthrope]

40. JA has to pretend HRC gives a crap about him....push a persecution narrative to explain

his continued lack of courage.

[MattP]

22. He says the AG wont indict , if the facts are there she would

Assange probably thinks the whole government should be in jail for the nsa program

[Demsrule86]

25. Let them try

It would seem he knows a bit about the criminal system.

[ButterflyBlood]

27. Makes sense that rapist Putin puppet would try to help to elect Trump

Luckily no one will take that rapist seriously.

[840high]

30. Prove he is a rapist.

[msanthrope]

37. He admitted penetrating a sleeping woman. His argument was not

that he did not do the acts alleged, but that the acts alleged in the Swedish warrant were not crimes.

[RandySF]

31. .

[Number23]

36. "nine superdelegates have dropped the former New York senator" Damn, they don't even PRETEND

to tell the freaking truth on that site, do they??

[msanthrope]

38. Why would they? What would be the motive? nt

[ucrdem]

43. Jules and Javert, teaming to take down the Clinton menace.

The irony, it hurts.

[msanthrope]

60. I adore anyone who can carry a Hugo reference with panache. nt

[Jamaal510]

45. Not even in his dreams. nt

[leftofcool]

46. LMAO

[Blue_Tires]

48. Yeah, I'm sure...

If Assange had the goods, he would have used them during the primary...

[stonecutter357]

51. fuck Ron Paul.

[wyldwolf]

53. Assange - another example of a no-nothing who is suddenly trying to play in the Democratic party.

[Gomez163]

54. *YAAAAAAWWWWNNNNN*

[okieinpain]

55. +1 n/t.

[Nye Bevan]

56. Accused rapist makes political pronouncements about US presidential race from his hidey-hole.

Does anyone still take this worm seriously?

[workinclasszero]

57. The indictment fairy is dead

[NurseJackie]

58. ... Today and tomorrow

[Orsino]

59. In how many business hours? n/t