Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:28 PM Jun 2016

FBI: We Do Not Expect To Find Any Criminal Wrongdoing On Hillary Clinton’s Part

By Ryan Denson on June 13, 2016 8:47 pm ·
CNN recently broke the news that according to investigators working with the FBI regarding Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.


The story, published this weekend, has been buried as more information emerges regarding the horrific terrorist attack in Orlando that left 50 people dead and 53 injured.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2016/06/13/fbi-we-do-not-expect-to-find-any-criminal-wrongdoing-on-hillary-clintons-part/


OK, so now that that's settled, I guess this forum is no longer needed
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI: We Do Not Expect To Find Any Criminal Wrongdoing On Hillary Clinton’s Part (Original Post) Dem2 Jun 2016 OP
The email fairy will never be vanquished!!!!!!! YouDig Jun 2016 #1
I -DO- BELIEVE IN FAIRIES!!! brooklynite Jun 2016 #4
So, according to the article, no final determination will be Exilednight Jun 2016 #2
The title doesn't even come close to matching the quote. (nt) w4rma Jun 2016 #3
+1. Such obvious propaganda. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #11
Well, then it fits in rather well with the usual posts on the subject. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #12
What a joke of an article. NWCorona Jun 2016 #5
+1. Vacuous. JudyM Jun 2016 #10
Now do they move on to the Clinton Foundation? libdem4life Jun 2016 #6
There will be no indictment and no impeachment leftofcool Jun 2016 #16
Pretty well connected, seems...with the Republicans, too. Impressive. libdem4life Jun 2016 #35
No, nothing there Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #18
The all-knowningness is stunning. libdem4life Jun 2016 #36
The Clinton's have been targets for years Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #38
I could not care any less about your questioning my motives. libdem4life Jun 2016 #39
Now do they move on to the Clinton Foundation? if you are a RWNJ you do... stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #28
I don't believe they are the ones in charge of that. Even the libdem4life Jun 2016 #37
If it's on the internet..... 840high Jun 2016 #7
Pretty much... Dem2 Jun 2016 #8
There will be no indictment Gothmog Jun 2016 #9
I'm one of the few Bernie supporters who never believed she would and never talked about it. JRLeft Jun 2016 #13
Indictment - unlikely. FBI actually announcing this - also unlikely. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #14
Because the FBI said no such thing the whole thing is spun from a CNN story that apparently azurnoir Jun 2016 #15
Thank you for stating the obvious noiretextatique Jun 2016 #41
You mean like the fake poll that no one can find Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #19
I still can't locate a link to the data for that poll. Like it was made up completely BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #26
I don't know that it ever existed. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #32
Good for you.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #34
So just realy really stupid not criminally stupid. whistler162 Jun 2016 #17
If stupidity was criminal Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #33
"...have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected..." Tarc Jun 2016 #20
Because the FBI can't believe their leaks and statements re: no wrongdoing have been ignored. randome Jun 2016 #21
"We do not expect"... NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #22
I hear the sound of Hillary haters hearts breaking workinclasszero Jun 2016 #23
But Benghazi! yellowcanine Jun 2016 #24
"expect" does not equate to "will not find". -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #25
C'mon Dem2, your breaking some hearts around here with this thread. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #27
K&R mcar Jun 2016 #29
But we found wrongdoing RIGHT HERE! ucrdem Jun 2016 #30
Hillary Haters will still find reasons to insist it's true. Facts don't matter. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #31
Isn't it just amazing how aides are pleading 5th amendment and libdem4life Jun 2016 #40
That settles it, because CNN said so! noiretextatique Jun 2016 #42

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
2. So, according to the article, no final determination will be
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:31 PM
Jun 2016

Made until after the interview. Good to know.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
5. What a joke of an article.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:39 PM
Jun 2016

"So, as reported by the Inspector General, Clinton may have caused a bureaucratic headache, but has not broken any laws.
So sorry, Republicans (and Susan Sarandon), it looks as though there won’t be any indictment. "

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
6. Now do they move on to the Clinton Foundation?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:45 PM
Jun 2016

Note that this refers to the server issues....the issues that the Benghazi Hearings kind of stumbled on to.

I think that's been the idea since the beginning. Unethical, perhaps, paranoid and sneaky, covering up whatever, dissing Obama...but not criminal...as in jail. Notwithstanding all the huffy parade of Indictment Fairy gifs...they are getting more attractive, I must admit.

I don't think the concept of indictment came out until the Foundation "irregularities" were discovered. That will not go away. It's just a matter of when. Too many people are in the loop on that one. It's turned into a dare to Comey...does he dare?

Long time until November. The Republicans, in their disarray, might prefer to "let" her win and not have to be constantly vetting Trump's insanity. Then while the impeachment progresses, and nothing like "getting Hillary" and Impeachment v. 2 would unite them better, they regroup and watch the show.

I'm a lifelong Democrat and I expect to stay one, but the party is between a rock and a hard place and it pisses me off.

ETA: Must be psychic...Post #4 has a new one...a video, no less. Cute.

Demsrule86

(68,355 posts)
38. The Clinton's have been targets for years
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jun 2016

No doubt the foundation has already been scrutinised but that begs the question of why you want an investigation of a Democratic nominee. Why not attack Trump. I question your motivation in these matters.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
39. I could not care any less about your questioning my motives.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jun 2016

Let me clearly state so you don't have to question. The FBI is not the VRWC...see, they stand for two different things. One is political...one is Federal...no comparison. I have a BIG problem with the Foundation and if no one can see that these tentacles produced with uncommonly large sums of money that reach around the globe have expectations, wink wink or flat out quid pro quo...then you're in The Bubble. Most of the country Is Definitely Not and can think independently.

BTW, these are the kinds of Their Own Actions that have made them targets for all these years. They are not Victims, FFS. The Bubble and Power is why they go no where. But The Foundation...may have jumped the shark there.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
14. Indictment - unlikely. FBI actually announcing this - also unlikely.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:27 AM
Jun 2016

I've never heard of the FBI making an announcement like "We don't expect an indictment of ___ (fill in any name)." As soon as I saw the thread title, I was sure it was bogus. In fact, I was pretty confident it would be "sourced" to alleged insiders, all of them anonymous.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
15. Because the FBI said no such thing the whole thing is spun from a CNN story that apparently
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:38 AM
Jun 2016

the writers at addictinginfo thought no one would bother reading

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/10/politics/clinton-server-drone-fbi/index.html

Demsrule86

(68,355 posts)
19. You mean like the fake poll that no one can find
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:02 AM
Jun 2016

that says Dems want Sanders involved? This is way more credible.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
26. I still can't locate a link to the data for that poll. Like it was made up completely
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:28 AM
Jun 2016

just to serve as the basis of a bogus headline.

Demsrule86

(68,355 posts)
32. I don't know that it ever existed.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 10:58 AM
Jun 2016

It was not listed and the page I found said ...never existed or was deleted.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
34. Good for you....
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 11:32 AM
Jun 2016

But I do know a number of Bernie supporters who are there with you. My wife is (or was) one.

It's good to see folks who can disagree about the best candidate without indulging in wishful thinking.

Tarc

(10,472 posts)
20. "...have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected..."
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:57 AM
Jun 2016

No 11th-hour indictment to hand the nomination to Bernie now.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
21. Because the FBI can't believe their leaks and statements re: no wrongdoing have been ignored.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:01 AM
Jun 2016

"Hello? Is this thing on?"

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
22. "We do not expect"...
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:05 AM
Jun 2016

of course they don't expect, she was SOS after all so one would "expect" conformance with the law. This OP means exactly squat with regard to the likelihood of a formal indictment.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
23. I hear the sound of Hillary haters hearts breaking
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:10 AM
Jun 2016

all over the internets...its especially loud here at DU!

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
27. C'mon Dem2, your breaking some hearts around here with this thread.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:37 AM
Jun 2016

The FBI investigated the Fort Hood shooter before his attack, the Boston Marathon bomber before his attack and the Orlando shooter before his attack. In all three cases they discontinued their investigations and chose to apply their resources elsewhere. Aren't emails more important than dead Americans ? This author thinks that it's high time to investigate the FBI's performance.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
40. Isn't it just amazing how aides are pleading 5th amendment and
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jun 2016

being forced to take depositions? Guess they all just had a slow week and needed something to do? They have to tell the truth, unfortunately. She put them out there as a shield to protect her...and they will take the fall.

Something very medieval about this...King/Queen of the Mountain watching from afar as the Peasants attempt to slay the enemy and defend them. That's why they don't get to the Monarch. S/He stays far enough out of the fray as self-protection. Because what would the Peasants in General do without a King/Queen to represent them and give their meaningless lives value.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»FBI: We Do Not Expect To ...