2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumReally? Not sure if this is serious.... More taking it to the convention?
These people really need to have a sitdown and discuss among themselves what they can possibly get out of drawing this thing out and constantly making more demands even though this thing is way past the point where he could ever possibly catch up.
Is someone pushing him to do this? Why is he still talking about taking it to the convention when there is no way he could ever possibly win on the first ballot? When there will be no second ballot?
The party is not going to meet all of his demands. He did not win. Hillary is up 12 points over Trump in some polls, so his arguments about polling are stale and he has not made any reasonable case for him getting his long list of demands met...
Sad to see the first female nominee of a major political party be treated like she must give in to the demands of the man who lost and be treated like she is not the real actual winner. To tell her she must remake Her platform in HIS image, or else, is kinda depressing and I see stuff like this in the workplace and school often.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/283448-sanders-spokesman-sanders-has-no-plans-to-drop-out
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Sanders is taking his loss personally and lashing out at anyone and everyone he thinks did him wrong.
Sad to watch, really.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He is making himself look terrible
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)"electability" argument like the Titanic. Superdelegates are not going to look at a double-digit lead by Clinton and say, "Better call in Bernie instead." He bet all his chips on a long shot, lost badly, and doesn't strike me as the type who handles losing gracefully.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I think the fame got to him
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)The last time I heard there are at least three different groups who have been granted permits. They want to show what they support and I'm told they have said they will be VERY PEACEFUL. We shall see what reaction they'll get and I'm sure there will be those who will try to agitate whatever they're trying to do.
So be it!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Might want to try a word with a little less history.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)My family did not need to 'go south'. They was already there
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Agitators. We are all very aware your family was already there in the South, quite clear for quite some time.
Maybe you might need to take a break, nap, meditate. It will all be over soon and you will not have to fight so hard.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)And your family already being in the South is not relevant to my ost
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The democratic party assisted us in ending Jim Crow. These agitators are protesting the party that ended Jim Crow. Dear.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Read up, How to Win Friends and Influence People. Dale Carnegie
You need it!
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)By not conceding and taking it to the convention he asked for this...he has become a sore loser and could help elect Trump.
As a woman, I am deeply offended and will not get over this anytime soon. I will send lots of money to anyone who runs against this guy...let him have a real contest for a change...I would love to see him lose his Senate seat...or at the very least every committee. He is also hurting down-ticket races and reducing our chances to take the Senate and the House....letting Bernie run was worse than nominating McGovern really.
swhisper1
(851 posts)of coarse there are radicals in every group
George II
(67,782 posts)...."the will of the people" over and over again. Now that the people have demonstrated their will, it's something completely different.
Most states won
Most pledged delegates won
Most popular votes
Most superdelegates
What else is there now?
swhisper1
(851 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)ya never know
bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)You are paying lots of attention and keeping everyone so very well informed! Thanks Brave....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Again may I recommend, Dale Carnegie, How to Win Friends and Influence People.
I see you failing miserably at it right now.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)But what have you won? Will be interesting, to say the very least.
In the very early days of DU there was a poster living in DC whose name was something like Jiacinto. You remind us much of him. . . .
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I hope he is well
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)I think we must be having a communication breakdown. Glitch, hell I don't know. I do know I'm done with back and forth with you. I hope you get over your angst about Bernie and his "supporters" soon. Be well.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)TwilightZone
(25,457 posts)I think it's just political theater at this point. I hope so anyway. I still expect him to drop out in the next week or so, though stuff like this certainly doesn't make that a given.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)sheshe2
(83,729 posts)I'm serious.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I guess he'll quit next January a month after the electoral college meets and he can't flip them
sheshe2
(83,729 posts)He will not stop.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You know how it is.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)And the media would be all over him if he did.
swhisper1
(851 posts)and transition to the movement within a week, maybe take a week to rest up, but I doubt it- he's a terrier, tireless and fearless.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Democratic losses, he will really be finished.
swhisper1
(851 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)I live in Ohio...she always wins...captain obvious Sanders rides again.
Jackilope
(819 posts)This is more than running for office. People want big money out of government and influencing politicians and government. Elections begin and end. Real vision and change takes time and grass roots. It would be a damn shame to give up on Progressive ideas and ideals and letting them die. Seriously, do you want to see the wealthy pay their fair share? Do you want an end to fracking?
The Democratic Party has been crapping on Progressives and taking their support for granted for a long time. Rahm Emmanual calling us names and smearing because we had no where else to go?
I know Corporate interests would like us to curl up and die. Is that how you feel?
I find nothing about vision and grass roots pathetic.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)On this subject
swhisper1
(851 posts)TwilightZone
(25,457 posts)If he wants to use the political capital he's gained, he should concede and endorse Clinton, then prepare for the platform discussions at the convention and work toward getting down-ticket Dems elected. Staying in the race until the convention doesn't make any sense. Nothing is going to change.
swhisper1
(851 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)This statement can be read a bunch of different ways, but those words came straight from Sanders himself.
I don't have plans to go to the store on Friday, but it doesn't mean I won't.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)If she's leading Trump by double-digits in all the polls next week, his leverage goes up in smoke--it'll show she doesn't need him because of course his supporters won't vote for Trump
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)That is my view.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)step.
he can still fight for reforms and convention planks leading up to the convention, even if he acknowledges what the end game is
politics is essentially taking credit and avoiding blame--seems to do either there's one course of action to take
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The right thing to do is acknowledge the result and endorse the winner.
swhisper1
(851 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)If he won't concede...she should move on. We were never getting his supporters anyway...so we will have to win without them.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)The following, or something similar, is what I think is most likely to do:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2182694
bravenak
(34,648 posts)City councils. Run mayors. Every damn board or governing body needs ppeople running for every seat from our side. Stop letting repubs run unopposed just because the party does not run anybody. Find out where we gave up at and win there, put in work and people will listen when yiu start winning or narrowing those gaps.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)it's so generous of you to allow us to run for school boards and such though I thank you truly I do
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You ain't the owners of the word 'progressive'
swhisper1
(851 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's your privilege.
swhisper1
(851 posts)Squinch
(50,944 posts)right. She is simply pointing out where we are weak and where we can make progress.
And you are taking it as a personal insult?
Seriously?
You really don't get how this works, do you?
WhiteTara
(29,702 posts)We need to stuff every office with Democrats. That's the only way we can win a revolution.
oasis
(49,376 posts)Super delegates, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The attacks need to stop and superdelegates not existing would not have helped him one bit so he needs to retire that talking point.
swhisper1
(851 posts)oasis
(49,376 posts)It's just that simple.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)that we wait til the end of the week to see how it pans out.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)that he would do all he can to keep Trump from winning and continue to hit Hillary.
I think he will do the right thing.
I doubt that some of his more rabid followers on DU will
swhisper1
(851 posts)she wont have a prayer of winning
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)that you would chose over Hillary?
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Trump supporters.
swhisper1
(851 posts)I would NOT choose any republican over Hillary, but I am a progressive. Many indies and relieved republicans, perhaps repug minorities, it is an unguessable number, but would be higher than Trump by far
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)And secondly, the fact you used the word sane republican in an actual sentence means you really do support the Republicans and want Hillary to lose. There are no sane Republicans except in opposite world...and the fact you want the Democratic nominee to lose should get you booted out of here after tomorrow...hope so.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,731 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)My guess is that, no matter what he previously said, he will run third party. Hope I am wrong but doubt it.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)But at this point I could see him trying. And failing miserably until he drops out.
tritsofme
(17,376 posts)And keep the money flowing to the Weaver/Devine Retirement Fund....I guess it doesn't bother me, if anything it gives me a chuckle.
Everyday that goes by Sanders becomes less relevant and Trump continues to self immolate.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)is driving even women who liked Bernie nuts. So maybe in the end, Bernie's inability to accept his loss will help us.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)I wonder what Hillary's share will be. Right now shes a shoo-in. Lets see if she respects Bernie tonight and at the convention and beyond. Oh to be a fly on that wall
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)...but of course you knew that. She doesn't have to do anything. It's her choice.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Response to peace13 (Reply #28)
Post removed
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)Dyed in-the-wool Bernie supporters but they're even getting angry at him now. I'm not angry at him YET, because I know at some point this whole 'show' will end for him, and he'll have to drop out, as Hillary IS going to be the Dem nominee for POTUS. Losing is difficult and as we all know hurts like HELL, and at age 74 he's probably thinking about how long he'll be here to get things done he really wants to get done in his heart of hearts. But the reality is that he's not the only person to lose at something. Losing IS a part of life.
I'll continue to wait to see how the meeting between Sanders and Hillary shakes out first before I say anything more.
still_one
(92,122 posts)about it
swhisper1
(851 posts)it was never the presidency. I am ecstatic he got this far, cracking eyes open around the world
still_one
(92,122 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)I was considering but now I know She doesn't need us apparently
still_one
(92,122 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)I truly don't get that.
still_one
(92,122 posts)the republican nominee will be trump, no amount of convincing is going to change that mind set
People are going to do what people are going to do, regardless of what someone posts on a forum
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Well, we're in for a ride as this season develops!
still_one
(92,122 posts)lapucelle
(18,242 posts)If some Sanders voters use their votes as a weapon or a tool for revenge, it is on them, not me.
I don't control anyone's vote, and I'm not going to let anyone control mine with threats.
I was there in 2008 when Hillary lost under same rules that people are claiming were rigged in her favor, and I was there in 2000 when purity tests over matters that people don't even remember anymore led to the Bush presidency.
We can only hope that people do the right thing.
still_one
(92,122 posts)said they would not vote for Hillary, 6 said they would
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)however there is a candidate that is waiting for Sanders supporters with arms wide open.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)I am sure you know that.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)the candidate has stated it many times. You're smart and pay attention to news sources right?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)Hillary said she doesn't need Sanders' voters support.
How do you go from an anonymous post to that assumption?
swhisper1
(851 posts)Squinch
(50,944 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Squinch
(50,944 posts)Someone was describing his appearance on some news show where he had to talk really fast, and they cut away from him after only a minute or two.
His time is up.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Reminds me of how Snowden lost his mojo. The media grew bored with his announcements that he was going to reveal a stuning blow soon. Nothing much happened and now we never hear from him
Squinch
(50,944 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)to the corporate news outlets? They couldn't WAIT to marginalize him and, most importantly, his message. That mild social democratic message that the rest of the world has actually enacted, but will "never happen" here in the US is an anathema to the corporate news world AND their owners.
They started out ignoring him until the pressure of actual support made him impossible to ignore and they'll go right back to ignoring him and his message as soon as possible. That's the way they want it. It's up to the supporters now. Will they allow themselves to be ignored or will they demand attention to the message.
Squinch
(50,944 posts)publicized. It just wasn't compelling enough to win him a majority.
I liked much of his message in the beginning. It just quickly became clear that he was not someone who could enact any of it. And as this became widely understood, he became negative and silly. And now he has completely spent all the influence that he could have used productively.
My guess is that his revolution will go the way of Occupy.
OTOH, I think Hillary will push through and enact many of the things that she and BS agreed upon (because, after all, they agreed on 93% of issues when they were both in the Senate,) and she will get us more than BS ever would have.
swhisper1
(851 posts)people are awake now. Only folks who believe they "Can't" will go back to sleep
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)I'd be subtracting things for every day he stayed in the race past Today. i.e. 1 day extra, your 4 people on the platform committee just dropped to 3. When we get down to zero of his peeps on the platform committee we then move to whether or not you will be speaking at the Convention. For each additional day you remain, we move you closer to the first day of the convention and an hour earlier in the day, until he's speaking to an empty convention center at 8:00 a.m. on day 1. Don't get me started. Trump is losing support by the day. Bernie is losing leverage by the day. Hold your position Hillary. Don't give in to blackmail. Bernie is not Putin or the Ayatollah.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)She should not pay ransom
PrettyKitty48
(7 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 14, 2016, 10:44 PM - Edit history (1)
Time to get serious. We simply don't have any more time to help nurse Bernie's tender hurtin' fee-fees. There need to be consequences to his inaction.swhisper1
(851 posts)Trump is losing more each day, but they are not going to Hillary. Johnson is up 2% in as many days. 3 more and he gets to be in the debates. Is he her next Bernie? Lets wait with baited breath
Liberal Jesus Freak
(1,451 posts)I can only imagine the "racist/sexist/misogynist" posts if a Bernie supporter had said this.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)jalan48
(13,856 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Oh well
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Good bye. Somebody needs to hand Bernie his hat and coat and see him to the door.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)People will whisper and snicker, you know? Like this:
Squinch
(50,944 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)He earned all the scorn he will be collecting.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Maybe a nice bit of shunning
NJCher
(35,650 posts)in your dreams, honey.
Come back and talk to me when you can get 30,000 to a stadium to listen to you.
Cher
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He only seems to have gotten ONE senator to endorse him. You really think he has much SWAY over those lifelong ESTABLISHMENT Superdelegates he called corrupt for the pasy year day in day out? Lo fucking l.
NJCher
(35,650 posts)I would have a response to you, but "pasy" year?
And what is "Lo fucking i?" Never heard that one.
Anyway, when/if you sober up or the swelling in your fingers has gone down from beating yourself up with a hammer, recall that the people in Congress go on to jobs as lobbyists. You think the merry-go-round will continue if someone like Bernie has power?
Here ya' go: Hope that helps.
Cher
bravenak
(34,648 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt
Rex
(65,616 posts)I am asking, because usually people will stick with a goal if there is something to gain. If there is nothing to gain, then it is kinda like trolling...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The media cuts away fast. He is rarely mentioned exceot in a derisive way. Nothing to gain at this point, just refuses to accept the loss. Not sure if it's trolling or just stubbornness
Rex
(65,616 posts)He just won't quit and has people telling him to stay in it, so he does.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)It was an honest question.
k8conant
(3,030 posts)when the DU Hillary supporters try to find their reasons for supporting her instead of just being against Bernie.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Then google how much percentage we are of democrats. Then google women. Find that percentage. Then see what percentage women make up of the party. Those are my groups. I think we have quite a big portion.
swhisper1
(851 posts)I cant find the number of AA dem women, but I will say, Hill gets 80% of AA dem women.. I will be generous and say 20% of half the dem women are for hillary. That comes to 10% of dems who will vote for Hillary are AA women.
Now, dems are 29% of the populace of the nation, women are half that number(14.5%). The 10% of that number is 1.45, round that up to 1.5% of the nation, throw in some AA indys that will go your way. That is a huge block (over 40% of americans). Stretching it, I see 3% of americans are pro Hillary black women.
Now if I could get google to cough up how many AA democratic women there are, I could be more exact , but maybe you will have better luck if you really care to continue this ridiculous conversation
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Men lean Republican, especially white men, so that must be taken into account. Blacks vote at a higher rate than other groups so factor that in, and black women even more so.
So if you take the exit polls from2012, you see that Romney won whites, men and women, Obama got everybody else, so even though there are many white men in the party, they left the party in droves years ago when civil right for blacks passed by democrats hands. That is why we are the party of feminists, civil rights and social justice.
I think I can find the study I read if I try super hard.
jamese777
(546 posts)and I support myself, thank you very much. I don't need some politician to do it for me.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)and observe. When we have to vent, it will be elsewhere, linking to your posts for all to see. It is a grand set-up
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And we will get behind the nominee.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)and will attack thinking you are so...clever...but anyone can see through you.
swhisper1
(851 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Good, we don't need to throw the election to the monster Trump.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Yes, I went to it...and honestly, it was pathetic.
swhisper1
(851 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)engage in the discussion and use tact
swhisper1
(851 posts)there, those who offer solutions we can kick around without bloodletting, realistic communication, honest exposure of flaws and criminal acts, lies and a look to the future. That is no longer here on DU. I hope it will return, but its a cesspool now.
swhisper1
(851 posts)the only interesting things will be new scandals- wikileaks or FBI, or more "mis-statements" from madam pres? Maybe more bobble-head reactions to questions, and cackling?
Nothing Trump will be worth reading. We can always go to photograpy, thats always cheering and pleasent. Groups that use to be ignored can surge while the boring election drags itself to the boring conclusion. We need a down-ticket group, that could be stimulating -cheering on dems in battle with psycho Republicans
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)He had such a great start. Now he throws it all away and will be remembered for how he lost joy what he won.
Sad. Beaten like a rented mule.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Disgraceful and petty and small.
Al Giordano for Senate.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Gothmog
(145,119 posts)With Warren, Clinton can go on eithout sanders
bravenak
(34,648 posts)His legacy will be tarnished
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)He thinks he's entitled to hand a list of "demands" to the woman who beat him, fair and square, by several million votes -- something that no other losing candidate has done in history.
Sadly, it's not a coincidence that the winner is the first woman nominee in history.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)As for primaries, they should all be closed. Want to vote in a primary? Then have some skin in the game and join a political party. Also, learn the voting regulations in your state, instead of whining how you were disenfranchised. It's your fault if you can't figure out what the voting requirements are in your state.
As for the super delegates, I don't care one way or the other. Since their implementation in the 1984 election, they have never subverted the will of the people. The candidate with the most pledged delegates wins the nomination. The closest Democratic primary results in modern times was in 2008. Hillary and Obama had 48% of the popular vote respectively. But, Obama had a small pledged delegate advantage of 102. The super delegates switched in enough numbers to nominate Obama.
For all the complaining that Sanders has done over the super delegates, even if they did not exist, he still would have lost the nomination. Hillary is ahead by 387 pledged delegates and 3.7M votes. It wasn't even close, she won solidly.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They were the only reason people were talking about 'momentum' rather than looking at delegate totals.
I don't mind superdelegates because they prevent us from having a Trump situation.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I have disliked caucuses for years, regardless of who was in the running. They are archaic and disenfranchise far too many people. Look at the crazy system they have in WA. A handful of people caucused, while thousands voted in the primary. Yet, the only delegates allocated were in the caucus. How's that democratic?
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)going to drop out and endorse the former SOS, I wouldn't at all be against the Dems finding someone to primary him for his re-election bid in 2018. I hope they at least take note of this for the next Democratic presidential primaries (whether it's 2020 or 2024) and make new rules to discourage people who pledge no loyalty to our party from joining to muck things up.