Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:43 PM Jun 2016

Bernie had alot more leverage a few weeks ago.

Tonight he just got trounced in the final primary and is farther behind in delegates that he has ever been. Trump is self destructing, Hillary is peaking and nearly all big name Democrats and liberal organizations have endorsed her. Bernie's stature and significance and relevance are all shrinking by the minute.

He should have dropped out weeks ago when his leverage was higher.. he could have negotiated for more of what he wanted.

76 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie had alot more leverage a few weeks ago. (Original Post) DCBob Jun 2016 OP
I agree... tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #1
If he keeps saying stuff like that there is no way he gets a speaking spot. DCBob Jun 2016 #2
Nope not a chance jimw81 Jun 2016 #33
He probably could have been veep, in fact he probably still could if he worked it ucrdem Jun 2016 #3
I like your comment "So to Bernie and his idealistic supporters I salute you" DCBob Jun 2016 #5
Yes he was kind of a foil to Trump ucrdem Jun 2016 #8
Third that here too. :) Hortensis Jun 2016 #44
Great comment and true. nt. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #6
He wouldn't gain anything by being vp in her administration. What power would she give him? JudyM Jun 2016 #7
Thanks and likewise! ucrdem Jun 2016 #9
support, not endorsement larkrake Jun 2016 #30
There is no support without endorsement Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #46
Pretty sure Bernie would not want to be VP under Clinton. peace13 Jun 2016 #51
Yes, as many predicted. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #4
That's what I've been saying. MoonRiver Jun 2016 #10
I'm sure that's what Hillary told him earlier this evening when they met azurnoir Jun 2016 #21
She needs him and his supporters. Especially his supporters. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #24
But here we are being told how insignificant Bernie is azurnoir Jun 2016 #25
Hillarie's, Obama's, Reid's, and Biden's actions and the rest of the parties actions say otherwise. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #72
So 43 percent of primary voters are irrelevant too? Armstead Jun 2016 #43
No, only a few of them are irrelevant metroins Jun 2016 #57
That's if the DNC doesn't think the long game. NWCorona Jun 2016 #11
Peaking in the sense LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #61
I think that's more or less right. Adrahil Jun 2016 #12
baloney. It is not dems that Hillary needs, it is indys and progressives larkrake Jun 2016 #29
She has them. What she doesn't have is the BOB-ers. randome Jun 2016 #64
Sanders lost much of his leverage when Warren endorsed Clinton Tarc Jun 2016 #13
Sanders does not have much leverage given California and DC Gothmog Jun 2016 #14
Yes be did. He should have struck while the iron was hot. sufrommich Jun 2016 #15
What is striking? Armstead Jun 2016 #35
Hillary Clinton won the goddamned election.Every fucking sufrommich Jun 2016 #55
Clinton felt entitled after 2008...and was rewarded with a key cabinet position Armstead Jun 2016 #56
Bernie metroins Jun 2016 #58
You have no idea if Clinton "bargained for a perch",I see a lot of sufrommich Jun 2016 #59
Bernie IS making it about him and what HE wants. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #60
Bernie doesn't need or want your leverage. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #16
What a surprise. Another nasty Clintonite thread about how they need but don't need progressives. nt w4rma Jun 2016 #17
You are not progressive. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #49
Yes, if only progressives were more like disposable wipes. peace13 Jun 2016 #54
you authoritarians just don't get it, and never will. Doctor_J Jun 2016 #18
Fuckin A, Bubba! TheKentuckian Jun 2016 #20
Wow. Just wow. Beware the thread cleansers. zonkers Jun 2016 #26
Love your response comment Armstead Jun 2016 #36
Authoritarian?? You are the one who sounds like an authoritarian. DCBob Jun 2016 #41
Oh I think he does Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #50
"Mrs. Clinton doesn't believe in any of those things" treestar Jun 2016 #63
Bernie has destroyed his reputation Renew Deal Jun 2016 #19
+1 CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #23
He "destroyed" his reputation the day he challenged the Annointment Armstead Jun 2016 #38
He did what he had to do. peace13 Jun 2016 #52
Then obviously he isn't needed on Hillary's campaign trail azurnoir Jun 2016 #22
There is sound logic to that view. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #27
no, she is not peaking. She peaked the day she entered the race and has been going larkrake Jun 2016 #28
Wanna bet? tirebiter Jun 2016 #31
I trust Bernie to make these decisions for himself. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #32
Luckily how much leverage he has has nothing to do with your personal opinion but highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #34
Clinton finished very strong. Nt NCTraveler Jun 2016 #37
Good thing. How many did she lose in a row, before her strong finish? peace13 Jun 2016 #53
She had a strong start, a strong middle, and a strong finish. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #62
I would have to look it up. Not one hundred percent sure. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #68
They are still looking at CA. peace13 Jun 2016 #69
I understand. I think Clinton will expand here lead. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #70
Good luck to you. : ) peace13 Jun 2016 #71
Yes he should just have slunk away and left 43 percent stranded Armstead Jun 2016 #39
Its basically a team sport and Bernie and his supporters are on the Dem team.. correct?? DCBob Jun 2016 #48
I was thinking that too, yesterday obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #40
He has until Monday before any influence starts to become moot. stevenleser Jun 2016 #42
So easy to sit inside the bubble with that dictum .... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #45
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #47
Agree with everything you said. But Sanders was never much of a politician. randome Jun 2016 #65
Very true workinclasszero Jun 2016 #66
Good point.. DCBob Jun 2016 #67
Stirring up more shit for no reason. No idea why. nt Logical Jun 2016 #73
This is a political discussion board. DCBob Jun 2016 #75
He overplayed his hand Stuckinthebush Jun 2016 #74
Indeed. DCBob Jun 2016 #76

tallahasseedem

(6,716 posts)
1. I agree...
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:46 PM
Jun 2016

and after his press conference today, I'm wondering if they should even give him a prime time speaking gig.

jimw81

(111 posts)
33. Nope not a chance
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:55 AM
Jun 2016

Longer he plays these games more likely he wouldn't get the early night speaking time. At this point Bernie is screwing Berine.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
3. He probably could have been veep, in fact he probably still could if he worked it
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:50 PM
Jun 2016

but I don't think he wants it. Frankly I don't think he wants to be a Democrat. He's not a big tent guy, but that's who he is and he's being true to his vision. He doesn't really need to do much more now than try not kick up a stink in Philly. A rueful speech and polite endorsement would be nice, but that's not really his style either, so he might just fax it in and spend his time at his own counter-convention, and that would be peachy. It won't matter to the outcome which is strictly Punch and Judy at this point.

So to Bernie and his idealistic supporters I salute you. As far as I can tell the damage isn't permanent and it was an exciting year.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
5. I like your comment "So to Bernie and his idealistic supporters I salute you"
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jun 2016

I second that. It was an amazing campaign.. no one could have predicted this... even Bernie!

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
8. Yes he was kind of a foil to Trump
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 10:01 PM
Jun 2016

I'm not sure where that leaves his voters but I think the worst that could happen would be a zero sum i.e. a 2- or even 3-way split that canceled out any advantage to Trump. That's why I don't think it much matters what he does at this point but it would be far better of course if he could work up some enthusiasm for the ticket. I guess he'll keep surprising us LOL.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
44. Third that here too. :)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:52 AM
Jun 2016

I personally really doubt he ever had a chance of being asked to be VP, though, no matter how he has managed to ignite higher aspirations in Americans. Remember, what we've been learning about his personality and character over this primary season was already well known to his colleagues.

Republican presidents may swing wildly from adopting nincompoops for electoral advantage and then keeping them "outside" to allowing other VPs to usurp presidential authority, but Democratic presidents have been going a very different direction. VP Biden is a partner to President Obama, participating in antiterrorism sessions, undertaking special missions, etc., etc. Even if Sanders' age didn't pose a very serious problem as running mate for a 68/69-year-old candidate, why on earth would Clinton consider "partnering" with a cranky hornet?

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
7. He wouldn't gain anything by being vp in her administration. What power would she give him?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:57 PM
Jun 2016

He's better off being free of any controlling influence on her part. He will have more influence without her. It was an exciting primary, best ever. While it lasted. Good luck to your candidate and thanks for the salute.

Demsrule86

(68,555 posts)
46. There is no support without endorsement
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:06 AM
Jun 2016

Oh, vote for the other candidate...I did not endorse her but do it anyway...nonsense...I doubt he can deliver his voters anyway...time to walk away...Bernie who? And hope bob is a small sub-group. I think it is.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
51. Pretty sure Bernie would not want to be VP under Clinton.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:52 AM
Jun 2016

Her disrespect to him over the course of the campaign would not permit that. When the time comes I am certain that he will give her the generous, ego stroking speech that you are looking for. When the time is right and not before that.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
21. I'm sure that's what Hillary told him earlier this evening when they met
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:42 AM
Jun 2016

after all if he has so little influence why ever would she need him on her campaign trail, right?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
25. But here we are being told how insignificant Bernie is
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 02:18 AM
Jun 2016

and aren't hs supporters young white males who love rallies but do not vote anyway, at least that's what I've read, I would think Hillary would not need such support

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
72. Hillarie's, Obama's, Reid's, and Biden's actions and the rest of the parties actions say otherwise.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:21 PM
Jun 2016

Don't pay attention to a bunch of people who have their panties in a wad half the the time. I've said all kinds of dumb things throughout the years. "I'll never vote for so-and-so."

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
43. So 43 percent of primary voters are irrelevant too?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:36 AM
Jun 2016

Good luck with that in November....and into the future

metroins

(2,550 posts)
57. No, only a few of them are irrelevant
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:10 AM
Jun 2016

The Bernie or Busters

A very small loud minority. The same people who think Republicans and Democrats are the same, despite SCOTUS. The one's who think Trump would be a okay.

Those irrational voters are irrelevant.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
11. That's if the DNC doesn't think the long game.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 10:12 PM
Jun 2016

There's gonna be ups and downs and there will be come a time where Bernie's supporter's will be needed and I'm sure the DNC is cognizant of that.

Also you should reword this.

"Hillary is peaking and nearly all big name Democrats and liberal organizations have endorsed her."

Peaking this early is something even I don't want happening.

LoverOfLiberty

(1,438 posts)
61. Peaking in the sense
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:32 AM
Jun 2016

of the Democratic primary, though you might say that it is a natural phenomenon once the likely outcome is obvious. In other words, since Hillary had effectively won the nomination, more people were likely to vote for her as the primaries wound down.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
12. I think that's more or less right.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 10:20 PM
Jun 2016

I think if he had negotiated a suspension of his campaign after California, he would have had the most power. Emotions were still high, people still considered him. He wanted to see the Primaries out and that's cool, but his power and influence is waning fast. If he wants ANY influence on events, he needs to act in the next couple of days. The last couple of days have reminded a lot of people of what is on the line here. His influence will all have evaporated by Philadelphia.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
13. Sanders lost much of his leverage when Warren endorsed Clinton
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 10:28 PM
Jun 2016

He isn't as key as he thinks he is to the progressive vote.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
35. What is striking?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:50 AM
Jun 2016

Give up and quietly walk away and just let Clinton snd the Corporate Dems take it all over and tell the 43 percent who voted for him to screw off?

All Hail the Party of Her Glorious Majesty and the Kingdom of Goldman

That would make him an irrelevant sychophsnt of the Holy Succession of the Royal Coupke and the Court of Monsanto

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
55. Hillary Clinton won the goddamned election.Every fucking
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:04 AM
Jun 2016

4 years someone wins and someone loses. Usually the loser loses gracefully,Sanders has made himself the exception,.Someone feels entitled and it ain't Hillary.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
56. Clinton felt entitled after 2008...and was rewarded with a key cabinet position
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:10 AM
Jun 2016

Bernie is fighting to keep the 43 percent who supported him AND HIS MESSAGE AND GOALS from being ignored and marginalized once again.

Clinton bargained for a perch from which to run again.

Who is/was acting entitled?

metroins

(2,550 posts)
58. Bernie
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:15 AM
Jun 2016

Because Hillary now has a platform.

Bernie will fade into almost nothing because his bargaining position is melting away. Had he suspended and endorsed, he could be on the campaign trail pulling Hillary left and championing her as a progressive while getting more air time and possibly a cabinet position from which he could do something.

Continuing to act like a ..... only gets him nothing and he will fade like he's done for 25 years in elected office.

He's just not realistic. In order to effect change, you have to act. Speeches only go so far, at some point you have to actually get something accomplished.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
59. You have no idea if Clinton "bargained for a perch",I see a lot of
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:16 AM
Jun 2016

Sanders supporters make that claim as if her role as SOS gives Bernie a right to be an asshole about losing. I'll make this prediction though,Bernie's no longer speaking for most of the voters who voted for him,they've moved on to the General. He's speaking for his small group of PUMAs now.

LuvLoogie

(6,995 posts)
60. Bernie IS making it about him and what HE wants.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:32 AM
Jun 2016

Why is it OK for him to legislatively cooperate with the Democratic establishment and sign compromise bills like the ACA and the 90s crime bill? But it's not okay for millennials and other of his supporters to join with the Democratic establishment?

Rather than give his supporters the best chance in the primary, he chose to cover for his logistical shortcomings with lawsuits and accusations of rigging and bias--further alienating his supporters from the process from which he has comfortably fed since he was 40.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
17. What a surprise. Another nasty Clintonite thread about how they need but don't need progressives. nt
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 11:08 PM
Jun 2016
 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
54. Yes, if only progressives were more like disposable wipes.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:02 AM
Jun 2016

She could use us and then dispose of us properly, as the package reads.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
18. you authoritarians just don't get it, and never will.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jun 2016

sanders does not care about leverage, or getting to speak in prime time at the convention. he believes that the American people are entitled to healthcare, decent wages, a good education, and clean air and water, and that the Democratic Party should fight for them. he also knows that mrs Clinton doesn't believe any of these things. he wants the party to be the progressive powerhouse it was for all those decades, instead of the republicans whipping boys.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
20. Fuckin A, Bubba!
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:40 AM
Jun 2016

Of course they tried to hide.


On Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:25 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

you authoritarians just don't get it, and never will.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2186824

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Time for nasty personal attacks has passed. No more bashing Democrats or their supporters.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:33 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Enough!
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Wtf, this post is innocuous
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Rules in GD haven't changed yet. Sorry. 
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No way, no how would I remotely consider hiding this post. Thanks for pointing it out though.
TheKentuckian
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not nasty, -- or personal, -- or false! Sheesh! 
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Just please stop. Sanders is not perfect and Clinton is not evil incarnate. 

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
41. Authoritarian?? You are the one who sounds like an authoritarian.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:25 AM
Jun 2016

This is not BernieUnderground. Other viewpoints are allowed.

Furthermore yout miss my point entirely. I am suggesting Bernie could have gained more towards the goals he has campaigned on had he negotiated earlier. It seems now he is more focused on exacting revenge on the party.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
63. "Mrs. Clinton doesn't believe in any of those things"
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:40 AM
Jun 2016

you've created a fictional Hillary and continue to believe in it.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
38. He "destroyed" his reputation the day he challenged the Annointment
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:56 AM
Jun 2016

Anyone who dared to stand up against the Royal Succession would hsve been tarred anf feathered by the followers of the Royal Corporate Coupke

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
52. He did what he had to do.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:57 AM
Jun 2016

I doubt he worried about his reputation. In any event he has had an awesome campaign. He has engaged Americans and offered his energy to try and save us from ourselves. He continues to represent the American people. I agree with you. Hill is still in shock that he had the audacity to put her to the trouble of campaigning for what was rightfully hers.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
22. Then obviously he isn't needed on Hillary's campaign trail
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:44 AM
Jun 2016

-I'm sure that's she told him at their meeting

 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
28. no, she is not peaking. She peaked the day she entered the race and has been going
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:02 AM
Jun 2016

downhill to almost a tie. She has a good distance to get as low as trump, a whole 3 percentage points. Bernie dropping out will give her a bump, but it wont last unless she works for it. It is her job and her job alone.

Johnson is climbing fast but I dont know who he is drawing. If he gets into the debates, he will be a spoiler for one of them.

If the RNC replaces Trump, all bets are off

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
34. Luckily how much leverage he has has nothing to do with your personal opinion but
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:29 AM
Jun 2016

with reality. Just like what finally happens with the race, the final nomination tallies and events and so on, what shall be shall be. And Bernie is doing what he thinks is right in terms of representing almost half the people who voted in the Democratic primaries and doing all he can do to ensure that their point of view is not simply discarded.

As President Obama and Hillary have done, I applaud him for fighting so hard to bring new people into the Party, for getting them enthused, and for raising important issues.

As long as he believes that staying in accomplishes these worthwhile goals, I am pleased to depend on his judgement and to let him do it.

LuvLoogie

(6,995 posts)
62. She had a strong start, a strong middle, and a strong finish.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:37 AM
Jun 2016

Bernie had one good little streak, which was anticipated.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
68. I would have to look it up. Not one hundred percent sure.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jun 2016

She sure had a strong finish when we were told that is where she would be at her worst as people got to know Sanders. Seems the exact opposite happened.

What are the results from NJ and Cali. They went pretty solid for her, right? And DC?

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
69. They are still looking at CA.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jun 2016

Election discrepancy and fraud suits are to be filed in the next week or so, after CA results are in. This lawsuit is not against Hill but against the fraud that used her to impact thee race as I understand it.

http://www.gregpalast.com/placebo-ballots-stealing-california-bernie-using-old-gop-vote-snatching-trick/

https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com/2016/06/06/major-election-fraud-suits-being-filed-trustvote-org/

These investigations are about the process jot the candidates.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
39. Yes he should just have slunk away and left 43 percent stranded
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:03 AM
Jun 2016

Last edited Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:35 AM - Edit history (1)

We are not her royal subjects. Sanders is representing our desire to have a voice.

43 Percent. Not 8 percent or 17 percent.

He doesn't have to beg the Royal Court as an individual. He represents US and we will not be ignored.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
48. Its basically a team sport and Bernie and his supporters are on the Dem team.. correct??
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:32 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary is going to be elected the leader of this team.. that was obvious many weeks ago. To defeat the other team we need cooperation and teamwork from all team members. Somehow I dont get the feeling Bernie and his supporters feel that way at all. They seem to look at other Democrats in an adversarial way. That's wrong and just helps the GOP. The sooner he concedes and endorses Hillary the better it will be for everyone.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
42. He has until Monday before any influence starts to become moot.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:32 AM
Jun 2016

If you are an advisor to Hillary you are telling her that you give Sanders until Monday to officially drop out and endorse her.

If that doesn't happen, It affects his role at the convention. Every week between now and July 25 with all votes counted, no primary happening and Hillary being the presumptive nominee, liberal groups endorsing her, etc., the value of his endorsement erodes until by mid July it wouldn't swing any votes. By that time any Sanders supporters who would be on board are on board without his help.

An endorsement between now and end of day on Monday and you probably give him a prime time speaking slot. If he endorses after that he might get a speaking slot during the day at some point during the convention. If he doesn't endorse he has no role at all.

Some folks here are asserting he doesn't want a role, I very much doubt that. He wants a prime time speaking slot if for no other reason than to outline one last time in front of a very large audience his vision for how America should be.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
45. So easy to sit inside the bubble with that dictum ....
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:56 AM
Jun 2016

dicta, dicta, dicta....

That, and $1.25 gets a cup of coffee at 7-11.

Response to DCBob (Original post)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
65. Agree with everything you said. But Sanders was never much of a politician.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:48 AM
Jun 2016

Never much for working well with others. His lack of endorsements from Congress tells us that much. He lacks the diplomatic skills needed to wade through 535 Congressional allies/enemies.

If there is to be a revolution, we need someone else to lead it.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
75. This is a political discussion board.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 08:30 PM
Jun 2016

This is a valid topic for discussion. Nothing to do with 'shit stirring '.

Stuckinthebush

(10,844 posts)
74. He overplayed his hand
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jun 2016

His relevance and power have both diminished greatly. It will be a good case study for future poly sci classes

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie had alot more leve...