2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWe Should Call Brocialism What It Is — White Populism
Read the whole article:
https://medium.com/marcushjohnson/we-should-call-brocialism-what-it-is-white-populism-ad257608ed52#.ktmx15erg
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)"It's like he was in my mind."
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)in open primaries and caucuses.
I like to remind people that even in a democratic socialist state, racial and social injustice and xenophobia can thrive.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)There are HUMAN PRFOBLEMS in any society.
So does that mean we shold not work to create a more just economic society simply because racism exists?
Who the hell says we can't tackle more than one issue at once?This artificial separation is nothing but enabling the Elites and allowing them to rob everyone, while we ignore it.
I
am
so
'
tired
of
these
deliberate
divisions
and
false
choices
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)the South. Even Bernie said the South didn't matter.
That denial of social justice ended Bernie's chances early on.
So there can be no economic justice until you get the social justice issues into your plan.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Most people were attracted to Bernie because they care deeply about social and economic justice together.
I am sick of these misleading deliberately divisive and memes.
The idea that social and economic justice have to be separated is an inverted form of GOP thinking....Divide and conquer, so that the middle and lower classes will all accept being ripped off and exploited and abused by an Elitist System for the Rich and Powerful.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Being shallow is thinking your revolution is the end all and be all for all people.
I hope in the future Bernie looks back and learns some lessons from the primary but like his followers I am afraid his ego and narcissism won't let that happen. Even now he is making demands as if he won!.
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)DebDoo
(319 posts)MaeScott
(878 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)while Hillary was a Goldwater girl. Social justice in intertwined with economic justice. They are inseparable.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Taking the root of one pejorative and combining it with another root that is supposed to demean every Bernie Sanders supporter...
Adding your own opinion, which is meant to supplant what came out of your mind to cover over actual events of this campaign, which is going all the way to the convention.
I can only imagine what your interpretation of Sanders supporters will be tomorrow.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Because Problem A exists means we can not work to solve that and Problem B at the same time.
It's ridiculous.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)is an old strategy to divert attention from who the real enemy is. it's sad so many are falling for it, even INTELLECTUALIZING it in THINK pieces.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)MaeScott
(878 posts)Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)What will these folks do with all of that free time on their hands?
Yes, disrespectful nicknames are not permitted.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10136548#post21
Armstead
(47,803 posts)This line of thinking is truly myopic.
No one is saying that if we have economic justice racism will disappear.
It is doing the bidding of the Corporate Masters to say that we cannot simultaneously deal with the issues of racism while also working for greater economic equality and justice at the same time.,
This is nothing but an inverted form of GOP thinking.
Demsrule86
(68,549 posts)That Bernie was obsessed with one set of issues ...that were important but no the only important issues.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Told that I could at least be able to afford to take a plane to go have an abortion- and black men could afford better lawyers. No Sanders fan jumped in to say how ridiculous that was. SJW became a periods give here as it is on RW sites. It was ugly and I'm glad it's over.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)Demsrule86
(68,549 posts)I totally agree with it. I told my husband early on that I did not like Bernie because he was a one trick pony and cared nothing for anything but banks...he called abortion a distraction. He always seemed condescending to People of color and women. And of course, the attacks on women by his supporters were unrelenting.
MaeScott
(878 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Jon Ace
(243 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)This is the same wheelhouse as Rahm calling progressives "fucking retarded".
Jimmy Dore nails it here-
Hillary Camp Using Insults & Name-Calling To Win Over Bernie Supporters.
think
(11,641 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)One more for my ignore list. It's been not nice knowing you.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)of the identity politics attacks I've seen here all season; and that's saying something.
It sure as hell isn't creating any "unity" behind her, or with supposedly fellow "Democrats."
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)The thought behind it is that a rising tide lifts all boats. White/Black/LGBT/ everyone, all of us.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)right now, our system has rejected a move to economic socialism except for some limited programs. There appears to be a HUGH focus on MONEY in Bernie's platform - and not enough on social justice.
To me, money is not the answer. I think that a large number of Democrats agree.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)The thing is that economic changes intended to erase inequity have historically usually left people of color out. The New Deal, the GI Bill, etc. So some people of color are skeptical when they hear about these kinds of plans without hearing prominently and explicitly that anti-racism is needed as well to make sure everyone benefits from the economic changes. The idea of "a rising tide lifts all boats" doesn't speak to people who have seen, or heard their parents and grandparents talk about, previous risen tides where their boats were definitely not lifted. I think younger African Americans were more likely than previous generations to vote for Bernie, and that makes sense to me as they're more removed from the time period of those various economic policies that helped white people a great deal but were kept out of the reach of people of color.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Been there.
Done that.
Doesn't work.
Number23
(24,544 posts)the idea that once middle to lower class white males get what they need, that things will magically begin to work out for everyone else.
She called it "trickle down justice" and it was easily one of the truest and most brilliant things I've ever seen here.
okasha
(11,573 posts)I just got the "identity politics" dog-whistle from a supporter of that theory. The white-'splainers seem totally oblivious to what they're saying, which is a big, honking clue that the rest of us should ignore what they say, too.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)The Goal of Brocialism is To Recenter The White Working Class
Brocialists clearly see racism and sexism as simply distractions to the class struggle. Intersectionality, diversity and identity politics have been demonized by the brocialist movement as taking away from what they believe should be a solely economic focus. When you believe that diversity is a bad goal, that leads to attempts at silencing the voices of minorities. It leads to attempts to silence women.
think
(11,641 posts)There's your white privilege...
BY MICHELE GORMAN ON 5/27/16 AT 1:39 PM
Despite recent rhetoric regarding the former U.S. president, years before he secured the Republican nomination in the 2016 presidential electiona feat acknowledged ThursdayDonald Trump and Bill Clinton were longtime friends.
~Snip~
Nine months ago, The Washington Post reported that on a private, casual phone call last spring, Bill Clinton encouraged Trump to play a larger role in the Republican Party. That conversation reportedly took place in May 2015, a month after Hillary Clinton declared her 2016 presidential bid and just weeks before Trump announced his.
~Snip~
I like him. And I love playing golf with him, Clinton said in a May 2012 interview with CNN, according to transcripts. He spoke highly of Trump, despite the real estate tycoons prominent role in the so-called birther movement, wherein he spent months publicly questioning President Barack Obamas original birth certificate. Trump, speaking to Fox News earlier that same year, said he thought Clinton was a really good guy.
Read more:
http://www.newsweek.com/history-donald-trump-bill-clinton-friendship-464360
Tarc
(10,476 posts)+1,000
Sanders ran a campaign with a limited focus-basically on economic issues. That is important. There is so much else.
POC, women, LGBT have a full agenda , as the Orlando shootings prove. Hillary spoke to us.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)If he had understood and made explicit the fact that we have to combat racism both together with, and separate from, economic issues, I think he'd have won.
If he had included people of color as high level advisors from the start, and if he'd listened to them and given them to the power to have influence, he would have won.
I am a huge fan of his economic goals. I wish he'd been able to do those things that would have led to a win.
No one will ever win a national election again without a high level of support from people of color.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Not everyone's on board yet, but anyone can be--to include our presumptive nominee, as soon as she dares.
TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)Fighting Corruption and income inequality is anti-black or at least of no interest to blacks because it does not specifically mention black people. Don't understand this at all. Does the media and dem party elites assume black people only care about black specific issues and have no ability to care about issues that the population at large cares about like climate change, outsourcing, citizens united? To me, this is racism. But ive been told repeatedly that I don't get it!
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Is that economic changes intended to erase inequity have historically usually left people of color out. The New Deal, the GI Bill, etc. So some people of color are skeptical when they hear about these kinds of plans without hearing prominently and explicitly that anti-racism is needed as well to make sure everyone benefits from the economic changes. The idea of "a rising tide lifts all boats" doesn't speak to people who have seen, or heard their parents and grandparents talk about, previous risen tides where their boats were definitely not lifted. I think younger African Americans were more likely than previous generations to vote for Bernie, and that makes sense to me as they're more removed from the time period of those various economic policies that helped white people a great deal but were kept out of the reach of people of color.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)most notorious Dudebro hot take artists on Twitter... I've butted heads with them, too...
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Who the fuck believes that "once the class struggle is complete, issues with race and gender will simply melt away." This author is attacking a windmill.
Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)The Flip Side of Big Money in Politics: What if the Will of the People is Racist?
Marcus H. Johnson
March 3, 2016
<edit>
That sounds exactly like what Donald Trump is pushing today! Hes talking about a fear of minorities and the need to fight back against Hispanics taking over white culture. Buchanans ideology obviously had public support in the 1990s, as Trumps does now. But what stopped him from grabbing the Republican nomination? Corporations loathed backing an open white nationalist. He could never raise the funds to seriously contend. The will of corporations stopped the racist will of the public.
With Donald Trump, money isnt an object. He can self fund his campaign and run it however the hell he wants. And absent corporate influence, he is giving the people what they crave. Maybe Bernie Sanders was wrong after all. Perhaps it is time to stop viewing the 1 percent as the villains. Perhaps, corporate interests are holding back something far more sinister: the will of the American people.
Red Mountain
(1,731 posts)People who care about YOU.
Or maybe they prefer a slow burn of racial intolerance to an all out Pat-style blowout.
As long as they and the 1% can continue to play us off against one another and avoid a resolution of the issues either for better or worse.......they win.
All they care about is a stable business environment.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Show me where Sanders or any of his surrogates said this.
Thanks in advance.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)(I'm not talking about Sanders supporters.)
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)jack_krass
(1,009 posts)Decided her best chance to win was carving up the party into factions, then getting the factions to hate each other through "not good enough, Bernie" and simmilar filth.
Number23
(24,544 posts)now. Makes it that much harder for the Bros to drown them out.
...There are so many other stories of online harassment coming from brocialists that it would be impossible to list them all here. But nearly all of the attacks carry the same thesis women and people of color are being selfish by concentrating on issues such as reproductive justice, diversity, and equal pay instead of solely focusing on the class struggle.
And their days of shouting down and intimidating everyone into accepting their privileged, moronic point of view is completely OVER.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)A perfect summation of what is going on...