Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:41 AM Jun 2016

Hillary Clinton’s State Department Armed Saudi Arabia to the Teeth

(Yea I know we're not supposed to post uncomfortable facts about Hillary Clinton here because she's the nominee and all but...I guess the post can be hidden...and this forum is going to be blown to smithereens (no pun intended) soon anyway).

By Medea Benjamin and Rebecca Green, March 8, 2016

While Saudi Arabia and Boeing poured cash into the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton's State Department approved enormous sales of Boeing fighter jets to the kingdom.

As Hillary Clinton emerges as the front-runner for the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate, she’s receiving increased scrutiny for her years as secretary of state — and in particular her hawkish foreign policy. Many critics are focusing especially on her long relationship with Saudi Arabia.

On Christmas Eve in 2011, Hillary Clinton and her closest aides celebrated a $29.4 billion sale of over 80 F-15 fighter jets, manufactured by U.S.-based Boeing Corporation, to Saudi Arabia. In a chain of enthusiastic emails, an aide exclaimed that it was “not a bad Christmas present.”

These are the very fighter jets the Saudis have been using to bomb Yemen since March 2015. A year later, at least 2,800 Yemeni civilians have been killed, mostly by airstrikes — and there’s no end in sight.

The indiscriminate Saudi strikes have killed journalists and ambulance drivers. They’ve hit the Chamber of Commerce, facilities supported by Médecins Sans Frontières (also known as Doctors Without Borders), a wedding hall, and a center for the blind. The attacks have also targeted ancient heritage sites in Yemen. International human rights organizations are saying that the Saudi-led strikes on Yemen may amount to war crimes.

During her tenure as secretary of state, Clinton made weapons transfers to the Saudi government a “top priority,” according to a new report published in The Intercept. And even while Clinton’s State Department was deeply invested in getting weapons to Saudi Arabia, the Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars in donations from both the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the weapons manufacturer Boeing. Christmas presents were being gifted all around.


THE REST:

http://fpif.org/hillary-clintons-state-department-armed-saudi-arabia-teeth/
70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton’s State Department Armed Saudi Arabia to the Teeth (Original Post) Triana Jun 2016 OP
Get one thing straight - Hillary Clinton did not own the State Dept. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
Who ran the State Dept? Who gave the decision to Obama? Was Hillary just a figure head? think Jun 2016 #2
Hate to tell you, but that's part of State's job. all american girl Jun 2016 #42
SoS job, hate to tell you, is to advise and inform the President. Exilednight Jun 2016 #67
Sorry, I know someone who that was their job...they are in the miliatry and worked all american girl Jun 2016 #68
I've actually worked at State, along with my father who reported Exilednight Jun 2016 #69
This is news? Try every other State Department before Clinton's brush Jun 2016 #51
"The Secretary of State does exactly what the President tells them to do" tk2kewl Jun 2016 #3
X1000 peace13 Jun 2016 #56
Then why did SA 'donate' to Clinton Foundation? HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #4
Because its a Charity,,,,Oh, and Cluster Bombs. bahrbearian Jun 2016 #6
a charity swhisper1 Jun 2016 #30
Did Saudis only access weapons after their donation? La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #8
The US has been selling weapons okasha Jun 2016 #18
That was my point. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #20
Understood. okasha Jun 2016 #22
I appreciate that. I was too lazy to do it! La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #24
Yep, see my #43 and #44 below. Nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #45
before the Foundation, we had a base there, no need to sell them anything, we were fighting their swhisper1 Jun 2016 #31
Lol. Yeah let's pretend that our relationship with Saudi Arabia only starts with the Clinton La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #37
I did not say that. The US sells arms to both sides in every war swhisper1 Jun 2016 #38
Yep, see my #43 and #44 below. Nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #46
not at a discount, and limited, then they got all they want cheap (for Saudis) swhisper1 Jun 2016 #33
HRC was also replaced, as was Petraeus with emphasis. leveymg Jun 2016 #9
HRC was allowed to quit after blowing up the mid east swhisper1 Jun 2016 #32
She may still pay a steep price for exceeding her mandate. leveymg Jun 2016 #40
It won't matter by then. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #41
Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi! brush Jun 2016 #52
Dogma! Dogma! Dogma! leveymg Jun 2016 #59
Original thought not needed when the best reponse to you bringing up Benghazi again is . . . brush Jun 2016 #61
You can try to screen your thoughts through simplistic slogans if you want, but I'm not joining you leveymg Jun 2016 #63
I see you didn't research how many embassy attack there were under Bush . . . brush Jun 2016 #64
What you call Benghazi!!! isn't my obsession. It's yours. leveymg Jun 2016 #65
The State Department reviews foreign military sales tammywammy Jun 2016 #23
Then her Secretary of State gig was meaningless? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #27
yes, she did nothing worthwhile swhisper1 Jun 2016 #39
OH... So, NOW, she wasn't in charge of this important post in line of the presidency? MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #48
I have zero issues selling arms to the Saudis jzodda Jun 2016 #5
"They have been buying arms from us since she was a young woman" Triana Jun 2016 #12
Did you miss the part about the Clinton Foundation? nt 2cannan Jun 2016 #13
I hope they give lots more to the Clinton foundation jzodda Jun 2016 #15
Thank you for standing up to their bitter slurs. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #17
Thanks jzodda Jun 2016 #19
They have several programs in East Africs okasha Jun 2016 #21
yeah, a whole 10% actually goes to charity swhisper1 Jun 2016 #34
You might want to do more research and not listen to RW crap, all american girl Jun 2016 #47
and where did you read that? Breitbart? jzodda Jun 2016 #58
False TwilightZone Jun 2016 #70
If I don't sell this young child cocaine... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #28
Incredibly dumb post La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #7
strong emphasis on that word "supposed" n/t Herman4747 Jun 2016 #29
Any and every administration that supports Saudi Arabia deserves to be criticized Kentonio Jun 2016 #53
tick, tick, tick... brooklynite Jun 2016 #10
Example of vitriol MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #49
medea benjamin, lol, tick tock tick tock nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #11
Medea Benjamin needs to get her head out of the sand. ISIS oasis Jun 2016 #14
Yes.... Let's hope that people who stand up to military imperialism go away... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #50
What??? Dem2 Jun 2016 #16
We've been selling them most anything they want for at least 50 years bhikkhu Jun 2016 #25
Funny how we now write off countries fighting for their freedom as 'failed states' Kentonio Jun 2016 #54
Kissing Saudi ass is an American tradition Clinton will be happy to continue arcane1 Jun 2016 #26
Well....they ARE our "allies"...more like frenemies UMTerp01 Jun 2016 #35
You wildly overestimate the power of the Saudis. Kentonio Jun 2016 #55
Medea Benjamin oberliner Jun 2016 #36
As did Carter who sold them, among other things, sixty F-15s back in the 1970s stevenleser Jun 2016 #43
And it was Lyndon Johnson who came up with the idea of the Saudis being allies stevenleser Jun 2016 #44
You wouldn't complain if a MAN sold weapons to a terrorist government Doctor_J Jun 2016 #57
Troll bait from last March. Hillary is our nominee. Time to stop the bash and trash OPs. Sancho Jun 2016 #60
It is the 16th, I don't think you should be campaigning against the Democratic candidate Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #62
Triana, I understand the point, but it's really every single Administration since forever 2banon Jun 2016 #66
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. Get one thing straight - Hillary Clinton did not own the State Dept.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:45 AM
Jun 2016

The Secretary of State does exactly what the President tells them to do. Nothing more, nothing less. If they do, then they are replaced - just like Colin Powell was. So, you need to change the title to "President Obama sold arms to Saudi Arabia while Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State. Your original title is an outright fabrication and somethong that a FoxNews report would be made of.

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
42. Hate to tell you, but that's part of State's job.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:10 AM
Jun 2016

and we have been selling weapons to the Saudi's forever. Why when it's Hillary it's a problem, anyone else...who cares?

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
67. SoS job, hate to tell you, is to advise and inform the President.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jun 2016

I'm sure she had some role in this. To think otherwise is naive.

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
68. Sorry, I know someone who that was their job...they are in the miliatry and worked
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jun 2016

worked with state to make sure this stuff happened. If you have no idea what state does, that is not my problem, but I now how this goes.

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
69. I've actually worked at State, along with my father who reported
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

Directly to the SoS. I've actually sat in on teleconferences with the then POTUS, whose last name also happens to be Clinton.

I know exactly how it all works.

brush

(53,776 posts)
51. This is news? Try every other State Department before Clinton's
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:56 AM
Jun 2016

And Israel too has bee armed by every other State Department before Clinton's.

Nothing to say about that?

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
3. "The Secretary of State does exactly what the President tells them to do"
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:58 AM
Jun 2016

Like not involving Sid Blumenthal in DOS biz?

Hillary never seems to be responsible for anything she does... who's gonna take the blame if she's POTUS?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
8. Did Saudis only access weapons after their donation?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:40 AM
Jun 2016

Or have Saudis been sold weapons much before the formation of the Clinton foundation

okasha

(11,573 posts)
18. The US has been selling weapons
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:15 PM
Jun 2016

to the Kingdom, to Jordan and Oman for decades, for at least two reasons--

1. They've been allies against Iraq, Syria and Iran.
2. The arms sales keep the oil flowing.

This started long before Bill Clinton's Presidency, much less the Clinton Foundation.


 

swhisper1

(851 posts)
31. before the Foundation, we had a base there, no need to sell them anything, we were fighting their
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:12 PM
Jun 2016

battle with Iraq, another reason why we went there, the Bushes were in bed with the Saudis for years

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
37. Lol. Yeah let's pretend that our relationship with Saudi Arabia only starts with the Clinton
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jun 2016

Foundation. You guys are so far removed from any fact based arguments

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
9. HRC was also replaced, as was Petraeus with emphasis.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jun 2016

I'm not entirely convinced that Obama's 2011 findings encompassed the full spectrum of covert activities actually carried out, particularly the pipeline of sophisticated weapons and Jihadists that was coordinated through the Qataris from Libya to Syria. The death of Amb. Stevens brought those operations into stark and unwanted relief.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
40. She may still pay a steep price for exceeding her mandate.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 03:16 AM
Jun 2016

We will see what is allowed to happen after Comey releases his report.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
41. It won't matter by then.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:00 AM
Jun 2016

The AG already stated that she will take more than a month -- or two -- before making her decision.

By then, it will be too late.

brush

(53,776 posts)
61. Original thought not needed when the best reponse to you bringing up Benghazi again is . . .
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:55 AM
Jun 2016

Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!

God! If it's not the email faux scandal, it's the Benghazi faux scandal (btw, google how many embassy attacks happened under Bush and how many died and maybe you'll understand my response a little more).

And when are you going to stop carrying water for the repugs?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
63. You can try to screen your thoughts through simplistic slogans if you want, but I'm not joining you
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jun 2016

You'd like to dumb down DU. To some degree, you've succeeded just by being here.

Denial! Denial! Denial! doesn't make it true.

When are you going to stop beating beating your dog?

brush

(53,776 posts)
64. I see you didn't research how many embassy attack there were under Bush . . .
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:21 PM
Jun 2016

without nary a whisper from the repugs, or you, but you try to revive the dead horse Benghazi again on a progressive site. God, when do repug talking points stop?

Here's a link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/13-benghazis-that-occurre_b_3246847.html

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
65. What you call Benghazi!!! isn't my obsession. It's yours.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:36 PM
Jun 2016

I'll do my own research. You do yours.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
23. The State Department reviews foreign military sales
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jun 2016

They review export licenses, that the deal complies with the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, and that it fits with the foreign policy of the current Administration. A deal this big would have taken years from initial contact to contract award. Years.

The State Department also promotes US business abroad.

Saudia Arabia is an ally of the US. Boeing is a US company.

If anyone wants to learn more about FMS deals they can go here: http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rsat/c14021.htm?goMobile=0

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
27. Then her Secretary of State gig was meaningless?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jun 2016

And gives her no credit for being a "leader"?

Just clarifying...

jzodda

(2,124 posts)
5. I have zero issues selling arms to the Saudis
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:04 AM
Jun 2016

If not from us they would buy it from elsewhere anyway.

Its fiction though to say HRC is responsible for this stuff. They have been buying arms from us since she was a young woman.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
12. "They have been buying arms from us since she was a young woman"
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jun 2016

True. Since the days of Ronnie RayGun at least.

jzodda

(2,124 posts)
15. I hope they give lots more to the Clinton foundation
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:27 PM
Jun 2016

Since it does good work around the world.

My friend from Nigeria told me the Clinton foundation cleaned up a toxic site and sent a doctor to the area to access the long term health risks. After the doctor was done she stayed extra to help people with routine medical issues.

You will Never ever get me to believe that the foundation is not a force for good.

jzodda

(2,124 posts)
19. Thanks
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:27 PM
Jun 2016

I don't like seeing right wing attacks on DU coming from fellow progressives. I can listen to Mark Levin if I want to hear attacks on Dems.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
21. They have several programs in East Africs
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:39 PM
Jun 2016

aimed at stopping the murder of elephants. (Those are especially dear to my heart.). Others include empowering third world women by supporting the formation of women-owned small businesses, the formation of small-farm collectives as an alternative to large-scale agribusiness, and programs to provide life-extending medication to HIV/AIDS patients at low to no cost.

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
47. You might want to do more research and not listen to RW crap,
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:17 AM
Jun 2016

because that's what they say and it's completely false.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
7. Incredibly dumb post
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:38 AM
Jun 2016

Hillary Clinton does not own the state department, this is a direct attack on Obama, who also couldn't have randomly ditched a supposed ally. That is not how international relations work. This is just a stupid attack on democrats and a fundamental lack of international relations.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
53. Any and every administration that supports Saudi Arabia deserves to be criticized
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:02 AM
Jun 2016

And in the strongest possible terms. That country is spending its vast wealth on spreading extremist Wahhabism around the world, oppressing its people horribly and exerting influence in many negative ways. Horrible theocratic regime.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
50. Yes.... Let's hope that people who stand up to military imperialism go away...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:46 AM
Jun 2016

While you light the candle for ... what? Only some of the oppressed?

Do you even know who Medea Benjamin is?

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
16. What???
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:44 PM
Jun 2016

Blame Hillary for one of the sign-offs that had to happen on something that wasn't initiated by her? That's nuts.

bhikkhu

(10,715 posts)
25. We've been selling them most anything they want for at least 50 years
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:57 PM
Jun 2016

...I don't see how one secretary of state or other was responsible, or could have put his or her foot down and put a stop to it.

I'm generally in favor of the middle eastern nations policing themselves, and Yemen is basically a failed state full of terrorists on the Saudi border. Not that they are doing it right, but I can't say we would do better. Ideally we'd convict them all of war crimes and replace the government, then do the same in other troubled countries, and establish regional peace. Idealism doesn't work very well.

In any case, the global arms market is a global arms market; they can spend their money anywhere they chose.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
54. Funny how we now write off countries fighting for their freedom as 'failed states'
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:04 AM
Jun 2016

And seemingly have no problem bombing the shit out of them. Kind of a good thing the world didn't take the same attitude during the Revolutionary War isn't it?

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
26. Kissing Saudi ass is an American tradition Clinton will be happy to continue
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:59 PM
Jun 2016

No matter how they treat women, gays, and non-Muslims, their money is oh so sweet. She will savor every cent.

 

UMTerp01

(1,048 posts)
35. Well....they ARE our "allies"...more like frenemies
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jun 2016

You do realize that if we piss off the Saudi gov't too much they will take their investments out of the US and literally make us a 3rd world country. But keep talking out of your ass and not share the whole story. Us being in bed with the Saudis happened LONG before Hillary was State Dept head, and long before Bill's presidency. Not saying its right but since DU has the geniuses, what is your solution?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
43. As did Carter who sold them, among other things, sixty F-15s back in the 1970s
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:10 AM
Jun 2016

The F-15 was the dominant fighter for decades. This sale was a game changer.

The US has been supplying a ton of arms to the Saudis going back at least 40 years. It's been policy that they are one of our allies in the region.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
44. And it was Lyndon Johnson who came up with the idea of the Saudis being allies
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:15 AM
Jun 2016

It was Johnson whose administration came up with the idea of selling arms to the Saudis and building the huge base at Diego Garcia to facilitate military cooperation with them.

So his policy goes back 50 years and three previous Democratic Presidents including the architect of the Great Society.

Sancho

(9,069 posts)
60. Troll bait from last March. Hillary is our nominee. Time to stop the bash and trash OPs.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jun 2016

Anyone with any sense knows that the President and Congress provide arms - not foundations. The SoS doesn't have a military budget. Every time that arms sales are not approved - then the government catches hell because it costs the US jobs.

Bernie almost always voted in favor of all these MIC deals!! That's where the money and arms originates.

Meanwhile, if my pet schnauzer was the SoS, you would say she "made weapons transfers". That's the job that you do at the discretion of the President and Congress.



Florencenj2point0

(435 posts)
62. It is the 16th, I don't think you should be campaigning against the Democratic candidate
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jun 2016

for President of the USA. BTW Media Benjamin is a jerk.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
66. Triana, I understand the point, but it's really every single Administration since forever
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:44 PM
Jun 2016

This is part of the problem with our miopics wrt to Neo-Liberal policies vs Neo-Conservative policies..

When it comes to Foreign Policy: There's is no daylight between the two parties.

That is the nut of it... right there.

Both Obama and HRC are Neo-Liberals, but significant daylight does exist between the two. For instance, given HRC's public Hawkish remarks on the Iran situation she would not have supported the work Kerry has done vis a vis Obama's direction.Her policies on the M.E. as we all know are more in line with PNAC.

But as regards funding S.A., along with the Swiss Cheese of the M.E. it's the status quo dating back since forever, continuity of governance they prefer to call it.






Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s State D...