2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton’s State Department Armed Saudi Arabia to the Teeth
(Yea I know we're not supposed to post uncomfortable facts about Hillary Clinton here because she's the nominee and all but...I guess the post can be hidden...and this forum is going to be blown to smithereens (no pun intended) soon anyway).
By Medea Benjamin and Rebecca Green, March 8, 2016
As Hillary Clinton emerges as the front-runner for the Democratic Partys presidential candidate, shes receiving increased scrutiny for her years as secretary of state and in particular her hawkish foreign policy. Many critics are focusing especially on her long relationship with Saudi Arabia.
On Christmas Eve in 2011, Hillary Clinton and her closest aides celebrated a $29.4 billion sale of over 80 F-15 fighter jets, manufactured by U.S.-based Boeing Corporation, to Saudi Arabia. In a chain of enthusiastic emails, an aide exclaimed that it was not a bad Christmas present.
These are the very fighter jets the Saudis have been using to bomb Yemen since March 2015. A year later, at least 2,800 Yemeni civilians have been killed, mostly by airstrikes and theres no end in sight.
The indiscriminate Saudi strikes have killed journalists and ambulance drivers. Theyve hit the Chamber of Commerce, facilities supported by Médecins Sans Frontières (also known as Doctors Without Borders), a wedding hall, and a center for the blind. The attacks have also targeted ancient heritage sites in Yemen. International human rights organizations are saying that the Saudi-led strikes on Yemen may amount to war crimes.
During her tenure as secretary of state, Clinton made weapons transfers to the Saudi government a top priority, according to a new report published in The Intercept. And even while Clintons State Department was deeply invested in getting weapons to Saudi Arabia, the Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars in donations from both the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the weapons manufacturer Boeing. Christmas presents were being gifted all around.
THE REST:
http://fpif.org/hillary-clintons-state-department-armed-saudi-arabia-teeth/
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)The Secretary of State does exactly what the President tells them to do. Nothing more, nothing less. If they do, then they are replaced - just like Colin Powell was. So, you need to change the title to "President Obama sold arms to Saudi Arabia while Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State. Your original title is an outright fabrication and somethong that a FoxNews report would be made of.
think
(11,641 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)and we have been selling weapons to the Saudi's forever. Why when it's Hillary it's a problem, anyone else...who cares?
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)I'm sure she had some role in this. To think otherwise is naive.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)worked with state to make sure this stuff happened. If you have no idea what state does, that is not my problem, but I now how this goes.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Directly to the SoS. I've actually sat in on teleconferences with the then POTUS, whose last name also happens to be Clinton.
I know exactly how it all works.
brush
(53,776 posts)And Israel too has bee armed by every other State Department before Clinton's.
Nothing to say about that?
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Like not involving Sid Blumenthal in DOS biz?
Hillary never seems to be responsible for anything she does... who's gonna take the blame if she's POTUS?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Or have Saudis been sold weapons much before the formation of the Clinton foundation
okasha
(11,573 posts)to the Kingdom, to Jordan and Oman for decades, for at least two reasons--
1. They've been allies against Iraq, Syria and Iran.
2. The arms sales keep the oil flowing.
This started long before Bill Clinton's Presidency, much less the Clinton Foundation.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)I was just elaborating on it a bit.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)battle with Iraq, another reason why we went there, the Bushes were in bed with the Saudis for years
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Foundation. You guys are so far removed from any fact based arguments
swhisper1
(851 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)swhisper1
(851 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)I'm not entirely convinced that Obama's 2011 findings encompassed the full spectrum of covert activities actually carried out, particularly the pipeline of sophisticated weapons and Jihadists that was coordinated through the Qataris from Libya to Syria. The death of Amb. Stevens brought those operations into stark and unwanted relief.
swhisper1
(851 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)We will see what is allowed to happen after Comey releases his report.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)The AG already stated that she will take more than a month -- or two -- before making her decision.
By then, it will be too late.
brush
(53,776 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Not a single original thought.
brush
(53,776 posts)Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!
God! If it's not the email faux scandal, it's the Benghazi faux scandal (btw, google how many embassy attacks happened under Bush and how many died and maybe you'll understand my response a little more).
And when are you going to stop carrying water for the repugs?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)You'd like to dumb down DU. To some degree, you've succeeded just by being here.
Denial! Denial! Denial! doesn't make it true.
When are you going to stop beating beating your dog?
brush
(53,776 posts)without nary a whisper from the repugs, or you, but you try to revive the dead horse Benghazi again on a progressive site. God, when do repug talking points stop?
Here's a link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/13-benghazis-that-occurre_b_3246847.html
leveymg
(36,418 posts)I'll do my own research. You do yours.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)They review export licenses, that the deal complies with the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, and that it fits with the foreign policy of the current Administration. A deal this big would have taken years from initial contact to contract award. Years.
The State Department also promotes US business abroad.
Saudia Arabia is an ally of the US. Boeing is a US company.
If anyone wants to learn more about FMS deals they can go here: http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rsat/c14021.htm?goMobile=0
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)And gives her no credit for being a "leader"?
Just clarifying...
swhisper1
(851 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Uh-huh...
jzodda
(2,124 posts)If not from us they would buy it from elsewhere anyway.
Its fiction though to say HRC is responsible for this stuff. They have been buying arms from us since she was a young woman.
Triana
(22,666 posts)True. Since the days of Ronnie RayGun at least.
2cannan
(344 posts)jzodda
(2,124 posts)Since it does good work around the world.
My friend from Nigeria told me the Clinton foundation cleaned up a toxic site and sent a doctor to the area to access the long term health risks. After the doctor was done she stayed extra to help people with routine medical issues.
You will Never ever get me to believe that the foundation is not a force for good.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)jzodda
(2,124 posts)I don't like seeing right wing attacks on DU coming from fellow progressives. I can listen to Mark Levin if I want to hear attacks on Dems.
okasha
(11,573 posts)aimed at stopping the murder of elephants. (Those are especially dear to my heart.). Others include empowering third world women by supporting the formation of women-owned small businesses, the formation of small-farm collectives as an alternative to large-scale agribusiness, and programs to provide life-extending medication to HIV/AIDS patients at low to no cost.
swhisper1
(851 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)because that's what they say and it's completely false.
jzodda
(2,124 posts)n/t
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...he'll just buy it somewhere else.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Hillary Clinton does not own the state department, this is a direct attack on Obama, who also couldn't have randomly ditched a supposed ally. That is not how international relations work. This is just a stupid attack on democrats and a fundamental lack of international relations.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)And in the strongest possible terms. That country is spending its vast wealth on spreading extremist Wahhabism around the world, oppressing its people horribly and exerting influence in many negative ways. Horrible theocratic regime.
brooklynite
(94,527 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Nicely done... I know you had at least THIS early education.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)oasis
(49,382 posts)is also a threat to the Saudis.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)While you light the candle for ... what? Only some of the oppressed?
Do you even know who Medea Benjamin is?
Blame Hillary for one of the sign-offs that had to happen on something that wasn't initiated by her? That's nuts.
bhikkhu
(10,715 posts)...I don't see how one secretary of state or other was responsible, or could have put his or her foot down and put a stop to it.
I'm generally in favor of the middle eastern nations policing themselves, and Yemen is basically a failed state full of terrorists on the Saudi border. Not that they are doing it right, but I can't say we would do better. Ideally we'd convict them all of war crimes and replace the government, then do the same in other troubled countries, and establish regional peace. Idealism doesn't work very well.
In any case, the global arms market is a global arms market; they can spend their money anywhere they chose.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)And seemingly have no problem bombing the shit out of them. Kind of a good thing the world didn't take the same attitude during the Revolutionary War isn't it?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)No matter how they treat women, gays, and non-Muslims, their money is oh so sweet. She will savor every cent.
UMTerp01
(1,048 posts)You do realize that if we piss off the Saudi gov't too much they will take their investments out of the US and literally make us a 3rd world country. But keep talking out of your ass and not share the whole story. Us being in bed with the Saudis happened LONG before Hillary was State Dept head, and long before Bill's presidency. Not saying its right but since DU has the geniuses, what is your solution?
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)3rd world country my ass.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Good lord.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The F-15 was the dominant fighter for decades. This sale was a game changer.
The US has been supplying a ton of arms to the Saudis going back at least 40 years. It's been policy that they are one of our allies in the region.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)It was Johnson whose administration came up with the idea of selling arms to the Saudis and building the huge base at Diego Garcia to facilitate military cooperation with them.
So his policy goes back 50 years and three previous Democratic Presidents including the architect of the Great Society.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Sancho
(9,069 posts)Anyone with any sense knows that the President and Congress provide arms - not foundations. The SoS doesn't have a military budget. Every time that arms sales are not approved - then the government catches hell because it costs the US jobs.
Bernie almost always voted in favor of all these MIC deals!! That's where the money and arms originates.
Meanwhile, if my pet schnauzer was the SoS, you would say she "made weapons transfers". That's the job that you do at the discretion of the President and Congress.
Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)for President of the USA. BTW Media Benjamin is a jerk.
2banon
(7,321 posts)This is part of the problem with our miopics wrt to Neo-Liberal policies vs Neo-Conservative policies..
When it comes to Foreign Policy: There's is no daylight between the two parties.
That is the nut of it... right there.
Both Obama and HRC are Neo-Liberals, but significant daylight does exist between the two. For instance, given HRC's public Hawkish remarks on the Iran situation she would not have supported the work Kerry has done vis a vis Obama's direction.Her policies on the M.E. as we all know are more in line with PNAC.
But as regards funding S.A., along with the Swiss Cheese of the M.E. it's the status quo dating back since forever, continuity of governance they prefer to call it.