Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:25 AM Jun 2016

Well, I pretty much 100% want Booker for VP now.

Cons:

1. He's a Dem Senator from a state with a Repub governor
2. He's from NJ, which doesn't help us

Pros:
1. I LOVE HIM

Ok, I know that's not the most reasoned argument, but...I LOVE HIM. He STOOD IN SOLIDARITY with Murphy during the filibuster. He gave a wonderful, fiery, impassioned speech.

I know, I know, we can't have two East Coasters. We can't take a Dem Senate seat away. I know it's not gonna happen.

BUT I LOVE HIM.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, I pretty much 100% want Booker for VP now. (Original Post) auntpurl Jun 2016 OP
He was great on this...but... Proud Public Servant Jun 2016 #1
Cory Booker's position on trade could help define him B Calm Jun 2016 #2
Booker voted against Fast Track. NT Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #4
and that's a plus in my opinion! Took balls to go against Obama! B Calm Jun 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author AntiBank Jun 2016 #3
He's been tops on my wish list since the beginning ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #5
I've seen him mentioned some. auntpurl Jun 2016 #10
Christie doesn't get to pick replacement... brooklynite Jun 2016 #6
Oh, right! That's good news. auntpurl Jun 2016 #8
Booker's a victim of far-left insistence on "purity." Hortensis Jun 2016 #9
I like Warren auntpurl Jun 2016 #11
Hispanics are, of course, a very large Hortensis Jun 2016 #13
Booker is too self promoting. Like Harold Ford and Tulsi Gabbard. He's not genuine. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #12
Maybe. I like the fact that he's confident. auntpurl Jun 2016 #14
Like Gabbard and Ford, he has attacked Democrats, including the President, for his own political Trust Buster Jun 2016 #17
Interesting. Thanks. auntpurl Jun 2016 #29
His constituents, myself included, would disagree with you. nt BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #15
Booker is "a new Democrat" who defended Bain Capital and is described as a neoliberal. w4rma Jun 2016 #16
Thank you, some seem to not be familiar with this guy's record of self promotion. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #18
Thanks! B Calm Jun 2016 #20
"Neoliberal" is such a tiresome insult rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #30
Thanks for this info. auntpurl Jun 2016 #31
In some ways he is a natural successor to HRC and the Clintonian style of being a Democrat. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #19
I've always liked him. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #21
No thanks. Reason: this-- geek tragedy Jun 2016 #22
You would think attacking the Obama campaign would be B Calm Jun 2016 #23
Most people have short memories. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #24
Interesting. Thanks for info. auntpurl Jun 2016 #32
Read this: Michael Powell in NYT Smarmie Doofus Jun 2016 #25
He also stood in solidarity with Bain Capital against Obama. bunnies Jun 2016 #26
I love him too rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #27
I prefer Warren, but I'd be happy with Booker. NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #28

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
1. He was great on this...but...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:30 AM
Jun 2016

He's got a record of Wall Street support that rivals Chuck Schumer's. He'd be a tough sell to the Warren wing.

Response to auntpurl (Original post)

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
5. He's been tops on my wish list since the beginning ...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:53 AM
Jun 2016

...But he seldom is mentioned by pundits or analysts.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
10. I've seen him mentioned some.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:23 AM
Jun 2016

He's definitely on the "short list" of many analyses, but they don't discuss him much. I think he's very impressive!

brooklynite

(94,541 posts)
6. Christie doesn't get to pick replacement...
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:03 AM
Jun 2016

If you recall, he came in when Lautenberg died. NJ goes straight to a special election.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
8. Oh, right! That's good news.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:08 AM
Jun 2016

Still doesn't solve the problem of two East-coasters, but I'm not sure that's as important anymore.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. Booker's a victim of far-left insistence on "purity."
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:12 AM
Jun 2016

They've been doing their best to take down a lot of good left-wing leaders with their typical extreme hostility to anyone who isn't with them completely.

A social scientist pointed out in layman's talk that while the far right hates everyone else, the far left hates itself. Nothing demonstrates the latter more clearly than the jobs far-left extremists do on left-wing leaders in office, whose real-life records inevitably stoke purist ire and attack. Like Cory Booker and Julian Castro.

That said, for some odd reason I just love the idea of Hillary and Elizabeth Warren working together as a team to make things happen. No idea why the far left hasn't turned Warren into an object of their loathing yet, but wait for it...

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
11. I like Warren
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:26 AM
Jun 2016

but I would really like to have an AA or Latino on the ticket. I think it's really important and not just for "optics".

Your point about the far-left and their purity tests is right on.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. Hispanics are, of course, a very large
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:38 AM
Jun 2016

and underrepresented "minority." They're mostly coming through for us, they're due, and they're feeling it.

Won't quarrel for sure, although all the very same things could be said for women. Male presidents with male VPs are the norm. If we elect our first female president now, how many decades will pass before we have our first pair of women at the top? This could be a chance for a two-fer. Any Hispanic women on the list?

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
17. Like Gabbard and Ford, he has attacked Democrats, including the President, for his own political
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 08:08 AM
Jun 2016

gain. Democrats in Washington do not trust the guy. He's a non-starter from a V.P. perspective.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
16. Booker is "a new Democrat" who defended Bain Capital and is described as a neoliberal.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 08:06 AM
Jun 2016

Booker has been described by many as a liberal, a moderate, and a neoliberal. In a July 2013 Salon interview, Booker said that "there's nothing in that realm of progressive politics where you won't find me." However, in a September 2013 interview with The Grio, when asked if he considered himself a progressive, he avoided the term, saying he is a Democrat and an American. George Norcross III described Booker as "a new Democrat — a Democrat that's fiscally conservative yet socially progressive." In May 2012, Booker defended Bain Capital's record and criticized Obama's attack on private equity. In response, the Republican National Committee created a petition called I Stand With Cory Booker. Booker has also received criticism from both progressives and liberals, such as Ronald Rice and Rush Holt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cory_Booker#Political_positions

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
30. "Neoliberal" is such a tiresome insult
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:09 AM
Jun 2016

It means "a liberal I don't like because his socialism isn't pure enough."

America is a diverse country. Centrists always get attacked from the ideological extremes. But they are the ones who actually get anything done.

FDR would be called a neoliberal today. He supported free trade and his reforms were meant to preserve capitalism not overthrow it.

No one claims themselves to be a "neoliberal." It isn't an ideology, just an insult..."Not pure enough for me."

Booker is a passionate and smart leader.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
25. Read this: Michael Powell in NYT
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 08:59 AM
Jun 2016

>>>>United States Senator Cory A. Booker talks of his adopted city of Newark as if it were his very own Wild West. As mayor, he ran toward gunshots “that sounded like cannon fire,” cradled a dying boy whose mouth “foamed red” with blood, and learned as much from a plain-spoken woman in the projects “as from any professor.”

This makes for excellent commencement speech fodder.

But a recent state audit underlines that the former mayor might have paid more attention to the prosaic business of running his city. Instead of shoveling driveways — he loved on snowy days to run about Newark with his shovel — he could have attended a meeting, just one, of his Newark Watershed Conservation and Development Corporation.

It turns out this corporation, which the mayor championed and empowered, was pilfering from Newark.

The executive director, Linda Watkins-Brashear, who was a close ally of the mayor, acted like a bear come upon a honey pot. The state comptroller found her total compensation over seven years came to $1.98 million. Yet her salary during those years came to $1.16 million.

It seems she cut herself checks from the agency’s accounts. She also handed millions of dollars in no-bid contracts to friends and a former husband. She has denied wrongdoing.

Then there was the general counsel, Elnardo Webster, who is a close friend and former law partner of Mr. Booker. He made as much as $400,000 without a contract that anyone could find.

Mr. Booker is a splendid retailer of his narrative, but after a while there is a Barnum & Bailey quality to it. His maiden speech in the Senate went on for more than 30 minutes and ranged from the founding fathers to slavery to his own story to, oh yes, unemployment benefits, which was his ostensible point.

He talks, tweets and travels>>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/04/nyregion/leaders-words-dont-tell-the-real-story.html?_r=0

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Well, I pretty much 100% ...