2016 Postmortem

George II

(67,782 posts) Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:53 AM Jun 2016

CNN: "Sources" say that the Clinton campaign is NOT vetting Sanders as her VP choice!

At this time he will not be considered as her running mate, according to CNN.

I'm sure more will be said about this later today.

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN: "Sources" say that the Clinton campaign is NOT vetting Sanders as her VP choice! (Original Post) George II Jun 2016 OP

Anyone with a clue knows he's not going to be her running mate. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #1

I know that, you know that, but hopefully this will put an end to the pie-in-the-sky.... George II Jun 2016 #9

good obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #2

Thank God. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #3

I know, between that and Hillary's shrill tones I am sure it would be miserable. Matt_in_STL Jun 2016 #14

... CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #16

Not news to most people. Most of those same people wouldn't want her to consider him anyway tonyt53 Jun 2016 #4

I would certainly hope not...n/t monmouth4 Jun 2016 #5

this is possibly the least surprising development ever. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #6

I'm relieved too. floriduck Jun 2016 #7

It would just be pandering if they floated his name.. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #8

I know that I wouldn't want him jabbing WhiteTara Jun 2016 #10

Local radio station confrimed tht . . . Iliyah Jun 2016 #11

I ever thoughts that was in any way feasible ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #12

That's the correct decision. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #13

It would look illegal if she were. Orsino Jun 2016 #15

I'm sure that is one of the ransom items he used when he met with her... eastwestdem Jun 2016 #17

That's sarcastic, right? floppyboo Jun 2016 #23

Good. bushisanidiot Jun 2016 #18

I wouldn't want him to be. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #19

He would be an awful choice from a purely strategic perspective. nt BreakfastClub Jun 2016 #20

Well that's a no-brainer decision. n/t Lil Missy Jun 2016 #21

Not a surprise mcar Jun 2016 #22

That sounds like something everyone can agree with AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #24

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)

1. Anyone with a clue knows he's not going to be her running mate. n/t

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:54 AM

Jun 2016

George II

(67,782 posts)

9. I know that, you know that, but hopefully this will put an end to the pie-in-the-sky....

Reply to PoliticAverse (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:10 PM

Jun 2016

....speculation of many that he deserves to be her running mate.

obamanut2012

(26,050 posts)

2. good

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:54 AM

Jun 2016

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)

3. Thank God.

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:54 AM

Jun 2016

I'm not sure I could stand another 4.5 months of listening to the sound of his grating voice.

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)

14. I know, between that and Hillary's shrill tones I am sure it would be miserable.

Reply to CorkySt.Clair (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:42 PM

Jun 2016

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)

16. ...

Reply to Matt_in_STL (Reply #14)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 02:25 PM

Jun 2016

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)

4. Not news to most people. Most of those same people wouldn't want her to consider him anyway

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:54 AM

Jun 2016

monmouth4

(9,691 posts)

5. I would certainly hope not...n/t

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:55 AM

Jun 2016

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)

6. this is possibly the least surprising development ever. nt

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:55 AM

Jun 2016

floriduck

(2,262 posts)

7. I'm relieved too.

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 11:56 AM

Jun 2016

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

8. It would just be pandering if they floated his name..

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:01 PM

Jun 2016

As being in the running.

WhiteTara

(29,699 posts)

10. I know that I wouldn't want him jabbing

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:11 PM

Jun 2016

his finger in my face for 4 years!

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)

11. Local radio station confrimed tht . . .

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:22 PM

Jun 2016

Surprisingly tho, Los Angeles Mayor, Eric Garcetti is on the short list.

ismnotwasm

(41,971 posts)

12. I ever thoughts that was in any way feasible

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:25 PM

Jun 2016

Good to put it to rest.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

13. That's the correct decision.

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:32 PM

Jun 2016

Orsino

(37,428 posts)

15. It would look illegal if she were.

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:44 PM

Jun 2016

Buying support is not allowed.

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)

17. I'm sure that is one of the ransom items he used when he met with her...

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 02:53 PM

Jun 2016

glad to hear she didn't fall for it.

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)

23. That's sarcastic, right?

Reply to eastwestdem (Reply #17)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:54 PM

Jun 2016

bushisanidiot

(8,064 posts)

18. Good.

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 04:32 PM

Jun 2016

He has way too much negative energy that would drag Hillary's ticket down.

Go home, Bernie. It's over.

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)

19. I wouldn't want him to be.

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 04:42 PM

Jun 2016

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)

20. He would be an awful choice from a purely strategic perspective. nt

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:46 PM

Jun 2016

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)

21. Well that's a no-brainer decision. n/t

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:49 PM

Jun 2016

mcar

(42,287 posts)

22. Not a surprise

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:51 PM

Jun 2016

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)

24. That sounds like something everyone can agree with

Reply to George II (Original post)

Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:02 PM

Jun 2016

Reply to this discussion