2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI would have voted for Hillary Clinton three months ago. I believed that our elections are just...
I would have voted for Hillary Clinton three months ago. I believed that our elections are just, verifiable, and democraticbut then discovered how easy it is to hack a voting machine without a trace. I told myself that previous elections hadnt necessarily been riggedbut then found evidence proving me wrong. I convinced myself that it didnt mean this Democratic nomination was rigged until I uncovered the truth.
I am an ardent skeptic turned fervent believer.
Over the course of this article, I will demonstrate that electoral fraud was committed favoring Hillary Clinton with a plethora of sources: exit poll data, statistics, mainstream and independent media articles, expert quotes and analysis, videos, anecdotes, and so forth. All of these sources can be accessed through clickable hyperlinks (the underlined text)....
When the exit polls are way off, either the polls are wrong, electoral fraud was committed, or both.
As Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. mentioned, research shows that exit polls are almost always spot on. When one or two are incorrect, they could be statistical anomalies, but the more incorrect they are, the more it substantiates electoral fraud.
https://medium.com/@spencergundert/hillary-clinton-and-electoral-fraud-992ad9e080f6
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)The other one is when you guys accuse any dissenter of using "GOP talking points."
J_J_
(1,213 posts)I have the feeling DU subscriptions and ad revenue will be tanking shortly
LexVegas
(6,005 posts)niyad
(112,434 posts)people were making these comments about bernie?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)TwilightZone
(25,342 posts)It solely affected Bernie Sanders.
This was in his original document, as noted in the comments. It's so ridiculous that it defies comment.
He uses margin of error, not understanding that it goes both ways.
In several instances, he overstated the result difference, usually doubling them, which is likely not a coincidence.
He ignores mail-in and early voting almost entirely.
He also assumes that all polling methodologies are the same, both in polling and exit polling. That's nonsense.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)It shouldn't matter who you vote for, election fraud concerns us all. Accepting election fraud means the DEATH of democracy.
And this gets a yawn? I wonder if some posters here are even in America or ever took civics.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)DianaForRussFeingold
(2,552 posts)Thank you!
I just don't get it. There are concerns of election fraud and voter
suppression in state after state.
In the future, if the Democratic Party doesn't take this issue seriously,
now--I believe we will lose credibility when the Republicans are involved.
I remember when Bobby Kennedy Jr. was praised when he talked about
the 2004 election fraud.
Keith Olbermann 2004 Ohio Election Fraud/Results Coverage:
Former President Jimmy Carter; "unlimited ability for money to influence elections, policy, and law.":
"Jimmy Carter, who says he doesn't believe George W. Bush actually won the presidency against Al Gore in 2000." Also, Discusses Nixon to LBJ, Reagan to Carter:
Thanks for having the courage to stand up for democracy!
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)I always liked Russ Feingold, he is one of the rare ones
I am so proud of everyone who is speaking out too, I feel like we are going through a birth canal.
WhiteTara
(29,676 posts)anybody can write on Medium. Of course, this article is just one guy's opinion that has not been sourced except in his own mind.
Renew Deal
(81,801 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)with or without other types of equipment, and California isn't one of them (DRE = direct recording equipment):
https://ballotpedia.org/Voting_equipment_by_state - scroll down to map and click "show" to expand table.
The bad news is that Florida is one of them.
deurbano
(2,891 posts)When my (then) 13-year-old son made a video about voter suppression in the lead-up to the 2012 presidential election (even interviewing a former Freedom Rider), he relied extensively on reporting by Ari Berman, since this is a signature issue for Berman.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,705 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I don't see you making any comments one way or the other, so given your documented hatred for Hillary, I must assume you think it some sort of gospel.
tick tock
AJH032
(1,124 posts)Polls had Hillary easily winning this state, but Bernie ended up winning by a couple points. Was that a fraudulent win, or is it only fraud when Hillary wins?
Breitbart would be a more appropriate site for your interests.
There you can read about Alex Jones and be in your element.
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)TwilightZone
(25,342 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Edison Research, the company that does all the exit polls for our primaries says that "the margin of error for a 95% confidence interval is about +/- 4% for a typical state exit poll."
12% in NY? There has been such a difference between the exit polls and the "reported" vote that they decided to cancel the exit polls for CA.
TwilightZone
(25,342 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)TheFarseer
(9,308 posts)When you hack Nebraska, just add one more vote to your total and save me from waiting in line.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)they made all the Clinton supporters so crazy then HAARP came in a blinded everyone to the fact that their vote changed.
I'm just waiting for the Illuminati to come charging in so we can have fully staffed FEMA camps with attached Death Panel annexes.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)ready for the FEMA camps. But you just wait...
brooklynite
(93,851 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)brooklynite
(93,851 posts)jamese777
(546 posts)This poll was one of the last statewide polls taken before the California Primary:
Hoover Institution Golden State Poll: Clinton +13 Over Sanders; Harris, Sanchez Lead Senate Field
STANFORD, CA: With Californias June 7 primary only a week away, a new Hoover Institution Golden State Poll finds Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump with large leads in their respective primaries but cautionary signs lay ahead and good news for Democratic U.S. Senate hopefuls Kamala Harris and Loretta Sanchez.
Hoovers Golden State Poll, administered by the survey research firm YouGov and designed in conjunction with Stanford Universitys Bill Lane Center for the American West, finds Clinton holding a 13-point lead over U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (51 percent to 38 percent).
Trump receives 66 percent in the Republican contest. Why that lofty number is problematic: Mitt Romney, like Trump a nominee-in-waiting, received 79.5 percent of the vote in Californias 2012 GOP presidential primary.
Clinton, meanwhile, continues to struggle with younger primary voters Sanders leads 61 percent to 30 percent among Californians under-30 and shows weakness among no party preference voters, trailing Sanders by 40 points.
Bruce Cain, the Spence and Cleone Eccles Family Director of Stanford Universitys Bill Lane Center for the American West, said, "The huge age divide in the Democratic contest poses a serious strategic question for the Clinton campaign: spend a lot of money now to try to offset or reduce this gap to avoid an embarrassing primary outcome that will not affect the delegate count much, or be patient, save her money and address the problem in the fall."
http://www.hoover.org/press-releases/hoover-institution-golden-state-poll-clinton-13-over-sanders-harris-sanchez-lead
The actual result of the primary was Clinton 55%/Sanders 44%.
Dem2
(8,166 posts)Just because there is unfairness in the world, doesn't mean that you should stop participating in it.
Complaining that something exists does not prove that it does in any given instance.