Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:26 AM Jun 2016

'Hundreds' of Clinton staffers transition to DNC payroll

As Democrats turn to the general election, "hundreds" of staffers from Hillary Clinton's campaign have begun to transition to the payroll at the Democratic National Committee, according to spokesman from the campaign and the Democratic committee.

The transition, which began in May, includes staffers who one Clinton aide said "are working in jobs that benefit the entire ticket, not just Hillary Clinton." The aide added that the change will impact "hundreds of people across the country," including staff at Clinton's headquarters in Brooklyn.

The move is yet another signal that the Clinton's primary campaign against Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is officially over and that the former secretary of state is wholly turning her focus to the general election campaign and Donald Trump.

The Hill reported on Wednesday that "a majority" of Clinton's staff "has transitioned immediately to the payroll at the Democratic National Committee." A Clinton aide denies that report, arguing that the transition will not include a majority of staff and was not starting this week.

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/15/politics/hillary-clinton-dnc/index.html

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Hundreds' of Clinton staffers transition to DNC payroll (Original Post) Jesus Malverde Jun 2016 OP
I thought winning California and Washington DC, the last two primaries, was the signal Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #1
shockingly, the nominee's campaign and the national party integrate operations. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
Leaked docs show they were in active coordination since ***last may*** JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #3
Oh the horror. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #5
It changes things for people who care about such things. Thanks for reading! JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #6
Ya know, ANY campaign can coordinate on things like... Adrahil Jun 2016 #9
coordinating on messaging when one is not the nominee seems different, at least to me. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #10
Bernie's isolation from the DNC has been his own choice. Adrahil Jun 2016 #12
I don't expect a campaign to be coordinating messaging with a primary candidate in May of 2015. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #21
Why not? Why didn't Bernie do it too? Adrahil Jun 2016 #23
Because this was may of 2015 and coordinating messaging is showing favoritism to a campaign JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #24
She is the nominee. That's just reality. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #13
Did you read the ***last may***? As in, May of 2015 ! JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #18
^^That^^ onecaliberal Jun 2016 #27
So my checks will say "DNC" now. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #4
I don't think super PACs are allowed to shift their staffers over to campaigns / national committees JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #8
My prior checks read "NSA' according to other posters here. NT msanthrope Jun 2016 #25
Brings back memories of her supporters mocking Bernie for laying off workers. peace13 Jun 2016 #7
Has this practice infuriated you about every presidential election? La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #11
The election was not over. peace13 Jun 2016 #15
The primary is over. Hence the transition of staffers. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #16
Not in May! peace13 Jun 2016 #17
Has been over since sanders started talking about switching super delegates La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #20
you are correct... But it was March. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #26
You said it better than I could. Delmette Jun 2016 #14
it was obvious to everyone outside the Bernie Bubble on April 27 that she was the nominee geek tragedy Jun 2016 #22
Normal operating procedure. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #19
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. shockingly, the nominee's campaign and the national party integrate operations.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:29 AM
Jun 2016

just like they've done in every other election cycle.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
9. Ya know, ANY campaign can coordinate on things like...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:55 AM
Jun 2016

registration, GOTV efforts, donor lists, etc. This is how party politics WORK.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
12. Bernie's isolation from the DNC has been his own choice.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:01 AM
Jun 2016

Even now, he treats the party like an enemy. I'm not sure what people expected?

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
21. I don't expect a campaign to be coordinating messaging with a primary candidate in May of 2015.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:13 AM
Jun 2016

That is what I don't expect.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
23. Why not? Why didn't Bernie do it too?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:16 AM
Jun 2016

I want to beat the fucking Republicans. I want the party to actually support that. That's what parties are for!

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
24. Because this was may of 2015 and coordinating messaging is showing favoritism to a campaign
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jun 2016

that is not yet nominated by the party voters.

Have the last word though, I'm not going to explain this any more.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
18. Did you read the ***last may***? As in, May of 2015 !
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:12 AM
Jun 2016

Nobody would object to coordinating messaging in May of 2016, as it was clear by that point she would be the nominee (barring some extraordinary happening)

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
8. I don't think super PACs are allowed to shift their staffers over to campaigns / national committees
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:53 AM
Jun 2016

There is a cooling off period.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
7. Brings back memories of her supporters mocking Bernie for laying off workers.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 09:53 AM
Jun 2016

There she was shifting her responsibility. Think about it. The DNC makes calls to all Dems encouraging everyone to help all Dems when in fact the donations are going to one fat cat politician who already is fed by the mega corporations. Just how much money does it take to get such an honorable person elected? This is infuriating.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
11. Has this practice infuriated you about every presidential election?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jun 2016

Or is this Hillary specific infuriation?

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
15. The election was not over.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:07 AM
Jun 2016

It would be wrong of any candidate to do this if they had not won the election. Your logic is unbecoming of an adult. Right is right and wrong is wrong and that is what is disturbing about the Clinton's. They are ALWAYS at the line or over it. Responding with shoulders shrugged and a slight frown questioning why everyone always picks on them.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
20. Has been over since sanders started talking about switching super delegates
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:13 AM
Jun 2016

He only started talking about that since it became mathematically impossible for him to win with the actual voters.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
22. it was obvious to everyone outside the Bernie Bubble on April 27 that she was the nominee
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 10:15 AM
Jun 2016

it was also obvious to anyone paying attention that she was going to be the nominee on April 20, and really on March 16 as well.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»'Hundreds' of Clinton sta...