Odds the idiots with the fake "Stanford study" conspiracy know their ass from a hole in the ground?

[YouDig]

I'd say about 27 trillion to one.

[Ace Rothstein]

1. I'd say more like eleventeen kajillion to one.

That's just my opinion though.

[bkkyosemite]

3. kajillion LOL

[bkkyosemite]

2. I'm an idiot that does not know my ass from a hole in the ground twice I'm a liar..

you people are disgusting with your attacks on other DUers here...purely disgusting and angry too.

[niyad]

4. unlike your attacks on HRC?

[YouDig]

5. I'm actually attacking the idiots who wrote that "study" as well as the idiot bloggers

who posted the "study" on their blogs and pretended it was a "Stanford study" just because one of the original idiots who wrote the "study" is, in addition to being an idiot, a graduate student at Stanford.

[niyad]

7. from snopes:

Report Advertisement

Fact Check Politics Ballot Box

Poll Position
Two researchers released a paper (not a study) examining whether primary election fraud that favored Hillary Clinton had occurred.
Kim LaCapria
Kim LaCapria
Jun 15, 2016

Share
9.9K


Claim: A 2016 Stanford study revealed widespread primary election fraud in multiple states favoring Hillary Clinton.
Mixture

WHAT'S TRUE: Two researchers (presumably graduate students) from Stanford University and Tilburg University co-authored a paper asserting they uncovered information suggesting widespread primary election fraud favoring Hillary Clinton had occurred across multiple states.

WHAT'S FALSE: The paper was not a "Stanford Study," and its authors acknowledged their claims and research methodology had not been subject to any form of peer review or academic scrutiny.

. . . .

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/

[randome]

11. I truly did not mean to infer you are an idiot, bkkyosemite, if that's what you're referring to.

But, come on, engage in a little self-reflection here. Just because someone trumpets their 'study' as from Stanford, why would you not question it?

We should question things more when they appear to confirm what we want to hear.

[niyad]

6. from snopes

Report Advertisement

Fact Check Politics Ballot Box

Poll Position
Two researchers released a paper (not a study) examining whether primary election fraud that favored Hillary Clinton had occurred.
Kim LaCapria
Kim LaCapria
Jun 15, 2016

Share
9.9K


Claim: A 2016 Stanford study revealed widespread primary election fraud in multiple states favoring Hillary Clinton.
Mixture

WHAT'S TRUE: Two researchers (presumably graduate students) from Stanford University and Tilburg University co-authored a paper asserting they uncovered information suggesting widespread primary election fraud favoring Hillary Clinton had occurred across multiple states.

WHAT'S FALSE: The paper was not a "Stanford Study," and its authors acknowledged their claims and research methodology had not been subject to any form of peer review or academic scrutiny.

. . . .

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/

[revmclaren]

8. K & R

The odds that that particular poster and MANY others will be here after Monday...About the same odds, give or take a Billion.


Note: Yes I'm back. Going to give DU another shot. If the changes come to pass, I will begin posting in earnest and become a star member.

Clinton - 2016 and beyond!

[zappaman]

9. The chance that those idiots know their ass from a hole in the ground...

[Hortensis]

10. Oh, I think it was deliberate chicanery.

But no matter how adequately they manage to function, their behavior suggests your estimate of their understanding is in the ballpark.