Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:40 PM Jun 2016

Bernie Sanders won mostly Solid Red States, Hillary won Most Solid Blue States

So how does that square with his message of far left progressiveness when the
states he won, outside of New England/Washington/Oregon, were mostly solid red.

What is a/the hypothesis?

I am interested to hear possibly explanations for this phenomena.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders won mostly Solid Red States, Hillary won Most Solid Blue States (Original Post) SirBrockington Jun 2016 OP
He was our chance to mend the rift that runs through the country. nt redgreenandblue Jun 2016 #1
Do you think the Dakotas, Montana etc SirBrockington Jun 2016 #3
Nobody polls us in Montana, lol. There's only about 26 of us spread over Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #14
They recognize the need for CHANGE. elleng Jun 2016 #2
I think the majority of Dems would vote against Citizens United SirBrockington Jun 2016 #5
Citizens United is a Red Herring Armstead Jun 2016 #21
It angered me when people discounted Southern States Clinton won Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #4
You dont think its a legitimate question? SirBrockington Jun 2016 #6
I felt it was illegitimate to say black democratic voters in the South Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #10
That is my point SirBrockington Jun 2016 #12
Hopefully, some of Sander's Supporters will want to defend or discuss that point. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #15
Hopefully SirBrockington Jun 2016 #19
Hillary fans insist that GOP cross-over voters were to blame 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #7
Maps show that he had appeal to conservative Democrats KingFlorez Jun 2016 #8
That is interesting SirBrockington Jun 2016 #9
Appeal mostly for not being Obama KingFlorez Jun 2016 #39
Sanders appeals to conservative Democrats primarily? Armstead Jun 2016 #24
I've studied politics for 20 years KingFlorez Jun 2016 #41
Thanks for making this point. athena Jun 2016 #42
TX, SC, GA, AR, LA, OK, AL, MS are solid blue? hobbit709 Jun 2016 #11
Or NC and TN? unc70 Jun 2016 #17
Related to the General SirBrockington Jun 2016 #18
I think it's correlation rather than causation. thesquanderer Jun 2016 #13
All Red, except for all the Blue States. Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Hawaii are not Red States Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #16
I believe outside of Hawaii I listed each one you mentioned SirBrockington Jun 2016 #38
I would ask Sanders supporters in those states to join us. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #20
You have it backwards. Look at these maps. Contrast and Compare. jillan Jun 2016 #22
That doesn't make the point you think it's making. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #25
Of course the bottom one doesn't look like the top one. LOL! One is the results of the primaries jillan Jun 2016 #27
Yes, lancer78 Jun 2016 #30
The electoral value of each state. Clinton: 402 -- Sanders: 136 LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #40
Like Obama said -- There are no red states or blue states -- There are purple states Armstead Jun 2016 #23
you mean like Minnesota and Michigan? but didn't you get the memo azurnoir Jun 2016 #26
She did NOT win California. She also didn't win other states in her column. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #28
CA? RandySF Jun 2016 #31
How does one even respond to that SirBrockington Jun 2016 #33
They are still counting California. The gap is probably too large to overcome, though. w4rma Jun 2016 #34
That's assuming all uncounted ballots are (D) RandySF Jun 2016 #35
No. It assumes that late mailers will break to Sanders. The provisional ballots surely will. (nt) w4rma Jun 2016 #37
ICD-10 CM SirBrockington Jun 2016 #36
KMFAYPB onecaliberal Jun 2016 #43
It means nothing for the general RandySF Jun 2016 #29
My take TheFarseer Jun 2016 #32

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
3. Do you think the Dakotas, Montana etc
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jun 2016

Would have voted Democrat in the General? What where his total numbers in those states vs. Trump?

Maru Kitteh

(28,339 posts)
14. Nobody polls us in Montana, lol. There's only about 26 of us spread over
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:21 PM
Jun 2016

147,000 square miles.

BTW, I'm proud to say that Hillary took much more of Montana than was expected! She's going to thump Trump! It may be the faintest of hopes, but Trump's negative pressure may flip a LOT of states. Montana has some Democratic tendencies. A girl can hope.

Either way, the Democrats of Montana are taking the long view! Keep working, keep pushing, keep speaking. It's the only way to move forward.

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
5. I think the majority of Dems would vote against Citizens United
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:54 PM
Jun 2016

Which made bringing in massive amounts of money into politics a necessity. But then, the Supreme court ruled 5-4.
Thus the need to CHANGE that by electing a democrat. Are their any democrats for Citizens United?

I think the change Bernie was for was to eliminate the big money. I think that only happens through the Supreme Court.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
21. Citizens United is a Red Herring
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:29 PM
Jun 2016

People behave like that was the worst thing that ever happened.

But that was merely icing on the cake. Things have been horrible in campaign finance for decades. The Clinton Democrats were masters at attracting Big Money,m and becoming beholden to Big Money Power.

Bernie also has attacked Citizens United. But he went much further and actually demonstrated that it is possible to go to the people rather than Big Donors to raise cash, if politicians actually sell messages that people respond to and support.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
4. It angered me when people discounted Southern States Clinton won
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jun 2016

Because they were conservative.

Let's stop this crap now.

States are not monolithic. Democrats in those states are not like their conservative neighbors.

It is time to unify.

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
6. You dont think its a legitimate question?
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:54 PM
Jun 2016

The narrative for why he lost the Southern states has been the higher African American population. Maybe there were other hypothesis

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
10. I felt it was illegitimate to say black democratic voters in the South
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:04 PM
Jun 2016

Should be discounted because the states they lived in were run by Republicans.
I don't think this is a legitimate question.

For me, it's time to fight Trump.

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
12. That is my point
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jun 2016

The narrative for why Hillary won in the south was stated primarily as Black Democratic voters. That was widely discussed.

But I haven't heard an explanation why Most of the conservative red states were won by the progressive?

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
7. Hillary fans insist that GOP cross-over voters were to blame
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:58 PM
Jun 2016

Ill-intentioned disingenuous RWers willing to throw their Primary vote away on Sanders,
merely to spite Hillary. The theory has it that these same GOP voters would then vote
Republican in the GE.

I'm sure there are holes in this argument, but have not researched it enough to know
where/what they are. I think a much more likely reason is that those are anyone-but-Trump
GOP voters, voters who would have stayed with Bernie in the GE, but not Hillary.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
8. Maps show that he had appeal to conservative Democrats
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 02:58 PM
Jun 2016

Clinton is tied to Obama and conservative Democrats can clear see that, so Sanders was a good protest vote for those people.

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
9. That is interesting
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jun 2016

I did not see anything stating he had appeal to conservative democrats. A protest vote from the right of the democratic party does makes as much sense as a protest vote from the left. I had not thought of that.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
39. Appeal mostly for not being Obama
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jun 2016

At the same time there are a few conservative Democrats left in the south that do believe in a more left-leaning economic message. But for the most part Sanders was a protest vote against Clinton.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
24. Sanders appeals to conservative Democrats primarily?
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jun 2016

Jeeze I've always heard the opposite that he us the candidate of crazy leftists.

It all gets confusing when one deals in simplistic stereotypes, instead of looking at voters as people with varying individual viewpoints and motivations for choosing candidates.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
41. I've studied politics for 20 years
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jun 2016

And particularly close in the past eight years, which means that I know vote patterns. Sanders' best counties in the south were some of the most conservative counties around, with some of them being Romney's best counties in 2012. For conservative Democrats he was a preferred choice, because he's not tied to Obama and they could send a statement by voting for him.

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
18. Related to the General
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:26 PM
Jun 2016

Outside of New England the ones that vote solidly blue in the General election the majority were won by by Hillary.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
13. I think it's correlation rather than causation.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:21 PM
Jun 2016

There are clearly reasons that Bernie generally did better in caucus states and in states with open primaries. The fact that many of those happened to be "red" states is, I think, a "red" herring.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
16. All Red, except for all the Blue States. Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Hawaii are not Red States
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jun 2016

And Hillary won Texas, Georgia, NC, SC, Alabama, and a long list of very crimson places.

So there is nothing to your premise at all.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
20. I would ask Sanders supporters in those states to join us.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:29 PM
Jun 2016

Every one of those states would gain by increasing support for democrats.

TwilightZone

(25,467 posts)
25. That doesn't make the point you think it's making.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jun 2016

The bottom map looks nothing like the top one. Two examples:

Sanders has a rather solid block of red states (excepting SD) in the plains and northern Rockies.

Clinton has a lot of blue states in the West, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest and Northeast.

But, hey, other than that, they're exactly the same.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
27. Of course the bottom one doesn't look like the top one. LOL! One is the results of the primaries
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:47 PM
Jun 2016

the other is the result of the last presidential election.

Hillary's biggest voting bloc came from the deep red south. States that will never vote blue.

 

lancer78

(1,495 posts)
30. Yes,
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:52 PM
Jun 2016

and those southern states are punished by having fewer delegates at the national convention when based on population. An example is California has more than twice the pledged delegates than Texas, but only has 50% more people.

LiberalFighter

(50,895 posts)
40. The electoral value of each state. Clinton: 402 -- Sanders: 136
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:20 PM
Jun 2016

Electoral votes of each state won by Obama in 2008.
Clinton: 264 -- Sanders: 84

Number of states won by Obama in 2008.
Clinton: 17 -- Sanders: 12

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
23. Like Obama said -- There are no red states or blue states -- There are purple states
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jun 2016

You have to look at each state individually to accurately analyze why one candidate or the other won. A whole host of different factors were involved, including the demographic composition, the nature of the primaries (open, closed, caucus, etc.) and the level of activism among the Democratic populace, among otehrs. Also at very localized factors within each state.

You can't say, for example, that Clinton won in some of those Deep South states because the overall population is so liberal. You also can't say Bernie won in Minnesota because it is a deeply conservative state than never elects Democrats.

In otehr words you can't generalize just based on the Red Blue template.



azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
26. you mean like Minnesota and Michigan? but didn't you get the memo
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jun 2016

it's because Republicans luv Socialism, free stuff , and revolution in fact most Republicans are really secret Socialists

onecaliberal

(32,828 posts)
28. She did NOT win California. She also didn't win other states in her column.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:50 PM
Jun 2016

I don't know who thinks the southern states who ALL went for Hillary are blue, but whatever.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
34. They are still counting California. The gap is probably too large to overcome, though.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:01 PM
Jun 2016

But it will get much closer.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
37. No. It assumes that late mailers will break to Sanders. The provisional ballots surely will. (nt)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 04:06 PM
Jun 2016

RandySF

(58,776 posts)
29. It means nothing for the general
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary will win VT, NH, WI, MN, WA, OR, HI, MI and ME. If Trump survives past the convention,I think his weakness will put some red states on the table.

TheFarseer

(9,322 posts)
32. My take
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 03:59 PM
Jun 2016

Speaking for Nebraska, where there basically isn't a democratic party establishment, I think states without an entrenched establishment were more likely to go for Bernie because there wasn't anyone screaming in my ear I have to vote for Hillary and we are less likely to care that Bernie was an independent.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders won mostly...