Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:46 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
AFL-CIO Says 'No' To Debbie Wasserman Schultz
For the first time in 24 years, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not get the endorsement of the AFL-CIO.
Despite winning the recommendation of the Broward County chapter, Wasserman Schultz failed to get the required 2/3 votes to secure the endorsement. The National AFL-CIO sent out an advisory stating there would be no endorsement of Democrats who voted in favor of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). That includes Wasserman Schultz. If you remember, Wasserman Schultz’s primary opponent, Tim Canova, protested the recommendation that Wasserman Schultz be endorsed, citing their failure to screen all candidates. Turns out Canova was right. At a June 12, 2016 meeting in Orlando, where AFL-CIO president Richard Trumpka was present, as was Wasserman Schultz, delegates from the CWA and the NNU spoke out against Wasserman Schultz. It resulted in the failed endorsement. http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/afl-cio-says-no-debbie-wasserman-schultz
|
11 replies, 1705 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | OP |
Thinkingabout | Jun 2016 | #1 | |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | #2 | |
Thinkingabout | Jun 2016 | #5 | |
Lazy Daisy | Jun 2016 | #3 | |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | #6 | |
NWCorona | Jun 2016 | #4 | |
Jester Messiah | Jun 2016 | #8 | |
MisterP | Jun 2016 | #9 | |
NWCorona | Jun 2016 | #10 | |
MisterP | Jun 2016 | #11 | |
bigwillq | Jun 2016 | #7 |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:54 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
1. Did Canoga get two thirds of the votes?
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #1)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:59 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
2. Nope, but she still loses right? funny how that works one way but not the other way right?
Response to insta8er (Reply #2)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:01 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
5. Guess AFL-CO doesn't care much these days as they did in the past, losing leverage.
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:01 PM
Lazy Daisy (928 posts)
3. Good
About time people start really looking at who they're voting for.
The last straw with me was the predatory lending push. She needs to get gone. |
Response to Lazy Daisy (Reply #3)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:03 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
6. "They" are all in the pocket of big money, predatory lenders..come on. How could anyone justify
that?
|
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:01 PM
NWCorona (8,541 posts)
4. I'm starting to feel sorry for her.
Response to NWCorona (Reply #4)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 07:32 AM
Jester Messiah (4,711 posts)
8. I'm not.
Once she gets chucked out of office I'm sure her pal Hillary will be there to pick her up, dust her off, and give her a cushy do-nothing job at the Clinton Foundation. She'll be well taken care of.
|
Response to NWCorona (Reply #4)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:02 PM
MisterP (23,730 posts)
9. 12 Senators, 69 Reps, 13 Governors, 913 state seats, while pretending each and every one of those
losses was the fault of a "far left" that could never be satisfied and thus should be shut up and banned from the party and that the course should be to court payday lenders and private prisons and blame anyone who complained
she can go sit on an egg |
Response to MisterP (Reply #9)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:11 PM
NWCorona (8,541 posts)
10. I should have included a sarcasm emoji
Yeah, her track record is abysmal. IMHO DWS had only one job from the start. Lay the ground work for a Clinton candidacy.
|
Response to NWCorona (Reply #10)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 01:40 PM
MisterP (23,730 posts)
11. I believe the poli sci term is "towering grease fire"
that's why I'm so nervous about Clinton vs. Trump: Trump hasn't started wars while ignoring his own advisors because his personal bootlickers told him to, nor has he handed Moscow dozens of thousands of emails
in fact the only opponents the Clinton faction has been able to defeat in 25 years was the party base: any wins were due to dissatisfaction with or a fatuous posture of Iraq opposition (2006 House) or a dead-cat bounce because the GOP was doing so bad (2006 Senate) |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:25 PM
bigwillq (72,790 posts)
7. Good (nt)