Message from a supporter of Guccifer

[LiberalArkie]

[stonecutter357]

1. tick tock..

[SFnomad]

2. Tick tock, tick tock ... less than 24 hours to go n/t

[arcane1]

77. Then you'll have to start posting substance.

Good luck!

[SFnomad]

81. When there are real OPs worth posting substance to, it won't be a problem. n/t

[stonecutter357]

3. that is some sick shit .

the DNC has not RAPED anyone...

[pangaia]

56. Even thought I know I am wasting my time, that is not what was said.

[stonecutter357]

63. The first sentence of the second paragraph.

[pangaia]

70. Yes, I know. read it again.

[redstateblues]

4. Is your hero still in jail?

[Adrahil]

5. Dear Angel, delete your account. NT

[riversedge]

51. Best Response yet!!

[Agschmid]

92. Yup.

[geek tragedy]

6. Guccifer is a loon and a criminal.

It speaks highly of her that his fan club hates Clinton.

[stevenleser]

27. And that is putting it nicely. nt

[KittyWampus]

7. Why is woman in quotes? Hillary Clinton is factually a woman.

Suppose I said Sanders was a "man" even though he never held a steady job until he was over 40?

Would that be okay with Sanders supporters?

[LonePirate]

8. Skinner needs to purge posts like these and the people who make them.

[obamanut2012]

17. I agree -- starting now

It's against TOS NOW.

[redstateblues]

9. It's amusing when a poster drops a turd

In the punch bowl and the doesn't stick around to defend it

[bettyellen]

10. Never donated or voted in a GE, and never will. Got it.

[MineralMan]

11. What are we supposed to take from this screed?

Why post it here? It's just another anonymous bit of writing. You don't even provide a link so we could see if this Angel person is even real. Where did you find it? Who is Angel? Why should we bother with his or her words?

Give us a link, at least, to your source, please.

[Autumn]

12. Jury results on your OP

Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:33 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Message from a supporter of Guccifer
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512204797

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Accusing Democratic leaders of "raping the American people" has no business being anywhere on DU. Please vote to hide this!

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:40 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Another post from fantasy-land from a die-hard Sanders supporter.

ENOUGH ALREADY!
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This has to be a troll....and it looks like this was not an original post but a copy-and-paste. Hide it!
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It does not accuse Democratic leaders of "raping the American people". Sometimes a sentence and words have more than one meaning. No one held down and actually raped the american people. Politicians, Democrats included have certainly curtailed out freedoms and liberties.. It should be a warning to DU and DUers if something like this is hidden based on how you wrongly interpret that phrase.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Might qualify for a hide tomorrow, but not today.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Oh by the way, Rec

[obamanut2012]

16. Jurors -- this is against TOS TODAY

And, anyone who recced this really needs to get over Bernie losing the nom.

[Autumn]

18. It's a current event, that Guccifer is a hacker who claims to have hacked her e mail

It's a missive penned by someone who supports him. It's a little screedy but I don't see how discussion of someones opinion is against the TOS even if their opinion is not favorable. People like that exist in the world you can't paint them out. Not to worry Skinner, will outline tomorrow what is and isn't allowed and all the bad stuff will go away.

[joshcryer]

62. Huh? It's a troll post by someone who never even donated to Dems.

It has no relevance to anything. Who cares what some Face Booker thinks. Purely fabricated "concern."

[George Eliot]

45. Thanks, Jury, for responsible rejection of alert. OP is expression of opinion.

Sometimes sensitive people don't like other people's opinions. That is sometimes a problem here I've noticed.

[Lord Magus]

87. Thanks so much for abusing the jury process to keep an obviously inappropirate post.

And also by publicizing the jury results, which I'm pretty sure is also against the rules.

[druidity33]

88. posting jury results is not against the rules. nt.

[Agschmid]

93. There will be no results to post under the new system.

[Autumn]

90. No, posting jury result is not against the rules and it has been done often.

I don't see the OP as inappropriate. YMMV

The owners of this site make money from the discussions here. It seems to me the more discussion the more money goes into their pockets and maintaining the site. If they decide to purge all the people and posts that you don't like, that's their decisions and I have no problem with that at all. It doesn't hurt my pocketbook.

[itsrobert]

13. Hi JPR lurkers

Enjoy it while you can.

[Live and Learn]

19. Back at you HCS lurkers. Sorry your site isn't doing as well. nt

[Autumn]

20. They had to close down jackass radicals.

[Live and Learn]

21. The grade school version of HRC? HRC seems more like Junior High. nt

[hootinholler]

42. I hadn't heard that.

Now that I know, I kinda miss hootinhorror.

[Live and Learn]

67. LOL May she/he rest in peace. nt

[itsrobert]

22. They don't need another site. Hillary won

and Bernie lost by a YUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGE margin of voters.

[Live and Learn]

23. Bernie won. You just can't see it. I predict you will get it someday. nt

[pinebox]

59. You said it!

[revmclaren]

64. JPR is an anti Democratic and anti-Clinton hate site. Still waiting for word back from Skinner if it

will be considered a CAN NOT link to or promote on DU Site. Sure meets the definition Skinner has set. Wouldn't it be a hoot if after today telling people about Jack@#*t or promoting them leaving DU would get you tomb stoned. Especially after so many DUers THREATENED Skinner with hurting him financially by leaving and going to Jack@#$t if he didn't cave to their demands.



Enjoy the REAL clueless cave and echo chamber that IS JPR starting tomorrow. You all deserve each other.





Clinton - 2016 and beyond.

PS - I will become a star member after Skinner and the admins scrape the s%$t off the DU floor and the stench dies down. He will get my financial support along with hundreds of others who wouldn't before.

[Live and Learn]

68. That is ridiculous. You may become a star member but I doubt you will post much after

November. At least, until the next primary.

[Live and Learn]

72. The lurking I believe. nt

[revmclaren]

79. DU google is your friend. Or check my profile.

Bye. Enjoy your adventure.





Clinton - 2016 and beyond.

[Live and Learn]

85. Not worth it. nt

[obamanut2012]

14. lolz you guys!

[obamanut2012]

15. Tomorrow cannot get here soon enough for me

[pangaia]

58. Hiding behind "tomorrow. " That sure takes guts.

[one_voice]

24. What's with the fucking

Last edited Sun Jun 19, 2016, 07:39 PM - Edit history (1)

scare quotes around the word woman when describing Hillary?

[cali]

25. I find it offensive that the author put "woman" in quotes. It's so offensive

that nothing else said could possibly redeem it- not that I found this letter compelling.

[RandySF]

26. One more day

[Metric System]

28. Bat-shit crazy.

[Hekate]

29. Fewer than 24 hours. Tick tock.

[mwrguy]

30. Guccifer needs a long vacation

Somewhere like Pelican Bay.

[LiberalArkie]

31. And to the "one more day folks", yes one more day and it will be all yours.

One more day and you can party hardy. Jump up and down and never hear from most of us ever again. I know that everyone here will enjoy the site being more like the site Freerepublic.com where no declension from the company line is allowed. I think Storefront operates along those lines also as do probably most political discussion systems. So this will probably will become more like all the rest of the systems out there instead of one that valued various opinions.

[geek tragedy]

32. Are people allowed to write pro-Clinton posts at JPR or

to even say she won the nomination without cheating?

[LiberalArkie]

33. I have no idea really. Are people allowed to say anything good about Bernie on

hillaryclintonsupporters.com.

[geek tragedy]

36. I don't post there.

You post at JPR and don't know the rules?

here, allow me:

David Brock (noted "former" Conservative and enabler of Clarence Thomas' sexual harassment) has announced that he's spending a million bucks on Internet trolls to combat disloyalty towards Hillary Clinton. To combat this crap, we have a new rule: henceforth, any speculation about Bernie possibly not winning the Democratic nomination must be phrased as follows: "If Hillary and her DNC steals the election, and if Hillary is not indicted for the obvious criminally jeopardizing of national security by using a personal mail server as SOS to evade FOIA, then..."


This not only captures the truth, it's something that a Brock-troll won't write, of course.

Failure to use this phrasing or something very close when speculating that Bernie might not win the nomination will result in a deleted post. The second time it happens, the poster will be banned.

http://jackpineradicals.org/showthread.php?9700-New-rule-for-posts-on-jpr

[LiberalArkie]

37. The main rule is not to discuss other systems and their users. That has fallen through

the cracks recently, but when 2.0 comes online the next couple of weeks that will go back into effect.

But here are the rules I found:

Exclamation New Rules For JackpineRadicals
As of right now, discussion on how certain sites that are trying to silence Senator Bernie Sanders, his campaign and his supporters, is fair game.

Many sites that call themselves "liberal," "progressive" and/or "Democratic" that have followed the edict that after the March 15, 2016 primary, Senator Bernie Sanders will be treated as less than a candidate, may be discussed on JackpineRadicals.org

These sites are doing the same as most of the mainstream media and the DNC. Because of that, they should be treated equally to the aforementioned organizations and corporations. These third-way attacks on our republic, our process, on free speech, on independent voters and on the left of the Democratic party, must be called out.

That said, in order to keep this site different from other sites, and to make it a more welcoming place to visit for like minded individuals, personal attacks and unsubstantiated insults will not be allowed.

1. Absolutely no calling out of any member of any site in a negative manner.
2. Stay away from the minutia and the emotional.

Some suggestions:

1. Stay away from ad hominem: Attacking the character or motives of a person rather than the an expressed idea.

2. If you have been mistreated on another political website, please refrain from continuing the dispute
here. If you believe that you were unfairly attacked and the attack is something others should be made
aware of, please keep your information factual and backed up with evidence. The moderators and site
owners reserve the right to disagree with your perspective and may ask for you to edit or delete your
comment or post. If you are asked to edit your comment or post, or if there is a deletion, this is in no
way implying that you were incorrect in your assessment, only that a larger difficulty is being
avoided.

I hope this helps.. They are hard rules to follow.

[geek tragedy]

38. you missed one.

David Brock (noted "former" Conservative and enabler of Clarence Thomas' sexual harassment) has announced that he's spending a million bucks on Internet trolls to combat disloyalty towards Hillary Clinton. To combat this crap, we have a new rule: henceforth, any speculation about Bernie possibly not winning the Democratic nomination must be phrased as follows: "If Hillary and her DNC steals the election, and if Hillary is not indicted for the obvious criminally jeopardizing of national security by using a personal mail server as SOS to evade FOIA, then..."


This not only captures the truth, it's something that a Brock-troll won't write, of course.

Failure to use this phrasing or something very close when speculating that Bernie might not win the nomination will result in a deleted post. The second time it happens, the poster will be banned.

http://jackpineradicals.org/showthread.php?9700-New-rule-for-posts-on-jpr

Okay to call Hillary Clinton a "c@nt" and advocate voting for Donald Trump, but not okay to say that Hillary didn't 'steal' the nomination.

Enjoy your troll magnet.

[LiberalArkie]

39. Well being a leftist site language is usually enough to make me blush. I was raised to be a

southern gentleman and my mom kept the soap bar always handy. But a lot of others were not raised that way, so yes the language is free and open. I don't think they have turned on the politically correct feature yet. But I guess at some point it will happen, it usually does even in the navy.

[geek tragedy]

41. at that online insane asylum it's okay to say Clinton is a 'c@nt' but not okay

to say she won because she got more votes.

Because misogyny is okay but reality is forbidden.

Those are the values of Donald Trump and Ted Nugent, not progressives and the left.

Which is why half that site is trolls who got banned from DU.

I do hope you all enjoy that place and its Trumpian magnificence so much you find no need to return here.

[LiberalArkie]

43. What ever you think, that is your thought process not mine. My mind does not go into gutter

thinking. I am sure a lot of other people have no problem with what Bernie was called before he even had his first nation news coverage. I think it was like Bernie had 2% of the coverage that Hillary had, but that is ok with a lot of people. Now one cares what an old white man says anyway. You can tell by his press coverage.

What brought people to Bernie was his ideas not him. He even says that. Now most candidates want their names out there in front of everything. Even though Bernie co authored a lot of bills, you will not find his name on many, just not his thing.

I wonder if Pres. Obama would have brought up about increasing Social Security benefits if Bernie's followers had not been for it.

But enough said..

Good chatting with you..

[randome]

48. It was Elizabeth Warren who's been pushing for that, even introduced a bill.

Even if you and yours insist on the credit, what does that have to do with not supporting the Democratic nominee?

Can you not accept your perceived success and move on?

[LiberalArkie]

49. Great.. I did not realize that. I just knew that Bernie had been talking about it since

early last year, if not before and then I heard that President Obama brought it up. I knew before he wanted to cut and reframe the SS payments. So whoever got the idea out there that there are a lot of people like me with $900 a month after medicare is taken up would like a little bump up.

[randome]

53. I honestly don't think Obama wanted to do any of that.

I know, the case can be made that only direct arguments can sway the GOP but...no, that's not how self-destructive fanatics work.

Whenever Obama has made such an offer, it has never been accepted. I won't pretend to know what's going on in his head but I don't think he would cut SS, he only makes the suggestion when his political instincts -which so far have been pretty damned accurate- tell him it won't be accepted.

It's a way to sway the one to three percent of 'reasonable' GOP-ers away from the GOP. And hopefully being more entertaining of Democratic Party ideas.

[Live and Learn]

65. Isn't it funny how Clinton supporters are the ones that keep bringing the word up?

Seem to have a strange fascination with the word.

It is not a word I use or even like but you do realize it is quite common in other parts of the world and isn't considered as offensive as it is here.

[geek tragedy]

66. in American English it's used by misogynist, hateful morons to

degrade a woman or women in general

Especially when used in political discourse.

I'm glad the people who think it's acceptable self-deported.

[Live and Learn]

69. Well, maybe the posters aren't using American English.

Are you planning to export your censorship worldwide?

[geek tragedy]

76. no, just using my free speech rights to express my opinion

about those who encourage misogyny while forbidding the discussion of reality

[Live and Learn]

86. Was that English? nt

[Number23]

91. "Because misogyny is okay but reality is forbidden." Sounds like you hit the nail on the head

I do hope you all enjoy that place and its Trumpian magnificence so much you find no need to return here.



Considering how glorious and magnificent that place is supposed to be judging by the ENDLESS amount of touting it gets, I really have no idea why the ones singing its praises the loudest are still here.

It's hilarious. Like they're thinking to themselves, "oh my God, this place is so incredibly lusciously perfect that I need to spend all my time SOMEWHERE ELSE!11"

[840high]

40. ...!100++++

[Lord Magus]

54. You think DU will be more like Free Republic when Freeper content like the OP is no longer allowed?

[Tarc]

34. A Sad last gasp by a tiny, tiny minority of the Sanders support base

I'm glad most of them are sensible and are on-board to support Hillary in the fall.

[MFM008]

35. TOMORROW

Make it work Skinner.

[LiberalArkie]

47. Oh it will, all he has to do is tag a record for the user and the user is toast. Pretty damn easy.

I am sure on Monday anyone in the HRC group can send him a list and we will all be toast,

[XRubicon]

44. Tomorrow, tomorrow

[BootinUp]

46. ROFL!

[randome]

50. The Indictment Angel?

{Ow. I could have a concussion.}

[riversedge]

52. Did you make that up? What is the source??

[LiberalArkie]

55. From a tweet. I am not good at all in writing, I wish I was, but never was. I have had great

ideas for stories and such, but dyslexia and crap just makes it hard to do it. I love music but got told by music teachers to never come back. I can't carry a tune in a bucket. I was kicked out of choir as a kid and adult.

So nope, if it makes any sense at all, it did not come from me. If you read something with my name on it and say "What the hell is that jackass trying to say" that would be one I wrote.

[riversedge]

74. You should have included the twitters name and date etc. Looks like it was

just made up and plopped here in DU. Take it Down. Makes you look foolish.

[LiberalArkie]

78. Well considering it is the 19th, and it is in GD-P, I would assume it will be down at 00:00 ET

And I am always thought of as foolish, so no problem there.

[randome]

57. Come on, it LOOKS like a Facebook post so it must be true!!

[LiberalArkie]

60. Tell Bravenak I enjoyed our chats very much..

[riversedge]

73. What a silly thing to say. Tell her yourself.

[pinebox]

61. ROFL @ Hillary supporters screaming "tick tock!"

This is hilarious! Ignore it and all will be ok, it will all just go away! lol
Meanwhile on a site with 500 million more users called twitter........

[randome]

75. I think Humanity, in general, knows not to believe everything they read on Twitter.

(Can't believe I had to actually say that.)

(An alleged, unsourced Twitter rant, by the way.)

[Scurrilous]

80. Dear Angel, Go @#$% yourself.

"24 Hours..."

[Segami]

82. KICK

[kstewart33]

83. Segami, really?

You're better than this.

[riversedge]

84. unless it has a twin-seems exactly what he'd do!

[itsrobert]

89. Goodbye