Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,805 posts)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 03:47 PM Jun 2016

Eastern Washington superdelegate throws her support behind Clinton

SPOKANE, Wash. - Now that Hillary Clinton is the presumptive Democratic nominee, Washington State superdelegates are beginning to throw their support behind her.

Eastern Washington's only superdelegate, Valerie Brady Rongey, announced Sunday she is endorsing Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

"Regardless of caucus or primary results, we know that Washington State will be well represented and well respected by a President Hillary Clinton," she said in a statement.

Rongey is the Vice Chair for the Spokane County DNC. She had refrained from making her endorsement until the State Party processes were completed.

"But I have been working passionately for the Hillary Clinton campaign at a very Grassroots level in Eastern Washington," Rongey said.

Rongey said she looks forward to working with the entire Washington State delegation in Philadelphia at the Democratic National Convention July 25-28.


http://www.kxly.com/news/spokane-news/eastern-washington-superdelegate-throws-her-support-behind-clinton/40127556

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eastern Washington superdelegate throws her support behind Clinton (Original Post) RandySF Jun 2016 OP
JPR Lurkers itsrobert Jun 2016 #1
Tell that to the BS cheerleaders that keep posting anti-Secretary Clinton OPs n/t SFnomad Jun 2016 #2
I've noticed much less MFM008 Jun 2016 #3
So she waited to endorse? Good for her. I aoplaud her patience and willingness to wait. George Eliot Jun 2016 #4
The people she represents decided a while back. seabeckind Jun 2016 #7
The people she represents also decided in much greater numbers to vote for Hillary. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #16
Nope. Doesn't count. seabeckind Jun 2016 #17
Sure, of course it doesn't count. Because anything other than a Bernie victory doesn't count. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #18
Wow, I could hear the stamp all the way over here. seabeckind Jun 2016 #19
Based on recent election results seabeckind Jun 2016 #5
The DNC is not solely responsible to make that happen. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #10
She is the local rep for the DNC. seabeckind Jun 2016 #11
People in general don't know who is the DNC person. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #12
Did you do the proper stretching exercises? seabeckind Jun 2016 #13
I'm sure the delegate will consider your words of wisdom. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #14
Thanks for taking the role as defender of the faith. seabeckind Jun 2016 #15
Thanks for the endorsement, they are arriving to vote in the convention. Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #6
Spokane has a democrat? nt lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #8
They have some. seabeckind Jun 2016 #9

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
3. I've noticed much less
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 04:00 PM
Jun 2016

Spleen on super delegate Web site's
Now people just hate them because they're Democrats and that's the norm.
At least from Eastern Washington.

George Eliot

(701 posts)
4. So she waited to endorse? Good for her. I aoplaud her patience and willingness to wait.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jun 2016

she may have worked for Hillary but she waited for the people to decide. I think that's what they all should have done.

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
7. The people she represents decided a while back.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 05:40 PM
Jun 2016

She decided to override the opinions of the people after they had decided.

It seems to me like she is undermining the democratic base in hr area. In effect she is abandoning them.

If the process is already decided, why didn't she wait until after the first ballot at the convention? She would satisfy any obligation she might have toward her neighbors and Hillary would still be the nominee.

Don't you see that her actions reinforce the establishment accusation?

Probably not.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
16. The people she represents also decided in much greater numbers to vote for Hillary.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:40 PM
Jun 2016
http://results.vote.wa.gov/results/current/President-Democratic-Party.html

But since no pledged delegates are attached to the Washington primary, we're supposed to pretend it doesn't reflect the beliefs of the people who voted in it?

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
17. Nope. Doesn't count.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jun 2016

Washington is a caucus state.

No matter how much you stamp your foot and say it ain't fair.

That woman was most likely at the caucus in her area. She probably set it up. And couldn't convince the people face to face.

I know, we'll do a do over and pretend it was binding.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
18. Sure, of course it doesn't count. Because anything other than a Bernie victory doesn't count.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jun 2016

Who are you to say that the 800,000 people who voted in that primary "don't count" just because there were no pledged delegates attached to their vote?

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
19. Wow, I could hear the stamp all the way over here.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:54 PM
Jun 2016

Psychological projection is a real thing.

I really enjoy the change of words in these comments. Nobody said the people didn't count.

The statement was that the process didn't count.

I'm really enjoying these last few hours.

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
5. Based on recent election results
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jun 2016

I think the DNC would be better served by working to change the red areas of Washington blue.

Swinging a superdelegate, the vice chair of the very party whose duty it is to do that in her area, seems like a waste of an effort. Maybe she ought to be replaced with someone who might do better job. Perhaps someone who is more likely to represent the views of her people. Maybe she has different goals.

Some of those blue areas on these maps are very precarious. You might note the changes in the maps.

2012:


2008:

LiberalFighter

(50,912 posts)
10. The DNC is not solely responsible to make that happen.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 06:53 PM
Jun 2016

It is local and state parties that have the main responsibility. It appears that none of the congressional districts held by a Republican has a chance to go Democratic. Republicans won their districts by least a 60-40 margin. The 4th district looks totally futile as the top two primary winners were Republican. That is likely because it is a larger area that does not have much density.

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
11. She is the local rep for the DNC.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 07:06 PM
Jun 2016

How can she generate party loyalty when the face of the party in that area abandons their choice and goes with the national?

You don't think anyone notices that?

She didn't have to do a dam thing. Nothing. Let the first vote happen and sit it out. Then go Hillary.

And people wonder why independents think both parties stink?

I sure don't.

LiberalFighter

(50,912 posts)
12. People in general don't know who is the DNC person.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:04 PM
Jun 2016

The only ones that might pay that much attention to her would be Spokane Democrats. You probably didn't even know the DNC members for your state before this. And you won't be able to have a vote on the matter when there are new elections for those positions. The remaining unpledged delegates that haven't decided likely will go for Clinton too. The same is likely in Indiana.

She is demonstrating party loyalty. Not the way you want it. And it won't be the way you want as the rules state that she gets to decide who to support. When they had a primary held later the voters voted Clinton over Sanders. Which was more representative of the will of the people than a caucus.

Those independents didn't have the conviction to identify as Democrat let alone Republican. If they really thought both parties stink they wouldn't ever vote. People would be wrong to think that an organization will or should represent everything they believe in. It doesn't happen. Even small groups don't agree on everything.

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
13. Did you do the proper stretching exercises?
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:09 PM
Jun 2016

I worry that you might injure yourself.

BTW, the Spokane democrats are exactly the ones who would notice this. Which is the point.

She is demonstrating loyalty to a person who was NOT selected by said democrats.

(added) One of her duties in the party is to attract new democrats. Convince independents to join the party.

Nice example. I screwed over those other folks but I'm behind (what?) all the way.

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
15. Thanks for taking the role as defender of the faith.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:31 PM
Jun 2016

Heaven forbid someone should question the nobility.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Eastern Washington superd...