2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSecret Service veterans denounce anti-Clinton tell-all book
Former agents blast writer Gary Byrne for having 'underlying motives.'
By Edward-Isaac Dovere
06/21/16 05:22 AM EDT
The author of a new tell-all book about Hillary Clinton could never have seen any of what he claims he was too low-ranking say several high-level members of Secret Service presidential details, including the president of the Association of Former Agents of the United States Secret Service.
On Tuesday, AFAUSSS, which is strictly nonpartisan, is set to release a statement blasting Gary Byrne author of Crisis in Character, saying members strongly denounce the book, which they add has made security harder by eroding the trust between agents and the people they protect.
There is no place for any self-moralizing narratives, particularly those with an underlying motive, reads the statement from the groups board of directors, which says Byrne has politics and profit on his mind.
AFAUSSS rarely issues public statements of any kind.
snip---------------
People familiar with West Wing security laugh at the idea that Byrne or any uniformed officer ever would have walked in on Bill Clinton anywhere, whether in a meeting or, as a New York Post article over the weekend claims, in the middle of a make-out session in the Map Room with the late daughter of former Vice President Walter Mondale. The Secret Service presidential detail would have stopped him. (That affair was a well-worn rumor during the Clinton years, though strongly denied by Eleanor Mondale, who died of brain cancer in 2011.)
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-bill-clinton-secret-service-224578#ixzz4CEkxjCgU
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)niyad
(134,034 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)glennward
(989 posts)PJMcK
(25,126 posts)According to the article, "AFAUSSS rarely issues public statements of any kind."
A denunciation of the book and its author will get covered as well. Anyway, it's better than silence.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)which is appropriate for their service. Like the military, it is crucial that such public servants are neutral in political matters.
I think they chose to speak pout here because this guy undermines that. And further, he was not even in a position to actually some of the things he said he observed.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)The fact they're denouncing it at all is pretty unusual.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)roll out is next week, I think. Glad that there is someone refuting it already.
sheshe2
(98,452 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.