Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brexit results (Original Post) DavidDvorkin Jun 2016 OP
When are results expected? n/t FSogol Jun 2016 #1
Heard (in Rachel Maddow show) about 8pm ET they close the polls and we should get results about Her Sister Jun 2016 #2
BBC is doing exit polling, but they're not allowed to announce their poll Exilednight Jun 2016 #18
Polling closes at 10:00 PM GMT 6:00 ET. DemFromPittsburgh Jun 2016 #3
BBC News cable channel will start reporting on it at 6 p.m. Eastern time DavidDvorkin Jun 2016 #5
BBC guy on NPR said... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #6
Meh, election night would get kinda boring. vdogg Jun 2016 #7
Most news outlets here are saying we won't get results til tomorrow morning auntpurl Jun 2016 #4
It's stupid for Britain to pull out of the EU Yavin4 Jun 2016 #8
Nonsense nationalize the fed Jun 2016 #9
The Telegraph, really? auntpurl Jun 2016 #10
OMFG what are you even doing on DU? anigbrowl Jun 2016 #13
The soldiers and citizens of the USSR paid a massive price to ensure OnlyTheGood Jun 2016 #21
British cons want to leave EU because of Muslims or something.... JaneyVee Jun 2016 #14
Not really, most of it has to do with the contributions that the UK needs to make to the EU. As well insta8er Jun 2016 #20
no, they are bleeding money to support other nations in the coalition, and now are told they must swhisper1 Jun 2016 #29
It would diminish from Great Britain to Little England. DavidDvorkin Jun 2016 #11
nothing wrong with that, if they regain control of their own country swhisper1 Jun 2016 #26
That diminished status and power would make control much harder DavidDvorkin Jun 2016 #28
its a giant in power, not size, and will remain so . swhisper1 Jun 2016 #31
britian is the economy, if they pull out, they will be fine but europe will reel swhisper1 Jun 2016 #12
lol Britain is fucked. They're about to enter a big recession... Drunken Irishman Jun 2016 #23
so is EU, no, this is about control of ones borders for the good of the people. No one is going to swhisper1 Jun 2016 #24
It's about a bunch of racist assholes. Drunken Irishman Jun 2016 #25
thats not funny swhisper1 Jun 2016 #27
What the Brexit assholes spouted is just a gussied up version of Trump. Drunken Irishman Jun 2016 #30
Thanks! mcar Jun 2016 #15
This is very close but London isn't in yet and they're very strongly remain. vdogg Jun 2016 #16
If you really believe that, now would be a great time to buy the British pound. Barack_America Jun 2016 #19
As I said, it has to stay close in the rest of the country. vdogg Jun 2016 #22
Good night for Scottish independence nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #17
Yep HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #32
Now the choice is between independence and the EU geek tragedy Jun 2016 #33
The more I read about this vdogg Jun 2016 #34
No, those MPs are elected. DavidDvorkin Jun 2016 #35
 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
2. Heard (in Rachel Maddow show) about 8pm ET they close the polls and we should get results about
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jun 2016

midnight or 2 am ET because it looks close so they need to count all and make sure and since they won't have exit polls.

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
18. BBC is doing exit polling, but they're not allowed to announce their poll
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:22 PM
Jun 2016

Findings until after all polls are officially closed.

 

DemFromPittsburgh

(102 posts)
3. Polling closes at 10:00 PM GMT 6:00 ET.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jun 2016

First results around Midnight GMT. There are no exit polls. Each town announces all results after they are counted. There are about 350 of them Definitive results around breakfast over there.

DavidDvorkin

(19,473 posts)
5. BBC News cable channel will start reporting on it at 6 p.m. Eastern time
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 04:02 PM
Jun 2016

For all I know, they'll fill the airtime will constant repetition and talking about the vote, the way American news channels do when they don't have anything to report.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
6. BBC guy on NPR said...
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jun 2016

the polls close and all the votes get bundled up and delivered and counted. Then the results are let out.

NO news organizations are allowed to talk AT ALL about the election because even mentioning how long the lines are could affect the results. No exit polls, no predictions, no early results-- nothing at all but beautiful silence.

I really like that idea, and wish we could do he same here

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
4. Most news outlets here are saying we won't get results til tomorrow morning
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jun 2016

So East Coast US would be about 1:00am.

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
9. Nonsense
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 05:03 PM
Jun 2016

Britain did just fine before the US/CIA meddled in European affairs.

Why would any Brit want laws imposed on them by people in Belgium they didn't elect and can't vote out of "office"? The whole EU thing should be crushed like a cockroach.

The European Union always was a CIA project, as Brexiteers discover

The Telegraph 27 4 2016

Brexiteers should have been prepared for the shattering intervention of the US. The European Union always was an American project.

It was Washington that drove European integration in the late 1940s, and funded it covertly under the Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations.

While irritated at times, the US has relied on the EU ever since as the anchor to American regional interests alongside NATO...snip

...Nor are many aware of declassified documents from the State Department archives showing that US intelligence funded the European movement secretly for decades, and worked aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into the project.

As this newspaper first reported when the treasure became available, one memorandum dated July 26, 1950, reveals a campaign to promote a full-fledged European parliament. It is signed by Gen William J Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of Strategic Services, precursor of the Central Inteligence Agency. ...more:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/27/the-european-union-always-was-a-cia-project-as-brexiteers-discov/

Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels 19 Sep 2000

DECLASSIFIED American government documents show that the US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and directed the European federalist movement...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/1356047/Euro-federalists-financed-by-US-spy-chiefs.html

The US/CIA can't keep from meddling. And the people don't care enough to stop it.

NO THANK EU
Shout OUT!
Vote BREXIT

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
13. OMFG what are you even doing on DU?
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jun 2016

The Daily Telegraph is a nakedly conservative paper. Yes, I'm sure the US promoted the idea of the EU heavily in Europe, not least through the CIA. As a European myself I heartily agree with the notion that a stable peaceful EU closely allied with the US was much better than a continent wracked by two massive gruesome wars within thirty years. Britain was not doing just fine, it lost a generation of young men in WW1 and was then brought to its knees by WW2. It's only thanks to US intervention that I didn't grow up under Nazi rule rather than in a democratic society.

Why are you peddling this right-wing bullshit on DU?

OnlyTheGood

(21 posts)
21. The soldiers and citizens of the USSR paid a massive price to ensure
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:37 PM
Jun 2016

you and your forbears did not have to goose step.

Something on the order of 26 million dead.

 

insta8er

(960 posts)
20. Not really, most of it has to do with the contributions that the UK needs to make to the EU. As well
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:29 PM
Jun 2016

as to follow the rules and regulations set forth in Brussels by the European "government".

 

swhisper1

(851 posts)
29. no, they are bleeding money to support other nations in the coalition, and now are told they must
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:14 PM
Jun 2016

comply further .

DavidDvorkin

(19,473 posts)
28. That diminished status and power would make control much harder
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:11 PM
Jun 2016

The smaller and weaker a country is, the more it is subject to control by powerful neighbors.

 

swhisper1

(851 posts)
12. britian is the economy, if they pull out, they will be fine but europe will reel
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 05:36 PM
Jun 2016

The whole mess is due to the US globalization plans and countries are losing identity. I'm for Brexit

 

swhisper1

(851 posts)
24. so is EU, no, this is about control of ones borders for the good of the people. No one is going to
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:06 PM
Jun 2016

stop trade and investments. Britain historically has always managed on her own, she is tired of financially supporting other countries, she wants a divorce, if not the majority, nearly half are saying so.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
25. It's about a bunch of racist assholes.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jun 2016

I'm guessing part of you also wants to see Trump elected president here.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
30. What the Brexit assholes spouted is just a gussied up version of Trump.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:14 PM
Jun 2016

Listen to Nigel Farage. He sounds like a smarter Trump.

vdogg

(1,384 posts)
16. This is very close but London isn't in yet and they're very strongly remain.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:12 PM
Jun 2016

So long as the vote remains tied in the rest of the UK, then remain should come out on top.

vdogg

(1,384 posts)
22. As I said, it has to stay close in the rest of the country.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 10:42 PM
Jun 2016

If it doesn't, well, even London won't be able to pull it off.

vdogg

(1,384 posts)
34. The more I read about this
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 06:46 AM
Jun 2016

The pro leave movement had a good case once you strip away all the racist bullshit. The EU parliament does not provide direct representation for the people of Britain. MP's are appointed, and make decisions that affect Britain that the mostly can't be held accountable for. A better route would've been to work within and demand more direct representation. Barring that, I probably would've voted leave too.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Brexit results