2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTim Kaine is pro life
Hillary can't choose him imo
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/284379-abortion-is-weakness-for-clinton-vp-favorite
While Kaine does not back overturning the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, he is personally opposed to the practice and has backed controversial restrictions, such as parental notification laws and a ban on late-term abortions.
A range of groups supporting abortion rights, including EMILYs List, NARAL Pro-Choice America and Planned Parenthood, declined to comment or did not respond to inquiries when asked if they had concerns about Kaines record on abortion a silence that suggests there are Clinton picks theyd prefer to Kaine, who is reportedly being vetted for the position.
Siwsan
(27,379 posts)I know - picky picky, but it's a term that always drives me a little spare.
synergie
(1,901 posts)He does support some of the more moronic and damaging anti-choice restrictions though, but not choice itself.
Siwsan
(27,379 posts)We are all guilty, to a degree, of rationalizing. But the use of the term 'pro-life' has always raised my hackles. To a degree.
synergie
(1,901 posts)CONS use. They're not conservative or compassionate, Christian or "right" either. They simply are anti-choice, and once they've denied choice, their interest ends.
calimary
(84,839 posts)Anyone who strongly supports the death penalty CANNOT call themselves "pro-life."
Anyone who denies climate change (now ravaging the planet and impacting life on Earth) CANNOT call themselves "pro-life."
Anyone recklessly insisting that we need those coal-mining jobs back, and we don't have to conserve, and we don't have to recycle, and we don't have to stop being wasteful CANNOT call themselves "pro-life."
Anyone who yells "drill baby drill" CANNOT call themselves "pro-life.
Anyone whose first choice is war-making before negotiating or promoting peace treaties CANNOT call themselves "pro-life."
Anyone who hates immigrants and immigration and doesn't give a damn what happens to immigrants CANNOT call themselves "pro-life."
Anyone who wants to help Donald Trump build that ol' wall CANNOT call themselves "pro-life."
Anyone who defends the wanton, reckless "guns for anybody who wants 'em" position DEFINITELY CANNOT call themselves "pro-life."
I think we should start kicking the supports out from under this whole "pro-life" canard. Connect the dots and attack it at its roots.
Let's help people drill down a little farther below the meaningless talking-point or sloganeering. Let's examine what it REALLY means to be "pro-life."
The whole "pro-life" crap needs to be re-examined, attacked, and undermined.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)Once you're here, it's "every man for himself"....
and I do mean, "every MAN for himself"...
synergie
(1,901 posts)it really is just all about controlling your mother and her body, nothing more.
synergie
(1,901 posts)Siwsan
(27,379 posts)It's like if you don't agree with them, you are pro death??? And, they are pro life, right up to the point of birth, then they really don't care, anymore. Then they become the party of "You are on your own".
synergie
(1,901 posts)happen to think that women receiving proper medical care for their condition is a good thing. They really are not pro-life at all, they care nothing about the health of the pregnancy, nor do they care about the fetus itself. Note how they're against women receiving health care, food stamps, even when they're pregnant and attack the EPA, which regulates toxins that affect fetal development.
There is no instance in which they are pro-life.
Response to Siwsan (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Rhiannon12866
(225,803 posts)"While Senator Kaine has been open about his personal reservations about abortion, hes maintained a 100% pro-choice voting record in the U.S. Senate. He voted against dangerous abortion bans, he has fought against efforts to defund Planned Parenthood, and he voted to strengthen clinic security by establishing a federal fund for it," NARAL President Ilyse Hogue said in the statement.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/288952-pro-abortion-rights-group-give-kaine-nod-of-approval
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)he was one of the last grudging holdouts to 'support' equality. His career has been very, very anti-gay and anti civil rights.
He's not an acceptable choice at all, in the least.
CrispyQ
(38,739 posts)How does a guy like this get a D behind his name? Our tent is too damned big. If she picks Kaine, I'll leave the top of the ticket blank.
Mass
(27,315 posts)leaning right on pretty much any issue (may be not gun rights).
The fact he is anti-choice is really only a problem in case of a 50-50 vote in the Senate on choice.
Arizona Roadrunner
(168 posts)Normally this might not be a big deal. But given the climate that we live in with all of the restrictions being enacted, do we really need a so called "pro life" "enabler" an the "ticket"? NO!!!!!!!!
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)I don't want to list any links to right-wing sources, but if you are interested, please google it.
It seems like he manages to offend both sides of the issue by trying to remain in the middle.
runaway hero
(835 posts)He's the exact same as Hillary.
FSogol
(46,918 posts)Abortion
2016 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions (Lifetime) 100%
2015 Democrats for Life of America - Positions 20%
2015 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2015 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2015 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Lifetime Score 100%
2015 Population Connection - Positions 100%
2014 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2014 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (June 4, 2014) 0%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2013-2014 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 0%
Kaine gets a bad rap. He's a good Democrat.
Remember that Joe Biden has the exact same viewpoint.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)couples without marriage rights or civil unions, both of which Kaine opposed until that opposition made him a glaringly obvious bigot. He's a hate monger who has contributed to the atmosphere of bigotry that creates the violence we see around us. He should not even be considered.
synergie
(1,901 posts)and as to marriage equality, there was quite a lot said by "good progressives" that would offend many.
It would seem you are a bit hyperbolic with the "hate monger" terminology and blaming him for violence and bigotry for holding a position that Bernie himself did until the sentiment of the nation changed is rather over the top.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Bernie's. Not in the slightest. Verbiage like that demonstrates that you do not approach these issues with respect.
Tim exploited LGBT persons for his own advancement for years, a gay baiting conservative. I understand you don't like to hear that fact, but it's the fact nonetheless.
Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #73)
Post removed
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)FSogol
(46,918 posts)He's one of the most compassionate, thoughtful persons in the Senate.
synergie
(1,901 posts)topics like marriage equality etc. is that even Bernie qualifies as a "hater" based on his positions against marriage equality in favor of state's rights.
Perhaps turn down the "hater" nonsense a little bit and realize that you need to actually know a bit about what someone has said and done specifically lest you set standards that even your own favorites would fail miserably if fairly applied.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)One article that I read said most of the opposition goes back to when he was governor. Since being in the Senate, his support from the pro-choice establishment has increased or improved. Those are very good ratings.
I know that he and Obama is or were friends and was on the short list for VP. And he is a Roman Catholic (as is Biden), which no doubt shapes his positions.
FSogol
(46,918 posts)but Kaine blocked all those bills. Of course, Bob McDonnell signed them when they came up again and a lot of clinics closed until Terry McAuliffe reversed it.
think
(11,641 posts)Numerous Wall Street donors identified Virginia Senator Tim Kaine as their preferred vice presidential nominee.
http://fortune.com/2016/06/20/wall-street-elizabeth-warren/
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)A potential VP? In other words, what political positions do you think are absolute non-starters?
We can't sell a "pro-life" VP to democratic women. Or someone who changed their position on LGBT.
synergie
(1,901 posts)is pro-life, the anti-choice position is not. Kaine is not anti-choice. Also, many people changed their positions on LGBT issues, including Bernie and many others, why would that disqualify anyone?
dflprincess
(28,583 posts)(see post #8)
FSogol
(46,918 posts)He's personally against abortion, but has always voted to protect a woman's right to chose.
He shouldn't be faulted for that.
TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)They did, however, appropriately chastise him for the 2009 "crisis pregnancy centers" bill.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)years ago. Ironic.
TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)criticizing others for their avatars supporting solidarity after Orlando: sad.
Blue_Adept
(6,439 posts)Though that's been the way for most of it, it was just we had more nuance posters for a while.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)and about LGBT posters every chance they get. The sport that avatar on cue, but the content is often devoid of empathy, fact or basic decency.
You for example feel free to suggest that my advocacy for LGBT of whom I am one is about the primary. Revoltingly privileged bullshit you fling.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)obamanut2012
(27,963 posts)He was very anti choice and anti LGBT rights until just a short time ago.
Sivart
(325 posts)If he is a D, then that is all that matters.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)The fact that we keep getting shovel-headed with "but they'll get rid of abortion if Clinton doesn't get in" by her supporters, coupled with the prospect of a pro-lifer for VP just tells me this tent is way too damn big. If a pro-lifer can somehow contrive to have a D behind their name, the tent is too damn big.
Sivart
(325 posts)that is what Clinton supporters have been telling Sanders supporters all this time. It is selfish to put one's own views and principals above a win for the party. It benefits Trump to do so. This is what we have been told for months.
All that matters is defeating Trump. We don't need a perfect candidate, or even one that we agree with on most things. It just needs to be a Democrat.
synergie
(1,901 posts)You do realize that the most pro-life position is the pro-choice one, since it promotes sane and rational notions of a doctor and a patient making the best decisions that affect the life and health of a woman, right?
It's time to stop banging one's head with a shovel and pretending it's someone else doing it, and to finally do your homework.
Time Kaine is pro-choice, and if Clinton the Democratic nominee does not get elected we truly will be facing a supreme court that is anti-life, anti-choice and anti-women, that is simple fact and simple reality, even if it it hurts your head to admit it.
It has nothing to do with tents, and I would think it behooves a person with a D behind their name to be pro-life, it's what fuels the fight for healthcare, promote women's rights and ensures that women's lives matter.
Please take some time to actually do some research on the man you've been told falsely holds positions he does not.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Tim_Kaine_Abortion.htm
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)uponit7771
(92,127 posts)TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)runaway hero
(835 posts)Really?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)who isn't 'pro-life?'
that's their language, not ours.
what matters is whether women have the choice to govern their own bodies
runaway hero
(835 posts)So why doesn't the potential vice president?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)The pro-life position is the pro-choice one, then anti-choice positions leads to women dying.
runaway hero
(835 posts)How do we sell this? To the center left.
synergie
(1,901 posts)runaway hero
(835 posts)I'm talking even center left soccer moms in places, not even the Bernie Bros/Women.
synergie
(1,901 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)If you don't believe in abortion, then don't have one. But do not presume to tell me how to run my life.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)obamanut2012
(27,963 posts)By far.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,400 posts)I believe in a culture of life from the womb to the tomb . However we live in a pluralistic society and many of these decisions reside with the individual.
apnu
(8,790 posts)zonkers
(5,865 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)It would make it tougher for me to vote for president. I have reconciled myself to voting for our nominee, but Kaine on the ticket would make me have a serious case of buyer's remorse.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)He has stated it over and over. Kaine has stated the very same position as Biden.
Brother Buzz
(38,101 posts)Late to the party again, or I would have posted the same.
bigtree
(90,376 posts)Retrograde
(10,789 posts)And comprehensive sex education for teens? Those are better ways of preventing abortions than outlawing them.
Hekate
(95,588 posts)jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)..but I'll be disappointed if the choice is Kaine.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It gives their position an assumed moral privilege it doesn't deserve.
None of us who defend choice are against "life". If we were, we wouldn't go on living.
And it is especially unpleasant to call people "pro-life" when they oppose reproductive choice but support war, the death penalty, and global policies that cause poverty and famine.
Rauchkp
(1 post)"Pro-life" and "pro-choice" are both political terms trying to frame one's personal views on the issue of abortion in the best possible way. Neither should apply to the issue of abortion alone. In fact, Democrats are unquestionably more pro-life and Republicans are more pro-choice on the vast majority of issues across the political spectrum.
Focusing our language on abortion alone, there are quite a few liberal people who see abortion as something that has no moral foundation. Biologically, human life begins at fertilization, and there is no scientific evidence (nor will there ever be) of fetal afterlife or that aborted babies go anywhere but straight to their deaths. I believe that true pro-lifers should promote paid maternity leave, Medicare-for-all, and other pro-government issues that have become commonplace in most contemporary democratic societies. When linking together the rights of both pregnant mother and unborn child, abortion (in most circumstances) is often seen as a morally unacceptable "solution" to the issues that can arise from pregnancy, undermining the nature of motherhood in itself. True (consistent) pro-lifers should naturally be Democrats and not Republicans.
uppityperson
(115,885 posts)I'm also unclear on what you mean by "undermining the nature of motherhood itself".
I agree that there needs to be a lot more support for parents to be able to provide best for their children.
Hekate
(95,588 posts)In other words, he does not impose his personal religion on the rest of us -- which is what we want in our public officials.