Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

insta8er

(960 posts)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 03:56 AM Jun 2016

Democrats Reject Platform Proposal Opposing Trade Deal


Democrats on Friday voted down an amendment to the party's platform that would have opposed the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, avoiding an awkward scenario that would have put its statement of values at odds with President Barack Obama.

Members of a Democratic National Convention drafting committee defeated a proposal led by Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., that would have added language rejecting the Pacific Rim trade pact, which has been opposed by presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

The panel, which is developing the party's platform ahead of next month's Philadelphia convention, instead backed a measure that said "there are a diversity of views in the party" on the TPP and reaffirmed that Democrats contend any trade deal "must protect workers and the environment."


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/democrats-begin-working-draft-party-platform-40107459
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats Reject Platform Proposal Opposing Trade Deal (Original Post) insta8er Jun 2016 OP
not likely to undermine obama as head democrat and favoring the TPP nt msongs Jun 2016 #1
I am not against TPP fun n serious Jun 2016 #2
Not surprising, Clinton's position has not been hard on TPP. joshcryer Jun 2016 #3
Stupid: it's like they WANT to lose the election. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #4
GOOD! MohRokTah Jun 2016 #5
Good trade agreements are good for everyone. Hortensis Jun 2016 #8
What is your favorite aspect of the TPP? The largess it affords to Big Pharma? -nt- NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #9
The fact that trade agreements result is lower tensions between nations MohRokTah Jun 2016 #10
No absolutist position should be BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #6
Have a look at this post-article by Elizabeth Warren. insta8er Jun 2016 #12
The popular sitting President will always win. SaschaHM Jun 2016 #7
Disgusting. AzDar Jun 2016 #11
 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
2. I am not against TPP
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 04:06 AM
Jun 2016

I think trade and labor market protectionism is an ethnonationalist appeal.. In my opinion globalization can not be stopped and we must be able to compete. Also, China playing footsies with Putin.. North Korea posturing missiles.. I think we have to have allegiance in the region. I think we have to cautiously proceed.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
3. Not surprising, Clinton's position has not been hard on TPP.
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:09 AM
Jun 2016

She's treading a fine line. Against Trump I'm not concerned though.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
5. GOOD!
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jun 2016

I fully support the TPP. Long term gains in the agreement far outweigh any short term losses.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
8. Good trade agreements are good for everyone.
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jun 2016

What's critical at this point is that we become a leader of this alliance among Pacific nations while we can--or China will.

Yes, the TPP is not yet a good trade agreement, still way too business-friendly, but that can be fixed over time as national governments around the planet continue to chisel away at the power of international business. The "wild west" era of international commerce is coming to an end. Not before many more lives are destroyed by it, but it is very much happening.

Meanwhile, we've already been able to affect the form the TPP's taken and disappoint business on a number of fronts, such as medication patents, though we're not the most liberal nation party to it. From inside we will continue to influence and rewrite it.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
10. The fact that trade agreements result is lower tensions between nations
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jun 2016

and bring workers in other nations closer to American standards of living, making them more US friendly.

China is a perfect example of how trade has worked. The Chinese people will never go back to their Maoist bondage from years ago. China is more Americanized every passing day.

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
6. No absolutist position should be
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 11:49 AM
Jun 2016

taken on ANY trade deal. Protection of workers and the environment MUST be included, among other things.

The provision that was backed gets it more or less right. If it means that Bernie won't endorse Hillary, so be it.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
7. The popular sitting President will always win.
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 11:51 AM
Jun 2016

You're not going to get a strong slap down written in the platform against something supported by the President.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democrats Reject Platform...