Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:03 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
Bush Treasury Secretary Paulson endorses Clinton
(CNN)Hank Paulson, the Republican Treasury secretary during the 2008 financial crisis, has endorsed Hillary Clinton, adding his name to prominent GOP heavyweights who are backing the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Paulson's support comes amid mounting concerns about Donald Trump's candidacy. Paulson, a controversial figure given President George W. Bush's handling of the downturn, said "a Trump presidency is unthinkable" and predicted that other conservatives would rally behind her. "I'll be voting for Hillary Clinton, with the hope that she can bring Americans together to do the things necessary to strengthen our economy, our environment and our place in the world," Paulson wrote in The Washington Post. "To my Republican friends: I know I'm not alone." Paulson, once the CEO of Goldman Sachs, criticized Trump's business record, divisiveness and brand of populist rhetoric. Clinton has been criticized for close ties to Wall Street, but not many Republicans of Paulson's stature have formally endorsed her. http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/24/politics/hank-paulson-hillary-clinton-endorsement/index.html
|
34 replies, 4814 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | OP |
jillan | Jun 2016 | #1 | |
book_worm | Jun 2016 | #21 | |
Hiraeth | Jun 2016 | #25 | |
still_one | Jun 2016 | #28 | |
SoLeftIAmRight | Jun 2016 | #29 | |
George Eliot | Jun 2016 | #2 | |
rickford66 | Jun 2016 | #3 | |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | #4 | |
Post removed | Jun 2016 | #5 | |
longship | Jun 2016 | #6 | |
bbmykel | Jun 2016 | #7 | |
Hiraeth | Jun 2016 | #27 | |
geek tragedy | Jun 2016 | #8 | |
TwilightZone | Jun 2016 | #9 | |
SaschaHM | Jun 2016 | #11 | |
TwilightZone | Jun 2016 | #12 | |
SaschaHM | Jun 2016 | #15 | |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | #13 | |
SaschaHM | Jun 2016 | #14 | |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | #16 | |
Hortensis | Jun 2016 | #19 | |
SidDithers | Jun 2016 | #17 | |
insta8er | Jun 2016 | #20 | |
joshcryer | Jun 2016 | #32 | |
ericson00 | Jun 2016 | #10 | |
John Poet | Jun 2016 | #33 | |
forjusticethunders | Jun 2016 | #34 | |
SidDithers | Jun 2016 | #18 | |
MohRokTah | Jun 2016 | #22 | |
Grassy Knoll | Jun 2016 | #23 | |
George II | Jun 2016 | #24 | |
bravenak | Jun 2016 | #26 | |
DesertRat | Jun 2016 | #30 | |
zappaman | Jun 2016 | #31 |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:08 PM
jillan (39,451 posts)
1. The gop is feeling very comfortable with our nominee.
![]() |
Response to jillan (Reply #1)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 09:12 PM
book_worm (15,951 posts)
21. Just like 1964 many prominent Republicans couldn't back Barry Goldwater
or even 2008 when many prominent Republicans also backed Barack Obama.
|
Response to jillan (Reply #1)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 01:06 AM
Hiraeth (4,805 posts)
25. isn't it absolutely fabulous. so excited for all of us. welcome Republicans. feel comfy and cozy.
Response to jillan (Reply #1)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 01:27 AM
still_one (87,989 posts)
28. No, they just realize how dangerous Trump is unlike some alleged progressives who say they won't for
Hillary against Trump
|
Response to jillan (Reply #1)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 01:29 AM
SoLeftIAmRight (4,883 posts)
29. Good thing hill is not bill - quick search on
Bill Clinton best republican president
the first hit was http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5669911 |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:11 PM
George Eliot (701 posts)
2. Paulson always knew how to get his bread buttered.
I hold no love for him. He looked out for his own at the expense of the American People.
|
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:17 PM
rickford66 (5,273 posts)
3. Would he have endorsed Bernie? Fat chance.
Response to rickford66 (Reply #3)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:18 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
4. No and I think Bernie would have been fine with that. But this is not about Bernie, but about HRC.
Response to insta8er (Reply #4)
Post removed
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 06:22 PM
longship (40,416 posts)
6. The former Secretary of Government Sachs. nt
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 06:24 PM
bbmykel (282 posts)
7. Yay, I guess
I wish I could feel good about this. Didn't he basically pocket a bunch of the TARP money?
|
Response to bbmykel (Reply #7)
Hiraeth This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 06:48 PM
geek tragedy (68,868 posts)
8. Repudiation of Trump more than an endorsement of Clinton nt
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #8)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 06:59 PM
TwilightZone (21,885 posts)
9. Agreed. They have two choices - Trump or Clinton.
This isn't complicated. In fact, it shouldn't be complicated for *anyone*, yet it somehow is.
|
Response to TwilightZone (Reply #9)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 07:05 PM
SaschaHM (2,897 posts)
11. You know that they have to figure out a way around the ToS to insult
Clinton now. Expect reaches like this all GE.
|
Response to SaschaHM (Reply #11)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 07:14 PM
TwilightZone (21,885 posts)
12. Yes, after months of assertions that Clinton can't win with just Democrats...
some on DU apparently expect her to try.
|
Response to TwilightZone (Reply #12)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:09 PM
SaschaHM (2,897 posts)
15. Yep. This is what this guy does.
Response to SaschaHM (Reply #11)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:03 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
13. Insult? she garners endorsement after endorsement from our friends on the right, that should be
a good thing right? I think that this means that they believe that she has something to offer them. How come you see that as an insult if this is being brought up? or do you view the endorsement from the other side as not a good thing?
|
Response to insta8er (Reply #13)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:09 PM
SaschaHM (2,897 posts)
14. Oh please!
You know what you're trying to do with your constant "look at this right winger who has endorsed Clinton posts". Welcome to my ignore list.
|
Response to SaschaHM (Reply #14)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:11 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
16. Endorsement is an Endorsement and if it comes from the right it means that she is appealing to
more than just the democratic base. Ignore list? why would you want to do that? don't you want to be informed about who our candidate is being praised by?
|
Response to insta8er (Reply #16)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:29 PM
Hortensis (56,874 posts)
19. These endorsements are repudiations of Trump.
Response to SaschaHM (Reply #11)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:23 PM
SidDithers (44,228 posts)
17. +1...nt
Sid |
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #8)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:40 PM
insta8er (960 posts)
20. That is a negative way of looking at it, you are saying because they don't like him she is their
second best thing...I would not be so negative, I would put it more in a context of that she has something to offer that he doesn't. And he is a raving lunatic of course.
|
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #8)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 02:57 AM
joshcryer (62,185 posts)
32. Also an attempt to curry favor.
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 07:01 PM
ericson00 (2,707 posts)
10. President Hillary could be the dawn of a new, less partisan age than 2001-2017 will have been
and I welcome that. The '90s, '80s, and even before that were far more civil.
|
Response to ericson00 (Reply #10)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 03:12 AM
John Poet (2,510 posts)
33. Yes, I'm sure that large portions of the GOP will be momentarily happy that
they don't have to deal with "that black guy" anymore...
However, as much as the GOP has hated the Clintons (primarily for having beaten them twice), I think to believe that some "new dawn" is coming is merely a pipe dream. This GOP endorsement parade, while impressive, is primarily an anti-Trump phenomenon. The sentiment isn't likely to outlast the election campaign. Once they have Trump out of the way, they can get back to hating on "that woman", and surely they will, as soon as she tries to do.... anything... |
Response to ericson00 (Reply #10)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 04:04 AM
forjusticethunders (1,151 posts)
34. I doubt it, unless Trump is truly a come-to-Jesus moment for movement conservatism.
They may be just responsible enough to endorse a candidate who is putting forth the most leftwing platform since the 80s at least, but not because they suddenly want a 2nd New Deal. But do they have the self-awareness to realize that they were but stepping stones on the road to Trump?
|
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:23 PM
SidDithers (44,228 posts)
18. Good...
She'll win in a landslide.
Sid |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 10:29 PM
MohRokTah (15,429 posts)
22. RIGHT ON!!!!!
Hillary is gonna win in a LANDSLIDE!!!
Thanks for your efforts in posting these wonderful endorsement threads, insta8er!!!! |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 10:34 PM
Grassy Knoll (10,118 posts)
23. Keep Em Coming, YASSSSS!!!!
![]() |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 10:49 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
24. That's a good thing.
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 01:08 AM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
26. This is good
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 01:37 AM
DesertRat (27,995 posts)
30. Yea!
Trump is driving them all out of the GOP!
![]() |
Response to insta8er (Original post)
Sun Jun 26, 2016, 02:08 AM
zappaman (20,597 posts)
31. Awesome!
![]() |