2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDem platform includes a $15 min wage, repealing the Hyde Amendment & expanding Social Security...
Dan Merica ?@danmericaCNN 6h6 hours agoHRC campaign says Dem platform includes a $15 min wage, repealing the Hyde Amendment & expanding Social Security.
Dan Merica ?@danmericaCNN 7h7 hours ago
Platform also includes surtax on multi-millionaires & reviewing past trade deals to be more protective of workers.
Cha
(297,462 posts)protective of workers.
Dan Merica ?@danmericaCNN 7h7 hours ago
Thank you!
Triana
(22,666 posts)....and that Dems can re-take the Senate and at least get rid of some of the dead-above-the-neck Republican CONgress in November.
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...of course Hillary's 'behind it.'
She's in front of it, too.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)As party leader, this platform is essentially her platform because she has a plurality of votes on the committee plus a great deal of collaboration and cooperation from the DNC's appointees. In all likelihood nothing passed or was shot down that wasn't preapproved by her or believed to be solidly in line with her goals.
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)Too bad the freeze on fracking and opposition to the TPP did not pass. But really no surprise. Wall street should be happy.
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...LED by the Clinton campaign representatives (and inspired by her majority of supporters in this election).
ciaobaby
(1,000 posts)the initial vote, only after much pushing by the Sanders group did it get included on a second vote.
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...it was already in the platform language.
Redundant language offered by Sanders representatives on the $15 minimum wage was REJECTED by a majority of the committee.
"We believe that Americans should earn at least $15 an hour and have the right to form a union."
-- D platform draft
Karen Finney ?@finneyk 17h17 hours ago
$15 minimum wage was ALREADY in the platform, what failed was an amendment with language tweaks.
Karen Finney ?@finneyk 17h17 hours ago
The $15 minimum wage is in the platform, as is Bernie language about $7.25 being a starvation/poverty wage
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)bigtree
(86,005 posts)The platform originally simply stated that the Democratic Party hopes to raise and index the minimum wage, with an earlier implication that this could be $15. Ellison proposed that the language be made clearer and stronger, changed from mere support to a demand to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour and index it.
Its important to recognize that $15 an hour really is actually not even what the minimum wage would be if we indexed it from 1968. It would probably be upwards of $22, Ellison stressed.
He also emphasized that it is important to index the minimum wage for inflation, so that we dont have to come back every Congress to raise it again.
Paul Booth, an official in the AFSCME labor union who was appointed by Clinton, insisted the language that we already have is exactly what we need.
While bringing up the specter of Donald Trump, Booth acknowledged the Fight for 15 movement and applauded the gutsy workers fighting for an increase in the minimum wage and the right to organize the union. Yet he still opposed Ellisons amendment.
Booth claimed the language suggests that the Democratic Party supports moving toward a $15 minimum wage, but added, we affirm and support different ways of getting there in different states.
This comment appears to reflect the position of Clinton, who has said different states should establish unique minimum wages...
read more: http://www.salon.com/2016/06/25/clinton_appointees_oppose_15_minimum_wage_amendment_in_democratic_platform_sanders_surrogates_back_it/
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)And it's what all progressives should seek. $22 is slightly rounded up, but is where we should be targeting.
edit: indexing the minimum wage has been the Democrat's position for a decade and a half. Not controversial. not revolutionary. Elect Democrats, it happens.
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...but I understand and appreciate the language in the bill which doesn't preclude or negate anything the Democrats might offer in Congress on this issue (including indexing), and provides room for any action on increasing the wage.
riversedge
(70,267 posts)$15 wage increase--as they are doing now. She has never been against it. Read her speeches and website before you post please.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Now it is time for Sanders to endorse or not.
randome
(34,845 posts)You imply that Wall Street is really calling the shots, yet we have a $15 minimum wage and strong support for unionization, which goes against what Wall Street is typically seen as wanting.
I don't understand this need to see that we are all downtrodden and helpless because of some amorphous enemy named "Wall Street".
NBachers
(17,133 posts)greymattermom
(5,754 posts)Really vote against a 15 minimum wage and an increase in social security?
randome
(34,845 posts)But the authentic right-wing Trump's Chumps don't care about anything but sounding tough.
mcar
(42,363 posts)It is a very liberal platform.