Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will Democratic Party endorsement of the TPP help Clinton to win in November? (Original Post) mia Jun 2016 OP
Nope Faux pas Jun 2016 #1
Democratic party isn't endorsing it, nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
Believe me it does. Remember fast track? JRLeft Jun 2016 #5
the party platform acknowledges disagreement within the party, doesn't come down on geek tragedy Jun 2016 #6
Do you really believe it's against the TPP? JRLeft Jun 2016 #8
to what are you referring as "it?" nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #11
Democratic party it's an organization, it's grammatically correct to refer to it as such. JRLeft Jun 2016 #14
no, just seeking clarity as to what you meant. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #16
Is there a faction against it yes the progressive caucus, but the rest of the party is for it. JRLeft Jun 2016 #18
not true. only 28 Dem Reps and 13 Dem Senators crossed AntiBank Jun 2016 #33
The majority of Congressional Democrats voted against Fast Track. NT Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #17
Sure won't. Any "win" would be in spite of it. villager Jun 2016 #3
We live in upside down world yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #4
Did the Democratic party actually endorse TPP, or is this hypothetical? DanTex Jun 2016 #7
"DNC Platform Committee Rejects Proposals Against Fracking, TPP, Israeli Occupation" KansDem Jun 2016 #10
So they didn't actually endorse TPP. This OP is hypothetical. DanTex Jun 2016 #12
The DNC took the TPP "off the table." KansDem Jun 2016 #23
Which is not an endorsement. Why do people have to pretend it's an endorsement? DanTex Jun 2016 #25
the White House has leaned on key Democrats to make sure that the platform did not include a rebuke. mia Jun 2016 #13
In other words, they didn't endorse TPP. DanTex Jun 2016 #15
They have neither rebuked, nor endorsed it. mia Jun 2016 #19
Correct. So your OP is hypothetical. The Dems didn't endorse TPP, and I doubt they will. DanTex Jun 2016 #20
Correct. Hypothetical, because I see endorsement of the TPP as a given. mia Jun 2016 #21
Please, it's not a "given." The president wants it, a lot of Dems don't, including DanTex Jun 2016 #22
Bit akin to asking if their endorsement of sourdough toast will help whatthehey Jun 2016 #9
wouldn't the following statement be more honest and accurate? La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #24
"Will Democratic Party staying neutral on the TPP help Clinton to win in November?" mia Jun 2016 #27
Or is it just HRC's platform committee members who want TPP? I wouldn't include/exclude the floriduck Jun 2016 #28
the party platform is staying neutral on TPP because Obama wants it, and he is still the leader of La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #29
So Hillary chose her platform members to represent the Presidents interests? I would never have floriduck Jun 2016 #30
I think they all live in the real world, and realize that they as the Democratic party should not La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #31
No. Just the opposite. Vinca Jun 2016 #26
no. 840high Jun 2016 #32
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. the party platform acknowledges disagreement within the party, doesn't come down on
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 10:50 AM
Jun 2016

one side or the other

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
14. Democratic party it's an organization, it's grammatically correct to refer to it as such.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jun 2016

I assume you view it as an insult. It's not.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
16. no, just seeking clarity as to what you meant.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:02 AM
Jun 2016

The Democratic party lacks internal consensus on the TPP. So it's not fair to say it opposes or that it supports the TPP.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
18. Is there a faction against it yes the progressive caucus, but the rest of the party is for it.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:09 AM
Jun 2016

The PC is outnumbered.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
3. Sure won't. Any "win" would be in spite of it.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 10:43 AM
Jun 2016

And should TPP then get passed, the real "losing" will commence...

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
10. "DNC Platform Committee Rejects Proposals Against Fracking, TPP, Israeli Occupation"
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 10:58 AM
Jun 2016
The committee drafting the Democratic Party’s platform has rejected a number of measures proposed by members appointed by Bernie Sanders. Meeting in St. Louis, Missouri, on Friday, members rejected measures to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, declare a national moratorium on fracking, and call for a $15-an-hour federal minimum wage and an end to Israeli occupation and illegal settlements. Sanders said he was "disappointed and dismayed" by the defeat of proposals on trade, but "pleased" over language about breaking up big banks. Speaking on MSNBC’s "Morning Joe" Friday, Sanders said he has turned his focus to the party platform.

DemocracyNow!

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
23. The DNC took the TPP "off the table."
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:04 PM
Jun 2016

You know, "off the table?"

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi promised Wednesday that when her party takes over, the new majority will not attempt to remove President Bush from office, despite earlier pledges to the contrary from others in the caucus.

“I have said it before and I will say it again: Impeachment is off the table,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said during a news conference.

--more--

Pelosi: Bush Impeachment `Off the Table’


Bush, who lied us into invading Iraq, killing hundreds of thousands of people and costing us trillions of dollars, is spared impeachment because Pelosi took him "off the table."

You know, that kind of "off the table."

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
25. Which is not an endorsement. Why do people have to pretend it's an endorsement?
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jun 2016

And what does this have to do with Iraq?

mia

(8,360 posts)
13. the White House has leaned on key Democrats to make sure that the platform did not include a rebuke.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jun 2016

"...the White House has leaned on key Democrats to make sure that the platform did not include a rebuke.

That became clear last weekend in St. Louis, when the platform drafting committee -- which includes just five Sanders appointees -- shot down a TPP plank. According to several committee members, the president personally spoke to the drafting committee's chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), and the White House did more outreach to make sure that Clinton appointees who might otherwise oppose TPP did not write that into the platform...."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/29/obama-and-sanders-battle-over-tpp-and-the-democratic-platform/?wpisrc=nl_politics&wpmm=1

mia

(8,360 posts)
19. They have neither rebuked, nor endorsed it.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jun 2016

Last edited Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:01 PM - Edit history (1)

The Democratic Party will be played as being for the TPP without a rebuke.
I worry that this will lose the election for us.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
20. Correct. So your OP is hypothetical. The Dems didn't endorse TPP, and I doubt they will.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:57 AM
Jun 2016

I don't know how it would affect the race if they did endorse it, but since they didn't, and they won't, then who really cares?

mia

(8,360 posts)
21. Correct. Hypothetical, because I see endorsement of the TPP as a given.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jun 2016

It's what the president wants. By not coming out against the TPP, the platform committee supports it.

Think I'll climb out of the rabbit hole, now. Thanks for this exchange.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
22. Please, it's not a "given." The president wants it, a lot of Dems don't, including
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jun 2016

both Hillary and Bernie. So they leave it out of the platform so as to not give the president the finger.

This is borderline Orwellian truth-denial, to insist that the Dem platform "endorses" TPP, when in fact they don't endorse TPP. It's the opposite of the truth.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
9. Bit akin to asking if their endorsement of sourdough toast will help
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jun 2016

If you had used "would" instead of "will" it may have been a mildly diverting hypothetical (if anyone cares the probable answer is "not much difference&quot but since they did no such thing, the question as asked is utter nonsense.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
24. wouldn't the following statement be more honest and accurate?
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jun 2016

Will Democratic Party staying neutral on the TPP help Clinton to win in November?

mia

(8,360 posts)
27. "Will Democratic Party staying neutral on the TPP help Clinton to win in November?"
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:19 PM
Jun 2016

I like the way you phrase the question. Thank you.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
28. Or is it just HRC's platform committee members who want TPP? I wouldn't include/exclude the
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:19 PM
Jun 2016

entire Democratic Party.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
29. the party platform is staying neutral on TPP because Obama wants it, and he is still the leader of
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:21 PM
Jun 2016

the party and a very popular president. Also, there is an odd chance that he might be right to be pro-TPP because so far he has not shown much of an inclination for fucking over Americans.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
30. So Hillary chose her platform members to represent the Presidents interests? I would never have
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:26 PM
Jun 2016

considered that from a prospective presidential nominee. So all the other votes had Mr. Obama's agenda in mind.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
31. I think they all live in the real world, and realize that they as the Democratic party should not
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jun 2016

undercut the sitting president.

it's not a nefarious conspiracy, but possibly just intelligent people doing the intelligent thing.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Will Democratic Party end...