Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe ominous Trump-Russia link: What happens if Moscow really is meddling in the 2016 race?
If Russian hackers are conducting a 2016 sabotage campaign, it would put massive strain on our political systemhttp://www.salon.com/2016/07/26/the_ominous_trump_russia_link_what_happens_if_moscow_really_is_meddling_in_the_2016_race/
The resignation of Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz over a series of embarrassing leaked emails is obviously a big political story, and it does not portend well for Democratic efforts at demonstrating unity over the next week. But the larger, much more significant story surrounding those emails is the growing pile of evidence that they were hacked and released by Russian intelligence agencies.
Vice News Thomas Rid compiled all the publicly available evidence surrounding the hacking of the DNC, which was first reported last month. Theres a lot of technical jargon, but he writes that the forensic evidence linking the DNC breach to known Russian operations is very strong, while the evidence linking its dissemination to the Russians is not as solid, yet a deception operation is still highly likely. The FBI is investigating the case, and as the Daily Beast reported Monday, the working theory is that the operation was intended to sway the presidential election in Donald Trumps favor:
The FBI suspects that Russian government hackers breached the networks of the Democratic National Committee and stole emails that were posted to the anti-secrecy site WikiLeaks on Friday. Its an operation that several U.S. officials now suspect was a deliberate attempt to influence the presidential election in favor of Donald Trump, according to five individuals familiar with the investigation of the breach.
Nothing has been concretely proven, but we have to consider the ominous ramifications of what were looking at here. The DNC hacking operation described by Vice was highly sophisticated and had been ongoing since at least summer 2015. One has to leave open the possibility that, given the proficiency of the hackers and the amount of time they spent undetected, they obtained access to information that hasnt been released yet. And if we are indeed seeing an effort by Russian intelligence services to sow chaos in the 2016 presidential race, then you cant rule out the possibility that well see more targeted releases of stolen information that coincide with big political moments the DNC emails dropped just before the Democratic convention, and we still have several debates to get through, not to mention Election Day itself.
clip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 754 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The ominous Trump-Russia link: What happens if Moscow really is meddling in the 2016 race? (Original Post)
Grey Lemercier
Jul 2016
OP
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)1. Didn't Israel in 2014? These are unusual times
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)2. Well, on the plus side, two things are likely to happen.
One, less improper behavior will be committed to print or tape, and security cameras.
Two, behavior will conform more strictly to rules and ethics since keeping it hidden is problematic.