Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,162 posts)
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 12:51 AM Aug 2016

Would this be legal for the IRS commissioner to do?

Could the commissioner announce that if Donald Trump makes a tax return public, the IRS won't audit it and will stop any audits on that return that might be in progress? They could say, we believe it is in the public's interest to see these and that the public can decide if he is immune or not.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would this be legal for the IRS commissioner to do? (Original Post) dsc Aug 2016 OP
No. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #1
why dsc Aug 2016 #2
It is illegal for the IRS to use official authority or influence to interfere with an election oberliner Aug 2016 #4
You used the magic word to describe it. "Political" MohRokTah Aug 2016 #5
He isn't resolving any issue dsc Aug 2016 #6
Interfering with an ongoing audit is giving unequal treatment under the law pinboy3niner Aug 2016 #9
It would certainly pose an interesting quandary for Trump . . . Journeyman Aug 2016 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author MohRokTah Aug 2016 #7
Not legal and not necessary. IRS already said audit does not prevent releases. Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2016 #8

dsc

(52,162 posts)
2. why
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 12:55 AM
Aug 2016

he isn't supporting or opposing Trump. He is saying the President's taxes are a political issue to be solved by the people.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
4. It is illegal for the IRS to use official authority or influence to interfere with an election
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 12:58 AM
Aug 2016

Pretty clear cut.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
5. You used the magic word to describe it. "Political"
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 01:02 AM
Aug 2016

Since it's a political issue, using the power of his position to resolve it is a blatant violation of the Hatch Act.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
6. He isn't resolving any issue
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 01:07 AM
Aug 2016

he is simply saying, I am using my authority to withhold prosecution for alleged tax crimes. Yes, it would make Trump decide what to do, to his possible political detriment but to his possible legal benefit.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
9. Interfering with an ongoing audit is giving unequal treatment under the law
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 01:36 AM
Aug 2016

Clearly unconstitutional and illegal. It's singling one taxpayer out for favorable treatment, regardless of what you consider a neutral motive.

Journeyman

(15,035 posts)
3. It would certainly pose an interesting quandary for Trump . . .
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 12:56 AM
Aug 2016

though I suspect he'd merely weather the storm and continue to refuse to release them, using his recent dodge about how damaging Romney's release proved to his campaign -- it came too late and he didn't have time to explain, was the official Trump line if I remember right.

Response to dsc (Original post)

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,002 posts)
8. Not legal and not necessary. IRS already said audit does not prevent releases.
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 01:11 AM
Aug 2016

Trump has been informed of this multiple times, but hopes voters do not know this.

Inform voters that Trump is free to release his tax returns and knows it but continues to stonewall the citizens of the USA.

There are many theories about the reasons he might be hiding: low net worth, high indebtedness, debt to Russian oligarchs, investments by Russian oligarchs, multiple tax dodges = low tax rate, charity scams, ....

The leading theory is the "hiding for all those reasons" theory.
The second leading theory is that he is hiding them for many of those reasons.
The third leading theory is that he is hiding them for one of those reasons.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Would this be legal for t...