The irony of Trump's claim Khan "has no right to..."

[Pluvious]

Some of this crap you just cannot make up !!
--

Trump: Khizr Khan "has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution."

Huh ??

Nothing better than the idiot himself proving his target's literal point !!

Found here:
(@derektmead and @liamstack)
https://twitter.com/derektmead/status/759828427377635328

[Thinkingabout]

1. Maybe this is Trump's answer to Khan's question "have you ever read the Contitution". Now Trump is

saying "claim", who do we believe, Khan ask a question and Trump spins it into something else. Trump, again, have you ever read the Constitution?

[Ilsa]

2. 1. Khan didn't do that. He just asked.

2. You're a public figure now. You have no (legal) recourse against pretty much anything anyone says against you. The Clintons can provide you with details.
3. If you want to spend the rest of your life arguing with people you don't know, then go ahead, take offense at every word, tweet away. The rest of us will know you're batshit crazy for spending your life doing this.
4. I hope you're ready this, will register and respond to all of the shit we post about you, Dumb Donald.

[liberal N proud]

3. Where was this claim?

Trump has made us wonder if he has read it because he doesn't know much about it as demonstrated by many remarks.

[VMA131Marine]

4. Sure Trump read the Constitution. He is especially familiar with Article XII

You know, the one written in invisible ink on the back of the Declaration of Independence

[Johnny2X2X]

5. Irony

Wow. Hey Trump, the constitution gives him that right, try reading it.

[pansypoo53219]

6. RUMP is not fair game, but hillary clinton has been attacked since 1991 in the national press.

did she whine when SPY magazine went after her? or Fux gnewz year after year? 20+ years of attacks painting her as a bad person.