Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:38 AM Aug 2016

Voting 3rd party is the electoral equivalent of sending thoughts and prayers

In a three way race, that does not mean the person who gets 34 percent is the president, nor in a four way race does it mean the person who gets 26 percent is president. Majority means “more than half,” not “more than the others.” In these latter two scenarios, the president would be decided by the Republican-led House of Representatives. That’s the law.

Which is why voting third party is mostly an empty gesture meant to telegraph a person’s own virtue without actually involving real work. If Stein really wanted to do some progressive good or even pass her bonkers woo ideas, she’d be a Democrat or at least an Independent who works with Democrats like Sanders. If Johnson actually cared about letting you smoke weed hassle-free, he should have done something about it when he was a Republican in actual power.

Nothing Stein or Johnson say matters. At all. Their platforms are meaningless because neither of them will ever be called to do any of it or have to answer for the promises that they made to voters. Theirs is a consequence-free existence. Politifact is never going to check them on the Johnsonmeter or the Steinmeter like they did for Barack Obama and will certainly do to whoever wins this long-ass trudge to the future of the country.

Saying, “I’m voting third party” in an election year (side note: maybe get off your butts in the mid-terms once in a while?) is meant to portray someone as free-thinking or too personally virtuous to stain their hands with the evil that is the “establishment” candidate, whatever the heck that means. They aren’t sheep like the rest of us who do the popular thing. It makes the question of franchise about how good a person that particular voter appears. It’s a matter of conscience, apparently, though I question the conscience of people who are that concerned about proving they’re smarter and better than all the rest of us.


Much more at link- this is a great article: http://www.freepresshouston.com/voting-third-party-is-the-electoral-equivalent-of-sending-thoughts-and-prayers/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voting 3rd party is the electoral equivalent of sending thoughts and prayers (Original Post) PeaceNikki Aug 2016 OP
It's worse actually. onecaliberal Aug 2016 #1
Agreed. PeaceNikki Aug 2016 #2
You're absolutely correct. It's a vanity vote. NurseJackie Aug 2016 #3
The folks who talk about how wonderful multiparty democracies are tend to forget... brooklynite Aug 2016 #4
+1 iandhr Aug 2016 #5

brooklynite

(94,624 posts)
4. The folks who talk about how wonderful multiparty democracies are tend to forget...
Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:42 AM
Aug 2016

...that for national elections, they usually involve coalitions of Parties, either center-left or center-right. As long as Jill Stein and the Greens are going to insist on left-wing purity, they'll never have either electoral success or political clout.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Voting 3rd party is the e...