Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(5,458 posts)
Mon Aug 15, 2016, 01:12 AM Aug 2016

Hillary Does What Democrats Should Do: Make Like FDR

Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Hillary Clinton is doing what Democrats should have been doing all along, and that’s looking and sounding — and, if given the chance, acting — like FDR. This means going big, big, big and fully using government to radically ramp up new programs and initiatives to tackle everything from the nation’s crumbling infrastructure to the chronic unemployment, especially among the urban poor.

Her FDR-like chorus was in full effect in her speech at a Michigan auto and aircraft parts manufacturing plant near Detroit. She promised a big spending spree to the tune of nearly $300 billion on a vast array of infrastructure building and repair projects; roads, bridges, airports schools, sewer systems and so on. The projects would create new jobs for thousands.

Clinton made it clear that she expects the rich to foot much of the bill by demanding hefty tax hikes on them. She added the final FDR touch to her big spending plan by promising to plop the legislation on Congress’ table within her first 100 days in office.
Clinton is doing the same. However, she also will have to fight the one thing that has kept Democrats since LBJ from making the fight against poverty, wealth and income inequality, and making the rich and corporations pay their fair share of taxes a party staple. That is the deep fear of being perennially branded, baited and reviled with the label and the perception that Democrats reflexively do tax and spend — that is spend at the expense of the middle class for programs that aid the poor and minorities. Democrats did lose elections in the 1980s to Reagan and Bush, and always the losses came with the tag that the Democrats were fixated on tilting to minorities. The race-tinged appeals did shell-shock the party. Bill Clinton was unabashed in basing his 1992 presidential campaign on courting the white middle class, and erasing the GOP-imposed stigma of the Democrats as solely the party of and for minorities. It worked. Clinton won and won again in 1996. This even more firmly implanted the notion and the fear that Democrats must run from big spending on jobs and infrastructure as being synonymous with pandering to minorities...... That’s a history that Clinton is largely rejecting. And well she should. FDR did and the country was the big winner for it.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Does What Democrats Should Do: Make Like FDR (Original Post) andym Aug 2016 OP
sounds like..... chillfactor Aug 2016 #1
Sounds like... Volaris Aug 2016 #2
Take a look at the make-up of Congress during FDR and for decades and decades afterwards. highprincipleswork Aug 2016 #3
Getting a true blue House will be difficult andym Aug 2016 #4
The courts are what is important at the moment Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #7
Funny... WiffenPoof Aug 2016 #5
I dispute that Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #6
recommended 1000X - and let's not forget the willingness to take on the Guardians of Plutocracy!! Bill USA Aug 2016 #8


(10,331 posts)
2. Sounds like...
Mon Aug 15, 2016, 02:20 AM
Aug 2016

What's important is to get a Blue Senate that isn't motivated by fear of rich corporate donors.

President Hillary can want a lot of things. It's Congress that makes those things happen. If we get another Senate like Obama had going in (Philosophically Democratic, but actionably the enablers of the corporate status quo when it mattered) it won't matter what the President wants done.
When she's elected, she needs to spend the first 2 years dropping a massively big hammer on the idiot Republicans and their Democratic 'friends' so she can get a True Blue House elected. I think it's the only way anything useful is going to get done her first term.
I'm optomistic, but I'm also a dirty realist.


(5,458 posts)
4. Getting a true blue House will be difficult
Mon Aug 15, 2016, 10:28 AM
Aug 2016

The GOP has a firm grasp on the districts through careful attention to control of state houses and legislatures in 2010. They actually have a unified set of groups working to achieve their dominance. More over since 1994, GOP has controlled the House for 18 out of the 22 years. When the Democrats did control the house, in 2007-2010, they had a lot of moderates in their majority.


(69,124 posts)
7. The courts are what is important at the moment
Mon Aug 15, 2016, 12:01 PM
Aug 2016

and if we have a big enough margin of victory we could get the House.


(2,404 posts)
5. Funny...
Mon Aug 15, 2016, 11:35 AM
Aug 2016

In the entire OP, not one mention of Bernie Sanders... The person who pushed her to the left.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Does What Democra...